Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 52 references

Gauging the only allowed regularizing null term of the free Dirac Lagrangian turns a free variational ambiguity into measurable dipole couplings and sharply bounds non-Riemannian geometry by causality.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-14 16:37 UTC pith:JTC7OZSZ

load-bearing objection Clean two-parameter classification of Legendre-regular Dirac null terms that, once gauged, induce real dipole operators and exclude the pure one-vector torsion/nonmetricity sectors under a frozen-background Velo–Zwanziger test. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.09738 v1 pith:JTC7OZSZ submitted 2026-07-02 physics.gen-ph

Induced Couplings and Causal Bounds from Nondegenerate Dirac Lagrangians

Marcelo Netz-Marzola , David Vasak , Vladimir Denk , J\"urgen Struckmeier , Horst Stoecker This is my paper
classification physics.gen-ph
keywords Dirac Lagrangiancovariant Legendre mapnull deformationPauli dipole operatorsVelo–Zwanziger criteriontorsionnonmetricitymetric-affine gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The ordinary Dirac Lagrangian is linear in field derivatives, so its covariant Legendre map is singular: the momenta do not determine the derivatives. The paper classifies the minimal first-order null deformations that fix this without changing the free Dirac equation, under phase invariance, reality, proper Poincaré covariance, and no external tensors. Only a two-parameter spinorial bivector survives, with lengths ℓ and ℓ₅. Once that representative is minimally gauged, the free null term is no longer a pure divergence. Under electromagnetism it generates magnetic and electric Pauli dipole operators plus an identically conserved dipole current, so precision moment measurements directly bound the same lengths that define the free theory. Under metric-affine gauging the same term produces spin-curvature, torsion and nonmetricity corrections; the Velo–Zwanziger criterion then excludes every nonzero pure axial, pure trace and mixed axial-trace torsion background, and every nonzero pure Weyl or second-trace nonmetricity background. The Levi-Civita limit remains causal and only adds lower-order curvature-dependent mass terms. Thus a free Hamiltonian-regularity choice becomes observable couplings while non-Riemannian sectors are tightly constrained.

Core claim

The unique (up to two real lengths) Hessian-regularizing null deformation of the free Dirac Lagrangian is the two-parameter bivector term with E^{μν}=ℓσ^{μν}+ℓ₅⋆σ^{μν}. Minimal U(1) gauging of this representative induces magnetic and electric Pauli dipole operators and an identically conserved dipole current; metric-affine gauging induces spin-curvature, torsion and nonmetricity corrections whose principal symbols are then subjected to the Velo–Zwanziger test, excluding all nonzero pure axial, pure trace, mixed axial-trace torsion and pure Weyl or second-trace nonmetricity backgrounds.

What carries the argument

The two-parameter spinorial bivector E^{μν}=ℓσ^{μν}+ℓ₅⋆σ^{μν} (ℓ²+ℓ₅²≠0) that regularizes the covariant Legendre map while remaining a free null Lagrangian; after minimal gauging it supplies the principal-symbol corrections whose characteristic determinant is tested by the Velo–Zwanziger criterion.

Load-bearing premise

The physically correct step is to promote the free horizontal null term itself into the matter Lagrangian and then apply ordinary minimal gauging, rather than keeping the same algebraic object as an invariant contact correction that never generates new principal-symbol terms.

