Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 112 references

F-theory models with $U(1)\times \mathbb{Z}_2,\, \mathbb{Z}_4$ and transitions in discrete gauge groups

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Along every bisection locus in the four-section geometry built from two quadrics in $\mathbb{P}^3$ fibered over any base, F-theory supports $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$, and Higgsing with hypermultiplet vevs reduces it to $\mathbb{Z}_4$.

desk verdict A clean determinant computation and a suggestive Higgsing chain, undercut by an unproven coordinate-reduction claim that makes 'any bisection locus' overreach. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06621 v3 pith:J7MPYMPD submitted 2019-08-19 hep-th

Yusuke Kimura This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords F-theorydiscretegaugegroupsgenus-onefibrationsfour-sectiongeometrybisectionMordell-WeilrankHiggsingsix-dimensionalsupergravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

In F-theory, gauge groups are read off from the geometry of a fibration; when the fibration has no global section, the gauge group is discrete. Splitting a multisection into smaller pieces can then look paradoxical: a discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ appears to grow into a discrete $\mathbb{Z}_4$, which is the reverse of ordinary symmetry breaking. This paper tests the proposal that the gauge group is actually enlarged at the splitting locus. Using the four-section geometry formed by intersecting two quadrics in $\mathbb{P}^3$ fibered over an arbitrary base, it claims that every locus where the four-section splits into a pair of bisections (multisections meeting each fiber in two points) carries $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$, not just $\mathbb{Z}_2$. Giving vacuum expectation values to hypermultiplets then breaks $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ down to $\mathbb{Z}_4$, so the apparent enhancement is a Higgsing chain; a separate family of models with $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_4$ is also constructed.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the associated double cover of a quadric complete intersection. For the two quadrics in $\mathbb{P}^3$, subtracting $\lambda$ times the first equation from the second and taking the determinant of the resulting symmetric $4\times4$ matrix produces a quartic $\tau^2=e_0\lambda^4+e_1\lambda^3+e_2\lambda^2+e_3\lambda+e_4$; this double cover has the same Jacobian as the original four-section geometry. The detection criterion is: if $e_0$ or $e_4$ is a perfect square, the double cover has two global sections and the Jacobian has Mordell–Weil rank one, giving one $U(1)$ in F-theory. On the normalized bisection locus (4) the computation gives $e_0=a_5^2a_{10}^2$, a perfect square, which is the step that turns the claim 'any bisection locus' into a determinant calculation. The Higgsing step is carried by a standard field-theory mechanism: after $SU(4)$ is broken to $U(1)$, leftover adjoint hypermultiplets become scalars of charge 4, and a vev for such a scalar breaks $U(1)$ to $\mathbb{Z}_4$.

