Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 39 references

Alfv\'en pulse at chromospheric footpoints of magnetic loops and generation of the super-Dreicer electric field

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An Alfvén pulse in an expanding magnetic tube creates a parallel electric field that exceeds the Dreicer threshold by 100–1000 times and can accelerate electrons to about 1 GeV.

desk verdict The exponential tube-expansion enhancement of E_parallel/E_Dreicer is a genuine new result, but the unexplained factor 10 in Eq. (40) and the order-of-magnitude estimates need tightening before the 10^2–10^3 claim is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06463 v3 pith:JQH37WAJ submitted 2024-12-09 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph

N.A. Emelyanov , Vl.V. Kocharovsky This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph MSC 76W0585A30 PACS 52.35.Bj96.60.qe
keywords Alfvénwavespulsesuper-Dreicerelectricfieldparticleaccelerationchromospheresolarflaresmagneticfluxtubesbarometricatmosphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that an Alfvén pulse climbing an exponentially widening chromospheric magnetic tube produces an electric field along the tube that outstrips the Dreicer runaway threshold by factors of $10^2$–$10^3$ as the plasma thins toward the corona. A reader should care because this supplies a concrete, geometry-driven mechanism for the footpoints of solar flare loops to accelerate very large numbers of electrons and send them into the coronal loop, easing the long-standing 'number problem' in flare particle acceleration. The claim is derived analytically: a self-similar linear solution for the torsional pulse, a perturbative estimate of the nonlinear parallel field $E_\parallel \propto B_\varphi^3$, and a barometric tube model in which the tube expansion converts height into an exponential growth of the field relative to the Dreicer limit.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the reduction of the Alfvén-wave problem to a one-dimensional string. Changing to the magnetic-flux coordinate $\xi = rA_\varphi$ and factoring the solution as $u = f(\xi,\eta,t)\exp\!\big(\tfrac12\int \eta (1/B_z)\,\partial_\eta B_z\,d\eta'\big)$ turns the wave equation into $\partial_t^2 f = \partial_\eta(c_A^2\,\partial_\eta f)$; when $B_z$ depends only on height the extra term vanishes and d'Alembert's formula gives the running-pulse solution. The nonlinear step projects the Euler equation onto the tube normal, replaces $\partial/\partial n$ by $1/\delta$ and the pulse integral by a length $\lambda$, and yields $E_\parallel \simeq (1/c)(\lambda/\delta) B_\varphi^3/(8\pi c_A\rho)$, equivalently $\propto (B_\varphi/B_z)^3 B_z$. Cross-section averaging and division by the Dreicer field produce Eq. (41), whose exponential factor $\exp(z/H)$ is the mechanism: the tube's barometric expansion turns altitude into growth of the accelerating field relative to the runaway threshold.

What would settle it

Run a 2.5D or 3D MHD simulation of a torsional Alfvén pulse with $B_\varphi/B_z\sim0.1$ in a barometric exponentially expanding tube using the paper's chromospheric parameters; if the simulated ratio $\langle E_\parallel\rangle/E_D$ either is not proportional to $B_\varphi^3$, does not grow as $\exp(z/H)$, or falls far short of $10^2$–$10^3$ at $z\approx2000$ km, the geometric-enhancement claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that magnetic geometry changes the acceleration threshold. In an axially symmetric flux tube whose longitudinal field is homogeneous over its cross section, the linear Alfvén-wave problem reduces exactly to a one-dimensional string equation, and the wave is a self-similar pair of running pulses. Because the pulse's own magnetic pressure drives a normal plasma flow, a longitudinal electric field appears at nonlinear order, $E_\parallel \simeq (1/c)(\lambda/\delta) B_\varphi^3/(8\pi c_A\rho)$, cubic in the pulse amplitude. In the barometric expanding tube the longitudinal field stays comparatively strong while the Dreicer field falls off with the electron density, so $\langle E_\parallel\rangle/E_D$ gains a factor $\exp(z/H)$ absent in cylindrical tubes; with chromospheric parameters this ratio can exceed unity at the footpoint and reach $10^2$–$10^3$ by the middle chromosphere. The authors conclude that such fields can accelerate electrons to order 1 GeV and fill coronal loops with high-energy particles.

