Leveraging MIMIC Datasets for Better Digital Health: A Review on Open Problems, Progress Highlights, and Future Promises

Afifa Khaled; Camillo Maria Caruso; Mohammed Sabir; Rizwan Qureshi; S Kevin Zhou; Suncheng Xiang; Valerio Guarrasi

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 240 references

Leveraging MIMIC Datasets for Better Digital Health: A Review on Open Problems, Progress Highlights, and Future Promises

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey maps the open problems keeping MIMIC-trained health models from the clinic — data granularity, coding heterogeneity, quality gaps, weak interoperability, and privacy limits — along with the progress and directions that could…

desk verdict A MIMIC survey on the right topic with a broken citation base—placeholder references, mismatched cites, and unsourced performance tables—so it cannot be trusted as a map of the field. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.12808 v1 pith:J7ZRSCEZ submitted 2025-06-15 cs.CV

Afifa Khaled , Mohammed Sabir , Rizwan Qureshi , Camillo Maria Caruso , Valerio Guarrasi , Suncheng Xiang , S Kevin Zhou This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.CV

keywords MIMIC-IIIMIMIC-IVelectronichealthrecordsdigitalcriticalcareopenproblemsinteroperabilityreproducibility

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

What this paper is trying to establish: a structured, up-to-date map of the open problems in research that uses the MIMIC critical-care datasets, so that a reader can see where MIMIC-based machine learning actually falls short and what has been done about it. The paper's contention is that the binding constraints on MIMIC-based digital health are structural rather than algorithmic — data granularity and cardinality that are small next to the feature space, heterogeneous coding schemes that resist standardization, data-quality gaps from missingness and label noise, weak interoperability with other hospital records, reproducibility failures, and unresolved privacy and ethics constraints. Against those problems it catalogues demonstrated progress in dimensionality reduction, missingness-aware temporal modeling, causal inference, and privacy-preserving analytics, and it argues that hybrid modeling, federated learning, standardized preprocessing pipelines, and shared benchmarks are the directions most likely to help. A reader should care because these open problems are precisely what separates high benchmark scores from models that work in real hospitals.

What carries the argument

The central object is the MIMIC dataset series itself — deidentified records of intensive-care admissions spanning structured vitals and labs, unstructured clinical notes, waveforms, and chest images — and the carrying machinery is the survey's taxonomy: two research domains (traditional clinical and computational applications versus novel data-mining approaches) crossed with seven named open-problem categories. That grid does the argument's work by converting scattered complaints about MIMIC into fixed problem families, against which the paper places demonstrated progress (dimensionality reduction, missingness-aware temporal models such as GRU-D, causal-inference methods, differential privacy and federated learning) and future directions (hybrid models, standardized extraction pipelines, shared benchmarks). Named interoperability standards carry the fix the paper believes in most: FHIR, a standard for exchanging health records, and OMOP-CDM, a common data model that aligns different hospital schemas, together with named reproducibility tools such as the MIMIC Code Repository of shared analysis scripts.

What would settle it

Look up the survey's load-bearing citations and compare each to its in-text use: if a substantial share of a sampled list do not exist or do not support the claims they are cited for — starting with the peptide-design paper cited on health policy and the particle-physics report cited on clinical notes — then the survey's map of the field cannot be relied upon; if the mismatches turn out to be isolated, the map stands. A complementary check is to take five published MIMIC mortality-prediction studies and verify that the survey's reported AUROC ranges and benchmark tables match the primary sources.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the survey's central claim is a classification: MIMIC research divides into traditional clinical and computational applications on one side and novel data-mining approaches on the other, and the obstacles to progress divide into seven named problem families — data granularity and cardinality limits, the effectiveness of predictive approaches under class imbalance and cohort bias, data integration and preprocessing, data-quality issues, interoperability and accessibility, reproducibility and productivity, and privacy, ethical, and legal constraints. The paper asserts that high-granularity, high-cardinality MIMIC data suffer the curse of dimensionality relative to only tens of thousands of ICU stays; that models reporting AUC above 0.90 on MIMIC frequently fail to replicate on independent data; that missingness-aware architectures such as GRU-D and preprocessing pipelines such as MIMIC-Extract constitute the clearest demonstrated progress; and that the field's promise lies in hybrid modeling, federated learning, FHIR/OMOP harmonization, and community benchmarking. The survey presents itself as the first review focused specifically on these open problems rather than on predictive performance alone.

Load-bearing premise

The whole review rests on one load-bearing premise: the work it cites exists and supports the statements attributed to it, so that the survey's map of open problems and progress is trustworthy; that premise is already strained in the manuscript itself, which cites a peptide-design paper for claims about health policy and a particle-physics technical report for claims about clinical notes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the survey's map is right, the next gains in MIMIC-based digital health will come more from standardization than from new network architectures: unified extraction toolkits, automated mapping of local codes to standard vocabularies, and FHIR/OMOP harmonization are the named levers.
Reported AUROC figures on MIMIC should not be read as clinical readiness, since the survey's cited evidence shows performance drops of roughly 5 to 12 percent under external validation; prospective multi-center validation becomes a precondition rather than an optional extra.
Missingness-aware modeling and fairness or calibration metrics should become standard parts of benchmarking suites, because irregular sampling and demographic bias are identified as persistent failure modes even in state-of-the-art models.
Shared, version-controlled analysis code is credited with cutting cohort-size variation in replication studies from over 25 percent to under 5 percent, which makes code sharing a load-bearing part of the field's credibility rather than a courtesy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Going beyond the survey: if its problem map is correct, then research effort on MIMIC should shift toward data infrastructure and validation infrastructure rather than incremental model improvements; one testable consequence is that studies adopting standardized preprocessing pipelines should show measurably higher cross-institution reproducibility.
Going beyond the survey: the seven problem families are not independent — heterogeneous coding is a root cause that feeds data quality, interoperability, and reproducibility problems at once — so solutions at the coding and vocabulary layer may cascade benefits across the taxonomy.
Going beyond the survey: because the manuscript's own reference list includes citations that do not match their in-text use (a peptide-design paper cited for digital-health policy claims and a particle-physics report cited for clinical notes), a reader should treat the survey's citations as a starting point rather than a verified map; a systematic citation audit of MIMIC review papers would measur

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You asked about the MIMIC survey. My take: the topic is right, the execution is not. The paper collects many genuine themes in MIMIC-based research — missingness, irregular sampling, code mapping, reproducibility, privacy, fairness, federated learning — and its chapter structure (predictive modeling, NLP, temporal mining, multimodal analysis, downstream tasks) roughly matches how the field organizes itself. If the citations were sound, this could serve as a useful orientation for newcomers. That is the extent of the good news.

The problems are load-bearing and visible on a first read. The reference list contains entries that cannot support the claims attached to them: a peptide-design paper ([1]) is cited for digital health policy; a CERN technical report ([10]) is cited for unstructured clinical notes in MIMIC; an ETL/FHIR-OMOP loading paper ([13]) is cited for MIMIC-IV release statistics. Reference [50] is "Knight. Imitation." and [62] is "John Smith and Jane Doe. Title of the study." — placeholders, not citable works. For a survey, the references are the content. When the attribution layer is this unreliable, claims about what progress has been made and which open problems persist become unverifiable, and the central claim of being a "comprehensive survey" fails on its own terms.

Compounding the citation failures: Table 6 lists precise AUROC values for "best models" on mortality, sepsis, and phenotyping with no source, and Tables 7–8 present performance ranges that cannot be traced. Section 1.2.2 contains duplicated bullets and garbled phrases ("1A20 000", "bassolid undsoliding"), and several subsections are simply off-topic — a drug-efficacy subsection on mindfulness-based interventions, a network-data-analytics survey, and a global air-quality dataset in a MIMIC review. These are not stylistic quibbles; they indicate the manuscript was not assembled carefully enough to merit referee time. The limitations section concedes potential bias, which is honest, but the defects go well beyond what that concession covers.

I agree with the reject verdict, and I do not think the stress-test overreached. This is a desk-reject-with-invitation-to-repair situation, not a revise-and-resubmit. The authors should rebuild the reference list from scratch, re-verify every in-text citation against its claim, source or delete every performance table, remove the off-topic sections, and copy-edit the whole text. If they do that, a genuinely comprehensive MIMIC survey would be a valuable addition to the literature. As it stands, I would not cite it and would not bring it to a reading group except as a cautionary example.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper is a narrative survey of research using the MIMIC critical care databases in digital health. It claims to be the first comprehensive survey focused specifically on open problems, organizing prior work on data granularity, cardinality, predictive modeling, data integration, data quality, interoperability, reproducibility, and privacy/ethics, and offering a taxonomy of applications and future directions.

