Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Orbital torque switching of room temperature two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Titanium orbital torque switches the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 at room temperature with a current density of about 1.6 × 10⁶ A/cm².

desk verdict First orbital-torque switching of a room-temperature vdW ferromagnet, but the torque source is inferred, not directly measured—send to referees. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04872 v1 pith:JEZQS4FO submitted 2024-12-06 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orbitalHalleffecttorqueFe3GaTe2vanderWaalsferromagnetmagnetizationswitchingtitaniumspin-orbitcorrelationorbitronics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that a titanium layer, a light metal with weak spin-orbit coupling, can switch the magnetization of the two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 at room temperature. The switching current density is about $1.6\times10^{6}$ A/cm$^{2}$, comparable to spin-orbit-torque switching of the same material by heavy metals and topological semimetals. The authors attribute the effect to orbital torque: charge current becomes orbital current in titanium through the orbital Hall effect, and the ferromagnet itself converts that orbital current into spin current through its strong spin-orbit correlation. If correct, the finding means efficient torque switching does not require heavy elements in the write channel, and opens a material-selection route for room-temperature two-dimensional memory and logic devices.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is a two-stage conversion. In the titanium layer, the orbital Hall effect produces an orbital current: the calculated orbital Hall conductivity is about 4600 ($\hbar/e$)(S/cm), while the spin Hall conductivity is only about 11 ($\hbar/e$)(S/cm), so ordinary spin-orbit torque from titanium is argued to be negligible. In the Fe3GaTe2 layer, the orbital current is converted to a spin current through spin-orbit correlation, quantified by the band-resolved correlation function $\langle \mathbf{L}\cdot\mathbf{S}\rangle_{n,\mathbf{k}}$ and its integrated coefficient $\eta_{L-S}$. The calculated per-layer $\eta_{L-S}$ stays near 0.38 from monolayer to bulk, and the correlation is concentrated in one spin channel near K and K$_1$, giving the ferromagnet a built-in orbital-to-spin conversion that the paper exploits for switching.

What would settle it

Measure the harmonic Hall voltage or the damping-like torque efficiency in the same Fe3GaTe2/Ti Hall bar and compare it with the torque expected from Ti's quoted spin Hall conductivity of about 11 ($\hbar/e$)(S/cm). If the measured torque efficiency is much larger than that spin Hall channel can explain, including interfacial contributions from the Fe3GaTe2/Ti interface, the orbital-torque attribution would be falsified. A second decisive test is a control sample in which the titanium layer's orbital Hall effect is suppressed or replaced by a metal with comparable spin Hall but lower orbital Hall conductivity: if the switching current density stays equally low, the torque is not orbital in origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the orbital Hall effect in titanium provides a large charge-to-orbital conversion ($\sigma_{\mathrm{OHE}}\sim4600$ $(\hbar/e)$(S/cm)) while the ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 provides a strong orbital-to-spin conversion via its spin-orbit correlation ($\eta_{L-S}\approx0.38$ per layer, roughly thickness-independent), so the combined Fe3GaTe2/Ti stack switches perpendicular magnetization at a lower current density than the conventional spin-orbit-torque stack Fe3GaTe2/Pt. The paper demonstrates deterministic switching at room temperature in Fe3GaTe2/Ti Hall bars, and finds that adding a Pt interlayer between Ti and Fe3GaTe2 raises the switching current, consistent with partial screening of the orbital current. It also uses density-functional-theory calculations to show that Fe3GaTe2 has spin-orbit-correlation hotspots near the Fermi level, concentrated in one spin channel at the K and K$_1$ points, which is the microscopic origin proposed for the efficient orbital-to-spin conversion.