What would settle it

A precision measurement of the electron’s anomalous magnetic moment or electric dipole moment that forces both regularization lengths to zero within experimental error would remove the induced dipole operators; alternatively, an explicit algebraic classification showing that a nonzero pure tensor-torsion or pure tracefree-nonmetricity background still yields only the metric light cone would reopen sectors the paper leaves unclassified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Species-dependent lengths (ℓ_f, ℓ_{5f}) that define free Dirac representatives become directly constrainable by magnetic-moment and EDM data, with electron bounds already |ℓ_e| ≲ 3.8×10^{-10} GeV^{-1} and |ℓ_{5e}| ≲ 6.2×10^{-16} GeV^{-1}.
  • Within the Riemann–Cartan axial–trace subsector the only Velo–Zwanziger-admissible point is vanishing axial and trace torsion; theories with propagating torsion of those types are excluded for the induced operator.
  • Pure Weyl and pure second-trace nonmetricity are likewise excluded; the combined trace-vector sector survives only when the effective trace vector vanishes.
  • In the Levi-Civita limit the light cone remains the metric cone and only lower-order scalar and pseudoscalar curvature-dependent mass terms appear.
  • The same lengths that regularize the free theory are inherited by every subsequent coupling of that fermion, so electromagnetic bounds automatically constrain geometric and other interactions built from the same representative.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If left-handed doublets must share a common pair (ℓ,ℓ₅) under unbroken electroweak symmetry, the already tight electron EDM bound would force the corresponding neutrino regularization lengths into the same ultra-small window.
  • A purely Lepagean retention of the bivector as an invariant contact term could yield a regular covariant Hamiltonian fermion sector without the non-Riemannian principal-symbol pathologies, at the price of losing the induced dipole moments.
  • The still-unclassified pure tensor-torsion and general tracefree-nonmetricity sectors are the natural next targets for algebraic assumptions that would either close or reopen them under the same Velo–Zwanziger test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper classifies the minimal first-order, charge-neutral, real, proper Poincaré-covariant null deformations of the free Dirac Lagrangian that make the covariant Legendre map locally invertible. Under the stated assumptions this yields the two-parameter bivector E^{μν}=ℓσ^{μν}+ℓ_5⋆σ^{μν} with ℓ²+ℓ_5²≠0 (Propositions 1–3). Minimal U(1) gauging of this representative induces magnetic and electric Pauli dipole operators and an identically conserved dipole current, so that precision moment data bound the same species-dependent lengths (ℓ_f,ℓ_{5f}). Metric-affine gauging in a Lorentz-spinor prescription produces spin-curvature, torsion and nonmetricity corrections to the Dirac operator. Applying the Velo–Zwanziger criterion to the induced principal symbol with frozen non-Riemannian backgrounds, the authors exclude every nonzero pure axial, pure trace and mixed axial–trace torsion background, as well as every nonzero pure Weyl and second-trace nonmetricity background (Table I, §§V.C–V.D); the combined trace-vector nonmetricity sector survives only when the effective vector H_μ vanishes, while tensor torsion and general tracefree nonmetricity remain unclassified. The Levi–Civita limit preserves the metric light cone and leaves only lower-order curvature-dependent mass terms.

Significance. If the classification and the characteristic analysis hold, the work converts a free variational ambiguity of the Dirac Lagrangian into a two-parameter family of observable dipole couplings that are already constrained by magnetic-moment and EDM data, while simultaneously furnishing sharp front-causality bounds on large classes of non-Riemannian backgrounds. Strengths include the explicit inverse of the mixed Hessian (Eqs. 22–24), the closed-form characteristic determinants for the pure one-vector and mixed axial–trace sectors, the clean reduction of the two-parameter problem to a single invariant length λ via a unit-determinant chiral transformation, and the transparent comparison with the nonminimal Poincaré-gauge operators of Obukhov et al. The results are falsifiable by moment measurements and by any dynamical realization of the excluded torsion/nonmetricity sectors.