Significance. If the survey were reliable, it would be a useful entry point for the MIMIC research community: it assembles a broad set of themes, distinguishes open problems from progress, and suggests concrete future work such as unified ETL toolkits, federated learning, and standardized benchmarks. The paper also credits specific prior contributions such as MIMIC-Extract, the MIMIC Code Repository, and GRU-D. However, the survey's central value depends on the accuracy of its synthesis, and that accuracy is not supported by the manuscript as submitted.

major comments (5)

[Section 1.1, references [1], [2], [10]] The survey's core claim of being a reliable map of prior MIMIC research is undermined by citations that do not match the claims they support. Reference [1] is listed as 'F. Johnson et al. Peptide design through binding interface mimicry' yet it is cited for statements about improving patient outcomes and informing policy decisions; reference [2] is a software-architecture paper cited for biomedical innovation and interoperability; and reference [10] is a CERN technical report cited as the source for the claim that MIMIC includes unstructured clinical notes. These are not isolated typos but systematic misattributions that make it impossible for the reader to verify the survey's statements.
[Section 1.2.2 and Section 2.3] The text contains numerous garbled and duplicated passages that indicate the manuscript is not carefully edited. Section 1.2.2 refers to '1A20 000 ICU stays' and 'a solid bassolid undsoliding the need for a need for any additional supported by significant improvements,' and repeats the identical bullet about predicting mortality and classifying length of stay. Section 2.3 repeats the sentence 'Further standardization frameworks are important; crucially, there are no user friendly tools.' These errors are not merely stylistic: they make specific factual claims unreadable and cast doubt on the care with which the rest of the content was verified.
[Section 4.5.6, Table 6, and Section 5, Tables 7-8] Table 6 reports AUROC values of 0.88 for mortality, 0.83 for sepsis, and 0.91 for phenotyping under a column 'Best Model' (e.g., XGBoost + LSTM, Temporal Fusion Transformer, BioClinicalBERT + GNN) without any citation, dataset split, or model definition. Tables 7 and 8 give AUROC ranges and MSE/RMSE values for classification and regression tasks with no indication of which studies produced these numbers. Because the paper is a survey, these unsourced performance figures cannot be checked against the literature and therefore fail to support the paper's claims about the state of progress.
[Section 3.1, Applications] Several subsections summarize studies that are unrelated to MIMIC or digital health. Section 3.1.5 describes mindfulness-based interventions, Section 3.1.6 describes a global air-quality PM2.5 dataset, and Section 3.1.4 includes 'A Survey on Network Data Analytics.' These passages appear to be abstracted from completely different papers and are presented as MIMIC applications without any connection to the dataset. This materially weakens the survey's claim to comprehensiveness and suggests that the application taxonomy is not grounded in a systematic review of the literature.
[References [50] and [62]] Two references are placeholders rather than citable works: reference [50] is listed as 'Knight. Imitation.' and reference [62] as 'John Smith and Jane Doe. Title of the study.' Both are cited in Section 1.2.4 to support substantive claims about imitation learning and prospective clinical validation. A survey whose reference list contains non-existent entries cannot support the assertion that it accurately represents prior work.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract and Section 1] The abstract capitalizes 'Kernel' in a way that is inconsistent with scientific prose, and the phrase 'MIMICs datasets comprises components' in Section 1.1 is grammatically incorrect.
[Figure 1] Figure 1 is labeled 'The overall framework of our survey' but displays only a generic dataset icon and no actual framework; it should be replaced with a real diagram or removed.
[Section 1.2.2] The phrase 'impleques' appears in the bullet 'The combination of simpleques with traditional classifiers'; this appears to be a corrupted word and should be corrected.
[Tables 2-4] Tables 2, 3, and 4 largely duplicate the same information in different formats; consolidating them would reduce redundancy and clarify the presentation.
[Section 1.3] The conclusion of Section 1.3 repeats the same sentence about interoperability improvements twice ('By advancing these taxonomy and classification initiatives' and 'By promoting the evolution of taxonomy'); one copy should be deleted.
[Section 3.1.1] The BLUE benchmark description is accurate in isolation, but it is not clear how it relates to the MIMIC dataset; the section would benefit from an explicit link to MIMIC if one exists.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a narrative survey with no derivation chain, fitted predictions, or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

This manuscript is a narrative review of MIMIC-based research. It does not derive results from first principles, fit parameters, or make quantitative predictions that could reduce to its own inputs. The central claim—that the survey maps open problems and progress in MIMIC research—is a synthesis of the cited literature. None of the review's assertions is established by defining a quantity in terms of the target conclusion, by renaming a known result, or by invoking an author-supplied uniqueness theorem. The authors do cite their own prior work (e.g., references [5], [14], and [15] involve the authors), but these citations support peripheral statements about ECG signal processing, biosensors in healthcare, and AI in drug discovery; they are not load-bearing for the survey's central organizational claims. The paper's evident weaknesses are citation reliability and textual integrity—for instance, reference [1] is a peptide-design paper cited for digital health statements, and reference [10] is a CERN report cited for clinical notes—but these are errors of attribution and scholarship, not circular reasoning under the enumerated patterns. No equation in the paper is equivalent to an input by construction, and no fitted value is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore, the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a literature review with no mathematical model, so it introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. Its claims rely on the accuracy of the external literature it cites, which is a separate reliability problem.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Leveraging MIMIC Datasets for Better Digital Health: A Review on Open Problems, Progress Highlights, and Future Promises." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J7ZRSCEZ

@misc{pith2026250612808,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Leveraging MIMIC Datasets for Better Digital Health: A Review on Open Problems, Progress Highlights, and Future Promises},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J7ZRSCEZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.12808}
}

read the original abstract

The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) datasets have become the Kernel of Digital Health Research by providing freely accessible, deidentified records from tens of thousands of critical care admissions, enabling a broad spectrum of applications in clinical decision support, outcome prediction, and healthcare analytics. Although numerous studies and surveys have explored the predictive power and clinical utility of MIMIC based models, critical challenges in data integration, representation, and interoperability remain underexplored. This paper presents a comprehensive survey that focuses uniquely on open problems. We identify persistent issues such as data granularity, cardinality limitations, heterogeneous coding schemes, and ethical constraints that hinder the generalizability and real-time implementation of machine learning models. We highlight key progress in dimensionality reduction, temporal modelling, causal inference, and privacy preserving analytics, while also outlining promising directions including hybrid modelling, federated learning, and standardized preprocessing pipelines. By critically examining these structural limitations and their implications, this survey offers actionable insights to guide the next generation of MIMIC powered digital health innovations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.12808 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The overall framework of our survey. sepsis detection [1] to clinical natural language processing [11] and epidemiological surveillance[3]. Its open access model has fostered reproducibility, standardized benchmarking, and interdisciplinary collaboration between clinical medicine, machine learning [14], and public health[1, 15]. Despite their extensive use, the increasing complexity of modern AI methods [2] and… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Open Problems in MIMIC Datasets. Despite containing rich clinical information, MIMIC III includes approximately 40,000 ICU stays as it mentioned before, which is small relative to the high dimensional feature space of physiological signals, medications, lab results, and notes [71, 72]. High granularity introduces computational difficulties curse of dimensionality, overfitting, poor generalization, and excessive cos… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** MIMIC dataset applications. The Biomedical Language Understanding Evaluation (BLUE) benchmark [222] was established to promote progress in the field of biomedical text analysis by offering a uniform evaluation framework. In order to evaluate the performance of various models, the researchers conducted a thorough assessment of deep learning architectures, such as BERT and ELMo, utilizing ten distinct biomedical datas… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

240 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

[1]

Johnson et al

F. Johnson et al. Peptide design through binding interface mimicry. Bioinformatics Advances, 2023

2023
[10]

Scale-sensitive response behavior in particle physics, 2015

CERN Publications. Scale-sensitive response behavior in particle physics, 2015. Technical Report

2015
[13]

Elisa Henke, Yuan Peng, and Others. An extract-transform-load process design for the incremental loading of real-world data based onfhirandomopcdm:Algorithmdevelopmentandvalidation.JMIR Medical Informatics, 11:e47310, 2023

2023
[62]

Title of the study.Journal of Medical Research, 15(3):123–130, 2020

John Smith and Jane Doe. Title of the study.Journal of Medical Research, 15(3):123–130, 2020

2020
[2]

N. Medhat. Granularity in software architecture. InProceedings of theInternationalConferenceonSoftwareDesign,pages1–10,2023. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 36 of 42 MIMIC Dataset

2023
[3]

Mimic-iv: Medical information mart for intensive care.https://mimic.mit.edu/, 2020

MIT Laboratory for Computational Physiology. Mimic-iv: Medical information mart for intensive care.https://mimic.mit.edu/, 2020. Accessed: 2025-05-12

2020
[4]

Themedicalinformationmart for intensive care (mimic).PhysioNet, 1:e5, 2011

M.Saeed,C.Lieu,S.Soni,andetal. Themedicalinformationmart for intensive care (mimic).PhysioNet, 1:e5, 2011

2011
[5]

Multi- stageadaptivefilterforecgsignalprocessing

RizwanQureshi,MuhammadUzair,andKhurramKhurshid. Multi- stageadaptivefilterforecgsignalprocessing. In2017International conference on Communication, Computing and Digital Systems (c- code), pages 363–368. IEEE, 2017

2017

Show all 240 references

[6]

Using freely ac- cessibledatabasesforlaboratorymedicineresearch:experiencewith mimic database.Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine, 2(6), 2017

Yuan-Lan Huang, Tony Badrick, and Zhi-De Hu. Using freely ac- cessibledatabasesforlaboratorymedicineresearch:experiencewith mimic database.Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine, 2(6), 2017

2017
[7]

Activedeeplearningtodetect demographictraitsinfree-formclinicalnotes.JournalofBiomedical Informatics, 107:103436, 2020

Amir Feder, Danny Vainstein, Roni Rosenfeld, Tzvika Hartman, AvinatanHassidim,andYossiMatias. Activedeeplearningtodetect demographictraitsinfree-formclinicalnotes.JournalofBiomedical Informatics, 107:103436, 2020

2020
[8]

T. J. Pollard, A. E. W. Johnson, and R. G. Mark. The mimic-iii clinicaldatabase:Abigdataresourceforcriticalcareresearch.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(6):1294–1303, 2016

2016
[9]

Lehman Li-wei, Mengling Feng, Mohammad Ghassemi, Benjamin Moody, Peter Szolovits,LeoAnthonyCeli,andRogerGMark

Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Lu Shen, H. Lehman Li-wei, Mengling Feng, Mohammad Ghassemi, Benjamin Moody, Peter Szolovits,LeoAnthonyCeli,andRogerGMark. Mimic-iii,afreely accessible critical care database.Scientific Data, 3:160035, 2016

2016
[11]

Challenges and recommendations for evidence-informed policy

OECD. Challenges and recommendations for evidence-informed policy. Technical report, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2023

2023
[12]

Alistair E. W. Johnson, Tom J. Pollard, et al. Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database.Scientific Data, 3:160035, 2016

2016
[14]

Artificial intelligence and biosensors in healthcare and its clinical relevance: A review

Rizwan Qureshi, Muhammad Irfan, Hazrat Ali, Arshad Khan, Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Shawkat Ali, Abbas Shah, Taimoor Muzaf- far Gondal, Ferhat Sadak, Zubair Shah, et al. Artificial intelligence and biosensors in healthcare and its clinical relevance: A review. IEEE access, 11:616...

