Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

Exact Black Hole Solutions in Bumblebee Gravity with Lightlike or Spacelike VEVS

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Exact black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity show Lorentz-violating corrections for both lightlike and spacelike vacuum values, with Wald entropy agreeing only in the lightlike case.

desk verdict The charged families fail the bumblebee field equation; the vacuum lightlike results are plausible but the paper's central claims need major revision. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.16731 v3 pith:JRYW2LH6 submitted 2025-10-19 gr-qc

Jia-Zhou Liu , Shan-Ping Wu , Shao-Wen Wei , Yu-Xiao Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783D05 PACS 04.70.-s04.50.Kd
keywords bumblebeegravityLorentzsymmetrybreakingvacuumexpectationvaluelightlikeVEVspacelikeblackholesolutionsWaldentropyIyer-Waldformalism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that bumblebee gravity -- general relativity augmented by a vector field that acquires a nonzero vacuum expectation value and couples nonminimally to curvature -- admits exact static, spherically symmetric black hole solutions in which the vector has two independent nonzero components. Unlike earlier single-component constructions, these solutions carry two Lorentz-violating parameters and exist for both spacelike and lightlike vacuum values. The central surprise is that a lightlike (null) vacuum expectation value still leaves observable imprints on the metric, so Lorentz violation is not washed out when the background vector is null. The paper derives neutral and electrically charged versions, and uses the Noether-charge (Wald) formalism to compare black hole entropy with the entropy implied by the first law. The thermodynamic result is a clean dichotomy: for spacelike vacuum values the two entropies disagree, as in earlier work; for lightlike vacuum values they coincide.

What carries the argument

The working engine is the frozen bumblebee field. The vector is postulated to sit exactly at its vacuum expectation value, B_μ = b_μ, with a constant temporal component b_t = α and a radial component fixed by the norm condition. This reduces the bumblebee stress-energy to an effective anisotropic fluid that can be absorbed into the metric function S(r) = (1 + ℓ1 + ℓ2)/A(r). The quantity ℓ1 = ξ b² is the familiar Lorentz-violating parameter from earlier single-component solutions, while ℓ2 = ξ α² is the new parameter introduced by allowing a nonzero time component. In the charged sector, a tuned nonminimal coupling γ = ξ/(2 + ℓ1) between the Maxwell field and the bumblebee field keeps the fie

What would settle it

Run an independent computer-algebra substitution of the neutral lightlike candidate (A = 1 - 2M/r, S = (1 + ℓ2)/A, b_t = α, b_r from the norm constraint) into the full bumblebee field equations (2.5)-(2.7) and require every residual component to vanish for arbitrary ℓ2 and α. Any nonzero residual in the t-r or r-r components would falsify the exactness claim. The same check should be repeated for the charged solution with the paper's tuned coupling γ = ξ/(2 + ℓ1), since the tuning is part of the claimed solution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that the frozen-ansatz family B_μ = b_μ, with b_μ = (α, b_r(r), 0, 0) and the norm constraint b_μ b^μ = const, solves the bumblebee field equations exactly. The neutral solutions have A(r) = 1 - 2M/r and S(r) = (1 + ℓ1 + ℓ2)/A(r), where ℓ1 = ξ b² and ℓ2 = ξ α²; when a cosmological constant is present, the same structure persists with A(r) acquiring an (A)dS term, but only under the tuning Λ = κλ/[ξ(1 + ℓ1)]. Adding a nonminimally coupled Maxwell field yields Reissner-Nordström-like solutions with charge Q = 2(1 + ℓ1)/(2 + ℓ1) Q0, again with S(r) = (1 + ℓ1 + ℓ2)/A(r). The paper emphasizes two consequences: even in the lightlike case b = 0 (ℓ1 = 0, ℓ2 ≠ 0) the spaceti

