Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Beyond Rescorla-Wagner: the ups and downs of learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2004.05069 v2 pith:JJX4UHR3 submitted 2020-04-10 q-bio.QM q-bio.NC

classification q-bio.QMq-bio.NC
keywords modellearningoscillationsoscillatoryassociativedatadynamicalrescorla-wagner
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We check the robustness of a recently proposed dynamical model of associative Pavlovian learning that extends the Rescorla-Wagner (RW) model in a natural way and predicts progressively damped oscillations in the response of the subjects. Using the data of two experiments, we compare the dynamical oscillatory model (DOM) with an oscillatory model made of the superposition of the RW learning curve and oscillations. Not only do data clearly show an oscillatory pattern, but they also favor the DOM over the added oscillation model, thus pointing out that these oscillations are the manifestation of an associative process. The latter is interpreted as the fact that subjects make predictions on trial outcomes more extended in time than in the RW model, but with more uncertainty.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools