REVIEW 5 cited by
Navigating Complexity: Orchestrated Problem Solving with Multi-Agent LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in solving various tasks, yet they often struggle with comprehensively addressing complex and vague problems. Existing approaches, including multi-agent LLM systems, offer solutions to certain challenges but still require manual setup and lack scalability. To address this gap, we propose a novel approach leveraging decomposition to enable LLMs to tackle vague problems effectively. Our approach involves an orchestrating LLM that interacts with users to understand the problem and then decomposes it into tangible sub-problems. Instead of expecting the LLM to solve the entire problem in one go, we train it to ask follow-up questions to gain a deeper understanding of the user's requirements. Once the problem is adequately understood, the orchestrating LLM divides it into smaller, manageable sub-problems. Each sub-problem is then assigned to specialized LLM agents or non-LLM functions for resolution. These agents work in parallel to solve their respective sub-problems, with the orchestrating LLM overseeing the process and compiling the solutions into a comprehensive answer for the user. By adopting this decomposition approach, we alleviate the constraints imposed by token limitations on LLM outputs and empower them to provide nuanced solutions to complex and ambiguous problems. Through our approach, we aim to enable LLMs to think and operate more like humans, breaking down complex problems into manageable parts and collaboratively solving them. This not only enhances the problem-solving capabilities of LLMs but also offers a scalable and efficient method for addressing a wide range of real-world challenges.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Conversational Medical AI: Ready for Practice
A real-world randomized trial found that a physician-supervised medical chatbot improved patient-rated clarity and satisfaction without overall safety failures.
-
Do as We Do, Not as You Think: the Conformity of Large Language Models
In multi-agent question answering, all 11 tested LLMs abandon some correct answers to follow a unanimous wrong majority, with the effect strongest under the Doubt protocol.
-
LLM4SR: A Survey on Large Language Models for Scientific Research
A systematic review of LLM-based systems for hypothesis discovery, experiment planning, scientific writing, and peer review, including benchmarks, evaluation methods, and open challenges.
-
Literature Review Of Multi-Agent Debate For Problem-Solving
A literature review concludes that multi-agent LLM debate helps up to a task-dependent point, after which extra agents and rounds add cost without reliable gains.
-
The Hitchhikers Guide to Production-ready Trustworthy Foundation Model powered Software (FMware)
The paper catalogs the lifecycle stages and production-readiness challenges of software built around foundation models (FMware) and proposes an action plan of engineering practices and research directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.