Load-bearing premise

The central mechanistic claim depends on the assumption that the titanium layer in this particular stack produces no significant spin current of its own, so the observed switching can be attributed to orbital torque; this assumption rests on a literature spin Hall conductivity value rather than on a control measurement within the same device.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Room-temperature two-dimensional orbitronic memory and logic devices become feasible using light-metal orbital Hall layers instead of heavy-metal spin Hall layers.
  • Because the per-layer orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency is nearly independent of thickness, the same switching mechanism should work from monolayer to bulk-like Fe3GaTe2 flakes, and the weak interlayer coupling may allow faster per-layer magnetization reversal.
  • The switching current density of Fe3GaTe2/Ti is comparable to that of Fe3GaTe2 driven by topological semimetals such as WTe2 and TaIrTe4, so orbital torque is a competitive alternative even against the most efficient spin Hall channels.
  • A heavy-metal spacer between the orbital Hall material and the ferromagnet partially screens the orbital current, so optimized OT devices should place the ferromagnet directly on the orbital Hall layer.
  • The material-selection rule suggested by the paper is to pair a high-orbital-Hall-conductivity light metal with a ferromagnet that has strong spin-orbit correlation, which can guide searches over other 2D-vdW ferromagnets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to vary the orbital Hall material (e.g., use Cr, Mn, or alloys with different orbital Hall conductivities) and check whether the switching current scales with the calculated orbital Hall conductivity rather than with atomic number; such a scaling would separate orbital transport from interfacial Rashba or proximity effects.
  • The paper's claim of thickness-independent per-layer $\eta_{L-S}$ implies monolayer Fe3GaTe2 should also switch efficiently under orbital torque, which is not demonstrated here since the measured flakes are roughly 15-18 nm thick.
  • The observed non-monotonic switching ratio with in-plane field suggests an optimal field window set by the competition between torque and perpendicular anisotropy; device designs could exploit this window to lower the write current in practical cells.
  • If orbital current is truly the operative channel, an inverse effect—orbital pumping or orbital Hall magnetoresistance in the same Fe3GaTe2/Ti stack—should be detectable, providing a transport-based way to confirm the mechanism independently of switching data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports current-induced magnetization switching of the van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 in Fe3GaTe2/Ti Hall-bar devices at room temperature and 275 K, with a switching current density of about 1.6e6 A/cm2. The authors attribute the switching to orbital torque generated by the orbital Hall effect in the light metal Ti, and they compare the Ti devices with Fe3GaTe2/Pt and Fe3GaTe2/Pt/Ti devices. Supporting first-principles calculations of the spin-orbit correlation function in Fe3GaTe2 are provided to argue that the ferromagnet efficiently converts orbital current into spin current. The central claim is that a light metal with weak spin-orbit coupling can efficiently switch a perpendicularly magnetized 2D van der Waals ferromagnet at room temperature via orbital torque.

Significance. If the mechanistic claim is substantiated, this is a significant demonstration of orbital torque switching in a room-temperature van der Waals ferromagnet, with potential consequences for orbitronic memory and logic devices. The paper has several strengths: it includes direct switching loops with polarity reversal, temperature-dependent switching data, comparison devices with Pt and Pt/Ti, and first-principles calculations of the spin-orbit correlation coefficient that involve no experimental fitting parameters. The reported switching current density is competitive with prior SOT-based Fe3GaTe2 devices. However, the central mechanistic attribution to orbital torque rather than spin-orbit torque is not experimentally isolated, and the supporting evidence is partly qualitative, so the significance currently rests on a plausible but incompletely verified mechanism.