2023
[15]

Ai in drug discovery and its clinical relevance.Heliyon, 9(7), 2023

RizwanQureshi,MuhammadIrfan,TaimoorMuzaffarGondal,She- heryar Khan, Jia Wu, Muhammad Usman Hadi, John Heymach, Xiuning Le, Hong Yan, and Tanvir Alam. Ai in drug discovery and its clinical relevance.Heliyon, 9(7), 2023

2023
[16]

Beyond thehipaaprivacyrule:enhancingprivacy,improvinghealththrough research

Lawrence O Gostin, Laura A Levit, and Sharyl J Nass. Beyond thehipaaprivacyrule:enhancingprivacy,improvinghealththrough research. 2009

2009
[17]

Mimic-iii database access information, 2020

MIT Laboratory for Computational Physiology. Mimic-iii database access information, 2020. Available at PhysioNet, accessed: 2023- 10-10

2020
[18]

Data descriptor: Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database.Scientific data, 3(160035):1–9, 2016

Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Lu Shen, Li-wei H Lehman, Mengling Feng, Mohammad Ghassemi, Benjamin Moody, Peter Szolovits, Leo Anthony Celi, and Roger G Mark. Data descriptor: Mimic-iii, a freely accessible critical care database.Scientific data, 3(160035):1–9, 2016

2016
[19]

Mimic-cxr:Alarge publicly available database of chest x-rays.https://physionet.org/ content/mimic-cxr/,2019

MITLaboratoryforComputationalPhysiology. Mimic-cxr:Alarge publicly available database of chest x-rays.https://physionet.org/ content/mimic-cxr/,2019. Highlightsimaging-focusedapplications and gaps in interdisciplinary research

2019
[20]

Mimic-iv, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.Scientific data, 10(1):1, 2023

AlistairEWJohnson,LucasBulgarelli,LuShen,AlvinGayles,Ayad Shammout, Steven Horng, Tom J Pollard, Sicheng Hao, Benjamin Moody, Brian Gow, et al. Mimic-iv, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.Scientific data, 10(1):1, 2023

2023
[21]

Chen and Y

L. Chen and Y. Yang. Biomedgpt: A unified biomedical generative pre-trainedmodel.arXivpreprintarXiv:2401.01234,2024. Demon- strates AI’s potential in MIMIC-III for tasks like clinical NLP and prediction

2024 arXiv
[22]

Benjamin Shickel, Patrick James Tighe, Azra Bihorac, and Parisa Rashidi. Deep ehr: a survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques for electronic health record (ehr) analysis.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 22(5):1589–1604, 2017

2017
[23]

Themimiccoderepos- itory: enabling reproducibility in critical care research.Scientific Data, 25(1):32–39, 2018

AlistairE.W.Johnson,DavidJ.Stone,etal. Themimiccoderepos- itory: enabling reproducibility in critical care research.Scientific Data, 25(1):32–39, 2018

2018
[25]

Oppor- tunitiesandchallengesfordevelopingmachinelearningmodelswith ehrdata

BirendraKumarSaraswat,AdityaSaxena,and P.C.Vashist. Oppor- tunitiesandchallengesfordevelopingmachinelearningmodelswith ehrdata. In2023InternationalConferenceonAdvancedComputing and Communication Technologies (ICACCTech), pages 649–656, 2023

2023
[26]

Benchmarking fhir/omop exports for data completeness and performance.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 245:107214, 2024

James Smith and Others. Benchmarking fhir/omop exports for data completeness and performance.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 245:107214, 2024

2024
[27]

Payberah, Mariagrazia Zottoli, Milad Nazarzadeh, Nathalie Conrad, Kazem Rahimi, and Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi

JoseRobertoAyalaSolares,FrancescaElisaDilettaRaimondi,Yajie Zhu, Fatemeh Rahimian, Dexter Canoy, Jenny Tran, Ana Cata- rina Pinho Gomes, Amir H. Payberah, Mariagrazia Zottoli, Milad Nazarzadeh, Nathalie Conrad, Kazem Rahimi, and Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi. Deep learning for e...

2020
[28]

Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1):18, 2018

AlvinRajkomar,EyalOren,KaiChen,AndrewMDai,NissanHajaj, Michael Hardt, Peter J Liu, Xiaobing Liu, Jake Marcus, Mimi Sun, et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1):18, 2018

2018
[29]

Laura Swinckels, Frank C Bennis, Kirsten A Ziesemer, Janneke F M Scheerman, Harmen Bijwaard, Ander de Keijzer, and Josef Jan Bruers. The use of deep learning and machine learning on longitu- dinalelectronichealthrecordsfortheearlydetectionandprevention of diseases: Scoping rev...

2024
[30]

Enhancing patient outcome prediction through deep learning with sequential diagnosis codes from structured electronic health record data: Systematic review

Tuankasfee Hama, Mohanad M Alsaleh, Freya Allery, Jung Won Choi, Christopher Tomlinson, Honghan Wu, Alvina Lai, Nikolas Pontikos, and Johan H Thygesen. Enhancing patient outcome prediction through deep learning with sequential diagnosis codes from structured electronic health ...

2025
[31]

Deeplearningforelectronichealthrecords:Acomparative review of model architectures.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2019

Authors. Deeplearningforelectronichealthrecords:Acomparative review of model architectures.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2019

2019
[32]

Sheng, Jieming Ma, and ZhimingCui.Asurveyofdeeplearningforelectronichealthrecords

Jiabao Xu, Xuefeng Xi, Jie Chen, Victor S. Sheng, Jieming Ma, and ZhimingCui.Asurveyofdeeplearningforelectronichealthrecords. Applied Sciences, 12(22), 2022

2022
[33]

Benchmarking with mimic-iv, an irregular, spare clinical time series dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15290, 2024

Hung Bui, Harikrishna Warrier, and Yogesh Gupta. Benchmarking with mimic-iv, an irregular, spare clinical time series dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15290, 2024

2024 arXiv
[34]

Omopandfhirindatastandardization.Kodjin Blog, 2024

KodjinTechnologies. Omopandfhirindatastandardization.Kodjin Blog, 2024

2024
[35]

Mimic-ivon fhir: Converting a decade of in-patient data into a standardized fhir database.JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation, 30(4):718–726, 2023

ZacharyEdward,TomJ.Pollard,andMichaelJohnson. Mimic-ivon fhir: Converting a decade of in-patient data into a standardized fhir database.JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation, 30(4):718–726, 2023

2023
[36]

Benchmark of deep learning models on large healthcare mimic datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.08531, 2017

Purushotham et al. Benchmark of deep learning models on large healthcare mimic datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.08531, 2017

2017 arXiv
[37]

Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2018

Purushotham et al. Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2018

2018
[38]

McDermott and G

M.B.A. McDermott and G. Chauhan. Mimic-extract: A data ex- traction, preprocessing, and representation pipeline for mimic-iii. Proceedings of the ACM, 2020

2020
[39]

Benchmarking emergency department prediction models with mimic-iv-ed.PMC, 2022

Liu et al. Benchmarking emergency department prediction models with mimic-iv-ed.PMC, 2022. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 37 of 42 MIMIC Dataset

2022
[40]

Mimic in the omop common data model.ResearchGate Preprint, 2021

Nicolas Paris and Adrien Parrot. Mimic in the omop common data model.ResearchGate Preprint, 2021

2021
[41]

Empoweringhealthcareinteroperability:Harness- ing hl7/fhir and omop for seamless data exchange, 2024

PromptlyHealth. Empoweringhealthcareinteroperability:Harness- ing hl7/fhir and omop for seamless data exchange, 2024

2024
[42]

Interpretability and fairness evaluation of deep learning models on mimic-iv dataset.Scientific Reports, 12:7166, 2022

Chuizheng Meng et al. Interpretability and fairness evaluation of deep learning models on mimic-iv dataset.Scientific Reports, 12:7166, 2022

2022
[43]

M. Syed, S. Syed, and K. Sexton. Application of machine learning in intensive care unit (icu) settings using mimic dataset: Systematic review.Informatics, 8(1):16, 2021

2021
[44]

Dynamic survival predic- tion in intensive care units from heterogeneous time series without the need for variable selection or pre-processing.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.07214, 2019

Jacob Deasy, Pietro Liò, and Ari Ercole. Dynamic survival predic- tion in intensive care units from heterogeneous time series without the need for variable selection or pre-processing.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.07214, 2019

1909 arXiv
[45]

Reproducemegit: A visu- alization tool for analyzing reproducibility of jupyter notebooks

Sheeba Samuel and Birgitta König-Ries. Reproducemegit: A visu- alization tool for analyzing reproducibility of jupyter notebooks. In arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.12110, 2020

2006 arXiv
[46]

Iseeu: Visually inter- pretable deep learning for mortality prediction inside the icu.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08201, 2019

William Caicedo-Torres and Jairo Gutierrez. Iseeu: Visually inter- pretable deep learning for mortality prediction inside the icu.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08201, 2019

1901 arXiv
[47]

Machine learning-based prediction of icu readmissions in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: Insights from the mimic databases.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01183, 2025

Shuheng Chen, Junyi Fan, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of icu readmissions in intracerebral hemorrhage patients: Insights from the mimic databases.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01183, 2025

2025 arXiv
[48]

Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients.Critical Care, 28:66, 2024

Laura González et al. Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients.Critical Care, 28:66, 2024

2024
[49]

Evaluatingprogress on machine learning for longitudinal electronic healthcare data

DavidBellamy,LeoCeli,andAndrewL.Beam. Evaluatingprogress on machine learning for longitudinal electronic healthcare data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.01149, 2020

2010 arXiv
[51]

The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.Na- ture Medicine, 24(11):1716–1720, 2018

MatthieuKomorowski,LeoAnthonyCeli,OmarBadawi,AndrewC Gordon, and Aldo A Faisal. The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.Na- ture Medicine, 24(11):1716–1720, 2018

2018
[52]

Continuous state imitation learning for sequential decision-making

Anirudh Raghu, Matthieu Komorowski, Leo Anthony Celi, Peter Szolovits, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. Continuous state imitation learning for sequential decision-making. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 4048–4058, 2017

2017
[53]

Safe reinforcement learning for sepsis treatment.Biophysical Journal, 116(3):486a, 2019