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the bumblebee vector stays exactly frozen at its vacuum value with a strictly constant time component and a radial component locked by the norm constraint; if that freeze is relaxed, the closed-form solution family has no reason to persist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every previously found one-parameter bumblebee black hole is a limiting case (ℓ2 = 0), so the new solutions extend the catalog by a genuinely independent Lorentz-violating parameter.
  • Lorentz violation survives in the null-VEV sector: even with ℓ1 = 0, the metric carries ℓ2 corrections and departs from Minkowski asymptotics, giving concrete targets for lensing, shadow, and quasinormal-mode tests.
  • The spacelike-VEV entropy discrepancy S ≠ S_W is robust to adding the second component; it is not an artifact of the single-component ansatz.
  • For lightlike VEVs, standard Wald entropy already satisfies the first law (S_W = S = π r_h²), so the Iyer-Wald formalism needs no corrective extra term in that sector.
  • The Smarr relation remains valid for the charged lightlike black holes even though individual thermodynamic quantities are ℓ2-dependent.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the frozen-VEV ansatz is imposed (not derived), the exactness likely does not survive away-from-minimum fluctuations or a nonconstant temporal profile; the solutions should be read as a consistent sector, and their linear stability is an open question.
  • Editorial inference: the null-VEV case is a natural testbed for the Iyer-Wald formalism itself; since the radial bumblebee component does not diverge at the horizon when b = 0, the horizon-integral ambiguity that is blamed for the spacelike mismatch disappears, which can be checked by an independent Euclidean-action computation.
  • Editorial inference: the non-Minkowskian asymptotics even for null VEV suggests that gravitational-wave or very-long-baseline interferometry observations might in principle bound ℓ2, but the paper does not compute such observables.
  • Editorial inference: the condition Λ = κλ/[ξ(1 + ℓ1)] couples the cosmological constant to the bumblebee potential; if that relation is not dynamically enforced, the (A)dS solutions are isolated points in parameter space rather than a continuous family.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs static, spherically symmetric black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity for a two-component bumblebee field whose VEV is either spacelike or lightlike. It presents Schwarzschild-like and Schwarzschild-(A)dS-like solutions in Sec. 3, then charged RN-like solutions with a nonminimally coupled electromagnetic field in Sec. 4, and analyzes their thermodynamics via the Iyer-Wald formalism in Sec. 5. The central claims are that Lorentz-violating corrections persist for lightlike VEVs and that, in this case, the Wald and thermodynamic entropies coincide, whereas for spacelike VEVs they do not.

Significance. The neutral-sector results are potentially interesting: they extend known single-parameter bumblebee black holes by a second Lorentz-violating parameter and include a lightlike-VEV branch. The paper also correctly checks several known limits, and the Iyer-Wald thermodynamic framework is standard. However, the claimed charged exact solutions contain a load-bearing inconsistency in the vector-field equation, and an internal contradiction in the Maxwell invariant. Until the charged sector is corrected, the paper's advertised charged solutions and the thermodynamic conclusions built on them are not valid.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Eq. (4.7)]
  2. [§4, after Eq. (4.13)]
  3. [§5, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.29) and §4, Eq. (4.15)]
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.16)]
  2. [§4, text before Eq. (4.21)]
  3. [§4, Eqs. (4.4)-(4.6)]
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A.5)]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the solutions are obtained by explicit ansatz-and-substitution and checked against independent limits; the thermodynamics comparison is a genuine Wald-vs-first-law computation.

full rationale

The derivation chain starts from explicit ansatze (metric (3.1), frozen bumblebee VEV (3.2)-(3.4)) and solves the field equations (2.5)-(2.7) for A and S. The asymptotic limits and parameter reductions (e.g., ell2=0 reduces to Refs. [22]/[23]/[31]; alpha=0 reduces to Ref. [31]) are checks against previously published solutions, not circular inputs. In the charged sector, the coupling gamma is fixed as a compatibility condition for the ansatz; even if the skeptic's substitution objection were correct, that would be an analytical error, not a circularity. The thermodynamic entropy S in (5.25) is obtained from requiring the first law, while the Wald entropy S_W in (5.24) is computed independently from the Noether charge; comparing them is a genuine calculation. The lightlike equality S_W=S=pi r_h^2 follows simply because ell1=0, and that condition is part of the setup rather than a hidden assumption imported into the result. Self-citations such as Ref. [31] (limit check) and Ref. [91] (extended Iyer-Wald formalism) are externally published general results and are not used as unverified uniqueness or ansatz premises. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the circularity score is zero.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the bumblebee action, the frozen-VEV ansatz, and the Iyer–Wald formalism; no new entities are introduced. The only ad-hoc choice beyond the model's standard assumptions is adopting the first-law entropy (over Wald entropy) as physical in the spacelike case, following Ref [69].