What would settle it

Start with a bisection locus written in the general factorized form $\alpha xy+(ax+by+cz+dw)(ex+fy+gz+hw)=0$ inside the two-quadric complete intersection, without imposing the asserted coordinate normalization to $z$. Compute the associated double cover from the determinant of the symmetric $4\times4$ matrix; if both $e_0$ and $e_4$ are not perfect squares for some valid choice of coefficients and base, the claimed universal $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge group fails on that locus.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ is never the full gauge group on a bisection locus of this four-section geometry. When the four-section splits into a pair of bisections, the associated double cover acquires two global sections, so its Jacobian has Mordell–Weil rank one; in F-theory that rank counts $U(1)$ factors, and the original genus-one fibration therefore supports $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$. With specialized coefficients the $U(1)$ is enhanced to $SU(4)\times SU(2)\times SU(2)\times SU(2)$, and on bases $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$ and $\mathbb{P}^2$ the matter spectrum forced by six-dimensional anomaly cancellation includes adjoint hypermultiplets of $SU(4)$. Turning on vevs for these hypermultiplets breaks $SU(4)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ to $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$; the remaining adjoint fields become scalars of $U(1)$ charge 4, and a vev for one such scalar breaks $U(1)$ to a discrete $\mathbb{Z}_4$. The paper presents this as confirmation that a previously proposed gauge-group enlargement at multisection splitting loci resolves the apparent $\mathbb{Z}_2\to\mathbb{Z}_4$ puzzle.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that every bisection locus in this four-section geometry can be brought, by a change of coordinates, to the one explicit complete intersection for which the perfect-square determinant calculation is done; the 'any bisection locus' conclusion depends on that equivalence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any six-dimensional F-theory compactification on this four-section geometry, a bisection locus automatically carries an extra $U(1)$; the discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ is not the whole gauge group there.
  • The puzzling geometric transition $\mathbb{Z}_2\to\mathbb{Z}_4$ is reinterpreted as the Higgsing chain $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2\to\mathbb{Z}_4$, so transitions among discrete gauge groups fit ordinary field-theory symmetry breaking.
  • Anomaly cancellation fixes the matter content needed for this Higgsing: nine adjoint hypermultiplets on a genus-9 curve when the base is $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$, and ten on a genus-10 curve when the base is $\mathbb{P}^2$.
  • The constructed family (14) gives explicit six-dimensional models with $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_4$, providing a concrete starting point for studying four-section splitting transitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the coordinate-normalization step is fully general, the same $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_2$ statement should hold in four-dimensional F-theory compactifications on this geometry before flux effects are switched on; the paper deliberately leaves fluxes out.
  • The same determinant-perfect-square test could be applied to other splitting patterns, such as an $n$-section splitting into a section and an $(n-1)$-section, to see whether gauge-group enlargement resolves that second puzzle as well.
  • The fact that scalars of $U(1)$ charge 4 trigger the $\mathbb{Z}_4$ transition suggests a general rule: matter whose $U(1)$ charge equals the order of the final discrete group is the Higgsing ingredient, which could predict discrete groups in other models.
  • A direct determinant computation on an unnormalized bisection locus would sharpen the universality claim; if both $e_0$ and $e_4$ can fail to be squares for some valid locus, the conclusion would hold only for the normalized form.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper examines six-dimensional F-theory compactifications on genus-one fibrations realized as complete intersections of two quadrics in P3 fibered over a base. The central claim is that on any locus where the four-section splits into a pair of bisections, the discrete Z2 gauge group is enhanced to U(1)×Z2. This is tested by computing the associated double cover: the coefficient e0 of λ4 is found to be a perfect square, a5²a10², which implies the Jacobian has Mordell-Weil rank one. In a specialization with some coefficients set to zero, the gauge group is claimed to enhance to SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)×SU(2)×Z2, and anomaly-based matter spectra are deduced for bases P1×P1 and P2. The paper then argues that giving vevs to hypermultiplets breaks SU(4)×Z2 to U(1)×Z2 and further breaks U(1) to a discrete Z4 gauge group. A family of models with U(1)×Z4 is constructed in Section 4. The work is presented as a consistency check of the author's earlier proposal in [45] for resolving a puzzle in discrete gauge group transitions.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a concrete geometric test of a proposal for resolving an apparent puzzle in transitions between discrete gauge groups in F-theory. The explicit determinant computation in Eq. (5) is a genuine check with no fitted parameters, and the Higgsing chain from U(1)×Z2 to Z4 is physically concrete. The main limitation is that the universal statement 'any bisection geometry locus' rests on an asserted coordinate reduction that is not proved in the text. Because of that gap, the currently established scope is narrower than the abstract claims; however, the core computation itself is sound and the paper is a useful contribution to the study of discrete gauge group transitions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (4), footnote 13] The universal claim that every bisection geometry locus in the four-section geometry (3) admits a transformation to the complete intersection (4) is asserted in one sentence ('Under a change of coordinate variables, one can replace ax+by+cz+dw with z'), and footnote 13 only verifies the particular bisection loci considered in [34,44]. The determinant computation in Eq. (5), from which e0 = a5²a10² is extracted, is performed only for the normal form (4). Without a proof that every bisection locus can be brought to this form, the conclusion 'U(1)×Z2 forms on any bisection geometry locus' overreaches the computation actually shown. In particular, the text does not analyze configurations in which the reducible member of the quadric pencil is not of the assumed form, or where the two bisection curves are not simultaneously cut out by x=z=0 and y=z=0 in a common coordinate system. Please supply a complete argument for the normal-form reduction, addressing also the base-dependence of coordinate changes and the line-bundle sections ai, bj, or alternatively restrict the main statement to the class of bisection loci for which the reduction is proved.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eqs. (12)-(13)] The matter spectrum that drives the Higgsing argument is inferred rather than derived. The text states that nine adjoint hypermultiplets 15 of SU(4) arise from the genus-9 curve C1 for the base P1×P1 and ten for the base P2, and that 'it appears a unique choice' for the matter at the intersection points, with the alternatives 6⊕6 vs (6,2) and (4,2) vs 4⊕4 left open at that stage. No anomaly equations are displayed; the reader is asked to accept that the count H=268 (or H=297) cancels the anomaly. Because the subsequent transition to U(1)×Z2 and then to Z4 depends on the presence and U(1) charges of the adjoint hypermultiplets, the derivation should either be carried out explicitly or the anomaly cancellation conditions should be written out so that the claimed uniqueness is verifiable.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (14)-(15)] The conclusion that the family (14) gives a U(1)×Z4 gauge group requires that the original genus-one fibration has no global section, so that the discrete gauge group is genuinely Z4 rather than trivial. The paper only states that (14) is a four-section geometry; a genus-one fibration can possess a four-section and a global section simultaneously, in which case the Jacobian fibration would be isomorphic to the original fibration and the Tate-Shafarevich group would not contribute a Z4 factor. Please show that the complete intersection (14) generically has no section, or otherwise clarify the sense in which 'four-section geometry' guarantees a nontrivial Z4.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1] The sentence 'A four-section splits into bisections, precisely when one of the two quadrics in the complete intersection (3) splits into linear factors along the vanishing of a certain linear equation' is vague: it is not stated whether 'a certain linear equation' is a condition on the base coordinates or on the fiber coordinates.
  2. [Section 3.3.2] The genus computation for C1 in the P2 base uses the plane-curve formula for a smooth curve of degree 6. If C1 is singular for generic choices of the coefficients, the genus may differ; please state that the formula applies to the generic member of the family.
  3. [Section 4] The determinant in Eq. (15) has e4 = -(b1²-b2²)², which is a perfect square as a polynomial, but the associated double cover can have degree less than 4 when b1 = b2 identically. The text should mention this degeneracy and state that the construction is understood for generic coefficients.
  4. [Throughout] The notation for gauge groups is inconsistent: the abstract and body use both 'Z2' and '\mathbb{Z}_2'. Please use a single convention, and also fix the typesetting of superscripts such as a5²a10², which appears garbled in the extract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the U(1)×Z2 result rests on an explicit determinant computation, not on a fitted input or a self-citation chain.

