Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Non-supersymmetric branes and discrete topological terms

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Computing the discrete $\mathbb{Z}_3$ topological term directly from the proposed chiral NS5-brane spectrum of the non-supersymmetric $\mathrm{SO}(16)^2$ heterotic string gives $A(1)=1/3$, the opposite of the value $2/3$ obtained by…

desk verdict A careful anomaly-inflow computation that flips the Z3 value relative to Tachikawa-Zhang, but only for a conjectural NS5 spectrum; useful and honest, conditional as advertised. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11610 v1 pith:JRHZRXWW submitted 2025-07-15 hep-th

Ivano Basile , Vittorio Larotonda This is my paper
classification hep-th MSC 81T3081T5057R90 PACS 11.25.-w
keywords discretetopologicaltermsNS5-branesnon-supersymmetricheteroticstringanomalyinflowglobalanomaliesGreen-SchwarzmechanismZ3-valuedtermbordisminvariants
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Non-supersymmetric string theories can come with discrete topological terms: phases assigned to spacetime manifolds that are invisible to any local action. This paper computes such a $\mathbb{Z}_3$-valued term in the unique ten-dimensional non-supersymmetric heterotic string with no tachyon, the $\mathrm{SO}(16)^2$ theory, using the chiral worldvolume spectrum of its NS5-brane proposed in [47]. The direct anomaly-inflow calculation gives $A(1)=4/12=1/3$, opposite to the value $8/12=2/3$ obtained in [49] by subtracting the two supersymmetric heterotic spectra. The paper concludes that the discrepancy is not a sign error but a physical ambiguity: the two routes use different anomaly polynomials, related by factorized terms, so the discrete term is sensitive to which one describes the non-supersymmetric brane. If either value is correct, the term is an observable phase distinguishing vacua; if the ambiguity stands, it quantifies how little is known about chiral brane spectra without supersymmetry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the global anomaly theory $X = \eta(N_7) - \int_{N_7} H_3 \wedge W_4$, whose phase on the seven-sphere probes the $\mathrm{SU}(2)_R$ Witten anomaly classified by $\pi_6(\mathrm{SU}(2)) = \mathbb{Z}_{12}$. The value is read off by lifting to $\mathrm{Sp}(2)$ through the fibration $\mathrm{Sp}(1) \subset \mathrm{Sp}(2)$: any extension contributes $t/12$, with $t$ the coefficient of $(1/48)\mathrm{tr}\,F^4$ in the $\mathrm{Sp}(2)$ anomaly polynomial. Branching rules under $\mathrm{SU}(2) \subset \mathrm{Sp}(2)$ convert the proposed worldvolume spectrum into $t \equiv 4 \pmod{12}$, producing $A(1)=1/3$.

What would settle it

Evaluate the six-dimensional anomaly polynomial of the non-supersymmetric NS5-brane from an independent UV definition, e.g. a weakly coupled dual brane or a direct string construction, and extract the coefficient of $(1/48)\mathrm{tr}F^4$ in the $\mathrm{SU}(2)_R\subset\mathrm{Sp}(2)$ extension: if it is $8$ rather than $4$, the proposed spectrum is ruled out and the term returns to $2/3$. Equivalently, compute the partition-function phase on the fluxed $\mathrm{Sp}(2)$ generator and check whether it is $e^{2\pi i/3}$ or $e^{4\pi i/3}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the chiral spectrum proposed in [47] for the non-supersymmetric NS5-brane---four fermion singlets, one fermion in $(16,1)\oplus(1,16)$, and one self-dual two-form---together with the minimal $\mathrm{SU}(2)_R$ representation ansatz fixes a $\mathbb{Z}_3$-valued discrete topological term of value $A(1)=1/3$ on the generator of $\pi_6(\mathrm{SU}(2))$. Requiring the anomaly polynomial to factorize with the Bianchi class $Z_4=p_1/2-2c_2$ leaves one undetermined coefficient $n_3$; including spacetime Yang-Mills fields forces $n_3=0$, making the spectrum $n_1=32$, $n_2=-2$, $n_{\mathrm{SD}}=-1$. The resulting $1/3$ is opposite to the $2/3$ obtained in [49] by virtual subtraction of the two supersymmetric theories. The paper argues that the discrepancy comes from the physics captured by the two computations---the earlier one injects M-theory data through the E-string anomaly polynomial, while the direct one uses only the proposed brane spectrum---so the topological term is determined only once the correct anomaly polynomial for the non-supersymmetric brane is identified.

Load-bearing premise

The computation stands on the tentative chiral spectrum proposed in [47]---four singlet fermions, a fermion in $(16,1)\oplus(1,16)$, and a self-dual two-form---on the ansatz that only trivial, fundamental, and adjoint $\mathrm{SU}(2)_R$ representations appear, and on the choice $n_3=0$, which the paper says cannot be fully justified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the direct computation is right, the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ topological term of the $\mathrm{SO}(16)^2$ heterotic string is $1/3$ when defined through the proposed NS5-brane spectrum, not $2/3$ as in the subtractive computation.
  • The proposed spectrum passes the full anomaly-inflow consistency check including Yang-Mills fields only for $n_3=0$; with that value the spectrum is uniquely fixed.
  • At least one input---the proposed brane spectrum or the M-theory inflow used for the E-string---does not give the correct anomaly polynomial for the non-supersymmetric brane, so the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ term is not yet uniquely determined.
  • In eight-dimensional non-supersymmetric gravity with a $\mathrm{U}(1)$ gauge factor and a two-form Green-Schwarz mediator, there is a $\mathbb{Z}_2$-valued discrete topological term given by the parity of the net number of chiral $\mathrm{SU}(2)_R$ doublets on the three-brane, equivalently the parity of net spacetime fermions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ambiguity is real, the $\mathbb{Z}_3$ term is not an intrinsic invariant of the $\mathrm{SO}(16)^2$ vacuum but depends on a choice of anomaly polynomial; the two allowed values would then be analogous to different theta-parameter branches, and some observable should distinguish them.
  • The eight-dimensional result suggests a general counting rule: in non-supersymmetric gravity with a Green-Schwarz two-form and a $\mathrm{U}(1)$, the discrete $\mathbb{Z}_2$ term is computable from chiral fermion parity, and this parity could become a quantum-gravity consistency condition if the UV completion fixes it.
  • A third anomaly polynomial, obtained by including the $\mathrm{SU}(2)_R$ bundle directly in the gauge-soliton inflow via the standard embedding as sketched in the paper, may yield either value; computing it explicitly would test which anomaly polynomial is the physical one for the small-instanton limit.
  • The same global-anomaly test can be applied to any alternative chiral brane spectrum, such as the one mentioned in [85]; whichever spectrum survives will fix the value of the discrete term and thereby constrain the physics of strongly coupled non-supersymmetric branes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper addresses the Z3-valued discrete topological term of the ten-dimensional non-supersymmetric SO(16)^2 heterotic string recently shown to exist by Tachikawa and Zhang. After reviewing the Green-Schwarz/inflow computation of [49], the authors compute the same term by direct anomaly inflow on the NS5-brane, using the chiral worldvolume spectrum proposed in [47]: four fermion singlets, a fermion in (16,1)⊕(1,16), and one self-dual 2-form. With an SU(2)_R representation ansatz restricted to singlet, doublet, and triplet, they obtain t ≡ 4 mod 12 and hence A(1)=1/3, opposite to the value 2/3 obtained in [49]. They then include Yang-Mills fields and argue that consistency of the refined anomaly polynomial forces the adjoint degeneracy n3 to vanish, although they state this cannot be fully justified. They also analyze bottom-up eight-dimensional non-supersymmetric gravitational theories, finding a Z2-valued discrete topological term determined by the parity of chiral SU(2)_R doublets on a three-brane probe. The paper is explicit throughout that the NS5-brane spectrum is an educated guess rather than a derivation.