free parameters (4)
  • ℓ2 = ξα² (time-component amplitude)
    New LV parameter from setting b_t = α = const in ansatz (3.8); a free constant of integration, not fitted, physically bounded only by |ℓ| < 6.2×10^-13.
  • γ = ξ/(2+ℓ1) = ξ/(2+ℓ1)
    Electromagnetic-bumblebee coupling fixed by hand to obtain the exact charged solution (Sec. 4); the paper does not show it satisfies the vector equation (4.7), which appears to require γ = ξ(1+ℓ1+ℓ2)²/(2+ℓ1).
  • Λ–λ relation = Λ = κλ(1+ℓ1)/ξ
    Cosmological constant locked to the potential's Lagrange multiplier so the (A)dS ansatz solves the equations exactly (Eq. 3.20); a tuning, not an independent input.
  • β (special case ξ=κ/2)
    Integration constant in b_t = α + β/r giving a nonvanishing bumblebee field strength B_rt = β/r² (Eqs. 3.10–3.11).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Bumblebee action (2.1) with nonminimal coupling ξBμBνRμν and potential V(B²±b²) is the correct gravitational dynamics
    The whole construction lives inside this specific Lorentz-violating gravity model; no independent evidence is provided for the model itself.
  • domain assumption Frozen VEV ansatz B_μ = b_μ with b_μb^μ = ±b² = const (Sec. 3, Eqs. 3.2–3.4)
    The bumblebee field is fixed at its vacuum configuration; fluctuations and away-from-minimum dynamics (cf. Ref [32]) are excluded. All exactness claims inherit this restriction.
  • domain assumption On-shell potential conditions V = V' = 0 for Case A (quadratic potential, Sec. 3.1)
    Standard in the subfield (Casana et al. [22]); makes the potential drop out of the field equations.
  • standard math Static, spherically symmetric metric ansatz (3.1) with only dt/dr bumblebee components
    Standard symmetry reduction; imposes the solution class being searched.
  • standard math Iyer–Wald Noether charge formalism and extended first-law construction (Sec. 5)
    Unproved background formalism invoked for entropy/energy; standard in black hole thermodynamics.
  • ad hoc to paper Thermodynamic entropy S = (1+ℓ1)πr_h² is the physical entropy (over Wald entropy S_W) in the spacelike case
    S is chosen so that the first law (5.26) holds; the paper adopts this interpretation following Ref [69] without resolving why Wald's formula fails.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact Black Hole Solutions in Bumblebee Gravity with Lightlike or Spacelike VEVS." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JRYW2LH6

@misc{pith2026251016731,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact Black Hole Solutions in Bumblebee Gravity with Lightlike or Spacelike VEVS},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JRYW2LH6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.16731}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent developments in Lorentz-violating theories of gravity, we obtain new black hole solutions within the framework of bumblebee gravity, where the bumblebee vector field possesses two independent nonzero components and acquires either a lightlike or spacelike vacuum expectation value. Within this framework, we derive new Schwarzschild-like and Schwarzschild-(A)dS-like black hole solutions. By further incorporating a nonminimally coupled electromagnetic field, we generalize these to new charged black hole solutions. These solutions extend previous results by including additional Lorentz-violating parameters. A key finding is that even for lightlike vacuum expectation values, the black hole solutions exhibit distinct corrections from Lorentz violation. Furthermore, we present a preliminary analysis of their thermodynamic properties. Similar to previous studies that reported a discrepancy between the black hole entropy and the Wald entropy in bumblebee gravity with spacelike vacuum expectation values, our solutions in the spacelike case exhibit the same behavior. In contrast, for the lightlike case considered here, the two entropies coincide.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Asymptotically-flat Black holes in Bumblebee gravity: Exact solutions and Thermodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Exact solutions for asymptotically flat black holes in bumblebee gravity with temporal bumblebee field, analytic Y charge and X potential, and discovery of new cases including unbounded charge-mass ratio and wormhole ...

