Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The Mass-Angular Momentum Inequality for Multiple Black Holes

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For axially symmetric maximal initial data with multiple black-hole ends, the ADM mass is at least the square root of total angular momentum unless an ADM-minimizing regular multi-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime exists, with…

desk verdict A genuine advance in the multi-black-hole mass-angular momentum inequality, conditional on a no-hair conjecture and on the unverified asymptotics of a companion paper; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15093 v1 pith:JNIQ62F6 submitted 2025-01-25 math.DG gr-qcmath.AP

Qing Han , Marcus Khuri , Gilbert Weinstein , Jingang Xiong This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DGgr-qcmath.AP MSC 53C4353C2183C0583C57 PACS 04.20.-q04.70.Bw
keywords mass–angularmomentuminequalitymultipleblackholesinitialdatasetssingularharmonicmapsrenormalizedenergyextremeKerraxisymmetricspacetimes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is the second half of a two-part attack on the conjectured mass–angular momentum inequality for multiple black holes. It proves that for complete, simply connected, axially symmetric, maximal initial data sets with one asymptotically flat end, finitely many other asymptotically flat or asymptotically cylindrical ends, nonnegative energy density, and vanishing rotational momentum density, either an ADM-minimizing counterexample to extreme black hole uniqueness exists, or the ADM mass satisfies $m \geq \sqrt{|J|}$, with equality only for a constant-time slice of extreme Kerr. The proof works by moving the black-hole punctures according to a new flow of singular harmonic maps into the hyperbolic plane, along which the renormalized harmonic map energy never increases. The result matters because the inequality is a quantitative refinement of the positive mass theorem and a necessary condition for weak cosmic censorship and the final-state conjecture; the flow also gives a dynamical route from arbitrary multi-black-hole data to the equality case.

What carries the argument

The central object is the singular harmonic map $\Phi=(u,v): \mathbb{R}^3 \setminus \Gamma \to \mathbb{H}^2$, with $\Gamma$ the $z$-axis minus punctures and target the hyperbolic plane in horospherical coordinates $(du^2 + e^{4u}dv^2)$. Its renormalized energy $E(\Phi)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}(|\nabla U|^2 + e^{4u}\rho^{-4}|\nabla v|^2)\,dx$, $U=u+\ln\rho$, is the quantity that controls the ADM mass via $m \geq \frac{1}{8\pi}E(\Phi)$. The flow is the autonomous system $\frac{dz_i}{dt} = -b_i(z_1,\dots,z_N)$ on the puncture locations, where $b_i$ are tangent map parameters at the punctures, related to conical angle defects of the associated stationary vacuum spacetime. Energy monotonicity, $\frac{d}{dt}E(\Phi_t) = -\sum_i f(b_i)b_i \leq 0$, converts the proof into an analysis of the flow's singular events: collisions, scattering to infinity, or stagnation; each preserves the lower bound by $\sqrt{|J|}$, and stagnation would contradict the assumed nonexistence of an ADM-minimizing multi-degenerate black hole solution.

