The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2412.17259 · v1 · pith:J76LGJJH · submitted 2024-12-23 · cs.CL · cs.IR

LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domain

Reviewed by Pithpith:J76LGJJHopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.IR
keywords legallegalagentbenchdomainagentsreal-worldbenchmarkcomplexitydesigned
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

With the increasing intelligence and autonomy of LLM agents, their potential applications in the legal domain are becoming increasingly apparent. However, existing general-domain benchmarks cannot fully capture the complexity and subtle nuances of real-world judicial cognition and decision-making. Therefore, we propose LegalAgentBench, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLM Agents in the Chinese legal domain. LegalAgentBench includes 17 corpora from real-world legal scenarios and provides 37 tools for interacting with external knowledge. We designed a scalable task construction framework and carefully annotated 300 tasks. These tasks span various types, including multi-hop reasoning and writing, and range across different difficulty levels, effectively reflecting the complexity of real-world legal scenarios. Moreover, beyond evaluating final success, LegalAgentBench incorporates keyword analysis during intermediate processes to calculate progress rates, enabling more fine-grained evaluation. We evaluated eight popular LLMs, highlighting the strengths, limitations, and potential areas for improvement of existing models and methods. LegalAgentBench sets a new benchmark for the practical application of LLMs in the legal domain, with its code and data available at \url{https://github.com/CSHaitao/LegalAgentBench}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    Evaluations of 53 LLMs on 14 basic math tasks show reasoning models use ~18x more tokens with sometimes lower accuracy, non-monotonic gains from extended budgets, and sharp performance drops under token constraints.

  2. ADAM: A Systematic Data Extraction Attack on Agent Memory via Adaptive Querying

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ADAM extracts data from LLM agent memory with up to 100% attack success rate by estimating data distribution and selecting queries via entropy guidance.

  3. From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review

    cs.AI 2025-04 accept novelty 4.0

    A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.