full rationale

Section 3.1's derivation of U(1)×Z2 is self-contained: the associated double cover (5) is computed directly from the bisection form (4), and the claim e0 = a5^2 a10^2 is an explicit determinant expansion; the inference from e0 being a perfect square to two global sections and Mordell–Weil rank one is cited to [19] (Morrison–Taylor), an external mathematical result, not to the author's own prior work. No parameter is fitted, and no target conclusion is used as an input. Section 3.2's SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)×SU(2) enhancement and Section 4's U(1)×Z4 example likewise proceed by explicit computation or by imposing a perfect-square condition and then verifying it. The main weakness is the unproven assertion (Section 3.1, footnote 13) that every bisection geometry locus in (3) can be transformed to (4); this is a generality gap or correctness risk, not a circular reduction, because the calculation for the transformed form does not presuppose the conclusion. The self-citations [34,44,45] supply the conjecture being tested and the examples of bisection loci, but the test itself is an independent determinant computation. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted. The computations rely on standard F-theory dictionary results from the cited literature (Jacobian construction, discrete gauge group from n-sections, Mordell-Weil rank to U(1)). No new entities are invented.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Jacobian fibration of the complete intersection can be computed via the associated double cover, and Mordell-Weil rank one corresponds to a U(1) gauge group.
    Invoked in Section 3.1 using results from [19,20,44].
  • domain assumption A discrete Z_n gauge group forms in F-theory on a genus-one fibration with an n-section.
    Standard F-theory dictionary, cited to [19,47].
  • domain assumption The complete intersections are Calabi-Yau when the line bundles satisfy [f] = -4K and [g] = -6K as described in [44].
    Background for the compactification to be consistent.
  • domain assumption Type I4 fibers over C1 are split, giving SU(4).
    Cited to [34,110]; used to identify the gauge group in Section 3.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of F-theory models with $U(1)\times \mathbb{Z}_2,\, \mathbb{Z}_4$ and transitions in discrete gauge groups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7MPYMPD

@misc{pith2026190806621,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: F-theory models with $U(1)\times \mathbbZ_2,\, \mathbbZ_4$ and transitions in discrete gauge groups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7MPYMPD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06621}
}
abstract

We examine the proposal in the previous paper to resolve the puzzle in transitions in discrete gauge groups. We focus on a four-section geometry to test the proposal. We observed that a discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge group enlarges and $U(1)$ also forms in F-theory along any bisection geometries locus in the four-section geometry built as the complete intersections of two quadrics in $\mathbb{P}^3$ fibered over any base. Furthermore, we demonstrate that giving vacuum expectation values to hypermultiplets breaks the enlarged $U(1)\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge group down to a discrete $\mathbb{Z}_4$ gauge group via Higgsing. We thus confirmed that the proposal in the previous paper is consistent when a four-section splits into a pair of bisections in the four-section geometry. This analysis may be useful for understanding the Higgsing processes occurring in the transitions in discrete gauge groups in six-dimensional F-theory models. We also discuss the construction of a family of six-dimensional F-theory models in which $U(1)\times\mathbb{Z}_4$ forms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [45]

    A note on transition in discrete gauge groups in F-theory

    Y. Kimura, “A note on transition in discrete gauge groups in F-theory” [arXiv:1907.13503 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1907

  2. [1]

    Evidence for F-theory

    C. Vafa, “Evidence for F-theory”,Nucl. Phys. B 469 (1996) 403 [arXiv:hep-th/9602022]

    arXiv 1996

  3. [2]

    Compactifications of F-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 1

    D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, “Compactifications of F-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 1”,Nucl. Phys. B 473 (1996) 74 [arXiv:hep-th/9602114]

    arXiv 1996

  4. [3]

    Compactifications of F-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 2

    D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, “Compactifications of F-theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 2”,Nucl. Phys. B 476 (1996) 437 [arXiv:hep-th/9603161]

    arXiv 1996

  5. [4]

    Stringyoriginofnon-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries,

    T.Kobayashi, H.P.Nilles, F.Ploger, S.RabyandM.Ratz, “Stringyoriginofnon-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries,”Nucl.Phys. B768 (2007) 135 [arXiv: hep-ph/0611020]

    arXiv 2007

  6. [5]

    Non-Abelian Discrete Flavor Sym- metries from Magnetized/Intersecting Brane Models,

    H. Abe, K.-S. Choi, T. Kobayashi and H. Ohki, “Non-Abelian Discrete Flavor Sym- metries from Magnetized/Intersecting Brane Models,” Nucl.Phys. B820 (2009) 317 [arXiv:0904.2631 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2009

  7. [6]

    Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity

    T. Banks and N. Seiberg, “Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity”,Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 084019 [arXiv:1011.5120 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2011

  8. [7]

    Sums over topological sectors and quantization of Fayet- Iliopoulos parameters

    S. Hellerman and E. Sharpe, “Sums over topological sectors and quantization of Fayet- Iliopoulos parameters”,Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 15 (2011) 1141–1199 [arXiv:1012.5999 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2011

Show all 112 references
  1. [8]

    RR photons

    P. G. Camara, L. E. Ibanez and F. Marchesano, “RR photons”,JHEP 09 (2011) 110 [arXiv:1106.0060 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Discrete gauge sym- metries in D-brane models

    M. Berasaluce-Gonzalez, L. E. Ibanez, P. Soler and A. M. Uranga, “Discrete gauge sym- metries in D-brane models”,JHEP 12 (2011) 113 [arXiv:1106.4169 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Discrete Gauge Symmetries in Dis- crete MSSM-like Orientifolds