What would settle it

Compute the ADM mass and angular momentum of a complete, simply connected, axially symmetric, maximal initial data set with multiple asymptotically flat or cylindrical ends, $\mu\geq 0$ and $J(\eta)=0$; a single example with $m<\sqrt{|J|}$ would falsify the inequality branch. Running the same data through the puncture flow should show the renormalized energy decreasing toward $\sqrt{|J|}$ unless the flow reaches a stagnating configuration with all tangent map parameters $b_i=0$, which would indicate the excluded multi-degenerate spacetime.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is a conditional rigidity statement: under the stated hypotheses, if no ADM-minimizing counterexample to the extreme black hole uniqueness conjecture exists, then every such initial data set satisfies $m \geq \sqrt{|J|}$, and equality forces the data to come from an extreme Kerr spacetime. The route to this is variational rather than algebraic: the ADM mass is bounded below by $\frac{1}{8\pi}$ times the renormalized energy $E(\Phi)$ of a unique singular harmonic map, and the paper shows that $E(\Phi)$ can be decreased, without going below $\sqrt{|J|}$, by flowing the puncture locations. Collisions and scatterings of punctures preserve the monotonicity, and a stagnating flow would produce a regular multi-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetime, which is exactly the excluded counterexample.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the refined asymptotic expansions of singular harmonic maps and their linearizations obtained in the companion paper [12] hold; without them the monotonicity formula, the boundary limits, and the differentiability of the flow do not follow, and the stagnation case additionally uses the assumption that no ADM-minimizing multi-degenerate vacuum spacetime exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the extreme black hole uniqueness conjecture holds in its ADM-minimizing form, the mass–angular momentum inequality $m \geq \sqrt{|J|}$ is unconditional for this class of initial data.
  • Any counterexample to the inequality would force the existence of a regular, axisymmetric, stationary vacuum spacetime with an asymptotically flat end and multiple degenerate horizons that minimizes ADM mass—an equilibrium whose presence would itself violate the expected final-state picture.
  • The equality case pins the bound to the extreme Kerr family alone, so the theorem upgrades the mass–angular momentum bound from a lower bound to a rigidity statement.
  • The puncture flow provides a constructive method to lower renormalized energy toward $\sqrt{|J|}$, giving a dynamical interpretation of the reduced mass functional $F(J_1,\dots,J_N,z_1,\dots,z_N)$ introduced by earlier work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The disjunctive structure suggests a route to black hole uniqueness: if one can rule out ADM-minimizing regular multi-degenerate stationary vacuum spacetimes by stability or topology arguments, both uniqueness and the unconditional inequality would follow.
  • The flow's monotone energy may be interpretable as a gradient-like descent for a configuration-space functional, so the collision and scattering analysis could carry over to other variational problems with prescribed singularities, such as charged or higher-dimensional multi-black-hole systems.
  • A numerical implementation of the puncture flow on two-puncture harmonic maps could test whether generic configurations collide, scatter, or stagnate, and would provide independent evidence on whether the lower bound is approached by extreme Kerr configurations.
  • If the stagnation case could be shown to have renormalized energy at least $\sqrt{|J|}$ directly, the theorem would become unconditional without a separate uniqueness step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves a conditional mass-angular momentum inequality for complete, simply connected, axially symmetric, maximal initial data sets with multiple asymptotically flat or asymptotically cylindrical ends, assuming nonnegative energy density and zero momentum density along the rotation axis. The main result, Theorem 1.1, states that either there exists an ADM-minimizing counterexample to the extreme black hole uniqueness conjecture, or the ADM mass satisfies m >= sqrt(|J|), with equality only for extreme Kerr initial data. The proof associates a singular harmonic map to each data set, bounds the ADM mass below by the renormalized harmonic map energy, and introduces a flow of punctures whose dynamics are determined by tangent map parameters. The renormalized energy is shown to be nonincreasing along smooth portions of the flow, through collisions and scatterings via configuration maps, and at stagnation the inequality follows from an induction argument conditional on the absence of an ADM-minimizing counterexample. The paper also develops a linearized asymptotic analysis near punctures and establishes smooth differentiability of the parameter-dependent family of singular harmonic maps.