Nagesh P Prasad et al. Safe reinforcement learning for sepsis treatment.Biophysical Journal, 116(3):486a, 2019

2019
[54]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12917, 2019

AnirudhRaghu,MarzyehGhassemi,andMatthieuKomorowski.Hi- erarchical imitation learning for multi-task healthcare applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.12917, 2019

1911 arXiv
[55]

PChentanezetal.Confoundinginimitationlearningfromelectronic health records.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 117:103716, 2022

2022
[56]

Model mismatch in imitation learning for healthcare.AMIAAnnualSymposiumProceedings,pages907–916, 2020

Anirudh Raghu et al. Model mismatch in imitation learning for healthcare.AMIAAnnualSymposiumProceedings,pages907–916, 2020

2020
[57]

Anirudh Raghu et al. Analysis of the effects of batch versus online learning in imitation learning for sepsis treatment.Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning, pages 115–125, 2018

2018
[58]

Counterfactual imitation learning in healthcare: Managing confounding biases.Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, 22:1–28, 2021

Jie Zhang et al. Counterfactual imitation learning in healthcare: Managing confounding biases.Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, 22:1–28, 2021

2021
[59]

Model-basedreinforcementlearningforsepsis management.Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34:7917–7924, 2020

MarinkaZitniketal. Model-basedreinforcementlearningforsepsis management.Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34:7917–7924, 2020

2020
[60]

Attention-based deep reinforcement learning for interpretable treatment recommendations

Tianqi Han et al. Attention-based deep reinforcement learning for interpretable treatment recommendations. InInternational Confer- ence on Learning Representations, 2021

2021
[61]

Investigationofbiasesinmortalityprediction models trained on MIMIC-III

Y.ZhangandOthers. Investigationofbiasesinmortalityprediction models trained on MIMIC-III. 2021

2021
[63]

Asurveyondeepmultimodal learning for computer vision: Advances, trends, applications, and datasets.The Visual Computer, 37:1323–1341, 2021

H.B.Syeda,M.Garza,andK.Sexton. Asurveyondeepmultimodal learning for computer vision: Advances, trends, applications, and datasets.The Visual Computer, 37:1323–1341, 2021

2021
[64]

Deep ehr: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques forelectronichealthrecord(ehr)analysis.IEEEJournalofBiomed- ical and Health Informatics, 2018

BenjaminShickel,PatrickJTighe,AzraBihorac,andParisaRashidi. Deep ehr: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques forelectronichealthrecord(ehr)analysis.IEEEJournalofBiomed- ical and Health Informatics, 2018

2018
[65]

Patient trajectory prediction in the mimic-iii dataset, challenges and pitfalls.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04605, 2019

Jose F Rodrigues-Jr, Gabriel Spadon, Bruno Brandoli, and Sihem Amer-Yahia. Patient trajectory prediction in the mimic-iii dataset, challenges and pitfalls.arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.04605, 2019

1909 arXiv
[66]

Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values.Scientific reports, 8(1):6085, 2018

Zhengping Che, Sanjay Purushotham, Kyunghyun Cho, David Son- tag, and Yan Liu. Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values.Scientific reports, 8(1):6085, 2018

2018
[67]

Matthew B. A. McDermott, Shirly Wang, Nikki Marinsek, Rajesh Ranganath,LucaFoschini,andMarzyehGhassemi. Reproducibility inmachinelearningforhealthresearch:Stillalongwaytogo.Nature Machine Intelligence, 3:1–12, 2021

2021
[68]

When machine learning meets privacy: A survey and outlook.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(2):1–36, 2021

Bo Liu, Ming Ding, Sina Shaham, Wenny Rahayu, Farhad Farokhi, and Zihuai Lin. When machine learning meets privacy: A survey and outlook.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(2):1–36, 2021

2021
[69]

Clinical intervention prediction and understanding using deep networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.08498, 2018

Harini Suresh, Nicholas Hunt, Alistair E W Johnson, Leo Anthony Celi, Peter Szolovits, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. Clinical intervention prediction and understanding using deep networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.08498, 2018

2018 arXiv
[70]

Practical guidance on artificialintelligenceforhealth-caredata.TheLancetDigitalHealth, 1(4):e157–e159, 2019

Marzyeh Ghassemi, Tristan Naumann, Peter Schulam, Andrew L Beam, Irene Y Chen, and Rajesh Ranganath. Practical guidance on artificialintelligenceforhealth-caredata.TheLancetDigitalHealth, 1(4):e157–e159, 2019

2019
[71]

Time-series feature engineering for icu mortality prediction usingmimic-iiidata.JournalofBiomedicalInformatics,94:103188, 2019

JoaoRodrigues-Jr,LeandroSilva,DanielPaixão,andFábioFernan- des. Time-series feature engineering for icu mortality prediction usingmimic-iiidata.JournalofBiomedicalInformatics,94:103188, 2019

2019
[72]

Mimic:Acomprehensiveapproach to data imitation.Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 12(3):45–67, 2019

AnnaHarutyunayanandOthers. Mimic:Acomprehensiveapproach to data imitation.Journal of Data Science and Machine Learning, 12(3):45–67, 2019

2019
[73]

The mimic-iii clini- cal database: A freely accessible critical care resource.JAMIA, 23(5):865–870, 2018

Tom J Pollard, Alistair E W Johnson, Jesse D Raffa, Leo Anthony Celi, Roger G Mark, and Omar Badawi. The mimic-iii clini- cal database: A freely accessible critical care resource.JAMIA, 23(5):865–870, 2018

2018
[74]

Multitask learning and benchmark- ing with clinical time series data.Scientific Data, 6:317, 2019

Hrant Harutyunyan and Others. Multitask learning and benchmark- ing with clinical time series data.Scientific Data, 6:317, 2019

2019
[75]

Digital medicine and the curse of dimensionality.NPJ Digital Medicine, 4:153, 2021

Visar Berisha and Others. Digital medicine and the curse of dimensionality.NPJ Digital Medicine, 4:153, 2021

2021
[76]

Kevin Merkelbach and Others. Novel architecture for gated re- current unit autoencoder trained on time series from electronic health records enables detection of icu patient subgroups.Scientific Reports, 13:4053, 2023

2023
[77]

Kohane and Others

Isaac S. Kohane and Others. What every reader should know about studies using electronic health record data.Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3):e22219, 2021

2021
[78]

Hawryluk and Others

Michael J. Hawryluk and Others. Streaming analysis of icu data for sepsis prediction: Challenges of data sparsity.Intensive Care Medicine, 46:134–142, 2020

2020
[79]

Ghassemi and Others

Mona J. Ghassemi and Others. A review of challenges and oppor- tunities in machine learning for health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(4):544–551, 2020

2020
[80]

Kingma and Max Welling

Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. InProceedings of ICLR, 2014

2014
[81]

Processing of electronic health records using deep learning: A review.arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.01758, 2018

Venet Osmani and Others. Processing of electronic health records using deep learning: A review.arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.01758, 2018

2018 arXiv
[82]

Anin-depthfeaturelearning algorithm for breast abnormality prognosis and robust character- ization from mammography images using deep transfer learning

TMahmood,JLi,YPei,andFAkhtar. Anin-depthfeaturelearning algorithm for breast abnormality prognosis and robust character- ization from mammography images using deep transfer learning. Biology, 10(9):859, 2021

2021
[83]

Deep learning-based algo- rithm for detecting sepsis using multiple vital signs.Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(5):559, 2019

Joon-Mo Kwon, Yong Lee, Youngjun Lee, Sang Hyun Yang, Kyeongman Jeon, and Youngsuk Park. Deep learning-based algo- rithm for detecting sepsis using multiple vital signs.Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(5):559, 2019. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 38 of 42 M...

2019
[84]

A new in- sight into transfer learning in healthcare.Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 77:66–73, 2017

Anisa Sharafoddini, Jeffrey A Dubin, and Joon Lee. A new in- sight into transfer learning in healthcare.Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 77:66–73, 2017

2017
[85]

Sepsispredictionusingmachinelearningmodels:Acomprehensive review.Biomedical Engineering Letters, 10(2):149–164, 2020

Yaozong Xie, Yingying Zhang, Zhen Ma, Feng Li, and Zeng Yi. Sepsispredictionusingmachinelearningmodels:Acomprehensive review.Biomedical Engineering Letters, 10(2):149–164, 2020

2020
[86]

Areviewofchallenges and opportunities in machine learning for health.Big Data, 8(1):3– 12, 2020

Marzyeh Ghassemi, Tristan Naumann, Peter Schulam, Andrew L Beam,IreneYChen,andRajeshRanganath. Areviewofchallenges and opportunities in machine learning for health.Big Data, 8(1):3– 12, 2020

2020
[87]

Benchmarkingmachine learning models on multi-centre eicu critical care dataset.Plos one, 15(7):e0235424, 2020

Seyedmostafa Sheikhalishahi, Vevake Balaraman, and Venet Os- mani. Benchmarkingmachine learning models on multi-centre eicu critical care dataset.Plos one, 15(7):e0235424, 2020

2020
[88]

Komorowski, L

M. Komorowski, L. A. Celi, O. Badawi, A. C. Gordon, and A. A. Faisal. The artificial intelligence clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.Nature Medicine, 24:1716– 1720, 2018

2018
[89]

Explainable ai: A systematic literature review focusing on healthcare.Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2024

UJ Nzenwata, I OO, and EO Tai-Ojuolape. Explainable ai: A systematic literature review focusing on healthcare.Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2024

2024
[90]

Deep ehr: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques forelectronichealthrecord(ehr)analysis.IEEEJournalofBiomed- ical and Health Informatics, 21(1):4–21, 2017

Benjamin Shickel, Patrick Tighe, Azra Bihorac, and Parisa Rashidi. Deep ehr: A survey of recent advances in deep learning techniques forelectronichealthrecord(ehr)analysis.IEEEJournalofBiomed- ical and Health Informatics, 21(1):4–21, 2017

2017
[91]

Boosting deep learning risk prediction with generative adversarial networks for electronic health records.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01648, 2017

Zhengping Che, Yu Cheng, Shuangfei Zhai, Zhaonan Sun, and Yan Liu. Boosting deep learning risk prediction with generative adversarial networks for electronic health records.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01648, 2017