major comments (2)
  1. §V.A and the Introduction state that torsion and nonmetricity are treated as fixed local backgrounds when the Velo–Zwanziger test is applied. Table I and the abstract then claim that every nonzero pure axial, pure trace, mixed axial–trace torsion background and every nonzero pure Weyl or second-trace nonmetricity background is “excluded.” This is a necessary local front-causality diagnostic for the spinor principal symbol, but it is not a complete dynamical exclusion: once ˜L_Gr is dynamical the same backgrounds are sourced by the spinor hypermomentum, and the paper never verifies that the joint system remains hyperbolic or that the connection equations cannot drive the excluded sectors to zero. The claim should be rephrased as a conditional exclusion under the frozen-background idealization, or the joint hyperbolicity should be addressed at least for the pure one-vector sectors.
  2. Introduction and §VI explicitly contrast the chosen route (promote the horizontal dedonderized Lagrangian to the matter action and then minimally gauge) with a pure Lepagean alternative that keeps the same algebraic bivector as an invariant contact correction and never generates new principal-symbol terms. The central physical claims of the paper—induced Pauli operators and the Table I exclusions—rest entirely on the first choice. The manuscript should state more clearly that the exclusions are route-dependent and that the Lepagean alternative remains open as a way to obtain a regular covariant Hamiltonian fermion sector without the non-Riemannian propagation pathologies.
minor comments (5)
  1. §III: the numerical bounds |ℓ_e|≲3.8×10^{-10} GeV^{-1} and |ℓ_{5e}|≲6.2×10^{-16} GeV^{-1} are useful sensitivity estimates, but the text should flag more explicitly that they assume the entire experimental uncertainty (or EDM bound) is attributed to the regularizing term and that no cancellation with other new-physics contributions is allowed.
  2. §IV.A, Eq. (49) and Appendix B: the matching to Obukhov et al. is clear for the axial-torsion, ℓ_5=0 case, but a short remark on how the parity-odd ℓ_5 terms would map (or fail to map) onto their nonminimal ansatz would help the reader.
  3. Table I caption: “Passes” is defined as “not immediately excluded.” For the pure tensor torsion and general tracefree nonmetricity rows this is accurate, but the caption could note that those sectors remain open only in the absence of further algebraic assumptions on q^λ_{μν} or N_{λμν}.
  4. Notation: the same symbol E^{μν} is used for the free regularizing bivector and for its curved, density-weighted counterpart; a brief reminder at the start of §IV would avoid momentary confusion.
  5. Typographical: “Poincar´ e” and similar accented characters appear inconsistently in the arXiv source; a uniform encoding would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity: two-parameter null class and Velo–Zwanziger exclusions are derived in-paper; self-citation to the 2024 Pauli paper is contextual, not definitional.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Introduction; Prop. 2–3 / Eq. (18); Sec. VI]
    "This extends the analysis of [1] by a parity-odd term. ... The Gasiorowicz term of [1] is the parity-even member of this family. If parity or CP invariance is imposed, the second, dual branch is removed. ... one then recovers the parity-even regularization as the unique representative within our demands (up to an overall normalization) [1]."

    The parity-even Gasiorowicz representative and some prior causal windows are imported from overlapping-author work [1]. This is not load-bearing for the paper’s central results: Propositions 1–3 re-derive the full two-parameter null class under stated symmetries, and Sec. V independently recomputes the characteristic determinant, eliminating the causal windows of [1]. The citation is contextual motivation and special-case recovery, not a uniqueness theorem that forces the VZ exclusions or the dipole operators.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Singularity of the free Dirac Hessian is shown directly (Sec. II.B). Propositions 1–3 classify Hessian-relevant null deformations under phase invariance, reality, proper Poincaré covariance and no external tensors, yielding E^{μν}=ℓσ^{μν}+ℓ₅⋆σ^{μν} with ℓ²+ℓ₅²≠0; the argument does not define the family by the later dipole or causality claims. Minimal U(1) gauging turns the free null term into Pauli magnetic/electric operators and a superpotential dipole current (Sec. III); the lengths (ℓ_f,ℓ_{5f}) are free species parameters bounded by external moment data, not fitted inside the paper to force those bounds. Metric-affine gauging produces the principal coefficient Γ^β_MA; the Velo–Zwanziger analysis (Sec. V) computes det(Γ^μ n_μ)=0 sector by sector and excludes nonzero pure axial, pure trace, mixed axial–trace torsion and pure Weyl/second-trace nonmetricity. Those exclusions are outputs of the characteristic polynomial, not inputs. Self-citation to struckmeier2024pauli supplies the parity-even special case and prior causal windows that this work eliminates; uniqueness of the two-parameter class and the full VZ table are re-derived here. The Lepagean alternative is stated as a genuine methodological fork, not smuggled as a uniqueness theorem. Frozen-background idealization is a completeness caveat, not circularity. Score 1 only for minor non-load-bearing self-citation context.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a short list of symmetry and gauging choices that select the two-parameter family and then promote it to a physical matter Lagrangian. The lengths themselves remain free until external data are invoked; no new particles or forces are postulated beyond the geometric fields already present in metric-affine gravity.

