REVIEW 1 cited by
The Scale of Reddening for Classical Cepheid Variables
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Field reddenings are summarized for 68 Cepheids from published studies and updated results presented here. The compilation forms the basis for a comparison with other published reddening scales of Cepheids, including those established from reddening-independent indices, photometry on the Lick six-color system, Str\"{o}mgren system, Walraven system, Washington system, Cape $BVI$ system, DDO system, and Geneva system, IRSB studies, and Cepheid spectroscopy, both old and new. Reddenings tied to period-color relations are the least reliable, as expected, while photometric color excesses vary in precision, their accuracy depending on the methodology and calibration sample. The tests provide insights into the accuracy and precision of published Cepheid reddening scales, and lead to a new system of standardized reddenings comprising a sample of 198 variables with an average uncertainty of $\pm0.028$ in E$_{B-V}$, the precision being less than $\pm0.01$ for many. The collected color excesses are used to map the dispersion in intrinsic colors as a function of pulsation period, the results contradicting current perceptions about the period dependence of dispersion in Cepheid effective temperatures.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The impact of stellar rotations and binaries on the shape of upper main sequence near turn off in open cluster NGC\,6067
In the open cluster NGC 6067, fast-rotating eMSTO stars are redder and more centrally concentrated than slow rotators, which supports pre-main-sequence star-disk interactions as the origin of the extended main-sequenc...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.