Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Can LLMs facilitate interpretation of pre-trained language models?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.13386 v2 pith:JH53OGFK submitted 2023-05-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords interpretationlanguageconceptsmodelspre-trainedchatgptanalysisannotated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Work done to uncover the knowledge encoded within pre-trained language models rely on annotated corpora or human-in-the-loop methods. However, these approaches are limited in terms of scalability and the scope of interpretation. We propose using a large language model, ChatGPT, as an annotator to enable fine-grained interpretation analysis of pre-trained language models. We discover latent concepts within pre-trained language models by applying agglomerative hierarchical clustering over contextualized representations and then annotate these concepts using ChatGPT. Our findings demonstrate that ChatGPT produces accurate and semantically richer annotations compared to human-annotated concepts. Additionally, we showcase how GPT-based annotations empower interpretation analysis methodologies of which we demonstrate two: probing frameworks and neuron interpretation. To facilitate further exploration and experimentation in the field, we make available a substantial ConceptNet dataset (TCN) comprising 39,000 annotated concepts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Process of Categorical Clipping at the Core of the Genesis of Concepts in Synthetic Neural Cognition

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Words that strongly activate both a lower-layer neuron and its strongly connected upper-layer neuron in GPT-2XL form more semantically similar clusters, which the paper interprets as a clipping process.

  2. How Do Artificial Intelligences Think? The Three Mathematico-Cognitive Factors of Categorical Segmentation Operated by Synthetic Neurons

    q-bio.NC 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper names three components of a neuron's aggregation function as cognitive factors and reports near-unity correlations in GPT-2XL, but the effects are largely true by construction.

Pith tools