REVIEW 3 cited by
In2Core: Leveraging Influence Functions for Coreset Selection in Instruction Finetuning of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Despite advancements, fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) remains costly due to the extensive parameter count and substantial data requirements for model generalization. Accessibility to computing resources remains a barrier for the open-source community. To address this challenge, we propose the In2Core algorithm, which selects a coreset by analyzing the correlation between training and evaluation samples with a trained model. Notably, we assess the model's internal gradients to estimate this relationship, aiming to rank the contribution of each training point. To enhance efficiency, we propose an optimization to compute influence functions with a reduced number of layers while achieving similar accuracy. By applying our algorithm to instruction fine-tuning data of LLMs, we can achieve similar performance with just 50% of the training data. Meantime, using influence functions to analyze model coverage to certain testing samples could provide a reliable and interpretable signal on the training set's coverage of those test points.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Quantum Annealing for Machine Learning: Applications in Feature Selection, Instance Selection, and Clustering
Quantum annealing matched simulated annealing on small QUBO-based machine learning tasks, with a hybrid classical clustering plus quantum medoid refinement pipeline giving the best submitted retrieval score in the clu...
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Electronic Health Record Modeling: From Deep Learning Approaches to Large Language Models
A survey that taxonomizes EHR modeling research into data-centric, architectural, learning-focused, multimodal, and LLM-based categories, with datasets and metrics.
-
Class-Proportional Coreset Selection for Difficulty-Separable Data
Class-proportional variants of difficulty-based coreset selection outperform class-agnostic methods on class-imbalanced security and medical datasets, particularly at 90-99.9% pruning rates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.