Significance. If the argument is correct, this is a substantial advance: it reduces the multi-black-hole mass-angular momentum inequality to the extreme black hole uniqueness conjecture and introduces a new monotone flow of singular harmonic maps that may be of independent interest. The paper contains significant original analysis, including the collision and scattering energy inequalities of Sections 5 and 6, the differentiability theorems of Section 9, and the linearized asymptotics of Section 8. There are no fitted parameters, and the proof is a conditional derivation from stated assumptions rather than a numerical or heuristic check. The main caveat is that the central monotonicity argument depends on the refined singular expansions of the companion paper [12], which are imported rather than proved here; the theorem should be read as conditional on [12] being correct.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Lemmas 4.4-4.5 and Eq. (4.27)] The monotonicity formula (4.27) is the engine of the whole flow argument, and its proof relies on the refined singular expansions (3.1)-(3.3) and the identity e^{4u} dtheta v = -(2 a_i sin theta)^{-1} from [12, (4.5)], together with [12, Theorems 2.1-2.2]. In particular, Lemmas 4.4 and 4.5 use these expansions to evaluate the boundary limits (4.12) and (4.17); if the companion asymptotics had a weaker weight, a logarithmic loss, or a different tangential constant, the limits would contain extra terms and (4.27) would fail. Since the present paper does not reproduce those proofs, the inequality branch of Theorem 1.1 is not self-contained. The authors should either include the necessary asymptotic proofs or explicitly state the theorem as conditional on [12] being established.
  2. [Section 7, Eqs. (7.8)-(7.9)] The stagnation/infimum argument uses the same symbol m* both for the infimum of the ADM masses and for the mass of the limiting flow configuration, so the displayed chain 'm* > m* >= sqrt(|J|)' in (7.9) is formally contradictory as written. This appears to be a notational collision rather than a mathematical error, but it occurs at a load-bearing point of the proof and must be repaired by introducing distinct notation and rewriting the inequalities (7.7)-(7.9) consistently.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Proposition 6.1] The paragraph after (6.1) contains the typo 'seaparation configuration maps'; this should read 'separation configuration maps'.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (4.14)] The display for the estimate of e^{4U} rho^{-4} dot v partial_r v has an awkward use of braces and an unexplained factor labeled 'partial_r v'; the typography should be cleaned up so the estimate is unambiguous.
  3. [Section 2, Eq. (2.16)] The notation F(J_1, ..., J_N, z_1, ..., z_N) is introduced in (2.16) but the punctures are denoted p_i throughout Section 3; the dependence of F on the puncture positions should be made consistent, for example by writing F(J, z) with an explicit definition of z.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: the main flow/monotonicity/induction argument is conditional on companion-paper asymptotics but does not reduce to its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a conditional proof: assuming the nonexistence of an ADM minimizing counterexample to extreme black hole uniqueness, it proves m >= sqrt(|J|) by a new puncture flow and induction on the number of black holes. No parameter is fitted and no 'prediction' is constructed from the quantity being proved. The heavy reliance on the companion paper [12] for the refined singular expansions (quoted in (3.1)-(3.3) as 'According to [12, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2]') and on prior work [8], [17] for existence, uniqueness, convexity, and gap estimates is real dependence, but these are parameter-free mathematical statements whose assumptions do not include the target inequality. The monotonicity formula (4.27), the boundary-term limits in Lemmas 4.4-4.5, and the differentiability results in Section 9 are new arguments that combine these inputs rather than renaming them. The extreme black hole uniqueness conjecture is not invoked as a fact; it is the alternative branch of the dichotomy, and the proof explicitly derives the inequality under the negation of that branch. The only notable internal defect is the typo in (7.9), 'the nonexistence of an ADM minimizing counterexample also implies m* > m*', which appears to be a notational slip (likely m* > m_*) and does not affect the logic. The nonlinear asymptotic analysis of [12] is not reproduced in this manuscript, so the theorem should be read as conditional on the correctness of [12]; this is a verification gap, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a large body of prior analytic results, especially the companion paper [12] and the harmonic map energy framework of [8] and [17]. The only genuinely unproven input is the extreme black hole uniqueness conjecture, which is explicitly isolated as the alternative in Theorem 1.1. No free parameters are fitted to data.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Existence, uniqueness, and energy minimality of the singular harmonic map Phi with prescribed potential constants (Chrusciel-Li-Weinstein [8, Prop. 2.1]; Khuri-Weinstein [17, Thm. 4.1]).
    Used in Section 2 to bound the ADM mass below by (1/8pi)E(Phi) = F(J_i,z_i), and in the rigidity/equality analysis.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic expansions of singular harmonic maps near punctures and at infinity, including convergence to tangent maps (Han-Khuri-Weinstein-Xiong [12, Thms. 2.1-2.3]).
    Basis for the expansions (3.1)-(3.4), the flow equations, the boundary-term limits in Lemmas 4.4-4.5, and the linearized analysis in Section 8.
  • domain assumption Existence of global Brill coordinates for simply connected axisymmetric manifolds with multiple ends ([5, Thm. 2.9], [26, Thm. 1.0.5]).
    Justifies the metric representation (2.1) used throughout.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 3.3 (extreme black hole uniqueness in PDE form): for N>1 distinct punctures with nonzero angular momenta, at least one tangent map parameter b_i is nonzero.
    The inequality branch of Theorem 1.1 is derived under the assumption that no ADM minimizing counterexample to this conjecture exists (Section 7, stagnation case). The theorem itself is a disjunction that includes the falsity of this conjecture.
  • domain assumption Gap bound / convexity of renormalized energy: E(Phi) has a positive gap for maps differing from an extreme Kerr map (Schoen-Zhou [25]; Khuri-Weinstein [17, Thm. 4.1]).
    Used in the rigidity argument and in the differentiability of harmonic maps with respect to parameters (Propositions 9.5-9.9).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Mass-Angular Momentum Inequality for Multiple Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JNIQ62F6

