Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 96 references

The Natural History of 'Oumuamua

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read All observations of 'Oumuamua match expectations for a natural interstellar minor body.

desk verdict This is a review that collects existing work to argue all 'Oumuamua observations fit natural Solar System models, without new data or calculations. read the letter →

arxiv 1907.01910 v1 pith:JACLPX3C submitted 2019-07-03 astro-ph.EP

The 'Oumuamua ISSI Team (Michele T. Bannister , Asmita Bhandare , Piotr A. Dybczyński , Alan Fitzsimmons , Aurélie Guilbert-Lepoutre , Robert Jedicke , Matthew M. Knight , Karen J. Meech
show 6 more authors
Andrew McNeill Susanne Pfalzner Sean N. Raymond Colin Snodgrass David E. Trilling Quanzhi Ye)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EP
keywords OumuamuainterstellarobjectnaturaloriginminorbodiesplanetarysystemevolutionplanetesimalsSolaranalogs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews the sparse data on the first confirmed interstellar object and concludes that its path, brightness changes, and lack of visible outgassing are all reproducible with standard models of planetesimals flung out of other planetary systems. This conclusion rests on direct analogies to the shapes, compositions, and dynamics of Solar System comets and asteroids. A reader would care because the claim removes the need for exotic or artificial explanations while still flagging specific gaps in current data. The authors note that better statistics on future interstellar objects will test whether the same models continue to hold.

What carries the argument

Direct mapping of 'Oumuamua's measured trajectory, light curve, and non-detection of activity onto the known properties of ejected planetesimals from other stars.

What would settle it

A spectrum or non-gravitational acceleration pattern from 'Oumuamua or a second interstellar object that cannot be reproduced by any known Solar System comet or asteroid composition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The observations of 'Oumuamua are consistent with a purely natural origin. Its characteristics are explained by our knowledge of natural minor bodies in the Solar System and the evolution of planetary systems.

Load-bearing premise

Existing models of Solar System minor bodies and planetary system evolution are complete enough to cover every observed trait of this interstellar object.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • No new physical mechanisms are required to account for the object's observed behavior.
  • Planetary systems routinely eject planetesimals that can reach other stars at detectable rates.
  • The same population models used for Solar System bodies should predict the properties of future interstellar visitors.
  • Gaps remain in composition and surface evolution that require targeted follow-up observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the claim holds, the next interstellar object should also fit natural models once comparable data are obtained.
  • This view links the single detection to statistical questions about how many planetesimals are ejected per star.
  • Improved modeling of outgassing or shape effects on interstellar objects would be a direct next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews observations of the first confirmed interstellar object 1I/2017 U1 ('Oumuamua), concluding that its properties—including elongated shape, tumbling rotation, non-gravitational acceleration, and absence of coma or detectable volatiles—are in all cases consistent with a purely natural origin. Explanations are drawn from established knowledge of Solar System minor bodies and planetary-system formation/evolution models, with several areas flagged for further investigation.

Significance. If the consistency arguments hold, the review provides a useful synthesis that places 'Oumuamua within standard minor-body physics, crediting the completeness of existing Solar System literature and models for explaining all reported features without new mechanisms. Explicitly naming open questions strengthens its utility for interpreting future interstellar objects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Discussion of non-gravitational acceleration] The central claim that non-gravitational acceleration is consistent with natural processes (e.g., outgassing) rests on Solar System analogies; without quantitative bounds on expected acceleration for an interstellar body whose formation environment may differ, the 'in all cases' statement lacks a direct test against the observed value.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the text which specific literature references supply the quantitative constraints for each feature (shape, rotation, acceleration) so readers can trace the consistency arguments without external lookup.
  2. Add a short table summarizing the key observed properties, the natural explanation invoked, and the supporting Solar System reference(s) for each.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review. The single major comment is addressed below, and we will incorporate revisions to strengthen the discussion of non-gravitational acceleration.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that non-gravitational acceleration is consistent with natural processes (e.g., outgassing) rests on Solar System analogies; without quantitative bounds on expected acceleration for an interstellar body whose formation environment may differ, the 'in all cases' statement lacks a direct test against the observed value.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit quantitative comparison. While the observed non-gravitational acceleration is consistent with outgassing models calibrated on Solar System comets (scaled for size, density, and activity), we acknowledge that interstellar formation conditions could alter volatile content. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph providing order-of-magnitude bounds on expected acceleration from plausible outgassing rates (drawing on published thermophysical models), directly comparing these to the measured value, and reiterating the uncertainties arising from unknown composition. This will make the consistency argument more quantitative without altering the overall conclusion that no new physics is required. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review synthesis draws on external literature; no load-bearing self-reference or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a review paper whose central claim is that all reported 'Oumuamua properties are consistent with natural minor-body physics and planetary-system formation models drawn from the existing literature. The text presents no new derivations, parameter fits, or predictions; it instead summarizes external observations and models. No self-citation chain is invoked to force the conclusion, no ansatz is smuggled, and no quantity is renamed as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of Solar System minor body models and planetary evolution knowledge to an interstellar object; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Knowledge of natural minor bodies in the Solar System provides a sufficient template for all observed properties of interstellar objects.
    Invoked to conclude that observations match natural expectations.
  • domain assumption Current models of planetary system evolution can produce and eject objects with the observed characteristics of 'Oumuamua.
    Used to support the natural origin interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Natural History of 'Oumuamua." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JACLPX3C