  2. Cosmological perturbations and gravitational waves in the general Einstein-vector theory

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the general Einstein-vector theory on a cosmological background, stable small-scale configurations admit at most two tensor, two vector, and one scalar gravitational-wave mode, with vector modes excluded when tenso...

  3. Asymmetric quantum steering harvested near a Lorentz-violating BTZ black hole

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Unruh-DeWitt detectors near a Lorentz-violating BTZ black hole harvest asymmetric quantum steering, with a thermal-intuition inversion and Lorentz violation suppressing maximal correlations.

  4. Probing Lorentz-violating effects via precession and accretion disk images of a rotating bumblebee black hole

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Lorentz violation in a rotating bumblebee black hole suppresses Lense-Thirring precession, increases periastron precession, shrinks the inner shadow, and enhances the lensed ring while leaving the critical curve nearl...

  5. Boson Stars in Bumblebee Gravity and Their Gravitational Waveforms from Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals

    gr-qc 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In bumblebee gravity, the Lorentz-violating parameter ℓ makes mini-boson stars more compact for positive ℓ and produces LISA-detectable, sustained EMRI waveforms for penetrating orbits.

  6. Stationary scalar clouds around a rotating Kalb-Ramond BTZ black hole

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Stationary scalar clouds exist around rotating KR BTZ black holes at superradiant threshold ω=mΩ_H, with positive KR parameter allowing nonmonotonic existence lines under Robin boundaries.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 70 linked inside Pith · cited by 6 Pith papers

  1. [69]

    An,Notes on thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-like bumblebee black hole,Phys

    Y.-S. An,Notes on thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-like bumblebee black hole,Phys. Dark Univ.45(2024) 101520 [2401.15430]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Birrell and P.C.W

    N.D. Birrell and P.C.W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (2, 1984), 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1984

  3. [2]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  4. [3]

    Aharony, S.S

    O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri and Y. Oz,Large N field theories, string theory and gravity,Phys. Rept.323(2000) 183 [hep-th/9905111]

    arXiv 2000

  5. [4]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [5]

    Alfaro, H.A

    J. Alfaro, H.A. Morales-Tecotl and L.F. Urrutia,Quantum gravity corrections to neutrino propagation,Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 2318 [gr-qc/9909079]

    arXiv 2000

  7. [6]

    Alfaro, H.A

    J. Alfaro, H.A. Morales-Tecotl and L.F. Urrutia,Loop quantum gravity and light propagation, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 103509 [hep-th/0108061]

    arXiv 2002

  8. [7]

    Rovelli and L

    C. Rovelli and L. Smolin,Loop Space Representation of Quantum General Relativity,Nucl. Phys. B331(1990) 80

    1990

Show all 93 references
  1. [8]

    Kostelecky and S

    V.A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel,Spontaneous Breaking of Lorentz Symmetry in String Theory, Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 683

    1989

  2. [9]

    Colladay and V.A

    D. Colladay and V.A. Kostelecky,Cross-sections and Lorentz violation,Phys. Lett. B511 (2001) 209 [hep-ph/0104300]

    2001 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Kostelecky and R

    V.A. Kostelecky and R. Lehnert,Stability, causality, and Lorentz and CPT violation,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 065008 [hep-th/0012060]

    2001 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Kostelecky and M

    V.A. Kostelecky and M. Mewes,Cosmological constraints on Lorentz violation in electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 251304 [hep-ph/0111026]

