Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

"I Always Felt that SomethingWasWrong.": Understanding Compliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies when Highly-Skilled Compliance Knowledge Workers Use Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04576 v3 pith:JD2B5COS submitted 2024-11-07 cs.HC

"I Always Felt that SomethingWasWrong.": Understanding Compliance Risks and Mitigation Strategies when Highly-Skilled Compliance Knowledge Workers Use Large Language Models

classification cs.HC
keywords complianceworkersknowledgeriskswhenllmsmodelsresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed knowledge-intensive has led to its widespread usage by knowledge workers to enhance their productivity. As these professionals handle sensitive information, and the training of text-based GenAI models involves the use of extensive data, there are thus concerns about privacy, security, and broader compliance with regulations and laws. While existing research has addressed privacy and security concerns, the specific compliance risks faced by highly-skilled knowledge workers when using the LLMs, and their mitigation strategies, remain underexplored. As understanding these risks and strategies is crucial for the development of industry-specific compliant LLM mechanisms, this research conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 knowledge workers from knowledge-intensive industries to understand their practices and experiences when integrating LLMs into their workflows. Our research explored how these workers ensure compliance and the resources and challenges they encounter when minimizing risks. Our preliminary findings showed that knowledge workers were concerned about the leakage of sensitive information and took proactive measures such as distorting input data and limiting prompt details to mitigate such risks. Their ability to identify and mitigate risks, however, was significantly hampered by a lack of LLM-specific compliance guidance and training. Our findings highlight the importance of improving knowledge workers' compliance awareness and establishing support systems and compliance cultures within organizations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. How Do You Choose Your AI Component? An Interview Study of Secure AI Integration in Practice

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In interviews, 22 practitioners chose AI models primarily on functionality, cost, and trust in vendors, with security rarely a formal criterion, suggesting the industry is repeating early software supply chain mistakes.

  2. Multi-Agent Firewall Architecture for Privacy Protection of Sensitive Data in Interactions with Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A local multi-agent firewall intercepts LLM web and API traffic and detects sensitive data with hybrid detectors, reaching up to 94.93% F1 on a PII benchmark.