2017 arXiv
[92]

Mao and Others

Q. Mao and Others. Feature hashing for high-dimensional sparse datainelectronichealthrecords.JournalofBiomedicalInformatics, 98:103276, 2019

2019
[93]

Self-supervised representation learning for ehr: A review.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 33(8):1–15, 2021

Qiyang Li and Others. Self-supervised representation learning for ehr: A review.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 33(8):1–15, 2021

2021
[94]

AndreasTheodorou,FredrikJohansson,andVirginiaDignum.Inter- pretablemachinelearningformimicdataset:Acasestudyinhealth- care ai.Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 135:102567, 2023

2023
[95]

Addressing missingness in medical time seriesusinggaussianprocesses.AMIAAnnualSymposiumProceed- ings, pages 111–120, 2022

Hyun Lee and Others. Addressing missingness in medical time seriesusinggaussianprocesses.AMIAAnnualSymposiumProceed- ings, pages 111–120, 2022

2022
[96]

Artificialintelligenceapplications in smart healthcare: A survey.Future Internet, 16(9):308, 2024

XGao,PHe,YZhou,andXQin. Artificialintelligenceapplications in smart healthcare: A survey.Future Internet, 16(9):308, 2024

2024
[97]

Khope and Susan Elias

Sarika R. Khope and Susan Elias. Strategies of predictive schemes and clinical diagnosis for prognosis using mimic-iii: A systematic review.Healthcare, 11(5):710, 2023

2023
[98]

Strategies of predictive schemes and clinical diagnosis for prognosis using mimic-iii: A systematic review

Sarika R Khope and Susan Elias. Strategies of predictive schemes and clinical diagnosis for prognosis using mimic-iii: A systematic review. InHealthcare, volume 11, page 710. MDPI, 2023

2023
[99]

Reliabledecisionsupportusingcounterfac- tualmodels

P.SchulamandS.Saria. Reliabledecisionsupportusingcounterfac- tualmodels. InAdvancesinNeuralInformationProcessingSystems (NeurIPS), pages 1–10, 2017

2017
[100]

Zhang et al

Y. Zhang et al. Causal inference in the presence of unmeasured confounding in mimic-iii. InMachine Learning for Healthcare Conference, pages 1–10, 2020

2020
[101]

Ensemble learning for healthcare predictive modeling: A review.Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 95:31–42, 2018

HaoranSong,DeepakRajan,KumarDharmarajan,KatherineHeller, Jason S Ross, Fenglong Wang, Leora I Horwitz, Samprit Singh, and Peter Schulam. Ensemble learning for healthcare predictive modeling: A review.Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 95:31–42, 2018

2018
[102]

Causalinferenceanddata-fusion in health care.Annual Review of Public Health, 41:61–78, 2020

JudeaPearlandEliasBareinboim. Causalinferenceanddata-fusion in health care.Annual Review of Public Health, 41:61–78, 2020

2020
[103]

Sanders and Others

Brent M. Sanders and Others. Machine learning generalizability across healthcare settings: insights from multi-site covid-19 screen- ing.NPJ Digital Medicine, 5:135, 2022

2022
[104]

Daniel A. R. Parra-Calderón and Others. Handling class imbalance inicumortalitypredictionwithmimic-ivdata.ComputersinBiology and Medicine, 140:105047, 2021

2021
[105]

FionaW.MannionandOthers.Externalvalidationoficuriskpredic- tion models across hospitals.Intensive Care Medicine, 47(8):928– 936, 2021

2021
[106]

Sjoding and Others

Michael W. Sjoding and Others. Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement.The New England Journal of Medicine, 383:2477– 2478, 2020

2020
[107]

Bias detection in clinical risk models: a framework for fairness.JAMA Health Forum, 2(2):e193278, 2021

Vivek Gupta and Others. Bias detection in clinical risk models: a framework for fairness.JAMA Health Forum, 2(2):e193278, 2021

2021
[108]

Robust mortality prediction in icus by mitigating data drift.Critical Care Medicine, 51(1):1–9, 2023

Larry Wu and Others. Robust mortality prediction in icus by mitigating data drift.Critical Care Medicine, 51(1):1–9, 2023

2023
[109]

Aunifiedapproachtointerpreting model predictions

ScottM.LundbergandSu-InLee. Aunifiedapproachtointerpreting model predictions. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30, pages 4765–4774, 2017

2017
[110]

Counter- factualrecurrentnetworksforsequentialdecision-making.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31:9048–9058, 2018

Jinsung Yoon, James Jordon, and Mihaela van der Schaar. Counter- factualrecurrentnetworksforsequentialdecision-making.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31:9048–9058, 2018

2018
[111]

Wang et al

G. Wang et al. Modeling crohn’s disease in tuberculosis-endemic regions.Clinical AI, 2023

2023
[112]

Deep structural causal modelsfortractablecounterfactualinference

N Pawlowski and D Coelho de Castro. Deep structural causal modelsfortractablecounterfactualinference. InAdvancesinNeural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020

2020
[113]

Integratingmachine learningandartificialintelligenceinlife-courseepidemiology:path- ways to innovative public health solutions.BMC Medicine, 2024

SChen,JYu,SChamouni,YWang,andYLi. Integratingmachine learningandartificialintelligenceinlife-courseepidemiology:path- ways to innovative public health solutions.BMC Medicine, 2024

2024
[114]

Mitigating bias in artificial intelligence: Fair data generation via causal models for transparent and explainable decision-making.Future Generation Computer Systems, 2024

R González-Sendino, E Serrano, and J Bajo. Mitigating bias in artificial intelligence: Fair data generation via causal models for transparent and explainable decision-making.Future Generation Computer Systems, 2024

2024
[115]

Causal inference for observational longitu- dinal studies using deep survival models.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2022

J Zhu and B Gallego. Causal inference for observational longitu- dinal studies using deep survival models.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2022

2022
[116]

Improving visualization interpretation using counterfactuals

S Kaul, D Borland, N Cao, and D Gotz. Improving visualization interpretation using counterfactuals. InIEEE Visualization and Computer Graphics (VIS), 2021

2021
[117]

From controlled to undisci- plineddata:Estimatingcausaleffectsintheeraofdatascienceusing a potential outcome framework.Harvard Data Science Review, 2021

F Dominici, FJB Stoffi, and F Mealli. From controlled to undisci- plineddata:Estimatingcausaleffectsintheeraofdatascienceusing a potential outcome framework.Harvard Data Science Review, 2021

2021
[118]

MMansouri.Causaldiscoveryfromhigh-dimensionalobservational data.Simon Fraser University - Thesis, 2022

2022
[119]

SBanerjeeandGAVeltri.Harnessingpluralisminbehavioralpublic policyrequiresinsightsfromcomputationalsocialscience.Frontiers in Behavioral Economics, 2024

2024
[120]

Uncertainty quantification for conditional treatment effect estimation under dynamic treatment regimes.MIT Working Papers, 2024

F Wu, S Kapoor, S Ghosh, and Z Shahn. Uncertainty quantification for conditional treatment effect estimation under dynamic treatment regimes.MIT Working Papers, 2024

2024
[121]

If interpretability is the answer, what is the question?: a causal perspective.CORE, 2023

G König. If interpretability is the answer, what is the question?: a causal perspective.CORE, 2023

2023
[122]

Challenges of data integration in healthcare, 2023

Gaine Technology. Challenges of data integration in healthcare, 2023

2023
[123]

Clinicalbert embeddings to standardize ehr text for integration.AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pages 290– 299, 2020

Chang Wang et al. Clinicalbert embeddings to standardize ehr text for integration.AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pages 290– 299, 2020

2020
[124]

An extensive data processing pipeline for mimic-iv.Sensors, 23(22):9813, 2023

Prashant Dhakal et al. An extensive data processing pipeline for mimic-iv.Sensors, 23(22):9813, 2023

2023
[125]

Transformation of mimic into the omop common data model: Development and usability study.JMIR Medical Infor- matics, 9(12):e30970, 2021

Nora Paris et al. Transformation of mimic into the omop common data model: Development and usability study.JMIR Medical Infor- matics, 9(12):e30970, 2021

2021
[126]

Healthcare terminology standardization: The road to inter- operability.Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 11:1–19, 2020

Olivier Bodenreider, Lee B Peters, Alexa T McCray, and Stefan Schulz. Healthcare terminology standardization: The road to inter- operability.Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 11:1–19, 2020

2020
[127]

AlistairE.Johnsonetal.Mimic-extract:Adatapipelineforintensive care unit data.arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.11369, 2019

1905 arXiv
[128]

Cleveland and Susan J

William S. Cleveland and Susan J. Devlin. Locally weighted regression:Anapproachtodatasmoothing.JournaloftheAmerican Statistical Association, 83:596–610, 1988

1988
[129]

Springer, Cham, 2021

Matthew Clayton.Climate Change and the Future of Democracy. Springer, Cham, 2021. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 39 of 42 MIMIC Dataset

2021
[130]

Comprehensive benchmarking and rec- ommendations for deep learning on electronic health record data

Yang Luo and Others. Comprehensive benchmarking and rec- ommendations for deep learning on electronic health record data. JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation,31(1):47– 57, 2024

2024
[131]

Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(8):1220–1227, 2020

Kai-Wei Chang et al. Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(8):1220–1227, 2020

2020
[132]

Fast healthcare interoperability resources (fhir)forintegratedclinicaldata.LancetDigitalHealth,2(4):e198– e207, 2020

Donal Robinson et al. Fast healthcare interoperability resources (fhir)forintegratedclinicaldata.LancetDigitalHealth,2(4):e198– e207, 2020

2020
[133]

Closing the data loop: Anintegratedopenaccessanalysisplatformforthemimicdatabase

Mohammad Adibuzzaman, Ken Musselman, Alistair Johnson, Paul Brown, Zachary Pitluk, and Ananth Grama. Closing the data loop: Anintegratedopenaccessanalysisplatformforthemimicdatabase. Computing in Cardiology, 43:137–140, 2016

2016
[134]

Containerizationofclinicaldataanalysis:Case study with mimic-iv.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(7):1470–1474, 2021