major comments (4)
  1. [Orbital Torque Switching; Orbital Torque vs. Spin-orbit Torque; Fig. 2d] The polarity reversal of the switching loops upon reversing the in-plane field is the standard signature of any damping-like torque, whether spin–orbit or orbital in origin, and therefore does not identify the torque source. The only evidence against a spin-orbit torque contribution is a cited bulk spin Hall conductivity of Ti of about 11 (hbar/e)(S/cm) from prior work (ref. 16); this does not bound interfacial spin-orbit scattering at the Fe3GaTe2/Ti interface, and it does not rule out a self-induced torque from the 15.8-nm Fe3GaTe2 layer, which the authors themselves show possesses strong spin-orbit correlation in Fig. 4. The paper contains no control device that isolates the orbital channel, such as a Ti-free Fe3GaTe2 device, a non-orbital-metal spacer (e.g., Cu), or a harmonic-Hall/ST-FMR measurement to separate torque components. Without such controls, the statement that the switching is driven by the OT from the Ti OHM is not experimentally established.
  2. [Methods; Fig. 3; Fig. 3e] The switching current density J_s is not defined. The paper does not state whether J_s is computed using the total cross-section of the Fe3GaTe2/Ti stack, only the Fe3GaTe2 layer, or only the Ti layer, nor does it give the resistivities used to partition current between the layers. Since the three devices (Fe3GaTe2/Ti, Fe3GaTe2/Pt/Ti, Fe3GaTe2/Pt) have different Fe3GaTe2 thicknesses and different cap layers, the quantitative comparison in Fig. 3e and the conclusion that the OT efficiency of the Ti device is higher than the SOT efficiency of the Pt device cannot be verified without supplying the current-partitioning details.
  3. [Spin-orbit Correlation in the vdW Ferromagnet; Fig. 4] The first-principles spin-orbit correlation analysis is not quantitatively linked to the measured torque efficiency. The computed eta_L-S values for different Fe3GaTe2 thicknesses are presented, but no orbital torque efficiency (xi_OT) is calculated for the Fe3GaTe2/Ti heterostructure, and no interfacial transmission factor or orbital-to-spin conversion probability is included. The conclusion that the low switching current density 'arises from' the combined effects of Ti sigma_OHE and Fe3GaTe2 spin-orbit correlation is therefore qualitative and does not provide a quantitative, falsifiable prediction connecting the calculated eta_L-S to the observed J_s.
  4. [Orbital Torque Switching of 2D-vdW Ferromagnet] The argument that the switching ratio's non-monotonic dependence on the in-plane field 'excludes thermal effects' is not justified. A field-dependent switching ratio is expected for any torque-driven switching (both SOT and OT) and can also appear in thermally assisted switching; the observed behavior does not by itself rule out thermal or other non-torque mechanisms. This inference should be removed or supported by explicit control experiments, such as the ones requested in the first major comment.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Orbital Torque vs. Spin-orbit Torque; Fig. 3d description] The text contains typos: 'conversation' should be 'conversion' in the Fig. 3d mechanism description, 'blow' should be 'below' in the spin-orbit correlation section, and 'squared' should be 'square' in the switching-loop description.
  2. [Spin-orbit Correlation in the vdW Ferromagnet] The equation for eta_L-S is garbled in the manuscript; the symbols for the spin-orbit correlation function and the integration measure should be typeset properly so that the definition is unambiguous.
  3. [Fig. 1b caption; Orbital Torque Device Based on 2D-vdW Ferromagnet] The caption of Fig. 1b says 'calculated,' but the text cites ref. 16 for these values; please clarify whether the curves are reproduced from the cited work or computed in this manuscript.
  4. [Methods; Orbital Torque Switching of 2D-vdW Ferromagnet] The text '1 ms write-pulse with a 6s delay' should specify the delay unit explicitly (e.g., '6 s' rather than '6s') for consistency with the rest of the measurement description.
  5. [Throughout] The term '2D-vdW' is used for flakes with thicknesses of 15.8 nm, which are not monolayer samples; consider clarifying that '2D' refers to the van der Waals layered nature rather than a strict two-dimensional limit, to avoid misleading readers.
  6. [Fig. 3e caption] The Fig. 3e caption states 'measured at room temperature,' but the detailed comparison in Figs. 3a-c is performed at 275 K; please make the temperature convention consistent between the text and the figure caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the switching measurement is an experimental output, the Ti conductivities come from independent prior work, and the Fe3GaTe2 spin-orbit correlation is computed from first principles without fitting the measured switching.

