pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.01910 · v1 · pith:JACLPX3Cnew · submitted 2019-07-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

The Natural History of 'Oumuamua

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 09:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords Oumuamuainterstellar objectnatural originminor bodiesplanetary system evolutionplanetesimalsSolar System analogs
0
0 comments X

The pith

All observations of 'Oumuamua match expectations for a natural interstellar minor body.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews the sparse data on the first confirmed interstellar object and concludes that its path, brightness changes, and lack of visible outgassing are all reproducible with standard models of planetesimals flung out of other planetary systems. This conclusion rests on direct analogies to the shapes, compositions, and dynamics of Solar System comets and asteroids. A reader would care because the claim removes the need for exotic or artificial explanations while still flagging specific gaps in current data. The authors note that better statistics on future interstellar objects will test whether the same models continue to hold.

Core claim

The observations of 'Oumuamua are consistent with a purely natural origin. Its characteristics are explained by our knowledge of natural minor bodies in the Solar System and the evolution of planetary systems.

What carries the argument

Direct mapping of 'Oumuamua's measured trajectory, light curve, and non-detection of activity onto the known properties of ejected planetesimals from other stars.

If this is right

  • No new physical mechanisms are required to account for the object's observed behavior.
  • Planetary systems routinely eject planetesimals that can reach other stars at detectable rates.
  • The same population models used for Solar System bodies should predict the properties of future interstellar visitors.
  • Gaps remain in composition and surface evolution that require targeted follow-up observations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the claim holds, the next interstellar object should also fit natural models once comparable data are obtained.
  • This view links the single detection to statistical questions about how many planetesimals are ejected per star.
  • Improved modeling of outgassing or shape effects on interstellar objects would be a direct next step.

Load-bearing premise

Existing models of Solar System minor bodies and planetary system evolution are complete enough to cover every observed trait of this interstellar object.

What would settle it

A spectrum or non-gravitational acceleration pattern from 'Oumuamua or a second interstellar object that cannot be reproduced by any known Solar System comet or asteroid composition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.01910 by Alan Fitzsimmons, Andrew McNeill, Asmita Bhandare, Aur\'elie Guilbert-Lepoutre, Colin Snodgrass, David E. Trilling, Karen J. Meech, Matthew M. Knight, Piotr A. Dybczy\'nski, Quanzhi Ye), Robert Jedicke, Sean N. Raymond, Susanne Pfalzner, The 'Oumuamua ISSI Team (Michele T. Bannister.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Montage of images of ‘Oumuamua showing its point-like unresolved appearance with no hint of detectable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Montage of potential formation scenarios of ‘Oumuamua as a natural planetesimal. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Inferred number density of interstellar objects – for a fixed estimate of the mass density of 0.004–3 Earth [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Predicted distribution of orbital elements of natural interstellar objects (blue curves are inactive objects, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The discovery of the first interstellar object passing through the Solar System, 1I/2017 U1 ('Oumuamua), provoked intense and continuing interest from the scientific community and the general public. The faintness of 'Oumuamua, together with the limited time window within which observations were possible, constrained the information available on its dynamics and physical state. Here we review our knowledge and find that in all cases the observations are consistent with a purely natural origin for 'Oumuamua. We discuss how the observed characteristics of 'Oumuamua are explained by our extensive knowledge of natural minor bodies in our Solar System and our current knowledge of the evolution of planetary systems. We highlight several areas requiring further investigation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews observations of the first confirmed interstellar object 1I/2017 U1 ('Oumuamua), concluding that its properties—including elongated shape, tumbling rotation, non-gravitational acceleration, and absence of coma or detectable volatiles—are in all cases consistent with a purely natural origin. Explanations are drawn from established knowledge of Solar System minor bodies and planetary-system formation/evolution models, with several areas flagged for further investigation.

