Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide

As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 12 of 12 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.12489.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2608.12489 v1

Coverage vector

measured 12 of 12 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:04.637104Z

measured 12 of 12 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

12 of 12 outbound references displayed

verified exact7
verified fuzzy2
unresolved2
parse uncertain0
malformed identifier1
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 7e80eaf5-b68b-46c4-b532-3eb1f61d7bec · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Unresolved cited work

Reference 2

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:04.849071Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation b787a9ef-e61c-48d2-a146-58b19f9b24c1 · outbound

This paper cites Clipping does not help.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Clipping does not help

Reference 4

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.286958Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation 38911006-a473-49f6-b2eb-576f7622c079 · outbound

This paper cites Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actions.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actions

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:04.597975Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 0740720b-b718-4b7f-a01e-de79c450a313 · outbound

This paper cites poor model.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide poor model

Reference 11

Resolution: malformed identifier; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.227851Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation 12a1a8c3-400d-4aa4-90bf-095aaa89d2b1 · outbound

This paper cites shared ref.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide shared ref

Reference 12

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:04.758497Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation 69ef1131-c185-4106-8d43-d62cd6402da5 · outbound

This paper cites median relative RMSE.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide median relative RMSE

Reference 25

Resolution: verified fuzzy; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.248123Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation f5dee4ee-2d6b-4ac7-b5d8-efeca1edc54e · outbound

This paper cites Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response

Reference 2011

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.174671Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation f3973ebd-012e-48cc-923f-a386c9554dee · outbound

This paper cites Break- ing determinism: Stochastic modeling for reliable off-policy evaluation in ad auctions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03354,.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Break- ing determinism: Stochastic modeling for reliable off-policy evaluation in ad auctions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03354,

Reference 2017

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:04.944571Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation b5918e7d-73ee-4913-9ed6-39d0ccce3dd2 · outbound

This paper cites Logging Policy Design for Off-Policy Evaluation.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Logging Policy Design for Off-Policy Evaluation

Reference 2019

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.204381Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation f78adb0b-88b4-495b-aada-826561615543 · outbound

This paper cites Atlantic Causal Inference Conference (ACIC) Data Analysis Challenge 2017.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Atlantic Causal Inference Conference (ACIC) Data Analysis Challenge 2017

Reference 2022

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:04.586839Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation fdb687eb-d5bd-410d-abbf-bcd882ac2568 · outbound

This paper cites UpliftBench: Revealing Outcome-Regime and Objective Mismatch in Uplift Evaluation.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide UpliftBench: Revealing Outcome-Regime and Objective Mismatch in Uplift Evaluation

Reference 2024

Resolution: verified exact; local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.110356Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Observation 215e8b56-f2a5-4259-b170-f1711790189b · outbound

This paper cites Philip Thomas and Emma Brunskill.

When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide Philip Thomas and Emma Brunskill

Reference 2026

Resolution: verified exact; raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-16T00:16:05.046332Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.