@misc{pith2026250115093,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Mass-Angular Momentum Inequality for Multiple Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JNIQ62F6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15093}
}
read the original abstract

This is the second in a series of two papers to establish the conjectured mass-angular momentum inequality for multiple black holes, modulo the extreme black hole 'no hair theorem'. More precisely it is shown that either there is a counterexample to black hole uniqueness, in the form of a regular axisymmetric stationary vacuum spacetime with an asymptotically flat end and multiple degenerate horizons which is 'ADM minimizing', or the following statement holds. Complete, simply connected, maximal initial data sets for the Einstein equations with multiple ends that are either asymptotically flat or asymptotically cylindrical, admit an ADM mass lower bound given by the square root of total angular momentum, under the assumption of nonnegative energy density and axisymmetry. Moreover, equality is achieved in the mass lower bound only for a constant time slice of an extreme Kerr spacetime. The proof is based on a novel flow of singular harmonic maps with hyperbolic plane target, under which the renormalized harmonic map energy is monotonically nonincreasing. Relevant properties of the flow are achieved through a refined asymptotic analysis of solutions to the harmonic map equations and their linearization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15093 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Domain of integration and boundary components. Proof. First consider the case i = 2, . . . , N, in which I t 2 (δ, ϵ, λ, i) = I t 2 (δ, ϵ, i) is independent of λ. Since the areas of the relevant cylinders C t δ,ϵ,λ,i are O(δ) as δ → 0, it suffices to show that the integrands are O(1). For fixed ϵ > 0, observe that [12, Theorem 2.1], [19, Theorem 1.1], and (3.8) of Corollary 3.2 imply the existence of a constant C su… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Case 1: collision of two punctures. punctures. We will then consider the case where there is one collision location but possibly more than two colliding punctures. Finally, we will treat the general case. Case 1. Consider the situation in which only two punctures collide, and denote for convenience the two colliding punctures by p1, p2 with z-coordinates z1 < z2. Without loss of generality it may be assumed that the… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Scattering along two rods with four punctures. to obtain tension estimates (6.25) |τ (Ξn)| ≤ C 1 + r 3 i on (Si ∪ Bi) \ Γ, i = 1, . . . , k, where C is a constant independent of i and n. Note that |τ (Ξn)| = 0 on the compliment (R 3 \ Γ) \ (∪ k i=1Si ∪ Bi). Consider the quantity (6.26) Λ(Φn, Ξn) = p 1 + dH2 (Φn, Ξn) 2, and recall that [30, Lemma 1] implies (6.27) ∆Λ(Φn, Ξn) ≥ −|τ (Ξn)| ≥ ( − C 1+r 3 i on (Si ∪ Bi) \… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Kerr black hole formation with complete apparent horizon and a new approach toward Penrose inequality

    gr-qc 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors prove that scale-critical short-pulse initial data can produce global Kerr black hole formation spacetimes with a complete apparent horizon, and they derive dynamical and spacetime Penrose inequalities in ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [12]

