The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2103.11251 · v2 · pith:JOLJBKVJ · submitted 2021-03-20 · cs.LG · stat.ML

Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges

Reviewed by Pithpith:JOLJBKVJopen to challenge →

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords learninginterpretablemachinemodelsnetworksneuralproblemscausal
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Interpretability in machine learning (ML) is crucial for high stakes decisions and troubleshooting. In this work, we provide fundamental principles for interpretable ML, and dispel common misunderstandings that dilute the importance of this crucial topic. We also identify 10 technical challenge areas in interpretable machine learning and provide history and background on each problem. Some of these problems are classically important, and some are recent problems that have arisen in the last few years. These problems are: (1) Optimizing sparse logical models such as decision trees; (2) Optimization of scoring systems; (3) Placing constraints into generalized additive models to encourage sparsity and better interpretability; (4) Modern case-based reasoning, including neural networks and matching for causal inference; (5) Complete supervised disentanglement of neural networks; (6) Complete or even partial unsupervised disentanglement of neural networks; (7) Dimensionality reduction for data visualization; (8) Machine learning models that can incorporate physics and other generative or causal constraints; (9) Characterization of the "Rashomon set" of good models; and (10) Interpretable reinforcement learning. This survey is suitable as a starting point for statisticians and computer scientists interested in working in interpretable machine learning.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Agentic-imodels: Evolving agentic interpretability tools via autoresearch

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Agentic-imodels evolves scikit-learn regressors via an autoresearch loop to jointly boost predictive performance and LLM-simulatability, improving downstream agentic data science tasks by up to 73% on the BLADE benchmark.

  2. Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoders

    cs.LG 2024-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Gated SAEs decouple which features to use from how large their activations should be, applying the L1 penalty only to selection and thereby eliminating shrinkage while halving the number of firing features needed for ...

  3. Correcting Influence: Unboxing LLM Outputs with Orthogonal Latent Spaces

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A latent mediation framework with sparse autoencoders enables non-additive token-level influence attribution in LLMs by learning orthogonal features and back-propagating attributions.

  4. On the definition and importance of interpretability in scientific machine learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Interpretability in SciML requires mechanistic understanding rather than sparsity, and prior knowledge is often essential for interpretable scientific discovery.