Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Combining the AFLOW GIBBS and Elastic Libraries for efficiently and robustly screening thermo-mechanical properties of solids

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1611.05714 v2 pith:JG6T7KOT submitted 2016-11-17 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords propertiesmaterialsaflowautomaticcomputationaldebyegibbslibrary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Thorough characterization of the thermo-mechanical properties of materials requires difficult and time-consuming experiments. This severely limits the availability of data and it is one of the main obstacles for the development of effective accelerated materials design strategies. The rapid screening of new potential systems requires highly integrated, sophisticated and robust computational approaches. We tackled the challenge by surveying more than 3,000 crystalline solids within the AFLOW framework with the newly developed "Automatic Elasticity Library" combined with the previously implemented GIBBS method. The first extracts the mechanical properties from automatic self-consistent stress-strain calculations, while the latter employs those mechanical properties to evaluate the thermodynamics within the Debye model. The new thermo-elastic library is benchmarked against a set of 74 experimentally characterized systems to pinpoint a robust computational methodology for the evaluation of bulk and shear moduli, Poisson ratios, Debye temperatures, Gr\"uneisen parameters, and thermal conductivities of a wide variety of materials. The effect of different choices of equations of state is examined and the optimum combination of properties for the Leibfried-Schl\"omann prediction of thermal conductivity is identified, leading to improved agreement with experimental results than the GIBBS-only approach.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools