Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Surfacing contextual hate speech words within social media

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.10093 v1 pith:JSYYY22J submitted 2017-11-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords hatespeechwordsdetectionalternatedataapproachclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Social media platforms have recently seen an increase in the occurrence of hate speech discourse which has led to calls for improved detection methods. Most of these rely on annotated data, keywords, and a classification technique. While this approach provides good coverage, it can fall short when dealing with new terms produced by online extremist communities which act as original sources of words which have alternate hate speech meanings. These code words (which can be both created and adopted words) are designed to evade automatic detection and often have benign meanings in regular discourse. As an example, "skypes", "googles", and "yahoos" are all instances of words which have an alternate meaning that can be used for hate speech. This overlap introduces additional challenges when relying on keywords for both the collection of data that is specific to hate speech, and downstream classification. In this work, we develop a community detection approach for finding extremist hate speech communities and collecting data from their members. We also develop a word embedding model that learns the alternate hate speech meaning of words and demonstrate the candidacy of our code words with several annotation experiments, designed to determine if it is possible to recognize a word as being used for hate speech without knowing its alternate meaning. We report an inter-annotator agreement rate of K=0.871, and K=0.676 for data drawn from our extremist community and the keyword approach respectively, supporting our claim that hate speech detection is a contextual task and does not depend on a fixed list of keywords. Our goal is to advance the domain by providing a high quality hate speech dataset in addition to learned code words that can be fed into existing classification approaches, thus improving the accuracy of automated detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Making FETCH! Happen: Finding Emergent Dog Whistles Through Common Habitats

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows existing NLP systems find almost no novel dog whistles in social media, while the proposed EarShot pipeline raises F0.5 scores to 14.6 on synthetic Reddit, 5.7 on Gab, and 4.6 on Twitter.

  2. Impromptu Cybercrime Euphemism Detection

    cs.CL 2024-12 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors build the ICED benchmark of 440 cybercrime euphemism sentences and a context-augmented masked-language-model pipeline that detects held-out drug euphemisms with about 0.5 percent precision at top-20 retrieval.

Pith tools