free parameters (2)
  • ℓ (parity-even regularization length) = species-dependent; |ℓ_e| ≲ 3.8×10^{-10} GeV^{-1} from electron anomaly uncertainty
    Free real parameter of dimension length that multiplies σ^{μν}; fixed a posteriori by magnetic-moment data but not derived.
  • ℓ_5 (parity-odd regularization length) = species-dependent; |ℓ_{5e}| ≲ 6.2×10^{-16} GeV^{-1} from electron EDM
    Free real parameter multiplying the dual bivector; fixed a posteriori by EDM bounds but not derived.
axioms (5)
  • standard math Covariant Legendre regularity is equivalent to non-vanishing of the fiber Hessian det W ≠ 0 (inverse-function theorem on the derivative fiber).
    Stated in §II.A and used throughout the classification.
  • domain assumption Only first-order, charge-neutral, bilinear, real, proper-Poincaré-covariant null deformations without external tensors are admitted.
    Imposed in §II.C to reduce the general bilinear expression to the two-parameter bivector.
  • ad hoc to paper Minimal U(1) and metric-affine gauging are performed on the horizontal dedonderized Lagrangian rather than on a pure Lepagean contact form.
    Explicit methodological choice contrasted with the alternative Lepagean route in the Introduction and §VI; this choice generates the induced couplings and the principal-symbol modifications.
  • domain assumption Spinor connection is realized by the Lorentz-spinor prescription Ω_μ = −(i/4)σ_{ab} ω^{ab}_μ (nonmetricity enters only through tetrads and densities).
    Adopted in §IV; full world-spinor alternatives are not explored.
  • domain assumption Velo–Zwanziger real-root / non-timelike-conormal criterion is a sufficient exclusion test for causal front propagation on a frozen background.
    Applied throughout §V; the paper notes it is only an exclusion test, not a proof of strong hyperbolicity.
invented entities (1)
  • species-dependent regularization lengths (ℓ_f, ℓ_{5f}) as free properties of each Dirac representative independent evidence
    purpose: to label the chosen free Legendre-regular Lagrangian before any gauging, so that subsequent couplings inherit the same lengths
    Introduced in §III; they become measurable via dipole moments but have no independent existence outside the chosen representative.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 37254 in / 3231 out tokens · 35517 ms · 2026-07-14T16:37:35.453108+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The standard Dirac Lagrangian is linear in the field derivatives and therefore has a vanishing Hessian. We identify the minimal null deformations of this Lagrangian that make the covariant Legendre map locally invertible. Imposing global phase invariance, reality, proper Poincar\'e covariance, and absence of external background tensors leaves the two-parameter spinorial bivector $\mathcal E^{\mu\nu}=\ell\sigma^{\mu\nu} +\ell_5{}^\star\sigma^{\mu\nu}$, where the star denotes the Hodge dual and $\ell^2+\ell_5^2\neq0$. This extends the analysis of \cite{struckmeier2024pauli} by a parity-odd term. After minimal $U(1)$ gauging, this free null term is no longer variationally trivial and induces magnetic- and electric-dipole Pauli operators, together with an identically conserved dipole current. These dipole terms make the species-dependent regularization lengths directly constrainable by precision moment measurements. Metric-affine gauging in a Lorentz-spinor prescription then produces spin-curvature, torsion, and nonmetricity corrections to the Dirac operator. Applying the Velo-Zwanziger criterion, we exclude all nonzero pure axial, pure trace, and mixed axial-trace torsion backgrounds, as well as nonzero pure Weyl and second-trace nonmetricity backgrounds. The combined trace-vector nonmetricity sector is not excluded only when the effective trace vector vanishes. Tensor torsion and general tracefree nonmetricity remain unclassified without further algebraic assumptions, while the Levi-Civita limit preserves the metric light cone and leaves only lower-order curvature-dependent mass terms. Thus, gauging a Legendre-regular Dirac representative turns a free variational ambiguity into observable couplings, while non-Riemannian sectors are sharply constrained by causality bounds.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The determinant becomes det Γµ (s)nµ = 1 81 9n2 + 4λ2 n2s2 −(n·s) 2 2

