pith. sign in

arxiv: 2204.03685 · v2 · pith:JGXIE2EBnew · submitted 2022-04-07 · 💻 cs.CL

Read, Revise, Repeat: A System Demonstration for Human-in-the-loop Iterative Text Revision

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords revisionrevisionstexthumansystemeditswritersiterative
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Revision is an essential part of the human writing process. It tends to be strategic, adaptive, and, more importantly, iterative in nature. Despite the success of large language models on text revision tasks, they are limited to non-iterative, one-shot revisions. Examining and evaluating the capability of large language models for making continuous revisions and collaborating with human writers is a critical step towards building effective writing assistants. In this work, we present a human-in-the-loop iterative text revision system, Read, Revise, Repeat (R3), which aims at achieving high quality text revisions with minimal human efforts by reading model-generated revisions and user feedbacks, revising documents, and repeating human-machine interactions. In R3, a text revision model provides text editing suggestions for human writers, who can accept or reject the suggested edits. The accepted edits are then incorporated into the model for the next iteration of document revision. Writers can therefore revise documents iteratively by interacting with the system and simply accepting/rejecting its suggested edits until the text revision model stops making further revisions or reaches a predefined maximum number of revisions. Empirical experiments show that R3 can generate revisions with comparable acceptance rate to human writers at early revision depths, and the human-machine interaction can get higher quality revisions with fewer iterations and edits. The collected human-model interaction dataset and system code are available at \url{https://github.com/vipulraheja/IteraTeR}. Our system demonstration is available at \url{https://youtu.be/lK08tIpEoaE}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Semantic Prompting: Agentic Incremental Narrative Refinement through Spatial Semantic Interaction

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Semantic Prompting enables LLMs to perform precise incremental narrative revisions by perceiving semantic interactions in spatial layouts, addressing misalignment gaps in existing methods.

  2. Semantic Prompting: Agentic Incremental Narrative Refinement through Spatial Semantic Interaction

    cs.HC 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    The paper extends KMS-detailed-balance Lindbladian constructions beyond Gibbs states to prepare general stationary states σ=f(H)/Tr[f(H)], including microcanonical window states, with polynomial-time quantum circuit i...