    2001 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Colladay and P

    D. Colladay and P. McDonald,One-Loop Renormalization of the Electroweak Sector with Lorentz Violation,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 125019 [0904.1219]

    2009 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Berger, V.A

    M.S. Berger, V.A. Kostelecký and Z. Liu,Lorentz and CPT Violation in Top-Quark Production and Decay,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 036005 [1509.08929]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Carroll, G.B

    S.M. Carroll, G.B. Field and R. Jackiw,Limits on a Lorentz and Parity Violating Modification of Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 1231

    1990

  8. [15]

    Andrianov and R

    A.A. Andrianov and R. Soldati,Lorentz symmetry breaking in Abelian vector field models with Wess-Zumino interaction,Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 5961 [hep-th/9405147]

    1995 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Andrianov and R

    A.A. Andrianov and R. Soldati,Patterns of Lorentz symmetry breaking in QED by CPT odd interaction,Phys. Lett. B435(1998) 449 [hep-ph/9804448]

    1998 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Lehnert and R

    R. Lehnert and R. Potting,Vacuum Cerenkov radiation,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 110402 [hep-ph/0406128]

    2004 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Baeta Scarpelli,QED with chiral nonminimal coupling: aspects of the Lorentz-violating quantum corrections,J

    A.P. Baeta Scarpelli,QED with chiral nonminimal coupling: aspects of the Lorentz-violating quantum corrections,J. Phys. G39(2012) 125001 [1210.1552]. – 17 –

    2012 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Brito, H.G

    L.C.T. Brito, H.G. Fargnoli and A.P. Baêta Scarpelli,Aspects of Quantum Corrections in a Lorentz-violating Extension of the Abelian Higgs Model,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 125023 [1304.6016]

    2013 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Kostelecky and S

    V.A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel,Gravitational Phenomenology in Higher Dimensional Theories and Strings,Phys. Rev. D40(1989) 1886

    1989

  14. [21]

    Kostelecky,Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,Phys

    V.A. Kostelecky,Gravity, Lorentz violation, and the standard model,Phys. Rev. D69(2004) 105009 [hep-th/0312310]

    2004 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Casana, A

    R. Casana, A. Cavalcante, F.P. Poulis and E.B. Santos,Exact Schwarzschild-like solution in a bumblebee gravity model,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 104001 [1711.02273]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Övgün, K

    A. Övgün, K. Jusufi and I. Sakallı,Exact traversable wormhole solution in bumblebee gravity, Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 024042 [1804.09911]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Maluf and J.C.S

    R.V. Maluf and J.C.S. Neves,Black holes with a cosmological constant in bumblebee gravity, Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 044002 [2011.12841]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [25]

    C. Ding, C. Liu, R. Casana and A. Cavalcante,Exact Kerr-like solution and its shadow in a gravity model with spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 178 [1910.02674]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Santos, A.Y

    A.F. Santos, A.Y. Petrov, W.D.R. Jesus and J.R. Nascimento,Gödel solution in the bumblebee gravity,Mod. Phys. Lett. A30(2015) 1550011 [1407.5985]

    2015 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Jha and A

    S.K. Jha and A. Rahaman,Bumblebee gravity with a Kerr-Sen-like solution and its Shadow, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 345 [2011.14916]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Filho, J.R

    A.A.A. Filho, J.R. Nascimento, A.Y. Petrov and P.J. Porfírio,Vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 085010 [2211.11821]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [29]

    R. Xu, D. Liang and L. Shao,Static spherical vacuum solutions in the bumblebee gravity model, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 024011 [2209.02209]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    C. Ding, Y. Shi, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, C. Liu and Y. Xiao,Rotating BTZ-like black hole and central charges in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 573 [2302.01580]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Liu, W.-D

    J.-Z. Liu, W.-D. Guo, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Charged spherically symmetric and slowly rotating charged black hole solutions in bumblebee gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 145 [2407.08396]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Bailey, H.S