Significance. If the computed discrepancy were robust, it would be significant: it would show that the Z3-valued discrete term depends on which anomaly polynomial one uses, and that the relation between worldvolume spectra and M-theory inflow can flip the value. The paper's internal algebra is transparent and self-consistent: the review of [49] reproduces the benchmark 2/3, and the factorization and mod-12 computations are easy to follow. The bottom-up 8d analysis is a useful exploratory extension. However, the central result is conditional on two unproven inputs: the [47] chiral spectrum and the truncation to SU(2)_R spins j≤1. Since those inputs are not derived, the paper does not establish a robust prediction of the non-supersymmetric theory; it establishes a consistency test of a conjectural spectrum. The authors' own caveats in §3.1 and §5 are honest, but they undermine the conclusion in §7 that the discrepancy is due to physics captured by the two computations rather than to the tentative input.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, §4.1, §4.2] The load-bearing input of the computation is the proposed chiral NS5 spectrum from [47]. The paper itself states in §3.1 that this spectrum is an educated guess, not a proof, and that different chiral degrees of freedom can recombine to give the same anomaly. No independent derivation is provided. Consequently, the headline result A(1)=1/3 in §4.2 is not a prediction of the SO(16)^2 theory but of a conjectural refinement. If the actual worldvolume contains other degrees of freedom, the value can change. The authors should either provide independent evidence for the spectrum or explicitly frame the computation as a conditional test rather than as the value of the discrete topological term.
  2. [§4, eqs. (4.1), (4.9), (4.10)] The restriction in eq. (4.1) to SU(2)_R representations 'trivial, fundamental and adjoint' is an ansatz; the motivation offered in footnote 9 from a putative duality is not a derivation. The branching-rule relation n4 → n2 + 2n1 in eq. (4.9), and hence t = 124 + 36n3 ≡ 4 mod 12 in eq. (4.10), depend on this truncation. Allowing higher SU(2)_R representations changes the parametrization and can change t, so the claimed opposite value 1/3 versus 2/3 is not robust. The paper should either prove that higher SU(2)_R representations cannot contribute to the global anomaly or quantify how t would change if they were included.
  3. [§5, eq. (5.9)] The consistency condition n3 = 0 is derived by requiring cancellation of the residual c2 dependence in eq. (5.9), but the paper states that this choice 'cannot be fully justified.' Although n3 drops out of the Z3 value because t is computed modulo 12, the condition n3 = 0 is load-bearing for the claim in §5 that the proposed spectrum is consistent with the complete anomaly inflow including Yang-Mills fields. As written, that consistency claim is conditional on an unproven choice; the paper should discuss possible independent derivations of n3 = 0 or state this limitation more prominently.
  4. [§7] The conclusion that 'the source of the discrepancy is due to the physics captured by the two computations' overstates what the paper has shown. Given the unproven spectrum and the SU(2)_R ansatz, the discrepancy could equally be due to an incorrect or incomplete proposed spectrum, which the paper itself lists as an alternative. A conditional conclusion—for example, 'if the proposed spectrum is correct, the two computations differ by physics captured by M-theory inflow'—would match the evidence presented.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1, §2.2] There are typos: 'plauged' in the Introduction should be 'plagued', and 'onlt' in §2.2 should be 'only'.
  2. [§2.3.1, eq. (2.50)] The displayed trace identity for tr_10 F^4 is typeset confusingly ('=10 1/2 (trF^2)^2 + 3(trF^2)^2'); please rewrite it to make the numerical factors unambiguous.
  3. [§5, eq. (5.1)] The notation c^(1)_{2,16} and c^(2)_{2,16} is used without explicit definition; the second Chern classes of the two SO(16) factors should be defined at first use.
  4. [§6.2, eq. (6.15)] The bottom-up analysis again imposes the restriction to SU(2)_R singlet, doublet and triplet representations, but this restriction is not discussed in §6.2; if higher representations are allowed, the moment sums D_{k,r} used in eqs. (6.15)–(6.23) may be insufficient.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Z3 value is a forward consequence of an explicitly conjectural spectrum, externally benchmarked against the independent Tachikawa-Zhang computation.

full rationale

The paper's central computation in Section 4 takes the chiral NS5-brane spectrum proposed in [47] as an explicit input, fixes the SU(2)_R degeneracies by local anomaly factorization, and then evaluates the global anomaly coefficient t. The claimed result A(1)=1/3 is not obtained by imposing the target value; the coefficient t=124+36n3 is computed from the branching rules, and the n3 dependence drops out modulo 12, so the result is independent of the one parameter that is not fixed by the local factorization. The paper explicitly identifies the spectrum as an 'educated guess' rather than a derivation, and it compares the resulting value against the independent computation of [49], finding a discrepancy rather than a forced agreement. The citation to [47] supplies a conjectural input, but it is not invoked as an authority or a uniqueness theorem, and the paper openly discusses alternative proposals such as [85]. No equation in the paper defines the discrete topological term in terms of the worldvolume spectrum or fits the global anomaly to match the spectrum; the derivation is a forward consistency test. The fragility of the input spectrum is a correctness or robustness concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central input is the tentative NS5 chiral spectrum proposed in [47] (four singlets, a (16,1) and (1,16) fermion, a self-dual 2-form) plus the ansatz that only trivial, fundamental and adjoint SU(2)_R representations appear; the degeneracies are then fixed by local anomaly factorization up to n3, which is set to zero by requiring Yang-Mills consistency. The 8d bottom-up part postulates a single U(1) factor and arbitrary chiral charge degeneracies, so the resulting Z2 term is a statement about model data rather than a parameter-free derivation.

free parameters (4)
  • n3 (adjoint SU(2)_R degeneracy) = 0
    Degeneracy of SU(2)_R adjoint chirals in the NS5 spectrum; left free by local anomaly factorization (eq. 4.6), fixed to zero in Section 5 by requiring the refined spacetime Green-Schwarz term to contain no SU(2)_R Chern class; the authors state 'we cannot fully justify it'.
  • n1, n2 (virtual SU(2)_R degeneracies) = n1=32, n2=-2 at n3=0
    Virtual degeneracies of SU(2)_R singlets and fundamentals; determined by eqs. (4.6) from factorization and the [47] spectrum, not by external data.
  • Alpha, Beta (8d factorization coefficients) = fixed by inflow in terms of D-moments; non-unique
    Arbitrary factorization coefficients in the 8d anomaly polynomial (eq. 6.10), later fixed by matching three-brane inflow in eqs. (6.16).
  • k (8d worldvolume Green-Schwarz coefficient) = constrained by D1,1+14D1,2+51D1,3=12k
    Coefficient of the worldvolume Green-Schwarz term in 8d; the constraint is a consistency condition on the spectrum, another hand-set integer parameter.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The SO(16)^2 heterotic spectrum is the virtual difference of the Spin(32)/Z2 and E8 x E8 spectra restricted to so(16) and so(16) (eq. 3.1; also in [47,49,67]).
    Standard construction of the non-supersymmetric heterotic vacuum, used to derive the chiral content and anomaly polynomials.
  • ad hoc to paper Proposed chiral NS5 spectrum of [47]: four singlets, a (16,1) and (1,16) fermion, and one self-dual 2-form; this is the correct worldvolume content.
    The whole direct computation in Sections 4-5 is built on this candidate; the authors emphasize it cannot be proven without dualities.
  • ad hoc to paper SU(2)_R representations on the NS5 worldvolume consist only of trivial, fundamental and adjoint representations (Section 4).
    An ansatz, motivated by putative D-brane duality; it constrains the counting and hence the global anomaly.
  • standard math The global anomaly is captured by the anomaly theory X = eta - integral(H3 and W4) modulo unity (eq. 2.39), with twisted string structure dH=Z4.
    Uses eta invariants and Atiyah-Patodi-Singer; standard in the anomaly-inflow literature.
  • standard math Discrete topological terms are classified by torsion of string bordism and the TMF/Stolz-Teichner framework (Section 6).
    Conjectural mathematical structure (Stolz-Teichner) treated as background.
  • domain assumption Completeness principle: each charge must be realized by a brane (Section 6.1).
    Used to introduce three-brane probes in the 8d bottom-up analysis.
  • domain assumption The lower-dimensional analysis assumes a single two-form and a U(1) gauge factor in 8d; this restriction is a modeling choice.
    The authors state the generalization is in principle straightforward.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Non-supersymmetric branes and discrete topological terms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JRHZRXWW

@misc{pith2026250711610,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Non-supersymmetric branes and discrete topological terms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JRHZRXWW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11610}
}
read the original abstract

In a recent work, Tachikawa and Zhang proved the existence of a discrete topological term in the unique non-supersymmetric heterotic string with no tachyons in ten dimensions. This theory features NS5-branes, whose chiral degrees of freedom are not well-understood due to the absence of dualities or supersymmetry. In this paper, we test the consistency of a tentative spectrum obtained by anomaly inflow, studying the relation between the worldvolume theory and the discrete topological term in spacetime. Furthermore, we conduct a bottom-up investigation of lower-dimensional gravitational theories with the same methods.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11610 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A diagram of how the discrete and continuous topological terms of the space [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Heterotic Strings on Enriques Surfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Classification of shift vectors in heterotic orbifold compactifications on Enriques surfaces with spectrum analysis and tachyon projection for non-supersymmetric interpretations.

  2. Heterotic Strings on Enriques Surfaces

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Classifies shift vectors for heterotic orbifolds on Enriques surfaces, analyzes spectra, and interprets some models as non-supersymmetric 10D heterotic compactifications with tachyon projection.

  3. Aspects of strings without spacetime supersymmetry

    hep-th 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of tachyons and tadpoles in non-supersymmetric closed and orientifold strings, including ten-dimensional models and landscape attempts.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [47]

    Global anomalies & bor- dism of non-supersymmetric strings

    I. Basile, A. Debray, M. Delgado, and M. Montero, “Global anomalies & bor- dism of non-supersymmetric strings”, JHEP 02, 092 (2024), arXiv: 2310.06895 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [49]

    On a Z3-valued discrete topological term in 10d heterotic string theories

    Y. Tachikawa and H. Y. Zhang, “On a Z3-valued discrete topological term in 10d heterotic string theories”, SciPost Phys. 17, 077 (2024), arXiv: 2403.08861 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    The Topological Meaning of Nonabelian Anomalies

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. H. Ginsparg, “The Topological Meaning of Nonabelian Anomalies”, Nucl. Phys. B 243, 449–474 (1984)

    1984

  4. [2]

    Gravitational Anomalies

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten, “Gravitational Anomalies”, Nucl. Phys. B 234, edited by A. Salam and E. Sezgin, 269 (1984)

    1984

  5. [3]

    The Structure of Gauge and Grav- itational Anomalies

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and P. H. Ginsparg, “The Structure of Gauge and Grav- itational Anomalies”, Annals Phys. 161, edited by A. Salam and E. Sezgin, [Erratum: Annals Phys. 171, 233 (1986)], 423 (1985)

    1986

  6. [4]

    Anomalies and Odd Dimensions

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, S. Della Pietra, and G. W. Moore, “Anomalies and Odd Dimensions”, Annals Phys. 163, 288 (1985)

    1985

  7. [5]