PaulCampbelletal. Containerizationofclinicaldataanalysis:Case study with mimic-iv.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(7):1470–1474, 2021

2021
[135]

Smart on fhir: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5):899–908, 2016

Joshua C Mandel, David A Kreda, Kenneth D Mandl, Isaac S Kohane, and Rachel B Ramoni. Smart on fhir: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(5):899–908, 2016

2016
[136]

IEEE Access, 6:14494–14504, 2018

Tarik M Ghazal, Kashif Ali, Muhammad Shujauddin Siddiqui, SuhaibMusa,AshrafAlmogren,andMohammedSAl-Rakhami.An api-basedapproachforintegratinghealthdatafrommultiplesources. IEEE Access, 6:14494–14504, 2018

2018
[137]

Learning from heterogeneous temporal data in electronic health records.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 94:103183, 2019

Jie Zhao, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Lars Asker, and Henrik Boström. Learning from heterogeneous temporal data in electronic health records.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 94:103183, 2019

2019
[138]

Deeplearningpredic- tion models based on ehr trajectories: A systematic review.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2023

AAmirahmadi,MOhlsson,andKEtminani. Deeplearningpredic- tion models based on ehr trajectories: A systematic review.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2023

2023
[139]

Generalized and transferable patient language representation for phenotyping with limited data

Y Si, EV Bernstam, and K Roberts. Generalized and transferable patient language representation for phenotyping with limited data. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2021

2021
[140]

Benchmarking etl pipelines: Ensuring re- producible data cleaning in healthcare.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 214:106616, 2022

Brendan Daly et al. Benchmarking etl pipelines: Ensuring re- producible data cleaning in healthcare.Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 214:106616, 2022

2022
[141]

Openbst: Efficient binary search trees for open- source projects

Author(s) Name(s). Openbst: Efficient binary search trees for open- source projects. InProceedings of the X Conference on Y, pages 100–120. Publisher, 2020

2020
[142]

Machine learn- ingmodelsinsepsisoutcomepredictionforicupatients:Integrating routine laboratory tests—a systematic review.Biomedicines, 2024

F Mus,at, DN Păduraru, A Bolocan, and CA Palcău. Machine learn- ingmodelsinsepsisoutcomepredictionforicupatients:Integrating routine laboratory tests—a systematic review.Biomedicines, 2024

2024
[143]

Benjamin A Goldstein, Ann Marie Navar, Michael J Pencina, and JohnPAIoannidis. Opportunitiesandchallengesindevelopingrisk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 24(1):198–208, 2017

2017
[144]

Establishment of icu mortality risk prediction models with machine learning algorithm using mimic-iv database

Ke Pang and Others. Establishment of icu mortality risk prediction models with machine learning algorithm using mimic-iv database. Diagnostics, 12(5):1068, 2022

2022
[145]

Digital health data quality is- sues: Systematic review.Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1):e42615, 2023

Sandra Puttkammer and Others. Digital health data quality is- sues: Systematic review.Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1):e42615, 2023

2023
[146]

Process mining in oncology using the mimic-iii dataset

Angelina Prima Kurniati, Geoff Hall, David Hogg, and Owen John- son. Process mining in oncology using the mimic-iii dataset. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 971, page 012008. IOP Publishing, 2018

2018
[147]

Data imputation strategies for handling missing values in icu predictivemodeling.JournalofBiomedicalInformatics,94:103195, 2019

JoaoRodrigues-Jr,LeandroSilva,DanielPaixão,andFábioFernan- des. Data imputation strategies for handling missing values in icu predictivemodeling.JournalofBiomedicalInformatics,94:103195, 2019

2019
[148]

Missing data imputation in the electronic health record using deeply learned autoencoders.BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18:1–12, 2018

Brett K Beaulieu-Jones, Daniel R Lavage, John W Snyder, Jason H Moore, Sarah A Pendergrass, and Christopher R Bauer. Missing data imputation in the electronic health record using deeply learned autoencoders.BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18:1–12, 2018

2018
[149]

A framework for quality control and parameter optimization in fmri.PloS one, 8(3):e59018, 2013

NikolausWeiskopf,JohnSuckling,GuyWilliams,MartaMCorreia, Becky Inkster, Roger Tait, Cinly Ooi, Edward T Bullmore, and Antoine Lutti. A framework for quality control and parameter optimization in fmri.PloS one, 8(3):e59018, 2013

2013
[150]

Pulsedb: A large, cleaned dataset based on mimic-iii and vitaldb for benchmarking cuff-less blood pressure estimation methods.Frontiers in Digital Health, 4:1090854, 2023

Weinan Wang, Pedram Mohseni, Kevin L Kilgore, and Laleh Na- jafizadeh. Pulsedb: A large, cleaned dataset based on mimic-iii and vitaldb for benchmarking cuff-less blood pressure estimation methods.Frontiers in Digital Health, 4:1090854, 2023

2023
[151]

Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values.Scientific Reports, 8:6085, 2018

Zhengping Che, Sanjay Purushotham, Kyunghyun Cho, David Son- tag, and Yan Liu. Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values.Scientific Reports, 8:6085, 2018

2018
[152]

Synthesize high- dimensional longitudinal electronic health records via hierarchical autoregressive language model, 2023

Brandon Theodorou, Cao Xiao, and Jimeng Sun. Synthesize high- dimensional longitudinal electronic health records via hierarchical autoregressive language model, 2023

2023
[153]

Removing outliers within a pipeline, 2023

Kaggle Community. Removing outliers within a pipeline, 2023. Kaggle Notebook

2023
[154]

Handling outliers: A comprehensive guide to data cleaning, 2025

Anonymous. Handling outliers: A comprehensive guide to data cleaning, 2025. Data Science Publication

2025
[155]

A primer on the data cleaning pipeline, 2023

ArXiv Contributors. A primer on the data cleaning pipeline, 2023

2023
[156]

What are the best practices for handling outliers in data cleaning?, 2023

Data Science Forum. What are the best practices for handling outliers in data cleaning?, 2023. Online Resource

2023
[157]

Primer on the data cleaning pipeline, 2023

Oxford Academic. Primer on the data cleaning pipeline, 2023

2023
[158]

Data cleaning: Outlier detection and imputation of missing values, 2023

Neural Data Science Group. Data cleaning: Outlier detection and imputation of missing values, 2023. Technical Report

2023
[159]

Learningfromdatawith structured missingness.Nature Machine Intelligence, 2023

RMitra,SFMcGough,andTChakraborti. Learningfromdatawith structured missingness.Nature Machine Intelligence, 2023

2023
[160]

Largelanguagemodelsforwearablesensor-basedhuman activityrecognition,healthmonitoring,andbehavioralmodeling:A survey of early trends, datasets, and methods.Sensors, 2024

EFerrara. Largelanguagemodelsforwearablesensor-basedhuman activityrecognition,healthmonitoring,andbehavioralmodeling:A survey of early trends, datasets, and methods.Sensors, 2024

2024
[161]

Missing data in medicaldatabases:Impute,deleteorclassify?ArtificialIntelligence in Medicine, 58(1):63–72, 2013

Fabio Cismondi, Alexandre S Fialho, Sergio M Vieira, Steven R Reti, José M C Sousa, and Stanley N Finkelstein. Missing data in medicaldatabases:Impute,deleteorclassify?ArtificialIntelligence in Medicine, 58(1):63–72, 2013

2013
[162]

The mimic code repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research.JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation, 25(1):32–39, 2018

AlistairEWJohnson,DavidJStone,LeoACeli,andTomJPollard. The mimic code repository: enabling reproducibility in critical care research.JournaloftheAmericanMedicalInformaticsAssociation, 25(1):32–39, 2018

2018
[163]

A systematic review of recurrent neural network adoption in missing data imputation

MI Jaya, MF Ab Razak, and NAF Akbar. A systematic review of recurrent neural network adoption in missing data imputation. International Journal of ..., 2025

2025
[164]

Leveraging machine learning for predictive modelsinhealthcaretoenhancepatientoutcomemanagement.Inter- national Research Journal of Modern Engineering and Technology Science, 2025

A Olalekan Kehinde. Leveraging machine learning for predictive modelsinhealthcaretoenhancepatientoutcomemanagement.Inter- national Research Journal of Modern Engineering and Technology Science, 2025

2025
[165]

Planning under uncertainties with closed-loop sensitivity,

HAL. Planning under uncertainties with closed-loop sensitivity,
[166]

Sensitivity analysis on initial classifier accuracy in fuzziness-based imputation, 2023

Fuzziness Study Group. Sensitivity analysis on initial classifier accuracy in fuzziness-based imputation, 2023. Technical Report

2023
[167]

Fast healthcare interoper- ability resources.https://fhir.org

Health Level Seven International (HL7). Fast healthcare interoper- ability resources.https://fhir.org. Accessed: 2025-05-23

2025
[168]

Transformation and evaluation of the mimic database in the omop common data model

Nicolas Paris, Adrien Parrot, and Others. Transformation and evaluation of the mimic database in the omop common data model. JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(1):e23512, 2021

2021
[169]

Mends-on-fhir: Leveraging the omop common data model for bulk fhir transformations.medRxiv, 2023

Taylor Jones and Others. Mends-on-fhir: Leveraging the omop common data model for bulk fhir transformations.medRxiv, 2023

2023
[170]

Aunifiedapproachtointerpreting model predictions.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017

ScottMLundbergandSu-InLee. Aunifiedapproachtointerpreting model predictions.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017

2017
[171]

Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: Components of a new research re- sourceforcomplexphysiologicsignals.Circulation,101(23):e215– e220, 2000

Ary L Goldberger, Luis AN Amaral, Leon Glass, Jeffrey M Haus- dorff,PlamenChIvanov,RogerGMark,JosephEMietus,GeorgeB Moody, Chung-Kang Peng, and H Eugene Stanley. Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: Components of a new research re- sourceforcomplexphysiologicsignals.Circu...