    Q.G. Bailey, H.S. Murray and D.T. Walter-Cardona,Bumblebee gravity: Spherically symmetric solutions away from the potential minimum,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 024069 [2503.10998]

    2025

  26. [33]

    Li and J

    H. Li and J. Zhu,Static Spherical Vacuum Solution to Bumblebee Gravity with Time-like VEVs, 2506.17957

  27. [34]

    S. Li, L. Liang and L. Ma,Dyonic RN-like and Taub-NUT-like black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,2510.04405

  28. [35]

    Belchior, R.V

    F.M. Belchior, R.V. Maluf, A.Y. Petrov and P.J. Porfírio,Global monopole in a Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 658 [2502.17267]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [36]

    Chen and H.-S

    Y.-Q. Chen and H.-S. Liu,Taub-NUT-like black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 084040 [2505.23104]. – 18 –

    2025 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Araújo Filho, N

    A.A. Araújo Filho, N. Heidari, I.P. Lobo, Y. Shi and F.S.N. Lobo,The Flight of the Bumblebee in a Non-Commutative Geometry: A New Black Hole Solution,2509.17867

    arXiv

  31. [38]

    Araújo Filho, J.R

    A.A. Araújo Filho, J.R. Nascimento, A.Y. Petrov and P.J. Porfírio,An exact stationary axisymmetric vacuum solution within a metric-affine bumblebee gravity,JCAP07(2024) 004 [2402.13014]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [39]

    Delhom, J.R

    A. Delhom, J.R. Nascimento, G.J. Olmo, A.Y. Petrov and P.J. Porfírio,Metric-affine bumblebee gravity: classical aspects,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 287 [1911.11605]

    2021

  33. [40]

    Kalb and P

    M. Kalb and P. Ramond,Classical direct interstring action,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 2273

    1974

  34. [41]

    Altschul, Q.G

    B. Altschul, Q.G. Bailey and V.A. Kostelecky,Lorentz violation with an antisymmetric tensor, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 065028 [0912.4852]

    2010 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Lessa, J.E.G

    L.A. Lessa, J.E.G. Silva, R.V. Maluf and C.A.S. Almeida,Modified black hole solution with a background Kalb–Ramond field,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 335 [1911.10296]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Kumar, S.G

    R. Kumar, S.G. Ghosh and A. Wang,Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 104001 [2001.00460]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Yang, Y.-Z

    K. Yang, Y.-Z. Chen, Z.-Q. Duan and J.-Y. Zhao,Static and spherically symmetric black holes in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 124004 [2308.06613]

    2023 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Duan, J.-Y

    Z.-Q. Duan, J.-Y. Zhao and K. Yang,Electrically charged black holes in gravity with a background Kalb–Ramond field,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 798 [2310.13555]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Do and W.F

    T.Q. Do and W.F. Kao,Five-dimensional scalar-vector Kalb-Ramond black holes,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 044014

    2020

  40. [47]

    W. Liu, D. Wu and J. Wang,Static neutral black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity,JCAP09 (2024) 017 [2406.13461]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Liu, S.-P

    J.-Z. Liu, S.-P. Wu, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Exact black hole solutions in gravity with a background Kalb-Ramond field,2505.07404

  42. [49]

    W.-D. Guo, Q. Tan and Y.-X. Liu,Quasinormal modes and greybody factor of a Lorentz-violating black hole,2312.16605

    arXiv

  43. [50]

    Du, H.-F

    Y.-Z. Du, H.-F. Li, Y.-B. Ma and Q. Gu,Phase structure of the de Sitter Spacetime with KR field based on the Lyapunov exponent,2403.20083

    arXiv

  44. [51]

    Kuang and A

    X.-M. Kuang and A. Övgün,Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole,Annals Phys.447(2022) 169147 [2205.11003]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Oliveira, D.M

    R. Oliveira, D.M. Dantas, V. Santos and C.A.S. Almeida,Quasinormal modes of bumblebee wormhole,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 105013 [1812.01798]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    W. Liu, X. Fang, J. Jing and J. Wang,QNMs of slowly rotating Einstein–Bumblebee black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 83 [2211.03156]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Gomes, R.V

    D.A. Gomes, R.V. Maluf and C.A.S. Almeida,Thermodynamics of Schwarzschild-like black holes in modified gravity models,Annals Phys.418(2020) 168198 [1811.08503]

    2020 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Kanzi and I

    S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı,GUP Modified Hawking Radiation in Bumblebee Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B 946(2019) 114703 [1905.00477]. – 19 –

    2019 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Güllü and A

    I. Güllü and A. Övgün,Schwarzschild-like black hole with a topological defect in bumblebee gravity,Annals Phys.436(2022) 168721 [2012.02611]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Oliveira, D.M

    R. Oliveira, D.M. Dantas and C.A.S. Almeida,Quasinormal frequencies for a black hole in a bumblebee gravity,EPL135(2021) 10003 [2105.07956]

    2021 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Kanzi and I

    S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı,Greybody radiation and quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black hole in Bumblebee gravity model,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 501 [2102.06303]

    2021 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Hosseinifar, A.A.A

    F. Hosseinifar, A.A.A. Filho, M.Y. Zhang, H. Chen and H. Hassanabadi,Shadows, greybody factors, emission rate, topological charge, and phase transitions for a charged black hole with a Kalb-Ramond field background,2407.07017

    arXiv

  53. [60]

    W. Liu, D. Wu and J. Wang,Shadow of slowly rotating Kalb-Ramond black holes,JCAP05 (2025) 017 [2407.07416]

    2025 arXiv

  54. [61]

    W. Deng, W. Liu, F. Long, K. Xiao and J. Jing,Quasinormal Modes of a Massive Scalar Field in Slowly Rotating Einstein-Bumblebee Black Holes,2507.13978

  55. [62]

    Ovgün, K

    A. Ovgün, K. Jusufi and I. Sakalli,Gravitational lensing under the effect of Weyl and bumblebee gravities: Applications of Gauss–Bonnet theorem,Annals Phys.399(2018) 193 [1805.09431]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Sakallı and E

    I. Sakallı and E. Yörük,Modified Hawking radiation of Schwarzschild-like black hole in bumblebee gravity model,Phys. Scripta98(2023) 125307

    2023

  57. [64]

    Mangut, H

    M. Mangut, H. Gürsel, S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı,Probing the Lorentz Invariance Violation via Gravitational Lensing and Analytical Eigenmodes of Perturbed Slowly Rotating Bumblebee Black Holes,Universe9(2023) 225 [2305.10815]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Uniyal, S

    A. Uniyal, S. Kanzi and I. Sakallı,Some observable physical properties of the higher dimensional dS/AdS black holes in Einstein-bumblebee gravity theory,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 668 [2207.10122]

    2023 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Gu, W.-D

    Y.-T. Gu, W.-D. Guo and Y.-X. Liu,Quasinormal modes of an electrically charged Kalb-Ramond black hole,2509.23732

  60. [67]

    Lai, Y.-Q

    X.-B. Lai, Y.-Q. Dong, Y.-Z. Fan and Y.-X. Liu,Stability Analysis of Cosmological Perturbations in the Bumblebee Model: Parameter Constraints and Gravitational Waves, 2509.13958

  61. [68]

    Z.-W. Xia, H. Gong, Q. Pan and J. Jing,Probing Kalb–Ramond field with extreme mass ratio inspirals,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 960 [2509.16838]

    2025

  62. [70]

    Bertolami and J

    O. Bertolami and J. Paramos,The Flight of the bumblebee: Vacuum solutions of a gravity model with vector-induced spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 044001 [hep-th/0504215]

    2005 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Bluhm, S.-H

    R. Bluhm, S.-H. Fung and V.A. Kostelecky,Spontaneous Lorentz and Diffeomorphism Violation, Massive Modes, and Gravity,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 065020 [0712.4119]