Load-bearing premise

The estimate assumes the pulse's magnetic pressure is the only driver of the normal plasma flow, with the normal derivative replaced by $1/\delta$ and the integral over the pulse collapsed to a length $\lambda$; if gas pressure, field-line curvature, or background gradients contribute comparably, the claimed $10^2$–$10^3$ enhancement is not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For chromospheric currents of order $10^{10}$ A and fields $B_{z0}\sim10^2$–$10^3$ G, the super-Dreicer condition can already be met at the footpoint, so particle runaway does not require a trigger in the coronal loop.
  • Because $\langle E_\parallel\rangle/E_D$ grows as $\exp(z/H)$ while the pulse ascends, an expanding-tube footpoint acts as an extended acceleration region rather than a single thin layer.
  • The cubic dependence $E_\parallel\propto B_\varphi^3$ makes the mechanism strongly amplitude-sensitive: modest increases in the Alfvén-pulse strength translate into large gains in accelerating field.
  • Electron energies of order 1 GeV become reachable, which the paper connects to gamma-ray and neutral-pion emission in the most powerful flares.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit is that the same $\exp(z/H)$ enhancement should apply to any nonlinear torsional perturbation in an expanding flux tube, not only flare-loop footpoints; spicules and other expanding chromospheric structures are natural places to look for the effect.
  • The order-of-magnitude replacement $\partial/\partial n\approx 1/\delta$ and the finite-integral approximation in Eq. (38) can be tested directly with a 2.5D or 3D MHD simulation that keeps gas pressure, curvature, and background gradients; such a test would either confirm Eq. (41) quantitatively or expose the approximation's limits.
  • If runaway electrons damp the Alfvén pulse as the authors list among open questions, the acceleration may self-limit below 1 GeV, so the published energies should be read as an upper bound under undamped pulse propagation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops an analytic model for the propagation of a torsional Alfvén pulse in an axially symmetric magnetic flux tube of variable diameter and uses it to estimate the parallel (particle-accelerating) electric field in the chromospheric footpoints of coronal loops. In Section 2 the authors transform to flux coordinates (ξ = rAφ, η = z), reduce the linearized ideal-MHD equations to a one-dimensional string equation, and write a self-similar solution for Bφ in terms of a d'Alembert pulse with an amplitude prefactor governed by the longitudinal field variation. In Section 3 the solution is specialized to a barometric atmosphere in which the external pressure decays exponentially, so the tube expands as a(z) ∝ exp(z/(4H)). In Section 4 the normal component of the plasma velocity generated by the pulse's magnetic-pressure gradient is estimated, yielding E∥ ∝ (λ/δ) Bφ³/(8π c_A ρ); after averaging over the tube cross section and dividing by the Dreicer field, the paper obtains Eq. (41), in which ⟨E∥⟩/E_D grows as exp(z/H). For currents ~10^10 A, Bz0 ~ 10^2–10^3 G, H ~ 300 km, and chromospheric densities, the ratio is claimed to reach 10^2–10^3 in the middle chromosphere, sufficient for electron acceleration up to about 1 GeV.

