REVIEW 2 cited by
Can LLMs facilitate interpretation of pre-trained language models?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Work done to uncover the knowledge encoded within pre-trained language models rely on annotated corpora or human-in-the-loop methods. However, these approaches are limited in terms of scalability and the scope of interpretation. We propose using a large language model, ChatGPT, as an annotator to enable fine-grained interpretation analysis of pre-trained language models. We discover latent concepts within pre-trained language models by applying agglomerative hierarchical clustering over contextualized representations and then annotate these concepts using ChatGPT. Our findings demonstrate that ChatGPT produces accurate and semantically richer annotations compared to human-annotated concepts. Additionally, we showcase how GPT-based annotations empower interpretation analysis methodologies of which we demonstrate two: probing frameworks and neuron interpretation. To facilitate further exploration and experimentation in the field, we make available a substantial ConceptNet dataset (TCN) comprising 39,000 annotated concepts.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Process of Categorical Clipping at the Core of the Genesis of Concepts in Synthetic Neural Cognition
Words that strongly activate both a lower-layer neuron and its strongly connected upper-layer neuron in GPT-2XL form more semantically similar clusters, which the paper interprets as a clipping process.
-
How Do Artificial Intelligences Think? The Three Mathematico-Cognitive Factors of Categorical Segmentation Operated by Synthetic Neurons
The paper names three components of a neuron's aggregation function as cognitive factors and reports near-unity correlations in GPT-2XL, but the effects are largely true by construction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.