Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The redshift dependence of black hole mass distribution: Is it reliable for standard sirens cosmology?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.10256 v3 pith:JL5UIZ6J submitted 2021-12-19 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEgr-qc

classification astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords redshiftpisnmassdependenceblackwillmass-scalescale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

An upper limit on the mass of a black hole set by the pair-instability supernovae (PISN) process can be useful in inferring the redshift of the gravitational wave (GW) sources by lifting the degeneracy between mass and redshift. However, for this technique to work, it is essential that the PISN mass-scale is redshift independent or at least has a predictable redshift dependence. We show that the observed PISN mass-scale can get smeared and the position of the PISN mass-scale is likely to exhibit a strong redshift dependence due to a combined effect from the non-zero value of the delay time between the formation of a star and the merging of two black holes and the metallicity dependence of PISN mass scale. Due to the unknown form of the delay-time distribution, the redshift dependence of the PISN mass cut-off of the binary black holes (BBHs) cannot be well characterized and will exhibit a large variation with the change in redshift. As a result, the use of a fixed PISN mass scale to infer the redshift of the BBHs from the observed masses will be systematically biased. Though this uncertainty is not severe for the third observation run conducted by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA collaboration, in the future this uncertainty will cause a systematic error in the redshift inferred from the PISN mass scale. The corresponding systematic error will be a bottleneck in achieving a few percent precision measurements of the cosmological parameters using this method in the future.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Gravitational Wave Bias from 3D Power Spectra of Spectroscopic Surveys

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using mock gravitational wave catalogs built from the SDSS DR7 galaxy survey, the clustering bias of GW sources is most sensitive to host stellar mass, secondarily to star formation rate, and nearly insensitive to met...

  2. Blinded Mock Data Challenge for Gravitational-Wave Cosmology-I: Assessing the Robustness of Methods Using Binary Black Holes Mass Spectrum

    astro-ph.CO 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A blinded mock data challenge shows that ignoring a mild redshift evolution in binary black hole masses biases the gravitational-wave Hubble constant measurement by about 1.5 sigma at LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O4 sensitivity.

  3. Binary Black Hole Phase Space Discovers the Signature of Pair Instability Supernovae Mass Gap

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Applying a phase-space overlap method to GWTC-4, the paper claims first-generation black holes are truncated near 45.5 solar masses, but the cutoff follows from the assumed exponential mass prior rather than from the data.

Pith tools