    Lectures on Anomalies

    A. Bilal, “Lectures on Anomalies”, (2008), arXiv: 0802.0634 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [6]

    Anomalies and the Green-Schwarz Mechanism

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and M. A. Vazquez-Mozo, “Anomalies and the Green-Schwarz Mechanism”, in (2024), arXiv: 2211.06467 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 140 references
  1. [7]

    An SU(2) Anomaly

    E. Witten, “An SU(2) Anomaly”, Phys. Lett. B 117, edited by M. A. Shifman, 324–328 (1982)

    1982

  2. [8]

    GLOBAL GRA VITATIONAL ANOMALIES

    E. Witten, “GLOBAL GRA VITATIONAL ANOMALIES”, Commun. Math. Phys. 100, edited by A. Salam and E. Sezgin, 197 (1985)

    1985

  3. [9]

    Anomaly Inflow and the η-Invariant

    E. Witten and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly Inflow and the η-Invariant”, in The Shoucheng Zhang Memorial Workshop (Sept. 2019), arXiv:1909.08775 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Towards a Phenomenology for the non- supersymmetric Heterotic String

    S. Abel, K. R. Dienes, and E. Mavroudi, “Towards a Phenomenology for the non- supersymmetric Heterotic String”, PoS PLANCK2015, edited by I. Antoniadis, G. K. Leontaris, and K. Tamvakis, 001 (2016)

    2016

  5. [11]

    An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “An Update on Brane Supersymmetry Breaking”, (2017), arXiv:1711.11494 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Stability and vacuum en- ergy in open string models with broken supersymmetry

    S. Abel, E. Dudas, D. Lewis, and H. Partouche, “Stability and vacuum en- ergy in open string models with broken supersymmetry”, JHEP 10, 226 (2019), arXiv:1812.09714 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  7. [13]

    On Classical Stability with Broken Su- persymmetry

    I. Basile, J. Mourad, and A. Sagnotti, “On Classical Stability with Broken Su- persymmetry”, JHEP 01, 174 (2019), arXiv: 1811.11448 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings

    R. Antonelli and I. Basile, “Brane annihilation in non-supersymmetric strings”, JHEP 11, 021 (2019), arXiv: 1908.04352 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Dark Horse, Dark Matter: Revisiting the SO(16)x SO(16)’ Non- supersymmetric Model in the LHC and Dark Energy Era

    M. McGuigan, “Dark Horse, Dark Matter: Revisiting the SO(16)x SO(16)’ Non- supersymmetric Model in the LHC and Dark Energy Era”, (2019), arXiv: 1907. 01944 [hep-th]

    2019

  10. [16]

    Stability, enhanced gauge symmetry and sup- pressed cosmological constant in 9D heterotic interpolating models

    H. Itoyama and S. Nakajima, “Stability, enhanced gauge symmetry and sup- pressed cosmological constant in 9D heterotic interpolating models”, Nucl. Phys. B 958, 115111 (2020), arXiv: 2003.11217 [hep-th]. 25

    2020 arXiv

  11. [17]

    String Defects, Supersymmetry and the Swampland

    C. Angelantonj, Q. Bonnefoy, C. Condeescu, and E. Dudas, “String Defects, Supersymmetry and the Swampland”, JHEP 11, 125 (2020), arXiv: 2007.12722 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [18]

    de Sitter in non-supersymmetric string theories: no-go theorems and brane-worlds

    I. Basile and S. Lanza, “de Sitter in non-supersymmetric string theories: no-go theorems and brane-worlds”, JHEP10, 108 (2020), arXiv:2007.13757 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [19]

    On String Vacua without Supersymmetry: brane dynamics, bubbles and holography

    I. Basile, “On String Vacua without Supersymmetry: brane dynamics, bubbles and holography”, PhD thesis (Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, 2020), arXiv:2010. 00628 [hep-th]

    2020

  14. [20]

    Stable Vacua for Tachyonic Strings

    J. Kaidi, “Stable Vacua for Tachyonic Strings”, Phys. Rev. D 103, 106026 (2021), arXiv:2010.10521 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Type ¯0 heterotic string orbifolds

    A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival, “Type ¯0 heterotic string orbifolds”, Phys. Lett. B 814, 136080 (2021), arXiv: 2011.12630 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Misaligned Supersym- metry and Open Strings

    N. Cribiori, S. Parameswaran, F. Tonioni, and T. Wrase, “Misaligned Supersym- metry and Open Strings”, JHEP 04, 099 (2021), arXiv: 2012.04677 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Marginal deformations of heterotic interpolating models and exponential suppression of the cosmological constant

    H. Itoyama and S. Nakajima, “Marginal deformations of heterotic interpolating models and exponential suppression of the cosmological constant”, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136195 (2021), arXiv: 2101.10619 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [24]

    AdS swampland conjectures and light fermions

    E. Gonzalo, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, and I. Valenzuela, “AdS swampland conjectures and light fermions”, Phys. Lett. B 822, 136691 (2021), arXiv:2104.06415 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Landscape of promising nonsupersymmetric string models

    R. Perez-Martinez, S. Ramos-Sanchez, and P. K. S. Vaudrevange, “Landscape of promising nonsupersymmetric string models”, Phys. Rev. D 104, 046026 (2021), arXiv:2105.03460 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Supersymmetry breaking, brane dynamics and Swampland conjec- tures

    I. Basile, “Supersymmetry breaking, brane dynamics and Swampland conjec- tures”, JHEP 10, 080 (2021), arXiv: 2106.04574 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dy- namics, bubbles and the swampland

    I. Basile, “Supersymmetry breaking and stability in string vacua: Brane dy- namics, bubbles and the swampland”, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 44, 499–596 (2021), arXiv:2107.02814 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [28]

    String (In)Stability Issues with Broken Supersym- metry

    A. Sagnotti and J. Mourad, “String (In)Stability Issues with Broken Supersym- metry”, LHEP 2021, 219 (2021), arXiv: 2107.04064 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Target space duality of non-supersymmetric string theory

    H. Itoyama, Y. Koga, and S. Nakajima, “Target space duality of non-supersymmetric string theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 975, 115667 (2022), arXiv: 2110.09762 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [30]

    On warped string vacuum profiles and cosmologies. Part II. Non-supersymmetric strings

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “On warped string vacuum profiles and cosmologies. Part II. Non-supersymmetric strings”, JHEP 12, 138 (2021), arXiv: 2109.12328 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Modular invariance, misalignment and finiteness in non-supersymmetric strings

    N. Cribiori, S. Parameswaran, F. Tonioni, and T. Wrase, “Modular invariance, misalignment and finiteness in non-supersymmetric strings”, JHEP01, 127 (2022), arXiv:2110.11973 [hep-th]. 26

    2022 arXiv

  26. [32]

    On the stability of string theory vacua

    S. Giri, L. Martucci, and A. Tomasiello, “On the stability of string theory vacua”, JHEP 04, 054 (2022), arXiv: 2112.10795 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [33]

    On new vacua of non-supersymmetric strings

    S. Raucci, “On new vacua of non-supersymmetric strings”, Phys. Lett. B 837, 137663 (2023), arXiv: 2209.06537 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Revisiting Dudas-Mourad Compactifica- tions

    I. Basile, S. Raucci, and S. Thom´ ee, “Revisiting Dudas-Mourad Compactifica- tions”, Universe 8, 544 (2022), arXiv: 2209.10553 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [35]

    Non-supersymmetric AdS from string theory

    Z. K. Baykara, D. Robbins, and S. Sethi, “Non-supersymmetric AdS from string theory”, SciPost Phys. 15, 224 (2023), arXiv: 2212.02557 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Interpolation and exponentially suppressed cosmological constant in non-supersymmetric heterotic strings with general Z2 twists

    Y. Koga, “Interpolation and exponentially suppressed cosmological constant in non-supersymmetric heterotic strings with general Z2 twists”, Nucl. Phys. B990, 116160 (2023), arXiv: 2212.14572 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Higgs-portal dark matter from nonsupersymmetric strings

    E. Cervantes, O. Perez-Figueroa, R. Perez-Martinez, and S. Ramos-Sanchez, “Higgs-portal dark matter from nonsupersymmetric strings”, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115007 (2023), arXiv: 2302.08520 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Tachyons and misaligned super- symmetry in closed string vacua

    C. Angelantonj, I. Florakis, and G. Leone, “Tachyons and misaligned super- symmetry in closed string vacua”, JHEP 06, 174 (2023), arXiv: 2301 . 13702 [hep-th]

    2023

  33. [39]

    Fayet–Iliopoulos D-term in non-supersymmetric heterotic string orbifolds

    A. R. D. Avalos, A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival, “Fayet–Iliopoulos D-term in non-supersymmetric heterotic string orbifolds”, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 926 (2023), arXiv: 2302.10075 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Classification of chi- ral fermionic CFTs of central charge ≤ 16

    P. Boyle Smith, Y.-H. Lin, Y. Tachikawa, and Y. Zheng, “Classification of chi- ral fermionic CFTs of central charge ≤ 16”, SciPost Phys. 16, 058 (2024), arXiv:2303.16917 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Fake supersymmetry with tadpole potentials

    S. Raucci, “Fake supersymmetry with tadpole potentials”, JHEP 07, 078 (2023), arXiv:2304.12717 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Non-supersymmetric vacua and self-adjoint exten- sions

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “Non-supersymmetric vacua and self-adjoint exten- sions”, JHEP 08, 041 (2023), arXiv: 2305.09587 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [43]

    A 4D IIB flux vacuum and supersymmetry breaking. Part II. Bosonic spectrum and stability

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “A 4D IIB flux vacuum and supersymmetry breaking. Part II. Bosonic spectrum and stability”, JHEP 11, 061 (2023), arXiv: 2309 . 04026 [hep-th]

    2023

  38. [44]

    Effective orientifolds from broken supersymmetry

    J. Mourad and A. Sagnotti, “Effective orientifolds from broken supersymmetry”, J. Phys. A 57, 035401 (2024), arXiv: 2309.05268 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [45]

    D-term uplifts in nonsupersymmetric heterotic string models

    A. R. D. Avalos, A. E. Faraggi, V. G. Matyas, and B. Percival, “D-term uplifts in nonsupersymmetric heterotic string models”, Phys. Rev. D 108, 086007 (2023), arXiv:2306.16878 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle

    B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, H. Parra De Freitas, and S. Sethi, “Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings on a circle”, JHEP12, 082 (2024), arXiv:2307.13745 [hep-th]. 27

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings and chiral CFTs

    H. P. De Freitas, “Non-supersymmetric heterotic strings and chiral CFTs”, JHEP 11, 002 (2024), arXiv: 2402.15562 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    A T-duality of non-supersymmetric heterotic strings and an implica- tion for Topological Modular Forms

    V. Saxena, “A T-duality of non-supersymmetric heterotic strings and an implica- tion for Topological Modular Forms”, JHEP 09, 056 (2024), arXiv: 2405.19409 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [51]

    New Non-Supersymmetric Tachyon- Free Strings

    Z. K. Baykara, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “New Non-Supersymmetric Tachyon- Free Strings”, (2024), arXiv:2406.00185 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    The Quasicrystalline String Land- scape

    Z. K. Baykara, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “The Quasicrystalline String Land- scape”, (2024), arXiv: 2406.00129 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Non-supersymmetric non-tachyonic heterotic vacua with reduced rank in various dimensions

    C. Angelantonj, I. Florakis, G. Leone, and D. Perugini, “Non-supersymmetric non-tachyonic heterotic vacua with reduced rank in various dimensions”, JHEP 10, 216 (2024), arXiv: 2407.09597 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Rigid vacua with Brane Supersymmetry Breaking

    C. Angelantonj, C. Condeescu, E. Dudas, and G. Leone, “Rigid vacua with Brane Supersymmetry Breaking”, JHEP 04, 103 (2024), arXiv: 2403.02392 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    T-duality for non-critical heterotic strings

    H. P. De Freitas, “T-duality for non-critical heterotic strings”, (2024), arXiv:2407. 12923 [hep-th]

    2024

  48. [56]

    Vacuum Energy in Non-Supersymmetric Quasi-Realistic Heterotic-String Vacua with Fixed Moduli

    E. Basaad, L. A. Detraux, A. R. D. Avalos, A. E. Faraggi, and B. Percival, “Vacuum Energy in Non-Supersymmetric Quasi-Realistic Heterotic-String Vacua with Fixed Moduli”, (2024), arXiv: 2408.03928 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings

    S. Raucci, “Spacetime aspects of non-supersymmetric strings”, PhD thesis (Pisa, Scuola Normale Superiore, Sept. 2024), arXiv: 2409.19395 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Banks-Zaks Stabilisation of Non-SUSY Strings

    S. Abel, I. Basile, and V. Matyas, “Banks-Zaks Stabilisation of Non-SUSY Strings”, (2024), arXiv:2412.01914 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Brane profiles of non-supersymmetric strings

    J. Mourad, S. Raucci, and A. Sagnotti, “Brane profiles of non-supersymmetric strings”, JHEP 09, 019 (2024), arXiv: 2406.16327 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Anomaly Inflow and Gauge Group Topology in the 10d Sugimoto String Theory

    V. Larotonda and L. Lin, “Anomaly Inflow and Gauge Group Topology in the 10d Sugimoto String Theory”, (2024), arXiv: 2412.17894 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    New comments on six-dimensional orientifold vacua with reduced rank and unitarity constraints

    G. Leone, “New comments on six-dimensional orientifold vacua with reduced rank and unitarity constraints”, JHEP06, 062 (2025), arXiv:2412.19185 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Aspects of Stability, Rigidity and Unitarity in String Vacua

    G. Leone, “Aspects of Stability, Rigidity and Unitarity in String Vacua”, PhD thesis (Universit` a degli Studi di Torino, Italy, Turin U., 2024), arXiv:2408.00132 [hep-th]. 28

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Dynamical dark energy in 0’B braneworlds

    I. Basile, A. Borys, and J. Masias, “Dynamical dark energy in 0’B braneworlds”, (2025), arXiv:2502.20438 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  56. [64]

    M-theory boundaries beyond supersymmetry

    M. Montero and L. Zapata, “M-theory boundaries beyond supersymmetry”, (2025), arXiv:2504.06985 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  57. [65]

    The Non-SUSY Orbifolder: a tool to build promising non-supersymmetric string models

    E. Escalante-Notario, R. Perez-Martinez, S. Ramos-Sanchez, and P. K. S. Vau- drevange, “The Non-SUSY Orbifolder: a tool to build promising non-supersymmetric string models”, (2025), arXiv: 2504.20137 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Type I anomaly cancellation revisited

    S. S. Hosseini, Y. Tachikawa, and H. Y. Zhang, “Type I anomaly cancellation revisited”, (2025), arXiv: 2505.07933 [hep-th]

    2025

  59. [67]

    An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, P. H. Ginsparg, G. W. Moore, and C. Vafa, “An O(16) x O(16) Heterotic String”, Phys. Lett. B 171, 155–162 (1986)

    1986

  60. [68]

    String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry

    L. J. Dixon and J. A. Harvey, “String Theories in Ten-Dimensions Without Space-Time Supersymmetry”, Nucl. Phys. B 274, edited by B. Schellekens, 93– 105 (1986)

    1986

  61. [69]

    Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory

    S. Sugimoto, “Anomaly cancellations in type I D-9 - anti-D-9 system and the USp(32) string theory”, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, 685–699 (1999), arXiv: hep - th/9905159

    1999

  62. [70]

    String theory, misaligned supersym- metry, and the supertrace constraints

    K. R. Dienes, M. Moshe, and R. C. Myers, “String theory, misaligned supersym- metry, and the supertrace constraints”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4767–4770 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9503055

    1995 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Tachyons and Misaligned Supersymmetry in orientifold vacua

    G. Leone, “Tachyons and Misaligned Supersymmetry in orientifold vacua”, JHEP 11, 066 (2023), arXiv: 2308.09757 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Brane solutions in strings with broken supersym- metry and dilaton tadpoles

    E. Dudas and J. Mourad, “Brane solutions in strings with broken supersym- metry and dilaton tadpoles”, Phys. Lett. B 486, 172–178 (2000), arXiv: hep - th/0004165

    2000

  65. [73]

    Stability of non-supersymmetric vacua from cali- brations

    V. Menet and A. Tomasiello, “Stability of non-supersymmetric vacua from cali- brations”, (2025), arXiv: 2507.02787 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Emergent Strings at an Infinite Distance with Broken Supersymme- try

    I. Basile, “Emergent Strings at an Infinite Distance with Broken Supersymme- try”, Astronomy 2, 206–225 (2023), arXiv: 2201.08851 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics

    I. Garc ´ ıa-Etxebarria and M. Montero, “Dai-Freed anomalies in particle physics”, JHEP 08, 003 (2019), arXiv: 1808.00009 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Cobordism Classes and the Swampland

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Classes and the Swampland”, (2019), arXiv:1909.10355 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa, “Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland”, (2020), arXiv:2004.06738 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  70. [78]

    IIB string theory ex- plored: Reflection 7-branes

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, “IIB string theory ex- plored: Reflection 7-branes”, Phys. Rev. D 107, 086015 (2023), arXiv: 2212 . 05077 [hep-th]. 29

    2023

  71. [79]

    The Chronicles of IIBordia: Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland

    A. Debray, M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, and M. Montero, “The Chronicles of IIBordia: Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland”, (2023), arXiv: 2302.00007 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    R7-branes as charge conjugation operators

    M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, M. Montero, and E. Torres, “R7-branes as charge conjugation operators”, Phys. Rev. D 109, 046004 (2024), arXiv: 2305 . 05689 [hep-th]

    2024

  73. [81]

    Cobordism Utopia: U-Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland

    N. Braeger, A. Debray, M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, and M. Montero, “Cobordism Utopia: U-Dualities, Bordisms, and the Swampland”, (2025), arXiv: 2505.15885 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six-Dimensions

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and P. C. West, “Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six-Dimensions”, Nucl. Phys. B 254, 327–348 (1985)

    1985

  75. [83]

    Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory”, Phys. Lett. B 149, 117–122 (1984)

    1984

  76. [84]

    A Note on the Green-Schwarz mechanism in open string theories

    A. Sagnotti, “A Note on the Green-Schwarz mechanism in open string theories”, Phys. Lett. B 294, 196–203 (1992), arXiv: hep-th/9210127

    1992 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Calabi-Yau com- pactifications of non-supersymmetric heterotic string theory

    M. Blaszczyk, S. Groot Nibbelink, O. Loukas, and F. Ruehle, “Calabi-Yau com- pactifications of non-supersymmetric heterotic string theory”, JHEP 10, 166 (2015), arXiv:1507.06147 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  78. [86]

    The Heterotic String

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm, “The Heterotic String”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 502–505 (1985)

    1985

  79. [87]

    Heterotic String Theory. 1. The Free Heterotic String

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm, “Heterotic String Theory. 1. The Free Heterotic String”, Nucl. Phys. B 256, 253 (1985)

    1985

  80. [88]

    Heterotic String Theory. 2. The Interacting Heterotic String

    D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey, E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm, “Heterotic String Theory. 2. The Interacting Heterotic String”, Nucl. Phys. B 267, 75–124 (1986)