full rationale

The derivation chain examined here contains no step in which a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the target result. The central switching current densities in Figs. 2e and 3a-c are direct Hall-bar measurements, not quantities derived from the Ti orbital Hall conductivity or from the Fe3GaTe2 spin-orbit correlation coefficient. The Ti sigma_OHE of about 4600 (hbar/e)(S/cm) and the negligible sigma_SHE of about 11 (hbar/e)(S/cm) are taken from Ref. 16 (Choi et al., Nature 619, 52 (2023)), an independent prior observation and calculation; the paper does not fit these values to its own switching loops. The spin-orbit correlation coefficient eta_L-S for Fe3GaTe2 is computed from first principles using DFT and Wannier90 with no experimental switching data as input, and it is used only as a qualitative explanation of the measured efficiency. No equation in the paper connects the measured J_s to sigma_OHE or eta_L-S, so no output is equivalent by construction to an input. The comparison among Ti, Pt, and Pt/Ti devices is also experimental. The absence of a direct harmonic-Hall measurement or a Ti-free control is a legitimate experimental limitation regarding the attribution of the torque source, but it is a mechanistic-validity concern rather than circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present; the cited prior works provide independent feasibility evidence rather than a forced uniqueness argument.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two externally sourced or asserted pieces of physics: the orbital and spin Hall conductivities of titanium from a prior calculation, and the assumption that the DFT spin-orbit correlation coefficient captures the device-relevant orbital-to-spin conversion. No new particles, forces, or material phases are introduced. The DFT calculation itself has no fitted parameters.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The orbital Hall conductivity of titanium is about 4600 (hbar/e)(S/cm) and its spin Hall conductivity is only about 11 (hbar/e)(S/cm), as calculated in the cited work of Choi et al. (ref 16).
    This is used to attribute the observed switching to orbital torque and to rule out spin-orbit torque from titanium. The values come from a prior calculation for bulk titanium and are not measured in the Fe3GaTe2/Ti stack.
  • domain assumption The spin-orbit correlation coefficient eta_L-S, computed from band-resolved <L dot S> using Wannier interpolation, is a valid measure of the orbital-to-spin conversion efficiency in the real device.
    This bridges the DFT calculation to the experimental switching efficiency. The paper asserts this relationship without a quantitative transport model linking eta_L-S to the switching current density.
  • domain assumption DFT with the PBE functional and vdW-D3 correction describes the electronic structure and magnetic ground state of Fe3GaTe2 accurately enough for the spin-orbit correlation analysis.
    The paper uses standard DFT settings (400 eV cutoff, 15x15x1 and 15x15x3 k-meshes, PAW method). No comparison to experiments beyond lattice constants and magnetic moments is provided to benchmark the functional choice.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orbital torque switching of room temperature two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JEZQS4FO

@misc{pith2026241204872,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orbital torque switching of room temperature two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JEZQS4FO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04872}
}
read the original abstract

Efficiently manipulating the magnetization of van der Waals ferromagnets has attracted considerable interest in developing room-temperature two-dimensional material-based memory and logic devices. Here, taking advantage of the unique properties of the van der Waals ferromagnet as well as promising characteristics of the orbital Hall effect, we demonstrate the room-temperature magnetization switching of van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2 through the orbital torque generated by the orbital Hall material, Titanium (Ti). The switching current density is estimated to be around 1.6 x 10^6 A/cm^2, comparable to that achieved in Fe3GaTe2 using spin-orbit torque from spin Hall materials. The efficient magnetization switching arises from the combined effects of the large orbital Hall conductivity of Ti and the strong spin-orbit correlation of the Fe3GaTe2, as confirmed through theoretical calculations. Our findings advance the understanding of orbital torque switching and pave the way for exploring material-based orbitronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04872 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Orbital torque in van der Waals ferromagnet. a. Schematic of the Fe3GaTe2/Ti orbital torque heterostructure, in which the Ti orbital Hall material converts the charge current (JC) into the orbital current (JL), then the orbital current (JL) flows into the 2D-vdW FM Fe3GaTe2 layer and is converted into the spin current (JS) due to the spin-orbital coupling of the Fe3GaTe2 layer. b. The calculated orbital Hall conduct… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Theoretical calculation of spin-orbit correlation function nk    LS . a. The monolayer, bilayer, trilayer, and bulk Fe3GaTe2 structures, in which the Fe-I, Fe-II, Ga, and Te atoms are colored blue, light blue, green, and orange, respectively. b. The orbital-projected band structure of monolayer Fe3GaTe2 structure with different d states of Fe is highlighted by different colors. c-f. The calculated band-resolved s… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Recent progress on electron- and magnon-mediated torques

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-05 accept

    A review of electron- and magnon-mediated torques, covering spin-orbit, orbital, and magnon torque mechanisms and materials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Dieny, et al., Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry

    B. Dieny, et al., Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry. Nat. Electron. 3, 446-459 (2020)

  2. [2]

    Shao, et al

    Q. Shao, et al. , Roadmap of spin-orbit torques. IEEE Trans. Magn. 57, 800439 (2021)

  3. [3]

    Z. X. Guo, et al. , Spintronics for energy efficient computing: An overview and outlook. Proc. IEEE 109, 1398-1417 (2021)

  4. [4]

    Brataas, A

    A. Brataas, A. D. Kent & H. Ohno, Current-induced torques in magnetic materials . Nat. Mater. 11, 372-381 (2012)

  5. [5]

    Liu, et al., , Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum

    L. Liu, et al., , Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555-558 (2012)

  6. [6]

    Sinova, et al., Spin Hall effects

    J. Sinova, et al., Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

  7. [7]

    Song, et al

    C. Song, et al. , Spin-orbit torques: Materials, mechanisms, performances, and potential applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 118, 100761 (2021)

  8. [8]

    B. A. Bernevig, T. L. Hughes, and S. C. Zhang, Orbitronics: the intrinsic orbital current in p-doped silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 066601 (2005)

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Kontani, et al., Giant orbital Hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effects

    H. Kontani, et al., Giant orbital Hall effect in transition metals: Origin of large spin and anomalous Hall effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 016601 (2009)

  2. [10]

    Go, et al., Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects from orbital texture

    D. Go, et al., Intrinsic spin and orbital Hall effects from orbital texture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086602 (2018)

  3. [11]

    D. Jo, D. Go, and H.-W. Lee, Gigantic intrinsic orbital Hall effects in weakly spin-orbit coupled metals. Phys. Rev. B 98, 214405 (2018)

  4. [12]

    Lee, et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers

    D. Lee, et al., Orbital torque in magnetic bilayers. Nat. Commun. 12, 6710 (2021)

  5. [13]

    S. Han, H. W. Lee, and K. W. Kim, Orbital dynamics in centrosymmetric systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 176601 (2022)

  6. [14]

    Sala, and P

    G. Sala, and P. Gambardella, Giant orbital Hall effect and orbital -to-spin conversion in 3d, 5d, and 4f metallic heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 033037 (2022)

  7. [15]

    Go, et al., Long-range orbital torque by momentum -space hotspots

    D. Go, et al., Long-range orbital torque by momentum -space hotspots. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246701 (2023)

  8. [16]

    Y. G. Choi, et al., Observation of the orbital Hall effect in a light metal Ti. Nature 619, 52-56 (2023)

  9. [17]

    Hayashi, et al

    H. Hayashi, et al. , Observation of long -range orbital transport and giant orbital torque. Commun. Phys. 6, 32 (2023)

  10. [18]

    Sala, et al., Orbital Hanle magnetoresistance in a 3d transition metal

    G. Sala, et al., Orbital Hanle magnetoresistance in a 3d transition metal. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 156703 (2023) 19

  11. [19]

    Hayashi, D

    H. Hayashi, D. Go, S. Haku, Y. Mokrousov, and K. Ando, Observation of orbital pumping. Nat. Electron. 7, 646-652 (2024)

  12. [20]

    Y. H. Yang, et al., Orbital torque switching in perpendicularly magnetized materials. Nat. Commun. 15, 8645 (2024)

  13. [21]

    Xie, et al., Efficient noncollinear antiferromagnetic state switching induced by the orbital Hall effect in chromium

    H. Xie, et al., Efficient noncollinear antiferromagnetic state switching induced by the orbital Hall effect in chromium. Nano Lett., 23, 10274-10281(2023)

  14. [22]

    Zheng, et al., Effective electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnet by orbital torques

    Z. Zheng, et al., Effective electrical manipulation of a topological antiferromagnet by orbital torques. Nat. Commun. 15, 745 (2024)

  15. [23]

    Lee, H.-W

    H. Lee, H.-W. Lee, Composition dependence of the orbital torque in Co𝑥Fe1−𝑥 and Ni𝑥Fe1−𝑥 alloys: Spin-orbit correlation analysis. Curr. Appl. Phys. 67, 60-68 (2024)

  16. [24]

    Gong, et al., Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two -dimensional van der Waals crystals

    C. Gong, et al., Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two -dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265-269 (2017)

  17. [25]

    Huang, et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit

    B. Huang, et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature 546, 270-273 (2017)

  18. [26]

    Lin, et al., Two-dimensional spintronics for low -power electronics

    X. Lin, et al., Two-dimensional spintronics for low -power electronics. Nat. Electron. 2, 274-283 (2019)

  19. [27]

    Yang, et al., Two-dimensional materials prospects for non -volatile spintronic memories

    H. Yang, et al., Two-dimensional materials prospects for non -volatile spintronic memories. Nature 606, 663-673 (2022)

  20. [28]

    Zhu, et al

    W. Zhu, et al. Large room -temperature m agnetoresistance in van der Waals ferromagnet/semiconductor junctions. Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 128501 (2022)

  21. [29]

    Pan, et al., Room-temperature orbit-transfer torque enabling van der Waals magnetoresistive memories

    Z.-C. Pan, et al., Room-temperature orbit-transfer torque enabling van der Waals magnetoresistive memories. Sci. Bull. 68, 2743-2749 (2023)

  22. [30]

    Li, et al

    Z. Li, et al. Room -temperature sub -100 nm Né el -type skyrmions in non-stoichiometric van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3-xGaTe2 with ultrafast laser writability. Nat. Commun. 15, 1017 (2024)

  23. [31]

    Lv, et al., Distinct skyrmion phases at room temperature in two -dimensional ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2

    X. Lv, et al., Distinct skyrmion phases at room temperature in two -dimensional ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2. Nat. Commun. 15, 3278 (2024)

  24. [32]

    Zhang, et al., Above-room-temperature chiral skyrmion lattice and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in a van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3-xGaTe2

    C. Zhang, et al., Above-room-temperature chiral skyrmion lattice and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in a van der Waals ferromagnet Fe 3-xGaTe2. Nat. Commun. 15, 4472 (2024)

  25. [33]

    Liu, et al., Magnetic skyrmions above room temperature in a van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2

    C. Liu, et al., Magnetic skyrmions above room temperature in a van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GaTe2. Adv. Mater. 36, 2311022 (2024)

  26. [34]

    W. H. Li, et al. , Room-temperature van der Waals ferromagnet switching by spin-orbit torques. Adv. Mater. 35, 2303688 (2023)

  27. [35]

    Yun et al., Efficient current -induced spin torques and field -free magnetization switching in a room -temperature van der Waals magnet

    C. Yun et al., Efficient current -induced spin torques and field -free magnetization switching in a room -temperature van der Waals magnet . Sci. Adv. 9, eadj3955 (2023). 20

  28. [36]

    S. N. Kajale, et al., Current-induced switching of a van der Waals ferromagnet at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 15, 1485 (2024)

  29. [37]

    G. S. Choi, et al., Highly efficient room-temperature spin-orbit-torque switching in a Van der Waals heterostructure of topological insulator and ferromagnet. Adv. Sci. 11, 2400893 (2024)

  30. [38]

    Zhang, et al., Robust field-free switching using large unconventional spin-orbit torque in an all-Van der Waals heterostructure

    Y. Zhang, et al., Robust field-free switching using large unconventional spin-orbit torque in an all-Van der Waals heterostructure. Adv. Mater. 36, 2406464 (2024)

  31. [39]

    S. N. Kajale et al., Field-free deterministic switching of all -van der Waals spin-orbit torque system above room temperature. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk8669 (2024)

  32. [40]

    Zhang, et al

    G. Zhang, et al. Above -room-temperature strong intrinsic ferromagnetism in 2D van der Waals Fe 3GaTe2 with large perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Nat. Commun. 13, 1-8 (2022)

  33. [41]

    S. L. Ding, et al., Harnessing orbital-to-spin conversion of interfacial orbital currents for efficient spin-orbit torques. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 177201 (2020)

  34. [42]

    Lee, et al., Efficient conversion of orbital Hall current to spin current for spin-orbit torque switching

    S. Lee, et al., Efficient conversion of orbital Hall current to spin current for spin-orbit torque switching. Commun. Phys. 4, 234 (2021)

  35. [43]

    Tanaka, et al

    T. Tanaka, et al. Intrinsic spin Hall effect and orbital Hall effect in 4d and 5d transition metals. Phys. Rev. B 77, 165117 (2008)

  36. [44]

    Souza, N

    I. Souza, N. Marzari, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions for entangled energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 65, 035109 (2001)

  37. [45]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B 56, 12847 (1997)

  38. [46]

    Schreier, et al

    M. Schreier, et al. Sign of inverse spin Hall voltages generated by ferromagnetic resonance and temperature gradients in yttrium iron garnet platinum bilayers. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 025001 (2015)

  39. [47]

    Konschuh, M

    S. Konschuh, M . Gmitra, and J . Fabian, Tight-binding theory of the spin -orbit coupling in grapheme. Phys. Rev. B 82, 245412 (2010)

  40. [48]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmü ller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996)

  41. [49]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal-amorphous-semiconductor transition in Germanium, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994)

  42. [50]

    P. E. Blö chl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

  43. [51]

    J. P. Perdew, et al., Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992). 21

  44. [52]

    Grimme, Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐ range dispersion correction, J

    S. Grimme, Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐ range dispersion correction, J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787 (2006). 22 Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA1204003), the National Natural Science Foun...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.