    Pure axial torsion For purely axial torsion, tµ = 0, q λ µν = 0, the tensor coefficient reduces to T (s) µν =− 2λ 3 ερ µναnρsα. The determinant becomes det Γµ (s)nµ = 1 81 9n2 + 4λ2 n2s2 −(n·s) 2 2 . (115) Thus the characteristic equation is 9n2 + 4λ2 n2s2 −(n·s) 2 = 0,(116) or equivalently 9 + 4λ2s2 n2 = 4λ2(n·s) 2.(117) •Timelike axial torsion.Ifs µ is ...

  2. [2]

    One root is null,n 0 =−n 1

    =α s(n0 +n 1)2, α s := 4λ2S2 9 . One root is null,n 0 =−n 1. The other root is n0 n1 = 1 +α s 1−α s , wheneverα s ̸= 1, and has absolute value larger than one. Thus the lightlike axial sector admits timelike characteristic covectors. At the excep- tional valueα s = 1, transverse spatial directions give a degenerate or non-hyperbolic characteristic polynom...

  3. [3]

    Pure trace torsion For purely trace torsion, sµ = 0, q λ µν = 0, one has T (tr) µν = 8λ 9 t[µnν]. The determinant reduces to det Γµ (tr)nµ = n2 + 16λ2 81 n2t2 −(n·t) 2 2 .(118) Thus the characteristic equation is 1 + 16λ2 81 t2 n2 = 16λ2 81 (n·t) 2.(119) •Timelike trace torsion.Ift µ is timelike, choose tµ = (t0,0,0,0). Then n2 0 = 1 + 16λ2t2 0 81 |⃗ n|2,...

  4. [4]

    Apart from the null rootn 0 =−n 1, the second root is n0 n1 = 1 +α t 1−α t , forα t ̸= 1, and is timelike

    =α t(n0 +n 1)2, α t := 16λ2T 2 81 . Apart from the null rootn 0 =−n 1, the second root is n0 n1 = 1 +α t 1−α t , forα t ̸= 1, and is timelike. At the exceptional value αt = 1, the characteristic polynomial degenerates or fails to give real roots in transverse directions. Thus the lightlike trace sector is not admissible. •Spacelike trace torsion.Ift µ is ...

  5. [5]

    It is useful to define Fµν :=n αqαµν, w µ :=n αnβqαβµ.(120) Then T (q) µν =− 2λ 3 Fµν

    Pure tensor torsion For purely tensorial torsion, tµ = 0, s µ = 0, the tensor coefficient is T (q) µν =− 2λ 3 nρqρ µν. It is useful to define Fµν :=n αqαµν, w µ :=n αnβqαβµ.(120) Then T (q) µν =− 2λ 3 Fµν. With F 2 :=F µνF µν, F· ⋆F:=F µν(⋆F) µν, w 2 :=w µwµ, the characteristic determinant becomes 0 = n2 − 2λ2 9 F 2 2 + 4λ4 81 (F· ⋆F) 2 + 16λ2 9 w2.(121) ...

  6. [6]

    Mixed axial and trace torsion We now consider the mixed axial–trace sector, qλ µν = 0, s µ ̸= 0, t µ ̸= 0. The determinant may be written directly in terms of the invariants Xs :=n 2s2 −(n·s) 2, X t :=n 2t2 −(n·t) 2, Xst :=n 2(s·t)−(n·s)(n·t).(122) Using (114), one obtains det Γµ (st)nµ = n2 + 4λ2 9 Xs + 16λ2 81 Xt 2 + 256λ4 729 X2 st −X sXt .(123) For th...

  7. [7]

    Then bQλ = 1 4 Qλ, Q α β λ = 1 4 Qαδβ λ

    Pure Weyl nonmetricity For pure Weyl nonmetricity, Qλµν =Q (W) λµν = 1 4 Qλgµν, Q (t) λµν = 0, N λµν = 0. Then bQλ = 1 4 Qλ, Q α β λ = 1 4 Qαδβ λ. Hence (bQλ −Q λ)σλβ +Q α β λσαλ =− 3 4 Qλσλβ + 1 4 Qαδβ λσαλ =− 1 2 Qλσλβ. Therefore T (W) µν = λ 6 Q[µnν] = λ 12 (Qµnν −Q νnµ).(137) SinceT (W) µν is a simple bivector, the determinant re- duces to det Γµ (W) ...

  8. [8]

    Then Qλ = 0, bQλ = Λλ, and Qα β λ = 2 9 δβ αΛλ +g αλΛβ − 1 9Λαδβ λ

    Pure second-trace nonmetricity For pure second-trace nonmetricity, we set Qλµν =Q (t) λµν = 4 9 gλ(µΛν) − 1 9Λλgµν, Q(W) λµν = 0, N λµν = 0. Then Qλ = 0, bQλ = Λλ, and Qα β λ = 2 9 δβ αΛλ +g αλΛβ − 1 9Λαδβ λ. Thus (bQλ −Q λ)σλβ +Q α β λσαλ = Λλσλβ + 2 9 δβ αΛλσαλ + 2 9 gαλΛβσαλ − 1 9Λαδβ λσαλ = Λλσλβ − 2 9Λλσλβ − 1 9Λλσλβ = 2 3Λλσλβ. Therefore T (t) µν =−...

  9. [9]

    Finally, for a spacelike vector Λ µ = (0,Λ 1,0,0), one finds n2 0 =n 2 2 +n 2 3 + 81 81−λ 2Λ2 1 n2 1

    For a lightlike vector Λ µ = ΛL(1,1,0,0), the non-null root is n0 n1 = 1 +α Λ 1−α Λ , α Λ := λ2Λ2 L 81 , and is timelike forα Λ ̸= 1, while the exceptional value fails the real-root test in transverse directions. Finally, for a spacelike vector Λ µ = (0,Λ 1,0,0), one finds n2 0 =n 2 2 +n 2 3 + 81 81−λ 2Λ2 1 n2 1. Thus the regime |Λ1|< 9 λ has real roots b...

  10. [10]

    Combined trace-vector sector Although the pure Weyl and pure second-trace sec- tors have different numerical coefficients when written in terms ofQ µ and Λµ, their combination is not a genuinely 21 two-vector characteristic problem. For the trace-vector sector Qλµν =Q (W) λµν +Q (t) λµν, N λµν = 0, define the effective trace vector Hµ := bQµ −Q µ = Λµ − 3...