    Q. Han, M. Khuri, G. Weinstein, and J. Xiong, Asymptotic analysis of harmonic maps with prescribed singularities, preprint, arXiv:2212.14826

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Bartnik, The mass of an asymptotically flat manifold , Comm

    R. Bartnik, The mass of an asymptotically flat manifold , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 39 (1986), no. 5, 661–693

    work page 1986

  3. [2]

    Bray, Proof of the Riemannian Penrose inequality using the positive mass theorem , J

    H. Bray, Proof of the Riemannian Penrose inequality using the positive mass theorem , J. Differential. Geom., 59 (2001), no.2, 177–267

    work page 2001

  4. [3]

    Brill, On the positive definite mass of the Bondi-Weber-Wheeler time-symmetric gravitational waves , Ann

    D. Brill, On the positive definite mass of the Bondi-Weber-Wheeler time-symmetric gravitational waves , Ann. Phys., 7 (1959), 466–483

    work page 1959

  5. [4]

    Bryden, M

    E. Bryden, M. Khuri, and B. Sokolowsky, The positive mass theorem with angular momentum and charge for manifolds with boundary , J. Math. Phys., 60 (2019), no. 5, 052501, 10 pp

    work page 2019

  6. [5]

    Chru´ sciel,Boundary conditions at spatial infinity from a Hamiltonian point of view , Topological Properties and Global Structure of Space-Time (P

    P. Chru´ sciel,Boundary conditions at spatial infinity from a Hamiltonian point of view , Topological Properties and Global Structure of Space-Time (P. Bergmann and V. de Sabbata, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1986, pp. 49–59

    work page 1986

  7. [6]

    Chru´ sciel,Mass and angular-momentum inequalities for axi-symmetric initial data sets

    P. Chru´ sciel,Mass and angular-momentum inequalities for axi-symmetric initial data sets. I. Positivity of Mass, Ann. Phys., 323 (2008), 2566–2590

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    Chru´ sciel, and J

    P. Chru´ sciel, and J. Costa,Mass, angular-momentum and charge inequalities for axisymmetric initial data , Classical Quantum Gravity, 26 (2009), no. 23, 235013

    work page 2009

Show all 31 references
  1. [8]

    Chru´ sciel, Y.-Y

    P. Chru´ sciel, Y.-Y. Li, and G. Weinstein,Mass and angular-momentum inequalities for axi-symmetric initial data sets, II. Angular momentum , Ann. Physics, 323 (2008), no. 10, 2591–2613

    2008

  2. [9]

    Costa, Proof of a Dain inequality with charge , J

    J. Costa, Proof of a Dain inequality with charge , J. Phys. A, 43 (2010), no. 28, 285202

    2010

  3. [10]

    Dain, Proof of the angular momentum-mass inequality for axisymmetric black holes , J

    S. Dain, Proof of the angular momentum-mass inequality for axisymmetric black holes , J. Differential Geom., 79 (2008), 33–67

    2008

  4. [11]

    Dain, and M

    S. Dain, and M. Gabach-Clement, Geometrical inequalities bounding angular momentum and charges in general relativity, Living Rev. Relativ., (2018) 21, no. 5

    2018

  5. [13]

    Huang, R

    L.-H. Huang, R. Schoen, M.-T. Wang, Specifying angular momentum and center of mass for vacuum initial data sets , Comm. Math. Phys., 306 (2011), no. 3, 785–803

    2011

  6. [14]

    Huisken, and T

    G. Huisken, and T. Ilmanen, The inverse mean curvature flow and the Riemannian Penrose inequality , J. Differential Geom., 59 (2001), no. 3, 353–437

    2001

  7. [15]

    Jaracz, M

    J. Jaracz, M. Khuri, and B. Sokolowsky, in preparation

  8. [16]