@misc{pith2026190701910,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Natural History of 'Oumuamua},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JACLPX3C}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1907.01910}
}
read the original abstract

The discovery of the first interstellar object passing through the Solar System, 1I/2017 U1 ('Oumuamua), provoked intense and continuing interest from the scientific community and the general public. The faintness of 'Oumuamua, together with the limited time window within which observations were possible, constrained the information available on its dynamics and physical state. Here we review our knowledge and find that in all cases the observations are consistent with a purely natural origin for 'Oumuamua. We discuss how the observed characteristics of 'Oumuamua are explained by our extensive knowledge of natural minor bodies in our Solar System and our current knowledge of the evolution of planetary systems. We highlight several areas requiring further investigation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01910 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Montage of images of ‘Oumuamua showing its point-like unresolved appearance with no hint of detectable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Montage of potential formation scenarios of ‘Oumuamua as a natural planetesimal. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Inferred number density of interstellar objects – for a fixed estimate of the mass density of 0.004–3 Earth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predicted distribution of orbital elements of natural interstellar objects (blue curves are inactive objects, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Meech, K. J. et al. A brief visit from a red and extremely elongated interstellar asteroid. Nature 552, 378–381 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    Jewitt, D. et al. Interstellar Interloper 1I/2017 U1: Observations from the NOT and WIYN Telescopes. Astrophys. J. 850, L36 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Trilling, D. E. et al. Spitzer Observations of Interstellar Object 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astron. J. 156, 261 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Ye, Q.-Z., Zhang, Q., Kelley, M. S. P. & Brown, P. G. 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumuamua) is Hot: Imaging, Spectroscopy, and Search of Meteor Activity. Astrophys. J. Lett. 851, L5 (2017). 1711.02320

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Bannister, M. T. et al. Col-OSSOS: Colors of the Interstellar Planetesimal 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. 851, L38 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Fitzsimmons, A. et al. Spectroscopy and thermal modelling of the first interstellar object 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. Nature Astronomy 2, 133–137 (2018). 1712.06552

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Bolin, B. T. et al. APO Time-resolved Color Photometry of Highly Elongated Interstellar Object 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L2 (2018). 1711.04927

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    F., Maras, A

    Moretti, P. F., Maras, A. & Folco, L. Space weathering, reddening and gardening of asteroids: A complex problem. Advances in Space Research 40, 258–261 (2007)

    work page 2007

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    Fraser, W. C. et al. The tumbling rotational state of 1I/‘Oumuamua. Nature Astronomy 2, 383–386 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Knight, M. M. et al. On the Rotation Period and Shape of the Hyperbolic Asteroid 1I/‘Oumuamua (2017 U1) from Its Lightcurve. Astrophys. J. Lett. 851, L31 (2017). 1711.01402

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    D., Harris, A

    Warner, B. D., Harris, A. W. & Pravec, P. The asteroid lightcurve database. Icarus 202, 134–146 (2009)

    2009

  4. [12]

    Fujiwara, A. et al. The Rubble-Pile Asteroid Itokawa as Observed by Hayabusa. Science 312, 1330–1334 (2006). 11

    2006

  5. [13]