    L. E. Ibanez, A. N. Schellekens and A. M. Uranga, “Discrete Gauge Symmetries in Dis- crete MSSM-like Orientifolds”,Nucl.Phys. B865 (2012) 509–540 [arXiv:1205.5364 [hep- th]]

    2012 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in 4d string models

    M. Berasaluce-Gonzalez, P. G. Camara, F. Marchesano, D. Regalado and A. M. Uranga, “Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in 4d string models”,JHEP 09 (2012) 059 [arXiv:1206.2383 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Zp charged branes in flux compactifications

    M. Berasaluce-Gonzalez, P. G. Camara, F. Marchesano and A. M. Uranga, “Zp charged branes in flux compactifications”,JHEP 04 (2013) 138 [arXiv:1211.5317 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Discrete flavor symmetries in D-brane models

    F. Marchesano, D. Regalado and L. Vazquez-Mercado, “Discrete flavor symmetries in D-brane models”,JHEP 09 (2013) 028 [arXiv:1306.1284 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  7. [14]

    To Tilt or Not To Tilt: Discrete Gauge Symmetries in Global Intersecting D-Brane Models

    G. Honecker and W. Staessens, “To Tilt or Not To Tilt: Discrete Gauge Symmetries in Global Intersecting D-Brane Models”,JHEP 10 (2013) 146 [arXiv:1303.4415 [hep-th]]. 13

    2013 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Antisymmetric tensorZp gauge symmetries in field theory and string theory

    M. Berasaluce-Gonzalez, G. Ramirez and A. M. Uranga, “Antisymmetric tensorZp gauge symmetries in field theory and string theory”,JHEP 01(2014) 059 [arXiv:1310.5582 [hep- th]]

    2014 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Discrete Family Symmetry from F-Theory GUTs

    A. Karozas, S. F. King, G. K. Leontaris and A. Meadowcroft, “Discrete Family Symmetry from F-Theory GUTs”,JHEP 09 (2014) 107 [arXiv:1406.6290 [hep-ph]]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Discrete Abelian gauge symmetries and axions

    G. Honecker and W. Staessens, “Discrete Abelian gauge symmetries and axions”, J.Phys.Conf.Ser. 631 (2015) no.1 [arXiv:1502.00985 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in F-theory

    T. W. Grimm, T. G. Pugh and D. Regalado, “Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in F-theory”,JHEP 02 (2016) 066 [arXiv:1504.06272 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Sections, multisections, andU(1) fields in F-theory

    D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor, “Sections, multisections, andU(1) fields in F-theory”,J. Singularities 15 (2016) 126–149 [arXiv:1404.1527 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [20]

    F-theory on Genus-One Fibrations

    V. Braun and D. R. Morrison, “F-theory on Genus-One Fibrations”,JHEP 08 (2014) 132 [arXiv:1401.7844 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Physics of F-theory compactifications without section

    L. B. Anderson, I. Garcia-Etxebarria, T. W. Grimm and J. Keitel, “Physics of F-theory compactifications without section”,JHEP 12 (2014) 156 [arXiv:1406.5180 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  15. [22]

    F-Theory on all Toric Hypersurface Fibrations and its Higgs Branches

    D. Klevers, D. K. Mayorga Pena, P. K. Oehlmann, H. Piragua and J. Reuter, “F-Theory on all Toric Hypersurface Fibrations and its Higgs Branches”,JHEP 01 (2015) 142 [arXiv:1408.4808 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Yukawas and discrete symmetries in F-theory compactifications without section

    I. Garcia-Etxebarria, T. W. Grimm and J. Keitel, “Yukawas and discrete symmetries in F-theory compactifications without section”,JHEP 11 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1408.6448 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Discrete Gauge Symmetries by Higgsing in four-dimensional F-Theory Compactifications

    C. Mayrhofer, E. Palti, O. Till and T. Weigand, “Discrete Gauge Symmetries by Higgsing in four-dimensional F-Theory Compactifications”,JHEP 12 (2014) 068 [arXiv:1408.6831 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [25]

    On Discrete Symmetries and Torsion Homology in F-Theory

    C. Mayrhofer, E. Palti, O. Till and T. Weigand, “On Discrete Symmetries and Torsion Homology in F-Theory”,JHEP 06 (2015) 029 [arXiv:1410.7814 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Complete Intersection Fibers in F-Theory

    V. Braun, T. W. Grimm and J. Keitel, “Complete Intersection Fibers in F-Theory”, JHEP 03 (2015) 125 [arXiv:1411.2615 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [27]

    F-theory vacua with Z3 gauge symmetry

    M. Cvetič, R. Donagi, D. Klevers, H. Piragua and M. Poretschkin, “F-theory vacua with Z3 gauge symmetry”,Nucl. Phys. B898 (2015) 736–750 [arXiv:1502.06953 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Fluxes in F-theory Compactifications on Genus-One Fibrations

    L. Lin, C. Mayrhofer, O. Till and T. Weigand, “Fluxes in F-theory Compactifications on Genus-One Fibrations”,JHEP 01 (2016) 098 [arXiv:1508.00162 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Gauge Groups and Matter Fields on Some Models of F-theory without Section

    Y. Kimura, “Gauge Groups and Matter Fields on Some Models of F-theory without Section”,JHEP 03 (2016) 042 [arXiv:1511.06912 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Gauge symmetries and matter fields in F-theory models without section- compactifications on double cover and Fermat quartic K3 constructions times K3

    Y. Kimura, “Gauge symmetries and matter fields in F-theory models without section- compactifications on double cover and Fermat quartic K3 constructions times K3”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 21 (2017) no.8, 2087–2114 [arXiv:1603.03212 [hep-th]]. 14