Significance. If quantitatively correct, the result would provide a simple analytic mechanism for generating super-Dreicer fields in expanding chromospheric loops, with direct consequences for the flare 'number problem'. The paper has genuine strengths: the flux-coordinate reduction is elegant, the linear solution is explicit, the model contains no fitted parameters (the inputs are chosen from observed ranges), the Dreicer benchmark is an external formula, and several limitations (reflection, dissipation, kinetic effects, runaway feedback) are acknowledged in the conclusions. The principal weakness is that the headline factor 10^2–10^3 is obtained from order-of-magnitude replacements in Section 4 that are not quantified, and a linearization-validity issue arises precisely at the heights where the enhancement is quoted. The central derivation is therefore defensible but the quantitative claim needs additional support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eqs. (18)–(20)] The d'Alembert solution f = ψ(η ± c_A(η)t)/2 is not a solution of Eq. (18) when c_A varies with η; a proper treatment requires a Liouville transform or a WKB amplitude factor and would generate reflected waves. For the specific barometric model adopted in Section 3 (constant T and H, ρ ∝ exp(−z/H), B_z ∝ exp(−z/2H)), c_A is actually constant, so this defect does not by itself invalidate the central application. However, the claim that Eq. (20) is a general self-similar solution for arbitrary longitudinal profiles is overstated, and the paper should state the precise conditions under which Eq. (19) applies or replace it with the correct approximate solution.
  2. [Section 4, Eqs. (34)–(38)] The estimate E∥ ≈ (1/c)(λ/δ) Bφ³/(8π c_A ρ) rests on three unquantified replacements: ∂/∂n ≈ 1/δ, the identification of the integral in Eq. (36) with a factor λ, and the neglect of gas pressure and curvature in Eq. (31). In the same paragraph, the statement that the exponential multiplier can be ignored for λ ≲ 4H is questionable, since exp(−1) ≈ 0.37 is not negligible at the upper end of that range. Because the claimed 10^2–10^3 enhancement is a direct numerical consequence of this formula, the authors should justify these replacements with scale estimates or a concrete pulse profile (for example, the Gaussian pulse used in Figure 1) and provide an error estimate.
  3. [Section 4, Eqs. (40)–(41)] The numerical prefactor 1/10 in Eq. (40) and the factor 10^7/6 in Eq. (41) are introduced without derivation, and the Dreicer-field expression used is not stated. For the homogeneous-current profile used in the text, averaging α = (Bφ/Bz)³ over the cross section gives a factor 2/5, so the origin of the factor 1/10 is not evident. This is load-bearing because the statement that the ratio 'can already exceed unity at z = 0' and the final 10^2–10^3 value both scale linearly with this prefactor.
  4. [Section 3 and Conclusions] Equation (27) implies Bφ/Bz ∝ exp(z/(4H)), because Bφ decays as exp(−z/(4H)) while Bz decays as exp(−z/(2H)). For the quoted middle-chromosphere height z ≈ 2000 km and H ≈ 300 km, this ratio grows by a factor of roughly e^{5/3} ≈ 5.3 relative to z = 0; if the initial ratio is ~0.3, as allowed by the discussion around Eq. (23), the perturbation is no longer small. The perturbative estimate of E∥ from a linear pulse may then require nonlinear back-reaction, and the advertised 10^2–10^3 values should be accompanied by a check of the weak-nonlinearity condition. The authors' own closing caveat about small deviations from exponential structure addresses a different limitation and does not cover this point.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Several typographical slips remain: 'd'Alambert' should be 'd'Alembert', 'Space distribution' in the Figure 1 caption should be 'Spatial distribution', and 'table-type plasma density profile' is apparently intended as 'table-top plasma density profile'.
  2. [Section 4, Eq. (40)] The definition of α0 and of the averaging brackets in Eq. (40) is not explicit: it should be stated whether Bφ in α0 is evaluated at the tube boundary or after cross-sectional averaging, and the relationship between ⟨α0⟩ and the edge value should be written out.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (41)] The Dreicer-field formula is cited to Zaitsev, Kronshtadtov, and Stepanov (2016) but is not displayed; including the explicit expression used for E_D would make the numerical coefficient in Eq. (41) checkable.
  4. [Section 5, final paragraph] The closing characterization of a recent work (Pradhan et al. 2024) as 'misleading' is an editorial statement rather than a technical argument; it should be removed or replaced by a specific, verifiable remark.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the super-Dreicer result follows from the paper's own linear solution and perturbation estimates, with independently cited external parameters and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Section 2 solves the linearized ideal-MHD equations by the method of characteristics, obtaining the self-similar Alfvén-pulse solution in Eqs. (20) and (27). The exponential tube expansion, a(z) = a0 exp(z/4H), follows from the assumed barometric equilibrium Bz(z) = B0 exp(-z/2H) and flux conservation, Eqs. (24)-(26), citing the external prior work of Zaitsev and Stepanov, not the present authors. Section 4 then estimates the nonlinear parallel electric field from the Euler equation, Eq. (34), integrates Eq. (36), and obtains E_parallel approximately (1/c)(lambda/delta) B_phi^3/(8 pi c_A rho), Eq. (38). The Dreicer field is taken from the external Dreicer and Zaitsev-Kronshtadtov-Stepanov formulas. The input parameters I, B_z0, H, lambda, delta0, n0, and T are chosen from observed chromospheric ranges rather than fitted to produce the claimed 10^2-10^3 enhancement in Eq. (41). No equation used for that claim is defined in terms of the claim itself, and no self-citation with overlapping authorship is load-bearing. The unexplained factor 10 in Eq. (40) and the order-of-magnitude replacements in Eq. (38) are approximation-quality and robustness concerns, not circular reductions. Therefore the paper exhibits no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles or forces are introduced. The central claim rests on a chain of modeling choices (ideal MHD, incompressibility, radial-flow suppression, barometric stratification, and a short-pulse order-of-magnitude estimate) plus a set of chromospheric input parameters. The largest uncertainty is the order-of-magnitude replacement in Eq. 38 and the un-derived factor 1/10 in Eq. 40.