Significance. If the consistency arguments hold, the review provides a useful synthesis that places 'Oumuamua within standard minor-body physics, crediting the completeness of existing Solar System literature and models for explaining all reported features without new mechanisms. Explicitly naming open questions strengthens its utility for interpreting future interstellar objects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Discussion of non-gravitational acceleration] The central claim that non-gravitational acceleration is consistent with natural processes (e.g., outgassing) rests on Solar System analogies; without quantitative bounds on expected acceleration for an interstellar body whose formation environment may differ, the 'in all cases' statement lacks a direct test against the observed value.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify in the text which specific literature references supply the quantitative constraints for each feature (shape, rotation, acceleration) so readers can trace the consistency arguments without external lookup.
  2. Add a short table summarizing the key observed properties, the natural explanation invoked, and the supporting Solar System reference(s) for each.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review. The single major comment is addressed below, and we will incorporate revisions to strengthen the discussion of non-gravitational acceleration.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim that non-gravitational acceleration is consistent with natural processes (e.g., outgassing) rests on Solar System analogies; without quantitative bounds on expected acceleration for an interstellar body whose formation environment may differ, the 'in all cases' statement lacks a direct test against the observed value.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from a more explicit quantitative comparison. While the observed non-gravitational acceleration is consistent with outgassing models calibrated on Solar System comets (scaled for size, density, and activity), we acknowledge that interstellar formation conditions could alter volatile content. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph providing order-of-magnitude bounds on expected acceleration from plausible outgassing rates (drawing on published thermophysical models), directly comparing these to the measured value, and reiterating the uncertainties arising from unknown composition. This will make the consistency argument more quantitative without altering the overall conclusion that no new physics is required. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review synthesis draws on external literature; no load-bearing self-reference or fitted predictions

full rationale

This is a review paper whose central claim is that all reported 'Oumuamua properties are consistent with natural minor-body physics and planetary-system formation models drawn from the existing literature. The text presents no new derivations, parameter fits, or predictions; it instead summarizes external observations and models. No self-citation chain is invoked to force the conclusion, no ansatz is smuggled, and no quantity is renamed as a prediction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of Solar System minor body models and planetary evolution knowledge to an interstellar object; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Knowledge of natural minor bodies in the Solar System provides a sufficient template for all observed properties of interstellar objects.
    Invoked to conclude that observations match natural expectations.
  • domain assumption Current models of planetary system evolution can produce and eject objects with the observed characteristics of 'Oumuamua.
    Used to support the natural origin interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5730 in / 1225 out tokens · 41992 ms · 2026-05-25T09:48:10.077787+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 57 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Meech, K. J. et al. A brief visit from a red and extremely elongated interstellar asteroid. Nature 552, 378–381 (2017)

  2. [2]

    Jewitt, D. et al. Interstellar Interloper 1I/2017 U1: Observations from the NOT and WIYN Telescopes. Astrophys. J. 850, L36 (2017)

  3. [3]

    Trilling, D. E. et al. Spitzer Observations of Interstellar Object 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astron. J. 156, 261 (2018)

  4. [4]

    Ye, Q.-Z., Zhang, Q., Kelley, M. S. P. & Brown, P. G. 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumuamua) is Hot: Imaging, Spectroscopy, and Search of Meteor Activity. Astrophys. J. Lett. 851, L5 (2017). 1711.02320

  5. [5]

    Bannister, M. T. et al. Col-OSSOS: Colors of the Interstellar Planetesimal 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. 851, L38 (2017)

  6. [6]

    Fitzsimmons, A. et al. Spectroscopy and thermal modelling of the first interstellar object 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. Nature Astronomy 2, 133–137 (2018). 1712.06552

  7. [7]

    Bolin, B. T. et al. APO Time-resolved Color Photometry of Highly Elongated Interstellar Object 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 852, L2 (2018). 1711.04927

  8. [8]

    F., Maras, A

    Moretti, P. F., Maras, A. & Folco, L. Space weathering, reddening and gardening of asteroids: A complex problem. Advances in Space Research 40, 258–261 (2007)

  9. [9]

    Fraser, W. C. et al. The tumbling rotational state of 1I/‘Oumuamua. Nature Astronomy 2, 383–386 (2018)

  10. [10]

    Knight, M. M. et al. On the Rotation Period and Shape of the Hyperbolic Asteroid 1I/‘Oumuamua (2017 U1) from Its Lightcurve. Astrophys. J. Lett. 851, L31 (2017). 1711.01402

  11. [11]

    D., Harris, A

    Warner, B. D., Harris, A. W. & Pravec, P. The asteroid lightcurve database. Icarus 202, 134–146 (2009)

  12. [12]

    Fujiwara, A. et al. The Rubble-Pile Asteroid Itokawa as Observed by Hayabusa. Science 312, 1330–1334 (2006). 11

  13. [13]

    Densities of Solar System Objects from their Rotational Lightcurves

    Lacerda, P. & Jewitt, D. C. Densities of Solar System Objects from Their Rotational Light Curves.Astron. J. 133, 1393 (2007). astro-ph/0612237

  14. [14]

    M., Fulchignoni, M

    Zappala, V ., Cellino, A., Barucci, A. M., Fulchignoni, M. & Lupishko, D. F. An analysis of the amplitude-phase relationship among asteroids. Astron. Astrophys. 231, 548–560 (1990)

  15. [15]

    McNeill, A., Trilling, D. E. & Mommert, M. Constraints on the Density and Internal Strength of 1I/‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 857, L1 (2018). 1803.09864

  16. [16]

    Drahus, M. et al. Tumbling motion of 1I/‘Oumuamua and its implications for the body’s distant past. Nature Astronomy 2, 407–412 (2018)

  17. [17]

    Micheli, M. et al. Non-gravitational acceleration in the trajectory of 1I/2017 U1 (’Oumuamua). Nature 559, 223–226 (2018)

  18. [18]

    Belton, M. J. S. et al. The Excited Spin State of 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. Astrophys. J. Lett. 856, L21 (2018). 1804.03471

  19. [19]

    Search for OH 18-cm radio emission from 1I/2017 U1 with the Green Bank telescope

    Park, R. S., Pisano, D. J., Lazio, T. J. W., Chodas, P. W. & Naidu, S. P. Search for OH 18 cm Radio Emission from 1I/2017 U1 with the Green Bank Telescope. Astron. J. 155, 185 (2018). 1803.10187

  20. [20]

    Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. et al. Plausible Home Stars of the Interstellar Object ‘Oumuamua Found in Gaia DR2. Astron. J. 156, 205 (2018). 1809.09009

  21. [21]

    McGlynn, T. A. & Chapman, R. D. On the nondetection of extrasolar comets.Astrophys. J. Lett. 346, L105–L108 (1989)

  22. [22]

    Engelhardt, T. et al. An Observational Upper Limit on the Interstellar Number Density of Asteroids and Comets. Astron. J. 153, 133 (2017). 1702.02237

  23. [23]

    Meech, K. J. et al. Inner solar system material discovered in the Oort cloud. Science Advances 2, e1600038 (2016)

  24. [24]

    Project Pan-STARRS and the Outer Solar System

    Jewitt, D. Project Pan-STARRS and the Outer Solar System. Earth Moon and Planets 92, 465–476 (2003)

  25. [25]

    Haisch, J., Karl E., Lada, E. A. & Lada, C. J. Disk Frequencies and Lifetimes in Young Clusters. Astrophys. J. 553, L153–L156 (2001). astro-ph/0104347

  26. [26]

    Short dissipation times of proto-planetary discs - an artifact of selection effects?