    Kakkat, M

    V. Kakkat, M. Khuri, J. Rainone, and G. Weinstein, The geometry and topology of stationary multi- axisymmetric vacuum black holes in higher dimensions , Pacific J. Math., 322 (2023), no. 1, 59–97

    2023

  9. [17]

    Khuri, and G

    M. Khuri, and G. Weinstein, The positive mass theorem for multiple rotating charged black holes , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 55 (2016), no. 2, 1–29. 64 HAN, KHURI, WEINSTEIN, AND XIONG

    2016

  10. [18]

    Klainerman, Mathematical challenges of general relativity, Rendiconti di Matematica, Serie VII, 27 (2007), 105–122

    S. Klainerman, Mathematical challenges of general relativity, Rendiconti di Matematica, Serie VII, 27 (2007), 105–122

    2007

  11. [19]

    Li, and G

    Y.-Y. Li, and G. Tian, Regularity of harmonic maps with prescribed singularities , Comm. Math. Phys., 149 (1992), no. 1, 1–30

    1992

  12. [20]

    Mars, Present status of the Penrose inequality , Classical Quantum Gravity, 26 (2009), no

    M. Mars, Present status of the Penrose inequality , Classical Quantum Gravity, 26 (2009), no. 19, 193001, 59 pp

    2009

  13. [21]

    Penrose, Gravitational collapse - the role of general relativity , Riv

    R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse - the role of general relativity , Riv. del Nuovo Cim. (numero speziale), 1 (1969), 252–276

    1969

  14. [22]

    Penrose, Naked singularities, Ann

    R. Penrose, Naked singularities, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 224 (1973), 125–134

    1973

  15. [23]

    Penrose, Some unsolved problems in classical general relativity , Seminar on Differential Geometry, Ann

    R. Penrose, Some unsolved problems in classical general relativity , Seminar on Differential Geometry, Ann. Math. Study, 102 (1982), 631–668

    1982

  16. [24]

    Schoen, and S.-T

    R. Schoen, and S.-T. Yau, Proof of the positive mass theorem , Comm. Math. Phys., 65 (1979), 45–76

    1979

  17. [25]

    Schoen, and X

    R. Schoen, and X. Zhou, Convexity of reduced energy and mass angular momentum inequalities , Ann. Henri Poincar´ e,14 (2013), 1747–1773

    2013

  18. [26]

    Sokolowsky, Extensions of the mass angular momentum inequality in mathematical relativity , Stony Brook University, Dissertation, ProQuest LLC, 2019, 68 pp

    B. Sokolowsky, Extensions of the mass angular momentum inequality in mathematical relativity , Stony Brook University, Dissertation, ProQuest LLC, 2019, 68 pp

    2019

  19. [27]

    Weinstein, On rotating black holes in equilibrium in general relativity , Comm

    G. Weinstein, On rotating black holes in equilibrium in general relativity , Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 43 (1990), 903–948

    1990

  20. [28]

    Weinstein, On the Dirichlet problem for harmonic maps with prescribed singularities , Duke Math

    G. Weinstein, On the Dirichlet problem for harmonic maps with prescribed singularities , Duke Math. J., 77 (1995), no. 1, 135–165

    1995

  21. [29]

    Weinstein, Harmonic maps with prescribed singularities into Hadamard manifolds , Math

    G. Weinstein, Harmonic maps with prescribed singularities into Hadamard manifolds , Math. Res. Lett., 3 (1996), no. 6, 835–844

    1996

  22. [30]

    Weinstein, Harmonic maps with prescribed singularities and applications in general relativity , Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, 85 (2020), 479–489

    G. Weinstein, Harmonic maps with prescribed singularities and applications in general relativity , Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics, 85 (2020), 479–489

    2020

  23. [31]

    Witten, A simple proof of the positive energy theorem , Comm

    E. Witten, A simple proof of the positive energy theorem , Comm. Math. Phys., 80 (1981), 381–402. Department of Mathematics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA Email address : qhan@nd.edu Department of Mathematics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794...

    1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.