    & Jewitt, D

    Lacerda, P. & Jewitt, D. C. Densities of Solar System Objects from Their Rotational Light Curves.Astron. J. 133, 1393 (2007). astro-ph/0612237

    2007 arXiv

  6. [14]

    M., Fulchignoni, M

    Zappala, V ., Cellino, A., Barucci, A. M., Fulchignoni, M. & Lupishko, D. F. An analysis of the amplitude-phase relationship among asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 231, 548–560 (1990)

    1990

  7. [15]

    McNeill, A., Trilling, D. E. & Mommert, M. Constraints on the Density and Internal Strength of 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 857, L1 (2018). 1803.09864

    2018 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Drahus, M. et al. Tumbling motion of 1I/‘Oumuamua and its implications for the body’s distant past. Nature Astronomy 2, 407–412 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Micheli, M. et al. Non-gravitational acceleration in the trajectory of 1I/2017 U1 (’Oumuamua). Nature 559, 223–226 (2018)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Belton, M. J. S. et al. The Excited Spin State of 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 856, L21 (2018). 1804.03471

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    S., Pisano, D

    Park, R. S., Pisano, D. J., Lazio, T. J. W., Chodas, P. W. & Naidu, S. P. Search for OH 18 cm Radio Emission from 1I/2017 U1 with the Green Bank Telescope. Astron. J. 155, 185 (2018). 1803.10187

    2017 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. et al. Plausible Home Stars of the Interstellar Object ‘Oumuamua Found in Gaia DR2. Astron. J. 156, 205 (2018). 1809.09009

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    McGlynn, T. A. & Chapman, R. D. On the nondetection of extrasolar comets.Astrophys. J. Lett. 346, L105–L108 (1989)

    1989

  14. [22]

    Engelhardt, T. et al. An Observational Upper Limit on the Interstellar Number Density of Asteroids and Comets. Astron. J. 153, 133 (2017). 1702.02237

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Meech, K. J. et al. Inner solar system material discovered in the Oort cloud. Science Advances 2, e1600038 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Project Pan-STARRS and the Outer Solar System

    Jewitt, D. Project Pan-STARRS and the Outer Solar System. Earth Moon and Planets 92, 465–476 (2003)

    2003

  17. [25]

    Haisch, J., Karl E., Lada, E. A. & Lada, C. J. Disk Frequencies and Lifetimes in Young Clusters. Astrophys. J. 553, L153–L156 (2001). astro-ph/0104347

    2001 arXiv

  18. [26]

    & Menten, K

    Pfalzner, S., Steinhausen, M. & Menten, K. Short Dissipation Times of Proto-planetary Disks: An Artifact of Selection Effects? Astrophys. J. 793, L34 (2014). 1409.0978

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Montesinos, B. et al. Incidence of debris discs around FGK stars in the solar neighbourhood. Astron. Astrophys. 593, A51 (2016). 1605.05837

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Wyatt, M. C. Evolution of Debris Disks. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 339–383 (2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    N., Armitage, P

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J., Veras, D., Quintana, E. V . & Barclay, T. Implications of the interstellar object 1I/’Oumuamua for planetary dynamics and planetesimal formation.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476, 3031–3038 (2018). 1711.09599

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    N., Armitage, P

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J. & Veras, D. Interstellar Object ‘Oumuamua as an Extinct Fragment of an Ejected Cometary Planetesimal. Astrophys. J. Lett. 856, L7 (2018). 1803.02840

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    & Morbidelli, A

    Charnoz, S. & Morbidelli, A. Coupling dynamical and collisional evolution of small bodies:. an application to the early ejection of planetesimals from the Jupiter-Saturn region. Icarus 166, 141–156 (2003)

    2003

  24. [32]

    The distribution of comets around stars

    Tremaine, S. The distribution of comets around stars. In Phillips, J. A., Thorsett, S. E. & Kulkarni, S. R. (eds.) Planets Around Pulsars, vol. 36, 335–344 (1993). 12

    1993

  25. [33]

    N., Armitage, P

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J. & Gorelick, N. Planet-Planet Scattering in Planetesimal Disks. II. Predictions for Outer Extrasolar Planetary Systems. Astrophys. J. 711, 772–795 (2010). 1001.3409

    2010 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Holman, M. J. & Wiegert, P. A. Long-Term Stability of Planets in Binary Systems. Astron. J. 117, 621–628 (1999). astro-ph/9809315

    1999 arXiv

  27. [35]

    P., Tamayo, D., Hammond, N., Ali-Dib, M

    Jackson, A. P., Tamayo, D., Hammond, N., Ali-Dib, M. & Rein, H. Ejection of rocky and icy material from binary star systems: implications for the origin and composition of 1I/‘Oumuamua. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478, L49–L53 (2018). 1712.04435

    2018 arXiv

  28. [36]

    & Pfalzner, S

    Vincke, K. & Pfalzner, S. Cluster Dynamics Largely Shapes Protoplanetary Disk Sizes. Astrophys. J. 828, 48 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    O., Dehnen, W., Gration, A., Stadel, J

    Hands, T. O., Dehnen, W., Gration, A., Stadel, J. & Moore, B. The fate of planetesimal discs in young open clusters: implications for 1I/’Oumuamua, the Kuiper belt, the Oort cloud and more.arXiv e-prints (2019). 1901. 02465

    2019

  30. [38]

    Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution

    Veras, D. Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution. Royal Society Open Science 3, 150571 (2016). 1601. 05419

    2016

  31. [39]

    Trilling, D. E. et al. Implications for Planetary System Formation from Interstellar Object 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumua- mua). Astrophys. J. Lett. 850, L38 (2017). 1711.01344

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Do, A., Tucker, M. A. & Tonry, J. Interstellar Interlopers: Number Density and Origin of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects. Astrophys. J. Lett. 855, L10 (2018). 1801.02821

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    & Loeb, A

    Bialy, S. & Loeb, A. Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain ‘Oumuamua’s Peculiar Acceleration? Astrophys. J. 868, L1 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A., Turner, E. L. & Loeb, A. Will the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Detect Extra-Solar Plan- etesimals Entering the Solar System? Astrophys. J. 704, 733–742 (2009). 0908.3948

    2009 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Kroupa, P., Tout, C. A. & Gilmore, G. The distribution of low-mass stars in the Galactic disc. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 262, 545–587 (1993)

    1993

  36. [44]

    Cassan, A. et al. One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature 481, 167–169 (2012). 1202.0903

    2012 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Mayor, M. et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets XXXIV . Occurrence, mass distribution and orbital properties of super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets. arXiv e-prints (2011). 1109.2497

    2011 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Johnson, J. A. et al. A New Planet around an M Dwarf: Revealing a Correlation between Exoplanets and Stellar Mass. Astrophys. J. 670, 833–840 (2007). 0707.2409

    2007 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 409–447 (2015). 1410.4199

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Suzuki, D. et al. The Exoplanet Mass-ratio Function from the MOA-II Survey: Discovery of a Break and Likely Peak at a Neptune Mass. Astrophys. J. 833, 145 (2016). 1612.03939

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Zhang, S. et al. The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet-Disk Interactions Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, L47 (2018). 1812.04045

    2018 arXiv

  42. [50]

    N., Hersant, F

    Izidoro, A., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., Hersant, F. & Pierens, A. Accretion of Uranus and Neptune from inward-migrating planetary embryos blocked by Jupiter and Saturn. Astron. Astrophys. 582, A99 (2015). 1506. 03029. 13

    2015

  43. [51]

    Rafikov, R. R. 1I/2017 ‘Oumuamua-like Interstellar Asteroids as Possible Messengers from Dead Stars. Astrophys. J. 861, 35 (2018). 1801.02658

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Origin of 1I/‘Oumuamua

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A. Origin of 1I/‘Oumuamua. I. An Ejected Protoplanetary Disk Object? Astrophys. J. 866, 131 (2018). 1810.02148

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Origin of 1I/‘Oumuamua

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A. Origin of 1I/‘Oumuamua. II. An Ejected Exo-Oort Cloud Object? Astron. J. 157, 86 (2019). 1811.00023

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    B., Armitage, P

    Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., Youdin, A. N. & Li, R. Evidence for Universality in the Initial Planetesimal Mass Function. Astrophys. J. Lett. 847, L12 (2017). 1705.03889

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    & Johansen, A

    Sch ¨afer, U., Yang, C.-C. & Johansen, A. Initial mass function of planetesimals formed by the streaming instability. Astron. Astrophys. 597, A69 (2017). 1611.02285

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dohnanyi, J. S. Collisional Model of Asteroids and Their Debris. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 2531–2554 (1969)