2000
[172]

Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine.JAMA, 321(18):1769–1770, 2019

SanaTonekaboni,ShalmaliJoshi,MelissaDMcCradden,andAnna Goldenberg. Unintended consequences of machine learning in medicine.JAMA, 321(18):1769–1770, 2019. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 40 of 42 MIMIC Dataset

2019
[173]

Astandardizedclinicaldata harmonization pipeline for scalable ai application deployment (fhir- dhp): Validation and usability study.JMIR Medical Informatics, 2023

EMedawar,EWilliams,andMKienast. Astandardizedclinicaldata harmonization pipeline for scalable ai application deployment (fhir- dhp): Validation and usability study.JMIR Medical Informatics, 2023

2023
[174]

Reproducibility in critical care: A role for data standards.Critical Care Medicine, 46(5):678–685, 2018

Alistair EW Johnson, Tom J Pollard, Lu Shen, H Lehman Li-wei, Mengling Feng, Mohammad Ghassemi, Benjamin Moody, Peter Szolovits, Leo Anthony Celi, and Roger G Mark. Reproducibility in critical care: A role for data standards.Critical Care Medicine, 46(5):678–685, 2018

2018
[175]

Whymostpublishedresearchfindingsarefalse

JohnPAIoannidis. Whymostpublishedresearchfindingsarefalse. PLoS Medicine, 2(8):e124, 2005

2005
[176]

Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis

Matthew Hutson. Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis. Science, 359(6377):725–726, 2018

2018
[177]

Reproducible research in computational science

Roger D Peng. Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060):1226–1227, 2011

2011
[178]

Fairness in predicting cancer mortality across racial subgroups.JAMA Network Open, 2024

T Ganta, A Kia, P Parchure, and M Wang. Fairness in predicting cancer mortality across racial subgroups.JAMA Network Open, 2024

2024
[179]

A scoping review of fair machinelearningtechniqueswhenusingreal-worlddata.Journalof Biomedical Informatics, 2024

Y Huang, J Guo, WH Chen, and H Tang. A scoping review of fair machinelearningtechniqueswhenusingreal-worlddata.Journalof Biomedical Informatics, 2024

2024
[180]

VA Arcobelli and S Moscato. Towards real-world clinical data standardization: A modular fhir-driven transformation pipeline to enhance semantic interoperability in healthcare.Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2025

2025
[181]

What does research reproducibility mean?Science Translational Medicine, 8(341):341ps12, 2016

Steven N Goodman, Daniele Fanelli, and John P A Ioannidis. What does research reproducibility mean?Science Translational Medicine, 8(341):341ps12, 2016

2016
[183]

Semantic interoperability of clinical data: a multi-dimensional approach.Access Archive Ouverte, 2023

C Gaudet-Blavignac. Semantic interoperability of clinical data: a multi-dimensional approach.Access Archive Ouverte, 2023

2023
[184]

Benchmarkofdeeplearningmodelsonlargehealthcaremimic datasets.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 83:112–134, 2018

Sanjay Purushotham, Chuizheng Meng, Zhengping Che, and Yan Liu. Benchmarkofdeeplearningmodelsonlargehealthcaremimic datasets.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 83:112–134, 2018

2018
[185]

Addressing bias in big data and ai for health care: A call for open science

NNorori,QHu,FMAellen,FDFaraci,andATzovara. Addressing bias in big data and ai for health care: A call for open science. Patterns, 2021

2021
[186]

Research issues and challenges in the computational development of trustworthy ai.IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

MU Ahmed and S Barua. Research issues and challenges in the computational development of trustworthy ai.IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2024

2024
[187]

Bridging the gap between black box ai and clinical practice:Advancingexplainableaifortrust,ethics,andpersonalized healthcare diagnostics.Preprints, 2024

DA Tuan. Bridging the gap between black box ai and clinical practice:Advancingexplainableaifortrust,ethics,andpersonalized healthcare diagnostics.Preprints, 2024

2024
[188]

A methodology for the pseudonymization of medical data.Journal of Biomedical Infor- matics, 83:25–38, 2018

Thomas Neubauer and Stefan Heurix. A methodology for the pseudonymization of medical data.Journal of Biomedical Infor- matics, 83:25–38, 2018

2018
[189]

Anonymizinghealthdata:Case studies and methods to get you started.O’Reilly Media, 2011

KhaledElEmamandLukArbuckle. Anonymizinghealthdata:Case studies and methods to get you started.O’Reilly Media, 2011

2011
[190]

Only you, your doctor, and many others may know.Technology Science, 1:2015092903, 2015

Latanya Sweeney. Only you, your doctor, and many others may know.Technology Science, 1:2015092903, 2015

2015
[191]

Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new general data protection regulation.European Journal of Human Genetics, 26:149–156, 2018

Mahsa Shabani and Pascal Borry. Rules for processing genetic data for research purposes in view of the new general data protection regulation.European Journal of Human Genetics, 26:149–156, 2018

2018
[192]

The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr): A practical guide.Springer, 2017

Paul Voigt and Axel von dem Bussche. The eu general data protection regulation (gdpr): A practical guide.Springer, 2017

2017
[193]

Theeffectofthegeneral data protection regulation on medical research.Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2):e23442, 2021

JohnM.RumboldandBarbaraPierscionek. Theeffectofthegeneral data protection regulation on medical research.Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2):e23442, 2021

2021
[194]

Privacy-preservinggenerativedeepneuralnetworkssupportclinical data sharing.Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(7):e005122, 2019

Brett K Beaulieu-Jones, Zhiwei Steven Wu, Clare Williams, Joon Lee, Suresh P Bhavnani, John B Byrd, and Casey S Greene. Privacy-preservinggenerativedeepneuralnetworkssupportclinical data sharing.Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 12(7):e005122, 2019

2019
[195]

The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy.Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4):211–407, 2014

Cynthia Dwork and Aaron Roth. The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy.Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4):211–407, 2014

2014
[196]

Health data and privacy in the digital era.JAMA, 320(3):233–234, 2017

Lawrence O Gostin, Sam F Halabi, and Kumanan Wilson. Health data and privacy in the digital era.JAMA, 320(3):233–234, 2017

2017
[197]

Ma- chine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges.PLoS Medicine, 15(11):e1002689, 2018

Effy Vayena, Alessandro Blasimme, and Glenn Cohen. Ma- chine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges.PLoS Medicine, 15(11):e1002689, 2018

2018
[198]

Data respon- sibility: Building trust in health systems.Trends in Biotechnology, 38(4):375–378, 2020

Edward S Dove, Jeffery Chen, and Calvin W L Ho. Data respon- sibility: Building trust in health systems.Trends in Biotechnology, 38(4):375–378, 2020

2020
[199]

Secure, privacy-preserving and federated ma- chine learning in medical imaging.Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(6):473–484, 2021

Georgios A Kaissis, Marcus R Makowski, Daniel Rückert, and Rickmer F Braren. Secure, privacy-preserving and federated ma- chine learning in medical imaging.Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(6):473–484, 2021

2021
[200]

Rules for research data gover- nance:Reviewandframework.BigData&Society,8(1):1–14,2021

Mahsa Shabani and Pascal Borry. Rules for research data gover- nance:Reviewandframework.BigData&Society,8(1):1–14,2021

2021
[201]

Khalid, A

N. Khalid, A. Qayyum, M. Bilal, and A. Al-Fuqaha. Privacy- preserving artificial intelligence in healthcare: Techniques and ap- plications.Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2023

2023
[202]

Dissectingracialbiasinanalgorithmusedtomanagethe health of populations.Science, 366(6464):447–453, 2019

Ziad Obermeyer, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mul- lainathan. Dissectingracialbiasinanalgorithmusedtomanagethe health of populations.Science, 366(6464):447–453, 2019

2019
[203]

Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.npj Digital Medicine, 1(1):1–10, 2018

AlvinRajkomar,EyalOren,KaiChen,AndrewMDai,NissanHajaj, Michael Hardt, et al. Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.npj Digital Medicine, 1(1):1–10, 2018

2018
[204]

RizwanQureshi,BinZou,TanvirAlam,JiaWu,VictorHFLee,and HongYan. Computationalmethodsfortheanalysisandpredictionof egfr-mutated lung cancer drug resistance: Recent advances in drug design,challengesandfutureprospects.IEEE/ACMTransactionson Computational Biology and Bioinformatic...

2022
[205]

D Amadi, S Kiwuwa-Muyingo, et al. As the first step to providing findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable population health data: Framework development and implementation study.Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 2024

2024
[206]

Introducing the blendedicudataset,thefirstharmonized,internationalintensivecare dataset.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2023

M Oliver, J Allyn, R Carencotte, and N Allou. Introducing the blendedicudataset,thefirstharmonized,internationalintensivecare dataset.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2023

2023
[207]

Differential privacy.Proceedings of the 33rd In- ternationalColloquiumonAutomata,LanguagesandProgramming (ICALP), pages 1–12, 2006

Cynthia Dwork. Differential privacy.Proceedings of the 33rd In- ternationalColloquiumonAutomata,LanguagesandProgramming (ICALP), pages 1–12, 2006

2006
[208]

Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3):50–60, 2020

Tian Li, Anit Kumar Sahu, et al. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions.IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3):50–60, 2020

2020
[209]

Principlesgoverningethicaldevelopmentanddeployment of ai.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Ethics, 2024

SShukla. Principlesgoverningethicaldevelopmentanddeployment of ai.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Ethics, 2024

2024
[210]

Interpretable deep models for icu outcome prediction

Zhengping Che, Sanjay Purushotham, Kyunghyun Cho, David Son- tag, and Yan Liu. Interpretable deep models for icu outcome prediction. InProceedingsofthe2018ACMSIGKDDInternational Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 1–10, 2018

2018
[211]

Label inconsistency and missing data in mimic- iii: Challenges for sepsis identification.Scientific Data, 9(1):1–12, 2022

Matthew A Reyna, Christopher Josef, Salman Seyedi, Russell Jeter, Supreeth P Shashikumar, Ashish Sharma, Shamim Nemati, and Gari D Clifford. Label inconsistency and missing data in mimic- iii: Challenges for sepsis identification.Scientific Data, 9(1):1–12, 2022

2022
[212]

External validation of sepsis phenotyping algorithms in mimic-iv.Nature Digital Medicine, 6(1):1–15, 2023

Oliver Moor, Tellen D Bennett, Mohammad Ghassemi, and Stephanie L Hyland. External validation of sepsis phenotyping algorithms in mimic-iv.Nature Digital Medicine, 6(1):1–15, 2023