    2008 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Lehum, J.R

    A.C. Lehum, J.R. Nascimento, A.Y. Petrov and P.J. Porfirio,One-loop corrections in Maxwell-metric-affine bumblebee gravity,2402.17605

    arXiv

  65. [73]

    Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun

    S.W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199. – 20 –

    1975

  66. [74]

    Gibbons and S.W

    G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking,Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D15(1977) 2752

    1977

  67. [75]

    Bardeen, B

    J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S.W. Hawking,The Four laws of black hole mechanics,Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973) 161

    1973

  68. [76]

    Hawking,Black Holes and Thermodynamics,Phys

    S.W. Hawking,Black Holes and Thermodynamics,Phys. Rev. D13(1976) 191

    1976

  69. [77]

    Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys

    R.M. Wald,Black hole entropy is the Noether charge,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) R3427 [gr-qc/9307038]

    1993 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Iyer and R.M

    V. Iyer and R.M. Wald,Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028]

    1994 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Iyer and R.M

    V. Iyer and R.M. Wald,A Comparison of Noether charge and Euclidean methods for computing the entropy of stationary black holes,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 4430 [gr-qc/9503052]

    1995 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Avery and B.U.W

    S.G. Avery and B.U.W. Schwab,Noether’s second theorem and Ward identities for gauge symmetries,JHEP02(2016) 031 [1510.07038]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Compère,Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, vol

    G. Compère,Advanced Lectures on General Relativity, vol. 952, Springer, Cham, Cham, Switzerland (2, 2019), 10.1007/978-3-030-04260-8

    2019 doi

  74. [82]

    Barnich and F

    G. Barnich and F. Del Monte,Introduction to Classical Gauge Field Theory and to Batalin-Vilkovisky Quantization,1810.00442

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Ruzziconi,Asymptotic Symmetries in the Gauge Fixing Approach and the BMS Group,PoS Modave2019(2020) 003 [1910.08367]

    R. Ruzziconi,Asymptotic Symmetries in the Gauge Fixing Approach and the BMS Group,PoS Modave2019(2020) 003 [1910.08367]

    2020 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Kubiznak and R.B

    D. Kubiznak and R.B. Mann,P-V criticality of charged AdS black holes,JHEP07(2012) 033 [1205.0559]

    2012 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Dolan,The cosmological constant and the black hole equation of state,Class

    B.P. Dolan,The cosmological constant and the black hole equation of state,Class. Quant. Grav. 28(2011) 125020 [1008.5023]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Dolan,Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics,Class

    B.P. Dolan,Pressure and volume in the first law of black hole thermodynamics,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 235017 [1106.6260]

    2011 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Kubiznak, R.B

    D. Kubiznak, R.B. Mann and M. Teo,Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with Lambda,

  80. [88]

    Wei and Y.-X

    S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu,Insight into the Microscopic Structure of an AdS Black Hole from a Thermodynamical Phase Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 111302 [1502.00386]

    2015 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Cai, L.-M

    R.-G. Cai, L.-M. Cao, L. Li and R.-Q. Yang,P-V criticality in the extended phase space of Gauss-Bonnet black holes in AdS space,JHEP09(2013) 005 [1306.6233]

    2013 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Kastor, S

    D. Kastor, S. Ray and J. Traschen,Enthalpy and the Mechanics of AdS Black Holes,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 195011 [0904.2765]

    2009 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Y. Xiao, Y. Tian and Y.-X. Liu,Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics from Extended Iyer-Wald Formalism,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 021401 [2308.12630]

    2024 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Feng, H.-S

    X.-H. Feng, H.-S. Liu, H. Lü and C.N. Pope,Black Hole Entropy and Viscosity Bound in Horndeski Gravity,JHEP11(2015) 176 [1509.07142]

    2015 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Feng, H.-S

    X.-H. Feng, H.-S. Liu, H. Lü and C.N. Pope,Thermodynamics of Charged Black Holes in Einstein-Horndeski-Maxwell Theory,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 044030 [1512.02659]. – 21 –

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.