    2017 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Mordell-Weil Torsion in the Mirror of Multi-Sections

    P.-K. Oehlmann, J. Reuter and T. Schimannek, “Mordell-Weil Torsion in the Mirror of Multi-Sections”,JHEP 12 (2016) 031 [arXiv:1604.00011 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Gauge groups and matter spectra in F-theory compactifications on genus- one fibered Calabi-Yau 4-folds without section - Hypersurface and double cover construc- tions

    Y. Kimura, “Gauge groups and matter spectra in F-theory compactifications on genus- one fibered Calabi-Yau 4-folds without section - Hypersurface and double cover construc- tions”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) no.6, 1489–1533 [arXiv:1607.02978 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Discrete Symmetries in Heterotic/F-theory Duality and Mirror Symmetry,

    M. Cvetič, A. Grassi and M. Poretschkin, “Discrete Symmetries in Heterotic/F-theory Duality and Mirror Symmetry,”,JHEP 06 (2017) 156 [arXiv:1607.03176 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Discrete Gauge Groups in F-theory Models on Genus-One Fibered Calabi- Yau 4-folds without Section

    Y. Kimura, “Discrete Gauge Groups in F-theory Models on Genus-One Fibered Calabi- Yau 4-folds without Section”,JHEP 04 (2017) 168 [arXiv:1608.07219 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [35]

    K3 surfaces without section as double covers of Halphen surfaces, and F- theory compactifications

    Y. Kimura, “K3 surfaces without section as double covers of Halphen surfaces, and F- theory compactifications”,PTEP 2018 (2018) 043B06 [arXiv:1801.06525 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [36]

    F-theory on Quotient Three- folds with (2,0) Discrete Superconformal Matter

    L. B. Anderson, A. Grassi, J. Gray and P.-K. Oehlmann, “F-theory on Quotient Three- folds with (2,0) Discrete Superconformal Matter”,JHEP 06 (2018) 098 [arXiv:1801.08658 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [37]

    SU (n)× Z2 in F-theory on K3 surfaces without section as double covers of Halphen surfaces

    Y. Kimura, “SU (n)× Z2 in F-theory on K3 surfaces without section as double covers of Halphen surfaces” [arXiv:1806.01727 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    F-theory

    T. Weigand, “F-theory”,PoS TASI2017(2018) 016 [arXiv:1806.01854 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [39]

    An F-theory Realization of the Chiral MSSM with Z2-Parity

    M. Cvetič, L. Lin, M. Liu and P.-K. Oehlmann, “An F-theory Realization of the Chiral MSSM with Z2-Parity”,JHEP 09 (2018) 089 [arXiv:1807.01320 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [40]

    TASI Lectures on Abelian and Discrete Symmetries in F-theory

    M. Cvetič and L. Lin, “TASI Lectures on Abelian and Discrete Symmetries in F-theory”, PoS TASI2017(2018) 020 [arXiv:1809.00012 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Ontheprevalenceofellipticandgenusonefibrationsamong toric hypersurface Calabi-Yau threefolds

    Y.-C.HuangandW.Taylor, “Ontheprevalenceofellipticandgenusonefibrationsamong toric hypersurface Calabi-Yau threefolds”,JHEP 03 (2019) 014 [arXiv:1809.05160 [hep- th]]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Nongeometric heterotic strings and dual F-theory with enhanced gauge groups

    Y. Kimura, “Nongeometric heterotic strings and dual F-theory with enhanced gauge groups”,JHEP 02 (2019) 036 [arXiv:1810.07657 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [43]

    UnbrokenE7×E7 nongeometric heterotic strings, stable degenerations and enhanced gauge groups in F-theory duals

    Y. Kimura, “UnbrokenE7×E7 nongeometric heterotic strings, stable degenerations and enhanced gauge groups in F-theory duals” [arXiv:1902.00944 [hep-th]]

    1902 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Discrete gauge groups in certain F-theory models in six dimensions

    Y. Kimura, “Discrete gauge groups in certain F-theory models in six dimensions”,JHEP 07 (2019) 027 [arXiv:1905.03775 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Elevating the free fermion Z2×Z2 orbifold model to a compactification of F-theory

    P. Berglund, J. Ellis, A. E. Faraggi, D. V. Nanopoulos and Z. Qiu, “Elevating the free fermion Z2×Z2 orbifold model to a compactification of F-theory”,Int. Jour. of Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 1345–1362 [arXiv:hep-th/9812141]

    2000 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Triples, fluxes, and strings

    J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf, K. Hori, A. Keurentjes, J. Morgan, D. R. Morrison and S. Sethi, “Triples, fluxes, and strings”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 4 (2002) 995–1186 [arXiv: hep- th/0103170]. 15

    2002

  40. [48]

    F-Theory and the Mordell-Weil Group of Elliptically- Fibered Calabi-Yau Threefolds

    D. R. Morrison and D. S. Park, “F-Theory and the Mordell-Weil Group of Elliptically- Fibered Calabi-Yau Threefolds”,JHEP 10 (2012) 128 [arXiv:1208.2695 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  41. [49]

    U(1) symmetries in F-theory GUTs with mul- tiple sections

    C. Mayrhofer, E. Palti and T. Weigand, “U(1) symmetries in F-theory GUTs with mul- tiple sections”,JHEP 03 (2013) 098 [arXiv:1211.6742 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  42. [50]