  11. [11]

    Fails” means that every nonzero background in the sector either admits timelike characteristic covectors or fails the real-root test. “Passes

    Pure tracefree nonmetricity We finally consider a pure tracefree nonmetricity back- ground, Qλµν =N λµν, Q λ = 0, bQλ = 0. Then we have T (N) µν =− λ 3 nρN[µ ρ ν].(147) It is useful to define Fµν :=n ρN[µ ρ ν], w µ :=n ρFρµ.(148) Then T (N) µν =− λ 3 Fµν. Substitution into the general vector–tensor determinant gives the diagnostic formula det Γµ (N) nµ = ...

    2014

  12. [12]

    Struckmeier, D

    J. Struckmeier, D. Vasak, A. Redelbach, and H. Stoecker, Pauli-type coupling of spinors and curved spacetime, Classical and Quantum Gravity41, 175014 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    P. A. M. Dirac, Generalized Hamiltonian Dynamics, Canadian Journal of Mathematics2, 129 (1950)

    1950

  14. [14]

    Henneaux and C

    M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim,Quantization of Gauge Systems(Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1992)

    1992

  15. [15]

    Y. N. Obukhov, A. J. Silenko, and O. V. Teryaev, Spin-torsion coupling and gravitational moments of dirac fermions: Theory and experimental bounds, Physical Re- view D90, 124068 (2014)

    2014

  16. [16]

    Fabbri and M

    L. Fabbri and M. Tecchiolli, Restrictions on torsion– spinor field theory, Modern Physics Letters A34, 1950311 (2019)

    2019

  17. [17]

    V. A. Kosteleck` y and M. Mewes, Fermions with lorentz- violating operators of arbitrary dimension, Physical Re- view D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 88, 096006 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    I. L. Shapiro, Physical aspects of the space-time torsion, Physics Reports357, 113 (2002)

    2002

  19. [19]

    V. A. Kosteleck` y, N. Russell, and J. D. Tasson, Con- straints on torsion from bounds on lorentz violation, Physical review letters100, 111102 (2008)

    2008

  20. [20]

    Krupkov´ a and D

    O. Krupkov´ a and D. Smetanov´ a, Legendre transforma- tion for regularizable lagrangians in field theory, Letters in Mathematical Physics58, 189 (2001)

    2001

  21. [21]

    Hojman, Problem of the identical vanishing of euler– lagrange derivatives in field theory, Physical Review D 27, 451 (1983)

    S. Hojman, Problem of the identical vanishing of euler– lagrange derivatives in field theory, Physical Review D 27, 451 (1983). 27

    1983

  22. [22]

    Krupka and J

    D. Krupka and J. Musilov´ a, Trivial lagrangians in field theory, Differential Geometry and its Applications9, 293 (1998)

    1998

  23. [23]

    Palese, O

    M. Palese, O. Rossi, E. Winterroth, and J. Musilov´ a, Variational sequences, representation sequences and ap- plications in physics, SIGMA12, 045 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    Struckmeier, Hamiltonian dynamics on the symplec- tic extended phase space for autonomous and non- autonomous systems, J of Phys G: Nucl Phys38, 1257 (2005)

    J. Struckmeier, Hamiltonian dynamics on the symplec- tic extended phase space for autonomous and non- autonomous systems, J of Phys G: Nucl Phys38, 1257 (2005)

    2005

  25. [25]

    Struckmeier and W

    J. Struckmeier and W. Greiner,Extended Lagrange and Hamilton formalism for point mechanics and covariant Hamilton field theory(World Scientific, 2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Vasak and J

    D. Vasak and J. Struckmeier, Covariant canonical gauge theory of classical gravitation for scalar, vector, and spin-1/2 particle fields, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10228 (2023)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Measurement of the electron magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 071801 (2023), arXiv:2209.13084 [physics.atom-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science381, 46 (2023), arXiv:2212.11841 [physics.atom-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Gordon, Der strom der diracschen elektronentheorie, Z

    W. Gordon, Der strom der diracschen elektronentheorie, Z. Physik50, 630 (1928)

    1928

  30. [30]