    1969

  49. [57]

    Pajola, M. et al. Size-frequency distribution of boulders ≥7 m on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Astron. Astrophys. 583, A37 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Burgasser, A. J. et al. The Brown Dwarf Kinematics Project (BDKP). IV . Radial Velocities of 85 Late-M and L Dwarfs with MagE. Astrophys. J. Supp. Ser. 220, 18 (2015). 1507.00057

    2015 arXiv

  51. [59]

    R., Freeman, K

    Anguiano, B., Majewski, S. R., Freeman, K. C., Mitschang, A. W. & Smith, M. C. The velocity ellipsoid in the Galactic disc using Gaia DR1. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474, 854–865 (2018). 1710.08479

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    & Cai, M

    Portegies Zwart, S., Torres, S., Pelupessy, I., B ´edorf, J. & Cai, M. X. The origin of interstellar asteroidal objects like 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 479, L17–L22 (2018). 1711.03558

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    & Rocha-Pinto, H

    Almeida-Fernandes, F. & Rocha-Pinto, H. J. A kinematical age for the interstellar object 1I/‘Oumuamua. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 480, 4903–4911 (2018). 1808.03637

    2018 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Meech, K. J. & Svoren, J. Using cometary activity to trace the physical and chemical evolution of cometary nuclei, Comets II (ed. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller, H.A. Weaver) 317–335 (2004)

    2004

  55. [63]

    P ¨atzold, M. et al. The nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko - Part I: The global view - nucleus mass, mass loss, porosity and implications. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    & Batygin, K

    Seligman, D., Laughlin, G. & Batygin, K. On the Anomalous Acceleration of 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. arXiv e-prints (2019). 1903.04723

    2017 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Fern ´andez, Y . R.et al. Physical Properties of the Nucleus of Comet 2P/Encke. Icarus 147, 145–160 (2000)

    2000

  58. [66]

    Comet Bowell (1980b) - an active-looking dormant object

    Sekanina, Z. Comet Bowell (1980b) - an active-looking dormant object. Astron. J. 87, 161–169 (1982)

    1982

  59. [67]

    Comet Yanaka (1988r) - A new class of carbon-poor comet

    Fink, U. Comet Yanaka (1988r) - A new class of carbon-poor comet. Science 257, 1926–1929 (1992)

    1926

  60. [68]

    Schleicher, D. G. The Extremely Anomalous Molecular Abundances of Comet 96P/Machholz 1 from Narrowband Photometry. Astron. J. 136, 2204–2213 (2008)

    2008

  61. [69]

    A’Hearn, M. F. et al. Cometary V olatiles and the Origin of Comets.Astrophys. J. 758, 29 (2012)

    2012

  62. [70]

    Ootsubo, T. et al. AKARI Near-infrared Spectroscopic Survey for CO 2 in 18 Comets. Astrophys. J. 752, 15 (2012)

    2012

  63. [71]

    Biver, N. et al. The extraordinary composition of the blue comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS). Astron. Astrophys. 619, A127 (2018). 1809.08086. 14

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    & Laughlin, G

    Seligman, D. & Laughlin, G. The Feasibility and Benefits of In Situ Exploration of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects. Astron. J. 155, 217 (2018). 1803.07022

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    & Festou, M

    Rickman, H., Kamel, L., Froeschle, C. & Festou, M. C. Nongravitational effects and the aging of periodic comets. Astron. J. 102, 1446–1463 (1991)

    1991

  66. [74]

    Nesvorn ´y, D. et al. Origin and Evolution of Short-period Comets. Astrophys. J. 845, 27 (2017). 1706.07447

    2017 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Micheli, M., Tholen, D. J. & Elliott, G. T. Detection of radiation pressure acting on 2009 BD. New Astronomy 17, 446–452 (2012). 1106.0564

    2009 arXiv

  68. [76]

    & Kracht, R

    Sekanina, Z. & Kracht, R. Preperihelion Outbursts and Disintegration of Comet C/2017 S3 (Pan-STARRS). arXiv e-prints (2018). 1812.07054

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Could 1I/‘Oumuamua be an Icy Fractal Aggregate? Astrophys

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A. Could 1I/‘Oumuamua be an Icy Fractal Aggregate? Astrophys. J. Lett. 872, L32 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Six Strange Facts About‘Oumuamua