    Pfalzner, S., Steinhausen, M. & Menten, K. Short Dissipation Times of Proto-planetary Disks: An Artifact of Selection Effects? Astrophys. J. 793, L34 (2014). 1409.0978

  27. [27]

    Montesinos, B. et al. Incidence of debris discs around FGK stars in the solar neighbourhood. Astron. Astrophys. 593, A51 (2016). 1605.05837

  28. [28]

    Wyatt, M. C. Evolution of Debris Disks. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 339–383 (2008)

  29. [29]

    Implications of the interstellar object 1I/'Oumuamua for planetary dynamics and planetesimal formation

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J., Veras, D., Quintana, E. V . & Barclay, T. Implications of the interstellar object 1I/’Oumuamua for planetary dynamics and planetesimal formation.Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476, 3031–3038 (2018). 1711.09599

  30. [30]

    Interstellar object 'Oumuamua as an extinct fragment of an ejected cometary planetesimal

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J. & Veras, D. Interstellar Object ‘Oumuamua as an Extinct Fragment of an Ejected Cometary Planetesimal. Astrophys. J. Lett. 856, L7 (2018). 1803.02840

  31. [31]

    & Morbidelli, A

    Charnoz, S. & Morbidelli, A. Coupling dynamical and collisional evolution of small bodies:. an application to the early ejection of planetesimals from the Jupiter-Saturn region. Icarus 166, 141–156 (2003)

  32. [32]

    The distribution of comets around stars

    Tremaine, S. The distribution of comets around stars. In Phillips, J. A., Thorsett, S. E. & Kulkarni, S. R. (eds.) Planets Around Pulsars, vol. 36, 335–344 (1993). 12

  33. [33]

    Planet-planet scattering in planetesimal disks II: Predictions for outer extrasolar planetary systems

    Raymond, S. N., Armitage, P. J. & Gorelick, N. Planet-Planet Scattering in Planetesimal Disks. II. Predictions for Outer Extrasolar Planetary Systems. Astrophys. J. 711, 772–795 (2010). 1001.3409

  34. [34]

    Holman, M. J. & Wiegert, P. A. Long-Term Stability of Planets in Binary Systems. Astron. J. 117, 621–628 (1999). astro-ph/9809315

  35. [35]

    Ejection of rocky and icy material from binary star systems: Implications for the origin and composition of 1I/`Oumuamua

    Jackson, A. P., Tamayo, D., Hammond, N., Ali-Dib, M. & Rein, H. Ejection of rocky and icy material from binary star systems: implications for the origin and composition of 1I/‘Oumuamua. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478, L49–L53 (2018). 1712.04435

  36. [36]

    & Pfalzner, S

    Vincke, K. & Pfalzner, S. Cluster Dynamics Largely Shapes Protoplanetary Disk Sizes. Astrophys. J. 828, 48 (2016)

  37. [37]

    O., Dehnen, W., Gration, A., Stadel, J

    Hands, T. O., Dehnen, W., Gration, A., Stadel, J. & Moore, B. The fate of planetesimal discs in young open clusters: implications for 1I/’Oumuamua, the Kuiper belt, the Oort cloud and more.arXiv e-prints (2019). 1901. 02465

  38. [38]

    Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution

    Veras, D. Post-main-sequence planetary system evolution. Royal Society Open Science 3, 150571 (2016). 1601. 05419

  39. [39]

    Trilling, D. E. et al. Implications for Planetary System Formation from Interstellar Object 1I/2017 U1 (‘Oumua- mua). Astrophys. J. Lett. 850, L38 (2017). 1711.01344

  40. [40]

    Do, A., Tucker, M. A. & Tonry, J. Interstellar Interlopers: Number Density and Origin of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects. Astrophys. J. Lett. 855, L10 (2018). 1801.02821

  41. [41]

    & Loeb, A

    Bialy, S. & Loeb, A. Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain ‘Oumuamua’s Peculiar Acceleration? Astrophys. J. 868, L1 (2018)

  42. [42]

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A., Turner, E. L. & Loeb, A. Will the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Detect Extra-Solar Plan- etesimals Entering the Solar System? Astrophys. J. 704, 733–742 (2009). 0908.3948

  43. [43]

    Kroupa, P., Tout, C. A. & Gilmore, G. The distribution of low-mass stars in the Galactic disc. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 262, 545–587 (1993)

  44. [44]

    Cassan, A. et al. One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature 481, 167–169 (2012). 1202.0903

  45. [45]

