Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine-based Multimodal Pain Assessment Tool for Infants: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1607.00331 v3 pith:JC7PTKAM submitted 2016-07-01 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords paininfantsassessmentautomatedcurrentlimitationsapproachesassess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Bedside caregivers assess infants' pain at constant intervals by observing specific behavioral and physiological signs of pain. This standard has two main limitations. The first limitation is the intermittent assessment of pain, which might lead to missing pain when the infants are left unattended. Second, it is inconsistent since it depends on the observer's subjective judgment and differs between observers. The intermittent and inconsistent assessment can induce poor treatment and, therefore, cause serious long-term consequences. To mitigate these limitations, the current standard can be augmented by an automated system that monitors infants continuously and provides quantitative and consistent assessment of pain. Several automated methods have been introduced to assess infants' pain automatically based on analysis of behavioral or physiological pain indicators. This paper comprehensively reviews the automated approaches (i.e., approaches to feature extraction) for analyzing infants' pain and the current efforts in automatic pain recognition. In addition, it reviews the databases available to the research community and discusses the current limitations of the automated pain assessment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Harnessing the Power of Deep Learning Methods in Healthcare: Neonatal Pain Assessment from Crying Sound

    cs.CV 2019-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a 31-neonate NICU dataset, a lightweight CNN (N-CNN) and VGG16 both reached 96.77% accuracy and 0.94 AUC for classifying pain versus no-pain from cry spectrograms.

Pith tools