free parameters (6)
  • α0 = (Bφ0/Bz0)^3 = not specified; chosen from range (Bφ/Bz)^2 ~ 10^-1 to 10^-2
    Sets the pulse amplitude and enters cubically in E∥ (Eq. 39-40); no independent model for α0 is given.
  • λ/δ0 = 30-300 km / 30-300 km, so order 1
    Pulse length to transverse width ratio, a free geometric input that multiplies E∥ (Eq. 38-40).
  • Bz0 = 10^2-10^3 G
    Footpoint longitudinal field, chosen from chromospheric ranges; appears linearly in E∥.
  • n0 = 10^11-10^13 cm^-3
    Footpoint electron density; sets Dreicer field magnitude in Eq. 41.
  • T = 10^4 K
    Plasma temperature; appears in Dreicer field and scale height.
  • H = 300 km
    Pressure scale height; sets the rate of tube expansion and the exp(z/H) growth in Eq. 41.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Ideal single-fluid magnetohydrodynamics (Eq. 1)
    The entire analysis is based on ideal MHD; dissipation and two-fluid effects are excluded.
  • domain assumption Plasma is incompressible, ∇·v = 0
    Assumed at the start of Section 2 to simplify the MHD equations; not justified from plasma parameters.
  • ad hoc to paper No radial plasma flow, v_r ≡ 0, in the linear approximation
    Imposed in Section 2 to set up the linear problem; self-consistency is argued later in Section 3.
  • ad hoc to paper Longitudinal magnetic field B_z is independent of radius
    Needed to obtain κ ≡ 1 and τ^-2 = 0, reducing the wave equation to Eq. 17.
  • domain assumption Barometric equilibrium: B_z²/8π ≈ P_e with P_e from Eq. 24
    Used in Section 3 to set B_z(z) and the tube radius a(z).
  • ad hoc to paper Plasma density in the tube follows the same exponential law as external pressure
    Assumed so that c_A is nearly constant; this is a special, convenient stratification rather than a general result.
  • domain assumption For the nonlinear estimate: gas pressure negligible (P ≪ B_φ²/8π), pulse length λ ≪ curvature radius R
    Used in Section 4 to reduce the normal Euler equation to Eq. 34.
  • ad hoc to paper Order-of-magnitude replacement ∂/∂n ≈ 1/δ and integral factor λ
    Converts Eq. 36 into Eq. 38, a quantitative estimate of E∥ that drives the super-Dreicer conclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Alfv\'en pulse at chromospheric footpoints of magnetic loops and generation of the super-Dreicer electric field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JQH37WAJ

@misc{pith2026241206463,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Alfv\'en pulse at chromospheric footpoints of magnetic loops and generation of the super-Dreicer electric field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JQH37WAJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06463}
}
read the original abstract

A self-similar solution of the linearised magnetohydrodynamic equations describing the propagation of the Alfv\'en pulse in an axially symmetric magnetic tube of variable diameter is obtained. The electric field component induced by the non-linear Alfv\'en wave and directed along the tube surface, i.e., accelerating particles along the magnetic field, is determined on the basis of the perturbation theory and specified to the case of a magnetic flux tube homogeneous over its cross section. For the chromospheric tubes, whose configuration is given by the barometric law of plasma pressure decrease, the conditions for achieving the super-Dreicer electric field limit necessary to drive the accelerated high-energy electrons into the coronal part of the loop are established.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06463 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Space distribution of the dimensionless magnetic field component Bφ of the Alfv´en pulse at different times ˜τ = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 (a,b,c,d respectively), where ˜τ = cAt/H. The dashed curve is the radius of the magnetic tube. 4. Generation of the Accelerating Electric Field by a Non-linear Alfv´en Pulse The particles acceleration in chromospheric part of magnetic loops is de￾fined to a large extent by the magnitude of … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The expanding magnetic tube of the chromospheric part of the coronal loop. The black dashed arrows show Bφ component and the black dotted arrows depict the magnetic field lines of the flux tube surface, respectively. The green arrows indicate the normal component of the plasma flow velocity Vn, and the blue dash-dotted arrows show the non-linear electric field component E|| directed along the tube surface. the propa… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    : 2002, Particle Acceleration and Kinematics in Solar Flares – A Synthesis of Recent Observations and Theoretical Concepts