    Mayor, M. et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets XXXIV . Occurrence, mass distribution and orbital properties of super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets. arXiv e-prints (2011). 1109.2497

  46. [46]

    Johnson, J. A. et al. A New Planet around an M Dwarf: Revealing a Correlation between Exoplanets and Stellar Mass. Astrophys. J. 670, 833–840 (2007). 0707.2409

  47. [47]

    Winn, J. N. & Fabrycky, D. C. The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53, 409–447 (2015). 1410.4199

  48. [48]

    Suzuki, D. et al. The Exoplanet Mass-ratio Function from the MOA-II Survey: Discovery of a Break and Likely Peak at a Neptune Mass. Astrophys. J. 833, 145 (2016). 1612.03939

  49. [49]

    Zhang, S. et al. The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VII. The Planet-Disk Interactions Interpretation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 869, L47 (2018). 1812.04045

  50. [50]

    N., Hersant, F

    Izidoro, A., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., Hersant, F. & Pierens, A. Accretion of Uranus and Neptune from inward-migrating planetary embryos blocked by Jupiter and Saturn. Astron. Astrophys. 582, A99 (2015). 1506. 03029. 13

  51. [51]

    Rafikov, R. R. 1I/2017 ‘Oumuamua-like Interstellar Asteroids as Possible Messengers from Dead Stars. Astrophys. J. 861, 35 (2018). 1801.02658

  52. [52]

    Origin of 1I/'Oumuamua. I. An ejected protoplanetary disk object?

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A. Origin of 1I/‘Oumuamua. I. An Ejected Protoplanetary Disk Object? Astrophys. J. 866, 131 (2018). 1810.02148

  53. [53]

    Origin of 1I/'Oumuamua. II. An ejected exo-Oort cloud object?

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A. Origin of 1I/‘Oumuamua. II. An Ejected Exo-Oort Cloud Object? Astron. J. 157, 86 (2019). 1811.00023

  54. [54]

    Evidence for universality in the initial planetesimal mass function

    Simon, J. B., Armitage, P. J., Youdin, A. N. & Li, R. Evidence for Universality in the Initial Planetesimal Mass Function. Astrophys. J. Lett. 847, L12 (2017). 1705.03889

  55. [55]

    Initial mass function of planetesimals formed by the streaming instability

    Sch ¨afer, U., Yang, C.-C. & Johansen, A. Initial mass function of planetesimals formed by the streaming instability. Astron. Astrophys. 597, A69 (2017). 1611.02285

  56. [56]

    Dohnanyi, J. S. Collisional Model of Asteroids and Their Debris. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 2531–2554 (1969)

  57. [57]

    Pajola, M. et al. Size-frequency distribution of boulders ≥7 m on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Astron. Astrophys. 583, A37 (2015)

  58. [58]

    Burgasser, A. J. et al. The Brown Dwarf Kinematics Project (BDKP). IV . Radial Velocities of 85 Late-M and L Dwarfs with MagE. Astrophys. J. Supp. Ser. 220, 18 (2015). 1507.00057

  59. [59]

    The velocity ellipsoid in the Galactic disc using Gaia DR1

    Anguiano, B., Majewski, S. R., Freeman, K. C., Mitschang, A. W. & Smith, M. C. The velocity ellipsoid in the Galactic disc using Gaia DR1. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474, 854–865 (2018). 1710.08479

  60. [60]

    The origin of interstellar asteroidal objects like 1I/2017 U1 'Oumuamua

    Portegies Zwart, S., Torres, S., Pelupessy, I., B ´edorf, J. & Cai, M. X. The origin of interstellar asteroidal objects like 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 479, L17–L22 (2018). 1711.03558

  61. [61]

    A kinematical age for the interstellar object 1I/'Oumuamua

    Almeida-Fernandes, F. & Rocha-Pinto, H. J. A kinematical age for the interstellar object 1I/‘Oumuamua. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 480, 4903–4911 (2018). 1808.03637

  62. [62]