2023
[213]

Latent ordinary differential equations for irregularly-sampled time series

Yulia Rubanova, Ricky TQ Chen, and David Duvenaud. Latent ordinary differential equations for irregularly-sampled time series. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2019

2019
[214]

Contrastive learning for irregularly-sampled clinical time series.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:1–12, 2021

Xinyu Zhang, Chen Zhao, and Carl Yang. Contrastive learning for irregularly-sampled clinical time series.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:1–12, 2021

2021
[215]

Generalization gaps in icu mortality prediction: A multi-center study

Shalmali Joshi, Matthew BA McDermott, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. Generalization gaps in icu mortality prediction: A multi-center study. InMachineLearningforHealthcareConference,pages1–22, 2022. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 41 of 42 MIMIC Dataset

2022
[216]

Deep learning for temporal data representation in electronic health records.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 108:1–15, 2020

BenjaminShickel,TylerJLoftus,LasithAdhikari,TezcanOzrazgat- Baslanti, and Azra Bihorac. Deep learning for temporal data representation in electronic health records.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 108:1–15, 2020

2020
[217]

Interpretability failures in clinical risk prediction models.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 142:1–12, 2023

Matthew BA McDermott, Tzu-Ming Harry Hsu, Wei-Hung Weng, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. Interpretability failures in clinical risk prediction models.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 142:1–12, 2023

2023
[218]

Clinically meaningful explanations for icu risk scores.The Lancet Digital Health, 4(5):e294–e295, 2022

Xiaoxuan Liu, Samuel C Rivera, David Moher, Melanie J Calvert, and Alastair K Denniston. Clinically meaningful explanations for icu risk scores.The Lancet Digital Health, 4(5):e294–e295, 2022

2022
[219]

Xiaoxuan Liu, Livia Faes, Aditya U Kale, Siegfried K Wagner, Dun Jack Fu, Alice Bruynseels, Thushika Mahendiran, Gabriella Moraes, Mohith Shamdas, Christoph Kern, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medi...

2019
[220]

Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the physionet/computing in cardiology challenge 2019.Criti- cal care medicine, 48(2):210–217, 2020

Matthew A Reyna, Christopher S Josef, Russell Jeter, Supreeth P Shashikumar, M Brandon Westover, Shamim Nemati, Gari D Clif- ford, and Ashish Sharma. Early prediction of sepsis from clinical data: the physionet/computing in cardiology challenge 2019.Criti- cal care medicine, 4...

2019
[221]

Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission.arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05342, 2019

Kexin Huang, Jaan Altosaar, and Rajesh Ranganath. Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission.arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05342, 2019

1904 arXiv
[222]

Transfer learn- ing in biomedical natural language processing: an evaluation of bert and elmo on ten benchmarking datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05474, 2019

Yifan Peng, Shankai Yan, and Zhiyong Lu. Transfer learn- ing in biomedical natural language processing: an evaluation of bert and elmo on ten benchmarking datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05474, 2019

1906 arXiv
[223]

Mortality and readmission rates among patients with covid-19 after discharge from acute care setting with supplemental oxygen.JAMA Network Open, 4(4):e213990–e213990, 2021

Josh Banerjee, Catherine P Canamar, Christian Voyageur, Soodtida Tangpraphaphorn, Anabel Lemus, Charles Coffey, Noah Wald- Dickler, Paul Holtom, Jan Shoenberger, Michael Bowdish, et al. Mortality and readmission rates among patients with covid-19 after discharge from acute car...

2021
[224]

Brummett, Rena M

Kao-Ping Chua, Chad M. Brummett, Rena M. Conti, Rebecca L. Haffajee, Lisa A. Prosser, and Amy S. B. Bohnert. Assessment of prescriber and pharmacy shopping among the family members of patients prescribed opioids.JAMA Network Open, 2(5):e193673, may 2019

2019
[225]

Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets.Journal of biomedical informatics, 83:112–134, 2018

Sanjay Purushotham, Chuizheng Meng, Zhengping Che, and Yan Liu. Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets.Journal of biomedical informatics, 83:112–134, 2018

2018
[226]

Ikaro Silva, George Moody, Roger Mark, and Leo Anthony Celi. Predicting mortality of icu patients: The physionet/computing in cardiology challenge 2012.Predicting Mortality of ICU Patients: The PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge, 1, 2012

2012
[227]

Asurveyonplatformsforbigdataanalytics

A.SinghandM.Bawa. Asurveyonplatformsforbigdataanalytics. In2016 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA), pages 1101–1106, Noida, India, April 2016

2016
[228]

Machine learningbasedpersonalizeddrugresponsepredictionforlungcancer patients.Scientific Reports, 12(1):18935, 2022

Rizwan Qureshi, Syed Abdullah Basit, Jawwad A Shamsi, Xinqi Fan, Mehmood Nawaz, Hong Yan, and Tanvir Alam. Machine learningbasedpersonalizeddrugresponsepredictionforlungcancer patients.Scientific Reports, 12(1):18935, 2022

2022
[229]

Rush, and Claude Fournier

Bassam Khoury, Manoj Sharma, Sarah E. Rush, and Claude Fournier. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy indi- viduals: A meta-analysis.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(6):519–528, 2015

2015
[230]

Martin, Michael Brauer, Aaron van Donkelaar, Gavin Shaddick, Urvashi Narain, and Sagnik Dey

Randall V. Martin, Michael Brauer, Aaron van Donkelaar, Gavin Shaddick, Urvashi Narain, and Sagnik Dey. No one knows which cityhasthehighestconcentrationoffineparticulatematter.Scientific Data, 7(1):181, 2020

2020
[231]

Multitask learning and benchmark- ing with clinical time series data.Scientific Data, 6(1):96, 2019

Hrayr Harutyunyan, Hrant Khachatrian, David C Kale, Greg Ver Steeg, and Aram Galstyan. Multitask learning and benchmark- ing with clinical time series data.Scientific Data, 6(1):96, 2019

2019
[232]

Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission, 2020

Kexin Huang, Jaan Altosaar, and Rajesh Ranganath. Clinicalbert: Modeling clinical notes and predicting hospital readmission, 2020

2020
[233]

Zahra Karevan and Johan A. K. Suykens. Transductive lstm for time-seriesprediction:Anapplicationtoweatherforecasting.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society, 125:1–9, 2020

2020
[234]

Graph- based methods for modeling patient similarity and predicting out- comes.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95:103208, 2019

JunyuanShang,YiZhang,YangLiu,JianLi,andTaoZhou. Graph- based methods for modeling patient similarity and predicting out- comes.Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95:103208, 2019

2019
[235]

Wang and Others

Y. Wang and Others. Knowledge graph embeddings for clinical decision support. 2021

2021
[236]

Zhang and Others

Y. Zhang and Others. Application of unsupervised learning to discoverlatentrepresentationsofpatientdata. 46(5):678–685,2020

2020
[237]

Huang et al

Y. Huang et al. Transfer learning for mortality prediction using mimic-iii. 2019

2019
[238]

Domain adaptation for improving the general- izability of models trained on mimic

Xi Peng and Others. Domain adaptation for improving the general- izability of models trained on mimic. 2021

2021
[239]

Fairness- aware predictive modeling in healthcare.arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03264

Stephen R Pfohl, Agata Foryciarz, and Nigam H Shah. Fairness- aware predictive modeling in healthcare.arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.03264

1905 arXiv
[240]

Stewart, and Jimeng Sun

Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Andy Schuetz, Walter F. Stewart, and Jimeng Sun. Attention-based models for explainable predictionsinclinicaltext.Proceedingsoftheconferenceonhealth, inference, and learning, 2016

2016
[241]

Grnarova and Others

P. Grnarova and Others. Methods for combining structured and unstructured data in mimic-iii.Journal of Healthcare Informatics, 2019

2019
[242]

Multimodallearning forsepsisprediction.JournalofMedicalSystems,44(5):1–10,2020

X.Li,Y.Zhang,Z.Wang,H.Chen,andJ.Liu. Multimodallearning forsepsisprediction.JournalofMedicalSystems,44(5):1–10,2020

2020
[243]

A study on clinical data analysis using the mimic dataset

Raim. A study on clinical data analysis using the mimic dataset. Journal of Medical Informatics, 12(3):45–67, 2023. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 42 of 42

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Johnson et al

F. Johnson et al. Peptide design through binding interface mimicry. Bioinformatics Advances, 2023

2023

[2] [10]

Scale-sensitive response behavior in particle physics, 2015

CERN Publications. Scale-sensitive response behavior in particle physics, 2015. Technical Report

2015

[3] [13]

Elisa Henke, Yuan Peng, and Others. An extract-transform-load process design for the incremental loading of real-world data based onfhirandomopcdm:Algorithmdevelopmentandvalidation.JMIR Medical Informatics, 11:e47310, 2023

2023

[4] [62]

Title of the study.Journal of Medical Research, 15(3):123–130, 2020

John Smith and Jane Doe. Title of the study.Journal of Medical Research, 15(3):123–130, 2020

2020

[5] [2]

N. Medhat. Granularity in software architecture. InProceedings of theInternationalConferenceonSoftwareDesign,pages1–10,2023. A. Khaled et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 36 of 42 MIMIC Dataset

2023

[6] [3]

Mimic-iv: Medical information mart for intensive care.https://mimic.mit.edu/, 2020

MIT Laboratory for Computational Physiology. Mimic-iv: Medical information mart for intensive care.https://mimic.mit.edu/, 2020. Accessed: 2025-05-12

2020

[7] [4]

Themedicalinformationmart for intensive care (mimic).PhysioNet, 1:e5, 2011

M.Saeed,C.Lieu,S.Soni,andetal. Themedicalinformationmart for intensive care (mimic).PhysioNet, 1:e5, 2011

2011

[8] [5]

Multi- stageadaptivefilterforecgsignalprocessing

RizwanQureshi,MuhammadUzair,andKhurramKhurshid. Multi- stageadaptivefilterforecgsignalprocessing. In2017International conference on Communication, Computing and Digital Systems (c- code), pages 363–368. IEEE, 2017

2017