    New Global F-theory GUTs with U(1) symme- tries

    V. Braun, T. W. Grimm and J. Keitel, “New Global F-theory GUTs with U(1) symme- tries”,JHEP 09 (2013) 154 [arXiv:1302.1854 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Elliptic fibrations forSU (5)× U(1)×U(1) F-theory vacua

    J. Borchmann, C. Mayrhofer, E. Palti and T. Weigand, “Elliptic fibrations forSU (5)× U(1)×U(1) F-theory vacua”,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) no.4 046005 [arXiv:1303.5054 [hep- th]]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    F-Theory Compactifications with Multiple U(1)- Factors: Constructing Elliptic Fibrations with Rational Sections

    M. Cvetič, D. Klevers and H. Piragua, “F-Theory Compactifications with Multiple U(1)- Factors: Constructing Elliptic Fibrations with Rational Sections”,JHEP 06 (2013) 067 [arXiv:1303.6970 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Geometric Engineering in Toric F-Theory and GUTs with U(1) Gauge Factors,

    V. Braun, T. W. Grimm and J. Keitel, “Geometric Engineering in Toric F-Theory and GUTs with U(1) Gauge Factors,”JHEP 12 (2013) 069 [arXiv:1306.0577 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Chiral Four-Dimensional F-Theory Compactifications With SU(5) and Multiple U(1)-Factors

    M. Cvetič, A. Grassi, D. Klevers and H. Piragua, “Chiral Four-Dimensional F-Theory Compactifications With SU(5) and Multiple U(1)-Factors”, JHEP 04 (2014) 010 [arXiv:1306.3987 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    F-Theory Compactifications with Multiple U(1)- Factors: Addendum

    M. Cvetič, D. Klevers and H. Piragua, “F-Theory Compactifications with Multiple U(1)- Factors: Addendum”,JHEP 12 (2013) 056 [arXiv:1307.6425 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Elliptic fibrations with rank three Mordell-Weil group: F-theory with U(1) x U(1) x U(1) gauge symmetry,

    M. Cvetič, D. Klevers, H. Piragua and P. Song, “Elliptic fibrations with rank three Mordell-Weil group: F-theory with U(1) x U(1) x U(1) gauge symmetry,”JHEP 1403 (2014) 021 [arXiv:1310.0463 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    F-theory Family Unification

    S. Mizoguchi, “F-theory Family Unification”,JHEP 07 (2014) 018 [arXiv:1403.7066 [hep- th]]

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    F-GUTs with Mordell-Weil U(1)’s,

    I. Antoniadis and G. K. Leontaris, “F-GUTs with Mordell-Weil U(1)’s,”Phys. Lett. B735 (2014) 226–230 [arXiv:1404.6720 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A New Model for Elliptic Fibrations with a Rank One Mordell-Weil Group: I. Singular Fibers and Semi-Stable Degenerations

    M. Esole, M. J. Kang and S.-T. Yau, “A New Model for Elliptic Fibrations with a Rank One Mordell-Weil Group: I. Singular Fibers and Semi-Stable Degenerations”, [arXiv:1410.0003 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    F-theory and All Things Rational: Sur- veying U(1) Symmetries with Rational Sections

    C. Lawrie, S. Schäfer-Nameki and J.-M. Wong, “F-theory and All Things Rational: Sur- veying U(1) Symmetries with Rational Sections”,JHEP 09 (2015) 144 [arXiv:1504.05593 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  53. [61]

    General U(1)×U(1) F-theory com- pactifications and beyond: geometry of unHiggsings and novel matter structure,

    M. Cvetič, D. Klevers, H. Piragua and W. Taylor, “General U(1)×U(1) F-theory com- pactifications and beyond: geometry of unHiggsings and novel matter structure,”JHEP 1511 (2015) 204 [arXiv:1507.05954 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Origin of Abelian Gauge Symmetries in Heterotic/F-theory Duality,

    M. Cvetič, A. Grassi, D. Klevers, M. Poretschkin and P. Song, “Origin of Abelian Gauge Symmetries in Heterotic/F-theory Duality,”JHEP 1604 (2016) 041 [arXiv:1511.08208 [hep-th]]. 16

    2016 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Tall sections from non-minimal transformations

    D. R. Morrison and D. S. Park, “Tall sections from non-minimal transformations”,JHEP 10 (2016) 033 [arXiv:1606.07444 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Non-Higgsable abelian gauge symmetry and F-theory on fiber products of rational elliptic surfaces

    D. R. Morrison, D. S. Park and W. Taylor, “Non-Higgsable abelian gauge symmetry and F-theory on fiber products of rational elliptic surfaces”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 22 (2018) 177–245 [arXiv:1610.06929 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Gauge Backgrounds and Zero-Mode Counting in F-Theory

    M. Bies, C. Mayrhofer and T. Weigand, “Gauge Backgrounds and Zero-Mode Counting in F-Theory”,JHEP 11 (2017) 081 [arXiv:1706.04616 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    The Global Gauge Group Structure of F-theory Compactification with U(1)s

    M. Cvetič and L. Lin, “The Global Gauge Group Structure of F-theory Compactification with U(1)s”,JHEP 01 (2018) 157 [arXiv:1706.08521 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Algebraic Cycles and Local Anomalies in F- Theory

    M. Bies, C. Mayrhofer and T. Weigand, “Algebraic Cycles and Local Anomalies in F- Theory”,JHEP 11 (2017) 100 [arXiv:1706.08528 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Enhancements in F-theory models on moduli spaces of K3 surfaces withADE rank 17