    Meech, K. J. & Svoren, J. Using cometary activity to trace the physical and chemical evolution of cometary nuclei, Comets II (ed. M.C. Festou, H.U. Keller, H.A. Weaver) 317–335 (2004)

  63. [63]

    P ¨atzold, M. et al. The nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko - Part I: The global view - nucleus mass, mass loss, porosity and implications. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. (2018)

  64. [64]

    On the Anomalous Acceleration of 1I/2017 U1 `Oumuamua

    Seligman, D., Laughlin, G. & Batygin, K. On the Anomalous Acceleration of 1I/2017 U1 ‘Oumuamua. arXiv e-prints (2019). 1903.04723

  65. [65]

    Fern ´andez, Y . R.et al. Physical Properties of the Nucleus of Comet 2P/Encke. Icarus 147, 145–160 (2000)

  66. [66]

    Comet Bowell (1980b) - an active-looking dormant object

    Sekanina, Z. Comet Bowell (1980b) - an active-looking dormant object. Astron. J. 87, 161–169 (1982)

  67. [67]

    Comet Yanaka (1988r) - A new class of carbon-poor comet

    Fink, U. Comet Yanaka (1988r) - A new class of carbon-poor comet. Science 257, 1926–1929 (1992)

  68. [68]

    Schleicher, D. G. The Extremely Anomalous Molecular Abundances of Comet 96P/Machholz 1 from Narrowband Photometry. Astron. J. 136, 2204–2213 (2008)

  69. [69]

    A’Hearn, M. F. et al. Cometary V olatiles and the Origin of Comets.Astrophys. J. 758, 29 (2012)

  70. [70]

    Ootsubo, T. et al. AKARI Near-infrared Spectroscopic Survey for CO 2 in 18 Comets. Astrophys. J. 752, 15 (2012)

  71. [71]

    Biver, N. et al. The extraordinary composition of the blue comet C/2016 R2 (PanSTARRS). Astron. Astrophys. 619, A127 (2018). 1809.08086. 14

  72. [72]

    The Feasibility and Benefits of In Situ Exploration of `Oumuamua-like objects

    Seligman, D. & Laughlin, G. The Feasibility and Benefits of In Situ Exploration of ‘Oumuamua-like Objects. Astron. J. 155, 217 (2018). 1803.07022

  73. [73]

    & Festou, M

    Rickman, H., Kamel, L., Froeschle, C. & Festou, M. C. Nongravitational effects and the aging of periodic comets. Astron. J. 102, 1446–1463 (1991)

  74. [74]

    Nesvorn ´y, D. et al. Origin and Evolution of Short-period Comets. Astrophys. J. 845, 27 (2017). 1706.07447

  75. [75]

    Micheli, M., Tholen, D. J. & Elliott, G. T. Detection of radiation pressure acting on 2009 BD. New Astronomy 17, 446–452 (2012). 1106.0564

  76. [76]

    Preperihelion Outbursts and Disintegration of Comet C/2017 S3 (Pan-STARRS)

    Sekanina, Z. & Kracht, R. Preperihelion Outbursts and Disintegration of Comet C/2017 S3 (Pan-STARRS). arXiv e-prints (2018). 1812.07054

  77. [77]

    Could 1I/‘Oumuamua be an Icy Fractal Aggregate? Astrophys

    Moro-Mart ´ın, A. Could 1I/‘Oumuamua be an Icy Fractal Aggregate? Astrophys. J. Lett. 872, L32 (2019)

  78. [78]

    Six Strange Facts About`Oumuamua

    Loeb, A. Six Strange Facts About‘Oumuamua. ArXiv e-prints (2018). 1811.08832

  79. [79]

    & Loeb, A

    Siraj, A. & Loeb, A. ‘Oumuamua’s Geometry Could Be More Extreme than Previously Inferred. Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society 3, 15 (2019)

  80. [80]

    Thomas, C. A. et al. ExploreNEOs. V . Average Albedo by Taxonomic Complex in the Near-Earth Asteroid Population. Astron. J. 142, 85 (2011)

Showing first 80 references.