    botherref Aschwanden , M.J. : 2002, Particle Acceleration and Kinematics in Solar Flares – A Synthesis of Recent Observations and Theoretical Concepts . 101, 1. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019712124366 . http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1019712124366 . botherref

    doi:10.1023/a:1019712124366 2002

  2. [2]

    , Loeser , R

    botherref Avrett , E.H. , Loeser , R. : 2008, Models of the Solar Chromosphere and Transition Region from SUMER and HRTS Observations : Formation of the Extreme ‐ Ultraviolet Spectrum of Hydrogen , Carbon , and Oxygen . 175, 229. https://doi.org/10.1086/523671 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/523671 . botherref

    doi:10.1086/523671 2008

  3. [3]

    , Canivete Cuissa , J.R

    botherref Battaglia , A.F. , Canivete Cuissa , J.R. , Calvo , F. , Bossart , A.A. , Steiner , O. : 2021, The Alfvénic Nature of Chromospheric Swirls. 649, A121. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040110 . https://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202040110 . botherref

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040110 2021

  4. [4]

    : 2017, Flare Observations

    botherref Benz , A.O. : 2017, Flare Observations . 14, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41116-016-0004-3 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41116-016-0004-3 . botherref

    doi:10.1007/s41116-016-0004-3 2017

  5. [5]

    , Priest , E.R

    botherref Browning , P.K. , Priest , E.R. : 1982, The Structure of Untwisted Magnetic Flux Tubes. 21, 237. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091928208209015 . http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03091928208209015 . botherref

    work page doi:10.1080/03091928208209015 1982

  6. [6]

    , Carlsson , M

    botherref De Pontieu , B. , Carlsson , M. , Rouppe Van Der Voort , L.H.M. , Rutten , R.J. , Hansteen , V.H. , Watanabe , H. : 2012, UBIQUITOUS TORSIONAL MOTIONS IN TYPE II SPICULES . 752, L12. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/L12 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/L12 . botherref

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/752/1/l12 2012

  7. [7]

    : 1959, Electron and Ion Runaway in a Fully Ionized Gas

    botherref Dreicer , H. : 1959, Electron and Ion Runaway in a Fully Ionized Gas . I . 115, 238. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.115.238 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.115.238 . botherref

    doi:10.1103/physrev.115.238 1959

  8. [8]

    : 1960, Electron and Ion Runaway in a Fully Ionized Gas

    botherref Dreicer , H. : 1960, Electron and Ion Runaway in a Fully Ionized Gas . II . 117, 329. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.117.329 . https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.117.329 . botherref

    doi:10.1103/physrev.117.329 1960

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    , Shelyag , S

    botherref Fedun , V. , Shelyag , S. , Verth , G. , Mathioudakis , M. , Erdélyi , R. : 2011, MHD Waves Generated by High-Frequency Photospheric Vortex Motions. 29, 1029. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1029-2011 . https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/29/1029/2011/ . botherref

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    , Nita , G.M

    botherref Fleishman , G.D. , Nita , G.M. , Chen , B. , Yu , S. , Gary , D.E. : 2022, Solar Flare Accelerates Nearly All Electrons in a Large Coronal Volume. 606, 674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04728-8 . https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04728-8 . botherref

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    , Jess , D.B

    botherref Grant , S.D.T. , Jess , D.B. , Zaqarashvili , T.V. , Beck , C. , Socas-Navarro , H. , Aschwanden , M.J. , et al. : 2018, Alfvén Wave Dissipation in the Solar Chromosphere. 14, 480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0058-3 . https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018...

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    , Somov , B.V

    botherref Gritsyk , P.A. , Somov , B.V. : 2023, Modern analytic models of acceleration and propagation of electrons in solar flares. 193, 465. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.2021.08.039048 . https://ufn.ru/ru/articles/2023/5/a/ . botherref

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    : 1978, Alfven Waves in the Solar Atmosphere

    botherref Hollweg , J. : 1978, Alfven Waves in the Solar Atmosphere. 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152474 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00152474 . botherref

    1978 doi

  6. [14]

    : 1981, Alfven Waves in the Solar Atmosphere: II : Open and Closed Magnetic Flux Tubes

    botherref Hollweg , J.V. : 1981, Alfven Waves in the Solar Atmosphere: II : Open and Closed Magnetic Flux Tubes. 70, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154391 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00154391 . botherref

    1981 doi

  7. [15]

    , Jackson , S

    botherref Hollweg , J.V. , Jackson , S. , Galloway , D. : 1982, Alfven Waves in the Solar Atmosphere: III . Nonlinear Waves on Open Flux Tubes. 75, 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00153458 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00153458 . botherref

    1982 doi

  8. [16]

    , Brown , J.C

    botherref Hoyng , P. , Brown , J.C. , Beek , H.F. : 1976, High Time Resolution Analysis of Solar Hard X-ray Flares Observed on Board the ESRO TD-1A Satellite. 48, 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00151992 . https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976SoPh...48..197H . botherref

    1976 doi

  9. [17]

    , Mathioudakis , M

    botherref Jess , D.B. , Mathioudakis , M. , Erdélyi , R. , Crockett , P.J. , Keenan , F.P. , Christian , D.J. : 2009, Alfvén Waves in the Lower Solar Atmosphere . 323, 1582. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168680 . https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1168680 . botherref

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    , Cao , W

    botherref Ji , H. , Cao , W. , Goode , P.R. : 2012, OBSERVATION OF ULTRAFINE CHANNELS OF SOLAR CORONA HEATING . 750, L25. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/750/1/L25 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/750/1/L25 . botherref

    2012 doi

  11. [19]

    , Nelson , C.J

    botherref Liu , J. , Nelson , C.J. , Snow , B. , Wang , Y. , Erdélyi , R. : 2019, Evidence of Ubiquitous Alfvén Pulses Transporting Energy from the Photosphere to the Upper Chromosphere. 10, 3504. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11495-0 . https://www.nature.com/articles/s41...

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    , Wheatland , M.S

    botherref Melrose , D.B. , Wheatland , M.S. : 2013, Transfer of Energy , Potential , and Current by Alfvén Waves in Solar Flares . 288, 223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0305-9 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-013-0305-9 . botherref

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    , Wheatland , M.S

    botherref Melrose , D.B. , Wheatland , M.S. : 2014, Bulk Energization of Electrons in Solar Flares by Alfvén Waves . 289, 881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-013-0376-7 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-013-0376-7 . botherref

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    , Cargill , P.J

    botherref Miller , J.A. , Cargill , P.J. , Emslie , A.G. , Holman , G.D. , Dennis , B.R. , LaRosa , T.N. , et al. : 1997, Critical Issues for Understanding Particle Acceleration in Impulsive Solar Flares. 102, 14631. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA00976 . https://agupubs.onlineli...

    1997 doi

  15. [23]

    , Shetye , J

    botherref Murabito , M. , Shetye , J. , Stangalini , M. , Verwichte , E. , Arber , T. , Ermolli , I. , et al. : 2020, Unveiling the Magnetic Nature of Chromospheric Vortices. 639, A59. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038360 . https://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038...

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    : 2000 , The Basic Equations of Magnetohydrodynamics , Springer Netherlands , 73

    bbook Priest , E.R. : 2000 , The Basic Equations of Magnetohydrodynamics , Springer Netherlands , 73 . 978-90-277-1833-4 978-94-009-7958-1 . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7958-1_2 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-009-7958-1_2 . bbook

    2000 doi

  17. [25]

    , Forbes , T.G

    barticle Priest , E.R. , Forbes , T.G. : 2002 , The magnetic nature of solar flares . The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 10 , 313 . https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:121653337 . barticle

    2002

  18. [26]

    , Verth , G

    botherref Ruderman , M.S. , Verth , G. , Erdélyi , R. : 2008, Transverse Oscillations of Longitudinally Stratified Coronal Loops with Variable Cross Section . 686, 694. https://doi.org/10.1086/591444 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/591444 . botherref

    2008 doi

  19. [27]

    , Kosovichev , A.G

    botherref Sharykin , I.N. , Kosovichev , A.G. : 2014, FINE STRUCTURE OF FLARE RIBBONS AND EVOLUTION OF ELECTRIC CURRENTS . 788, L18. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/788/1/L18 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2041-8205/788/1/L18 . botherref

    2014 doi

  20. [28]

    , Magara , T

    barticle Shibata , K. , Magara , T. : 2011 , Solar Flares: Magnetohydrodynamic Processes . Living Reviews in Solar Physics 8 , 1 . https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:122217405 . barticle

    2011

  21. [29]

    : 2024, Magnetohydrodynamic Waves in the Partially Ionized Solar Plasma

    botherref Soler , R. : 2024, Magnetohydrodynamic Waves in the Partially Ionized Solar Plasma. 382, 20230223. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2023.0223 . https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2023.0223 . botherref

    2024

  22. [30]

    , Terradas , J

    botherref Soler , R. , Terradas , J. , Oliver , R. , Ballester , J.L. : 2017, Propagation of Torsional Alfvén Waves from the Photosphere to the Corona : Reflection , Transmission , and Heating in Expanding Flux Tubes . 840, 20. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d7f . https:...

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    , Shetye , J

    botherref Srivastava , A.K. , Shetye , J. , Murawski , K. , Doyle , J.G. , Stangalini , M. , Scullion , E. , et al. : 2017, High-Frequency Torsional Alfvén Waves as an Energy Source for Coronal Heating. 7, 43147. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43147 . https://www.nature.com/artic...

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    , Wang , H

    botherref Toriumi , S. , Wang , H. : 2019, Flare-productive active regions. Living Reviews in Solar Physics 16. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:139102669 . botherref

    2019

  25. [33]

    , Scullion , E

    botherref Tziotziou , K. , Scullion , E. , Shelyag , S. , Steiner , O. , Khomenko , E. , Tsiropoula , G. , et al. : 2023, Vortex Motions in the Solar Atmosphere : Definitions , Theory , Observations , and Modelling . 219, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-022-00946-8 . https:/...

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    , Erdélyi , R

    botherref Verth , G. , Erdélyi , R. , Goossens , M. : 2010, MAGNETOSEISMOLOGY : EIGENMODES OF TORSIONAL ALFVÉN WAVES IN STRATIFIED SOLAR WAVEGUIDES . 714, 1637. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1637 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1637 . botherref

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    , Scullion , E

    botherref Wedemeyer-Böhm , S. , Scullion , E. , Steiner , O. , Van Der Voort , L.R. , De La Cruz Rodriguez , J. , Fedun , V. , Erdélyi , R. : 2012, Magnetic Tornadoes as Energy Channels into the Solar Corona. 486, 505. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11202 . https://www.nature.c...

    2012 doi

  28. [36]

    : 1974 , Linear and Nonlinear Waves , Pure & Applied Mathematics , Wiley

    bbook Whitham , G.B. : 1974 , Linear and Nonlinear Waves , Pure & Applied Mathematics , Wiley . 978-0-471-94090-6 . bbook

    1974

  29. [37]

    , Cameron , R.H

    botherref Yadav , N. , Cameron , R.H. , Solanki , S.K. : 2020, Simulations Show That Vortex Flows Could Heat the Chromosphere in Solar Plage . 894, L17. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab8dc5 . https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ab8dc5 . botherref

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    , Stepanov , A.V

    botherref Zaitsev , V.V. , Stepanov , A.V. : 2015, Particle Acceleration and Plasma Heating in the Chromosphere . 290, 3559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0731-y . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-015-0731-y . botherref

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    , Kronshtadtov , P.V

    botherref Zaitsev , V.V. , Kronshtadtov , P.V. , Stepanov , A.V. : 2016, Rayleigh– Taylor Instability and Excitation of Super-Dreicer Electric Fields in the Solar Chromosphere . 291, 3451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0983-1 . http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11207-016-...

    2016 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.