    Y. Kimura and S. Mizoguchi, “Enhancements in F-theory models on moduli spaces of K3 surfaces withADE rank 17”,PTEP 2018 no. 4 (2018) 043B05 [arXiv:1712.08539 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    F-theory models on K3 surfaces with various Mordell-Weil ranks - constructions that use quadratic base change of rational elliptic surfaces

    Y. Kimura, “F-theory models on K3 surfaces with various Mordell-Weil ranks - constructions that use quadratic base change of rational elliptic surfaces”,JHEP 05 (2018) 048 [arXiv:1802.05195 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  62. [70]

    6d SCFTs and U(1) Flavour Symmetries

    S.-J. Lee, D. Regalado and T. Weigand, “6d SCFTs and U(1) Flavour Symmetries”,JHEP 11 (2018) 147 [arXiv:1803.07998 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Non-Cartan Mordell-Weil lattices of rational elliptic surfaces and heterotic/F-theory compactifications

    S. Mizoguchi and T. Tani, “Non-Cartan Mordell-Weil lattices of rational elliptic surfaces and heterotic/F-theory compactifications”,JHEP 03 (2019) 121 [arXiv:1808.08001 [hep- th]]

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    High U(1) charges in type IIB models and their F-theory lift

    F. M. Cianci, D. K. Mayorga Pena and R. Valandro, “High U(1) charges in type IIB models and their F-theory lift”,JHEP 04 (2019) 012 [arXiv:1811.11777 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Genericmatterrepresentationsin6Dsupergravitytheories

    W.TaylorandA.P.Turner, “Genericmatterrepresentationsin6Dsupergravitytheories”, JHEP 05 (2019) 081 [arXiv:1901.02012 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [74]

    F-theory models with 3 to 8 U(1) factors on K3 surfaces

    Y. Kimura, “F-theory models with 3 to 8 U(1) factors on K3 surfaces” [arXiv:1903.03608 [hep-th]]

    1903 arXiv

  67. [75]

    The Geometry of SO(3), SO(5), and SO(6) models

    M. Esole and P. Jefferson, “The Geometry of SO(3), SO(5), and SO(6) models” [arXiv:1905.12620 [hep-th]]

    1905 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Swampland Bounds on the Abelian Gauge Sector

    S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand, “Swampland Bounds on the Abelian Gauge Sector”,Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) no.2 026015 [arXiv:1905.13213 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    The Arithmetic of Elliptic Fibrations in Gauge Theories on a Circle

    T. W. Grimm, A. Kapfer and D. Klevers, “The Arithmetic of Elliptic Fibrations in Gauge Theories on a Circle”,JHEP 06 (2016) 112 [arXiv:1510.04281 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    J. W. S. Cassels,Lectures on Elliptic Curves , London Math. Society Student Texts24, Cambridge University Press (1991)

    1991

  71. [79]

    Model Building with F-Theory

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt, “Model Building with F-Theory”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 15 (2011) no.5, 1237–1317 [arXiv:0802.2969 [hep-th]]. 17

    2011 arXiv

  72. [80]

    GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory -I

    C. Beasley, J. J. Heckman and C. Vafa, “GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory -I”, JHEP 01 (2009) 058 [arXiv:0802.3391 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  73. [81]

    GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory - II: Experimental Predictions

    C. Beasley, J. J. Heckman and C. Vafa, “GUTs and Exceptional Branes in F-theory - II: Experimental Predictions”,JHEP 01 (2009) 059 [arXiv:0806.0102 [hep-th]]

    2009 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Breaking GUT Groups in F-Theory

    R. Donagi and M. Wijnholt, “Breaking GUT Groups in F-Theory”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 15 (2011) 1523–1603 [arXiv:0808.2223 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  75. [83]

    M theory on eight manifolds

    K. Becker and M. Becker, “M theory on eight manifolds”,Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 155–167 [arXiv: hep-th/9605053]

    1996 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Constraints on low dimensional string compactifica- tions

    S. Sethi, C. Vafa and E. Witten, “Constraints on low dimensional string compactifica- tions”,Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996) 213–224, [arXiv: hep-th/9606122]

    1996 arXiv

  77. [85]

    On flux quantization in M theory and the effective action

    E. Witten, “On flux quantization in M theory and the effective action”,J. Geom. Phys. 22 (1997) 1–13 [arXiv: hep-th/9609122]

    1997 arXiv

  78. [86]

    CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds

    S. Gukov, C. Vafa and E. Witten, “CFT’s from Calabi-Yau four folds”,Nucl. Phys. B584 (2000) 69–108 [arXiv: hep-th/9906070]

    2000 arXiv

  79. [87]

    M theory, orientifolds and G-flux

    K. Dasgupta, G. Rajesh and S. Sethi, “M theory, orientifolds and G-flux”,JHEP 08 (1999) 023 [arXiv: hep-th/9908088]

    1999 arXiv

  80. [88]

    A Note on G-Fluxes for F-theory Model Building

    J. Marsano, N. Saulina and S. Schäfer-Nameki, “ A Note on G-Fluxes for F-theory Model Building”,JHEP 11 (2010) 088 [arXiv:1006.0483 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  81. [89]

    On Flux Quantization in F-Theory

    A. Collinucci and R. Savelli, “On Flux Quantization in F-Theory”,JHEP 02 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1011.6388 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  82. [90]

    G-flux, M5 instantons, and U(1) sym- metries in F-theory

    J. Marsano, N. Saulina and S. Schäfer-Nameki, “G-flux, M5 instantons, and U(1) sym- metries in F-theory”,Phys. Rev. D87 (2013) 066007 [arXiv:1107.1718 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  83. [91]