    1986

  81. [89]

    The Semispin groups in string theory

    B. McInnes, “The Semispin groups in string theory”, J. Math. Phys. 40, 4699– 4712 (1999), arXiv: hep-th/9906059

    1999 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Moduli space of CHL strings

    S. Chaudhuri and J. Polchinski, “Moduli space of CHL strings”, Phys. Rev. D 52, 7168–7173 (1995), arXiv: hep-th/9506048

    1995 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Maximally supersymmetric string theories in D < 10

    S. Chaudhuri, G. Hockney, and J. D. Lykken, “Maximally supersymmetric string theories in D < 10”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2264–2267 (1995), arXiv: hep - th / 9505054

    1995

  84. [92]

    Exploring the landscape of CHL strings on T d

    A. Font, B. Fraiman, M. Gra˜ na, C. A. N´ u˜ nez, and H. Parra De Freitas, “Exploring the landscape of CHL strings on T d”, JHEP 08, 095 (2021), arXiv: 2104.07131 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  85. [93]

    New non-supersymmetric heterotic string theory with reduced rank and exponential suppression of the cosmological constant

    S. Nakajima, “New non-supersymmetric heterotic string theory with reduced rank and exponential suppression of the cosmological constant”, (2023), arXiv:2303. 04489 [hep-th]. 30

    2023

  86. [94]

    Bordism for the 2-group symmetries of the heterotic and CHL strings

    A. Debray, “Bordism for the 2-group symmetries of the heterotic and CHL strings”, Contemp. Math. 802, 227–98 (2024), arXiv: 2304.14764 [math.AT]

    2024 arXiv

  87. [95]

    The Supersymmetric effective action of the heterotic string in ten-dimensions

    M. de Roo, H. Suelmann, and A. Wiedemann, “The Supersymmetric effective action of the heterotic string in ten-dimensions”, Nucl. Phys. B 405, 326–366 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9210099

    1993 arXiv

  88. [96]

    The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String

    D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, “The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String”, Nucl. Phys. B 291, 41–89 (1987)

    1987

  89. [97]

    GLOBAL ANOMALIES IN STRING THEORY

    E. Witten, “GLOBAL ANOMALIES IN STRING THEORY”, in Symposium on Anomalies, Geometry, Topology (June 1985)

    1985

  90. [98]

    Differential twisted String and Five- brane structures

    H. Sati, U. Schreiber, and J. Stasheff, “Differential twisted String and Five- brane structures”, Commun. Math. Phys.315, 169–213 (2012), arXiv:0910.4001 [math.AT]

    2012 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Heterotic global anomalies and torsion Witten index

    K. Yonekura, “Heterotic global anomalies and torsion Witten index”, JHEP 10, 114 (2022), arXiv: 2207.13858 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Setting the quantum integrand of M-theory

    D. S. Freed and G. W. Moore, “Setting the quantum integrand of M-theory”, Commun. Math. Phys. 263, 89–132 (2006), arXiv: hep-th/0409135

    2006 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases

    D. S. Freed and M. J. Hopkins, “Reflection positivity and invertible topological phases”, Geom. Topol. 25, 1165–1330 (2021), arXiv: 1604.06527 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  94. [102]

    On the cobordism classification of symmetry protected topolog- ical phases

    K. Yonekura, “On the cobordism classification of symmetry protected topolog- ical phases”, Commun. Math. Phys. 368, 1121–1173 (2019), arXiv: 1803.10796 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Heterotic solitons

    A. Strominger, “Heterotic solitons”, Nucl. Phys. B 343, 167–184 (1990)

    1990

  96. [104]

    Worldbrane actions for string solitons

    C. G. Callan Jr., J. A. Harvey, and A. Strominger, “Worldbrane actions for string solitons”, Nucl. Phys. B 367, 60–82 (1991)

    1991

  97. [105]

    Orbifolds and solitons

    D. Kutasov, “Orbifolds and solitons”, Phys. Lett. B 383, 48–53 (1996), eprint: hep-th/9512145

    1996 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Heterotic NS5-branes from closed string tachyon condensation

    I. Garc ´ ıa-Etxebarria, M. Montero, and A. Uranga, “Heterotic NS5-branes from closed string tachyon condensation”, Phys. Rev. D90, 126002 (2014), arXiv:1405. 0009 [hep-th]

    2014

  99. [107]

    Anderson self-duality of topological modular forms, its differential-geometric manifestations, and vertex operator algebras

    Y. Tachikawa and M. Yamashita, “Anderson self-duality of topological modular forms, its differential-geometric manifestations, and vertex operator algebras”, (2023), arXiv:2305.06196 [math.AT]

    2023 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Anomalies, Characters and Strings

    A. N. Schellekens and N. P. Warner, “Anomalies, Characters and Strings”, Nucl. Phys. B 287, 317 (1987)

    1987

  101. [109]

    Heterotic String Loop Calculation of the Anomaly Cancelling Term

    W. Lerche, B. E. W. Nilsson, and A. N. Schellekens, “Heterotic String Loop Calculation of the Anomaly Cancelling Term”, Nucl. Phys. B 289, 609 (1987)

    1987

  102. [110]

    Anomalies of the SO(32) five-brane and their cancellation

    J. Mourad, “Anomalies of the SO(32) five-brane and their cancellation”, Nucl. Phys. B 512, 199–208 (1998), arXiv: hep-th/9709012. 31

    1998 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Evidence for heterotic - type I string duality

    J. Polchinski and E. Witten, “Evidence for heterotic - type I string duality”, Nucl. Phys. B 460, 525–540 (1996), arXiv: hep-th/9510169

    1996 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Putting string / five-brane duality to the test

    J. A. Dixon, M. J. Duff, and J. C. Plefka, “Putting string / five-brane duality to the test”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3009–3012 (1992), arXiv: hep-th/9208055

    1992 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Note on Anomaly Cancellation on SO(32) heterotic 5-brane

    H. Imazato, S. Mizoguchi, and M. Yata, “Note on Anomaly Cancellation on SO(32) heterotic 5-brane”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A26, 1453–1457 (2011), arXiv:1010. 1640 [hep-th]

    2011

  106. [114]

    Small instantons in string theory

    E. Witten, “Small instantons in string theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 460, 541–559 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9511030

    1996 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Anomaly - free supersymmetric models in six-dimensions

    J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly - free supersymmetric models in six-dimensions”, Phys. Lett. B 371, 223–230 (1996), arXiv: hep-th/9512053