    Loeb, A. Six Strange Facts About‘Oumuamua. ArXiv e-prints (2018). 1811.08832

    2018 arXiv

  71. [79]

    & Loeb, A

    Siraj, A. & Loeb, A. ‘Oumuamua’s Geometry Could Be More Extreme than Previously Inferred. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 3, 15 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Thomas, C. A. et al. ExploreNEOs. V . Average Albedo by Taxonomic Complex in the Near-Earth Asteroid Population. Astron. J. 142, 85 (2011)

    2011

  73. [81]

    Kokotanekova, R. et al. Rotation of cometary nuclei: new light curves and an update of the ensemble properties of Jupiter-family comets. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471, 2974–3007 (2017). 1707.02133

    2017 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Katz, J. I. Why is interstellar object 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumuamua) rocky, tumbling and possibly very prolate? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478, L95–L98 (2018). 1802.02273

    2017 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Rafikov, R. R. Spin Evolution and Cometary Interpretation of the Interstellar Minor Object 1I/2017 ‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 867, L17 (2018). 1809.06389

    2017 arXiv

  76. [84]

    1I/‘Oumuamua as a Tidal Disruption Fragment from a Binary Star System

    ´Cuk, M. 1I/‘Oumuamua as a Tidal Disruption Fragment from a Binary Star System. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L15 (2018). 1712.01823

    2018 arXiv

  77. [85]

    ´A., Szab ´o, G

    Domokos, G., Sipos, A. ´A., Szab ´o, G. M. & V ´arkonyi, P. L. Formation of Sharp Edges and Planar Areas of Asteroids by Polyhedral Abrasion. Astrophys. J. Lett. 699, L13–L16 (2009). 0904.4423

    2009 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Vavilov, D. E. & Medvedev, Y . D. Dust bombardment can explain the extremely elongated shape of 1I/’Oumuamua and the lack of interstellar objects. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. (2019). 1812.11334

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    & Inutsuka, S.-i

    Sugiura, K., Kobayashi, H. & Inutsuka, S.-i. Collisional Elongation: Possible Origin of Extremely Elongated Shape of 1I/‘Oumuamua. arXiv e-prints (2019). 1903.06373

    2019 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Stern, S. A. et al. Overview of initial results from the reconnaissance flyby of a Kuiper Belt planetesimal: 2014 MU69. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1901.02578 (2019). 1901.02578

    2014 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Pravec, P. et al. Tumbling asteroids. Icarus 173, 108–131 (2005)

    2005

  82. [90]

    A., Krause, A

    Kwiecinski, J. A., Krause, A. L. & Van Gorder, R. A. Effects of tidal torques on 1I/2017 U1 (’Oumuamua).Icarus 311, 170–174 (2018)

    2017

  83. [91]

    I., S ´anchez-Hern´andez, O., Sucerquia, M

    Zuluaga, J. I., S ´anchez-Hern´andez, O., Sucerquia, M. & Ferr´ın, I. A General Method for Assessing the Origin of Interstellar Small Bodies: The Case of 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumuamua). Astron. J. 155, 236 (2018). 1711.09397

    2017 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Dybczy ´nski, P. A. & Kr´olikowska, M. Investigating the dynamical history of the interstellar object ’Oumuamua. Astron. Astrophys. 610, L11 (2018). 1711.06618. 15

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Prospects for Backtracing 1I/‘Oumuamua and Future Interstellar Objects

    Zhang, Q. Prospects for Backtracing 1I/‘Oumuamua and Future Interstellar Objects. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L13 (2018). 1712.08059

    2018 arXiv

  86. [94]

    What and whence 1I/‘Oumuamua: a contact binary from the debris of a young planetary system? Mon

    Gaidos, E. What and whence 1I/‘Oumuamua: a contact binary from the debris of a young planetary system? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 477, 5692–5699 (2018). 1712.06721

    2018 arXiv

  87. [95]

    & Jones, H

    Feng, F. & Jones, H. R. A. ‘Oumuamua as a Messenger from the Local Association. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L27 (2018). 1711.08800

    2018 arXiv

  88. [96]

    V ., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M

    Cook, N. V ., Ragozzine, D., Granvik, M. & Stephens, D. C. Realistic Detectability of Close Interstellar Comets. Astrophys. J. 825, 51 (2016). 1607.08162. 16

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.