Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.07173 v1 pith:JHSIEJ3X submitted 2020-04-15 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords algorithmsinformationrecruitmentsensitivemultimodalautomatedbiasesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The presence of decision-making algorithms in society is rapidly increasing nowadays, while concerns about their transparency and the possibility of these algorithms becoming new sources of discrimination are arising. In fact, many relevant automated systems have been shown to make decisions based on sensitive information or discriminate certain social groups (e.g. certain biometric systems for person recognition). With the aim of studying how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data, we propose a fictitious automated recruitment testbed: FairCVtest. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. FairCVtest shows the capacity of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) behind such recruitment tool to extract sensitive information from unstructured data, and exploit it in combination to data biases in undesirable (unfair) ways. Finally, we present a list of recent works developing techniques capable of removing sensitive information from the decision-making process of deep learning architectures. We have used one of these algorithms (SensitiveNets) to experiment discrimination-aware learning for the elimination of sensitive information in our multimodal AI framework. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. More is Less? A Simulation-Based Approach to Dynamic Interactions between Biases in Multimodal Models

    stat.ML 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A heuristic, simulation-based framework classifies multimodal bias interactions as amplification, mitigation, or neutrality, applied to the MMBias dataset.

Pith tools