    1996 arXiv

  108. [116]

    Small E(8) instantons and tensionless noncritical strings

    O. J. Ganor and A. Hanany, “Small E(8) instantons and tensionless noncritical strings”, Nucl. Phys. B 474, 122–140 (1996), arXiv: hep-th/9602120

    1996 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Comments on string dynamics in six-dimensions

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Comments on string dynamics in six-dimensions”, Nucl. Phys. B 471, 121–134 (1996), arXiv: hep-th/9603003

    1996 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Anomaly polynomial of E-string theories

    K. Ohmori, H. Shimizu, and Y. Tachikawa, “Anomaly polynomial of E-string theories”, JHEP 08, 002 (2014), arXiv: 1404.3887 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Global Gauge Anomalies in Higher Dimensions

    E. Kiritsis, “Global Gauge Anomalies in Higher Dimensions”, Phys. Lett. B 178, [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 181, 416 (1986)], 53 (1986)

    1986

  112. [120]

    GLOBAL GAUGE ANOMALIES FOR THEORIES WITH THE GREEN- SCHW ARZ LOCAL ANOMALY CANCELLATION MECHANISM

    Y. Tosa, “GLOBAL GAUGE ANOMALIES FOR THEORIES WITH THE GREEN- SCHW ARZ LOCAL ANOMALY CANCELLATION MECHANISM”, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1934 (1989)

    1989

  113. [121]

    Global anomalies and geometric engineering of critical theories in six-dimensions

    M. Bershadsky and C. Vafa, “Global anomalies and geometric engineering of critical theories in six-dimensions”, (1997), arXiv: hep-th/9703167

    1997 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Some comments on 6D global gauge anomalies

    Y. Lee and Y. Tachikawa, “Some comments on 6D global gauge anomalies”, PTEP 2021, 08B103 (2021), arXiv: 2012.11622 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Omega vs. pi, and 6d anomaly cancellation

    J. Davighi and N. Lohitsiri, “Omega vs. pi, and 6d anomaly cancellation”, JHEP 05, 267 (2021), arXiv: 2012.11693 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  116. [124]

    The discrete Green-Schwarz mechanism in 6D F-theory and elliptic genera of non-critical strings

    M. Dierigl, P.-K. Oehlmann, and T. Schimannek, “The discrete Green-Schwarz mechanism in 6D F-theory and elliptic genera of non-critical strings”, JHEP 03, 090 (2023), arXiv: 2212.04503 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Anomaly constraints for heterotic strings and super- gravity in six dimensions

    I. Basile and G. Leone, “Anomaly constraints for heterotic strings and super- gravity in six dimensions”, JHEP 04, 067 (2024), arXiv: 2310.20480 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Spin cobordism and the gauge group of type I/heterotic string the- ory

    C. Kneissl, “Spin cobordism and the gauge group of type I/heterotic string the- ory”, JHEP 01, 181 (2025), arXiv: 2407.20333 [hep-th]. 32

    2025 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Topological Modular Forms and the Ab- sence of All Heterotic Global Anomalies

    Y. Tachikawa and M. Yamashita, “Topological Modular Forms and the Ab- sence of All Heterotic Global Anomalies”, Commun. Math. Phys.402, [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 402, 2131 (2023)], 1585–1620 (2023), arXiv: 2108 . 13542 [hep-th]

    2023

  120. [128]

    Topological modular forms and the absence of a heterotic global anomaly

    Y. Tachikawa, “Topological modular forms and the absence of a heterotic global anomaly”, PTEP 2022, 04A107 (2022), arXiv: 2103.12211 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) x SO(16) string

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Duality without supersymmetry: The Case of the SO(16) x SO(16) string”, Phys. Lett. B 414, 260–268 (1997), arXiv: hep- th/9707148

    1997

  122. [130]

    Strong / weak coupling duality relations for non- supersymmetric string theories

    J. D. Blum and K. R. Dienes, “Strong / weak coupling duality relations for non- supersymmetric string theories”, Nucl. Phys. B 516, 83–159 (1998), arXiv: hep- th/9707160

    1998

  123. [131]

    On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsuper- symmetric Heterotic String Theories

    A. E. Faraggi and M. Tsulaia, “On the Low Energy Spectra of the Nonsuper- symmetric Heterotic String Theories”, Eur. Phys. J. C 54, 495–500 (2008), arXiv:0706.1649 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Supersymmetric field theories and generalized coho- mology

    S. Stolz and P. Teichner, “Supersymmetric field theories and generalized coho- mology”, edited by H. Sati and U. Schreiber, 279–340 (2011), arXiv: 1108.0189 [math.AT]

    2011 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Monopoles, duality, and string theory

    J. Polchinski, “Monopoles, duality, and string theory”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S1, edited by H. Baer and A. Belyaev, 145–156 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0304042

    2004 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Cancelling mod-2 anomalies by Green-Schwarz mechanism with Bµν

    S. Saito and Y. Tachikawa, “Cancelling mod-2 anomalies by Green-Schwarz mechanism with Bµν”, (2025), arXiv: 2411.09223 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  127. [135]

    The anomaly that was not meant IIB

    A. Debray, M. Dierigl, J. J. Heckman, and M. Montero, “The anomaly that was not meant IIB”, Fortsch. Phys.70, 2100168 (2022), arXiv:2107.14227 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Topological Elliptic Genera I – The mathematical foundation

    Y.-H. Lin and M. Yamashita, “Topological Elliptic Genera I – The mathematical foundation”, (2024), arXiv: 2412.02298 [math.AT]

    2024 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Anomaly Inflow and p-Form Gauge Theories

    C.-T. Hsieh, Y. Tachikawa, and K. Yonekura, “Anomaly Inflow and p-Form Gauge Theories”, Commun. Math. Phys. 391, 495–608 (2022), arXiv: 2003 . 11550 [hep-th]

    2022

  130. [138]

    (Quadratically) Refined Discrete Anomaly Can- cellation

    M. Dierigl and M. Tartaglia, “(Quadratically) Refined Discrete Anomaly Can- cellation”, (2025), arXiv: 2504.02934 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle

    M. Montero and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle”, JHEP 01, 063 (2021), arXiv: 2008.11729 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  132. [140]

    Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d > 6

    A. Bedroya, Y. Hamada, M. Montero, and C. Vafa, “Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d > 6”, JHEP 02, 082 (2022), arXiv:2110.10157 [hep-th]. 33

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.