REVIEW 1 cited by
From topological amplitude to rescattering dynamics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We proposed a theoretical framework to correlate the topological diagram at quark level and rescattering dynamics at hadron level. In the framework, both the hadronic triangle diagram, and the topological-scattering diagram, which is the intermediate structure between topological diagram and triangle diagram, are expressed in the tensor form. The completeness of topological-scattering diagram is confirmed by the quark substructure of meson-meson scattering. The coefficient of each triangle diagram can be derived from the topological-scattering diagram and the total rescattering amplitudes are consistent with the ones derived from the chiral Lagrangian. If only the short-distance $T$ diagram is considered as the weak vertex in triangle diagram, the rescattering contributions in the $C$, $E$ and $P$ diagrams have definite proportional relation of $L(C):L(E):L(P)=-2:1:1$ under the $SU(3)_F$ symmetry, and the rescattering contributions in the $T$ and $A$ diagrams only arise from the $SU(3)_F$ breaking effects. Taking $D\to K\pi$ and $D\to \pi\pi$ modes as examples, we present our framework in detail. We find the Isospin relations in these decays are still valid in terms of triangle diagrams. Besides, the conclusions in the $D$ meson decays under the $SU(3)_F$ symmetry can be generalized to the $B$ meson decays under the $SU(4)_F$ symmetry.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
From topological amplitudes to rescattering dynamics in charmed baryon decays
The authors build a bridge between topological and rescattering amplitudes for charmed baryon decays and claim the Koerner-Pati-Woo theorem fails, suggesting a measurement of Lambda_c^+ -> Sigma^+ K_S^0.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.