    G-flux in F-theory and algebraic cycles

    A. P. Braun, A. Collinucci and R. Valandro, “G-flux in F-theory and algebraic cycles”, Nucl. Phys. B 856 (2012) 129 [arXiv:1107.5337 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Yukawas, G-flux, and Spectral Covers from Resolved Calabi-Yau’s

    J. Marsano and S. Schäfer-Nameki, “Yukawas, G-flux, and Spectral Covers from Resolved Calabi-Yau’s”,JHEP 11 (2011) 098 [arXiv:1108.1794 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  85. [93]

    G4 flux, chiral matter and singularity reso- lution in F-theory compactifications

    S. Krause, C. Mayrhofer and T. Weigand, “G4 flux, chiral matter and singularity reso- lution in F-theory compactifications”,Nucl. Phys. B 858 (2012) 1–47 [arXiv:1109.3454 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  86. [94]

    F-theory fluxes, Chirality and Chern-Simons theories

    T. W. Grimm and H. Hayashi, “F-theory fluxes, Chirality and Chern-Simons theories”, JHEP 03 (2012) 027 [arXiv:1111.1232 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Gauge Fluxes in F-theory and Type IIB Orientifolds

    S. Krause, C. Mayrhofer and T. Weigand, “Gauge Fluxes in F-theory and Type IIB Orientifolds”,JHEP 08 (2012) 119 [arXiv:1202.3138 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Conifold Transi- tions in M-theory on Calabi-Yau Fourfolds with Background Fluxes

    K. Intriligator, H. Jockers, P. Mayr, D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, “Conifold Transi- tions in M-theory on Calabi-Yau Fourfolds with Background Fluxes”,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17 (2013) 601 [arXiv:1203.6662 [hep-th]]. 18

    2013 arXiv

  89. [97]

    G-flux and Spectral Divisors

    M. Kuntzler and S. Schäfer-Nameki, “ G-flux and Spectral Divisors”,JHEP 11 (2012) 025 [arXiv:1205.5688 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Anomaly Cancellation And Abelian Gauge Symmetries In F-theory

    M. Cvetič, T. W. Grimm and D. Klevers, “Anomaly Cancellation And Abelian Gauge Symmetries In F-theory”,JHEP 02 (2013) 101 [arXiv:1210.6034 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Hypercharge flux in F-theory and the stable Sen limit

    A. P. Braun, A. Collinucci and R. Valandro, “Hypercharge flux in F-theory and the stable Sen limit”,JHEP 07 (2014) 121 [arXiv:1402.4096 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  92. [100]

    F-theory and 2d (0,2) Theories

    S. Schäfer-Nameki and T. Weigand, “F-theory and 2d (0,2) Theories”,JHEP 05 (2016) 059 [arXiv:1601.02015 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  93. [101]

    On Weierstrass Models

    N. Nakayama, “On Weierstrass Models”,Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra in Honor of Masayoshi Nagata , (1988), 405–431

    1988

  94. [102]

    Elliptic Three-folds I: Ogg-Shafarevich Theory

    I. Dolgachev and M. Gross, “Elliptic Three-folds I: Ogg-Shafarevich Theory”,Journal of Algebraic Geometry 3, (1994), 39–80

    1994

  95. [103]

    Elliptic Three-folds II: Multiple Fibres

    M. Gross, “Elliptic Three-folds II: Multiple Fibres”,Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 349, (1997), 3409–3468

    1997

  96. [104]

    Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six- Dimensions

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and P. West, “Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six- Dimensions”,Nucl. Phys. B254 (1985) 327–348

    1985

  97. [105]

    A Note on the Green-Schwarz mechanism in open string theories

    A. Sagnotti, “A Note on the Green-Schwarz mechanism in open string theories”,Phys. Lett. B294 (1992) 196–203 [arXiv:hep-th/9210127]

    1992 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Anomaly cancellation in six-dimensions

    J. Erler, “Anomaly cancellation in six-dimensions”,J. Math. Phys. 35 (1994) 1819–1833 [arXiv:hep-th/9304104]

    1994 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Anomaly - free supersymmetric models in six-dimensions

    J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly - free supersymmetric models in six-dimensions”,Phys. Lett. B371 (1996) 223–230 [arXiv:hep-th/9512053]

    1996 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Group representations and the Euler characteris- tic of elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds

    A. Grassi and D. R. Morrison, “Group representations and the Euler characteris- tic of elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds”,Jour. Alg. Geom. 12 (2003) 321–356 [arXiv:math/0005196]

    2003 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Global aspects of the space of 6D N = 1 supergravities

    V. Kumar, D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor, “Global aspects of the space of 6D N = 1 supergravities”,JHEP 11 (2010) 118 [arXiv:1008.1062 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Geometric singularities and enhanced gauge symmetries

    M. Bershadsky, K. A. Intriligator, S. Kachru, D. R. Morrison, V. Sadov and C. Vafa, “Geometric singularities and enhanced gauge symmetries”,Nucl. Phys. B 481 (1996) 215 [arXiv:hep-th/9605200]

    1996 arXiv

  103. [111]

    6D supergravity without tensor multiplets

    V. Kumar, D. S. Park, and W. Taylor, “6D supergravity without tensor multiplets”, JHEP 04 (2011) 080 [arXiv:1011.0726 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Enhanced gauge symmetry in type II string theory

    S. H. Katz, D. R. Morrison, and M. R. Plesser, “Enhanced gauge symmetry in type II string theory”,Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 105–140 [arXiv:hep-th/9601108]. 19

    1996 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.