    F. W. Hehl, A. Mac´ ıas, E. W. Mielke, and Y. N. Obukhov, On the structure of the energy-momentum and the spin currents in dirac’s electron theory, inOn Ein- stein’s Path: Essays in Honor of Engelbert Sch¨ ucking, edited by A. Harvey (Springer, New York, 1999) pp. 257– 274, arXiv:gr-qc/9706009

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    F. W. Hehl, J. D. McCrea, E. W. Mielke, and Y. Ne’eman, Metric-affine gauge theory of gravity: Field equations, noether identities, world spinors, and break- ing of dilation invariance, Phys. Rept.258, 1 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9402012

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  32. [32]

    Delhom, Minimal coupling in presence of non- metricity and torsion, The European Physical Journal C80, 728 (2020)

    A. Delhom, Minimal coupling in presence of non- metricity and torsion, The European Physical Journal C80, 728 (2020)

    2020

  33. [33]

    Hehl and B

    F. Hehl and B. Datta, Nonlinear spinor equation and asymmetric connection in general relativity, Journal of Mathematical Physics12, 1334 (1971)

    1971

  34. [34]

    Struckmeier and D

    J. Struckmeier and D. Vasak, Covariant canonical gauge theory of gravitation for fermions, Astron Nachr/AN 342, 745 (2021), arXiv:2101.04467 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Y. N. Obukhov, E. W. Mielke, J. Budczies, and F. W. Hehl, On the chiral anomaly in non-riemannian space- times, Foundations of Physics27, 1221 (1997)

    1997

  36. [36]

    Vignolo, S

    S. Vignolo, S. Carloni, R. Cianci, F. Esposito, and L. Fab- bri, Spinor fields in f (q)-gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 015009 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    Vasak, J

    D. Vasak, J. Struckmeier, and J. Kirsch,Covariant Canonical Gauge Gravity(Springer Nature, 2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Benisty, E

    D. Benisty, E. I. Guendelman, E. N. Saridakis, H. Stoecker, J. Struckmeier, and D. Vasak, Inflation from fermions with curvature-dependent mass, Physical Re- view D100, 043523 (2019)

    2019

  39. [39]

    Ribas, F

    M. Ribas, F. Devecchi, and G. Kremer, Cosmological model with non-minimally coupled fermionic field, EPL (Europhysics Letters)81, 19001 (2008)

    2008

  40. [40]

    Carloni, S

    S. Carloni, S. Vignolo, and R. Cianci, Non-minimally coupled condensate cosmologies: a phase space analysis, Classical and Quantum Gravity31, 185007 (2014)

    2014

  41. [41]

    Courant and D

    R. Courant and D. Hilbert,Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Partial Differential Equations(Inter- science, New York, 1962)

    1962

  42. [42]

    M. E. Tayloret al.,Partial differential equations III, Vol. 2 (Springer, 1996)

    1996

  43. [43]

    Vitagliano, Characteristics, bicharacteristics and ge- ometric singularities of solutions of pdes, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics11, 1460039 (2014)

    L. Vitagliano, Characteristics, bicharacteristics and ge- ometric singularities of solutions of pdes, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics11, 1460039 (2014)

    2014

  44. [44]

    Velo and D

    G. Velo and D. Zwanziger, Propagation and quantization of rarita-schwinger waves in an external electromagnetic potential, Physical Review186, 1337 (1969)

    1969

  45. [45]

    Fabbri, Non-causal propagation for higher-order inter- actions of torsion with spinor fields, International Journal of Theoretical Physics57, 1683 (2018)

    L. Fabbri, Non-causal propagation for higher-order inter- actions of torsion with spinor fields, International Journal of Theoretical Physics57, 1683 (2018)

    2018

  46. [46]

    V. M. Red’kov, A. A. Bogush, N. G. Tokarevskaya,et al., On parametrization of the linear gl (4, c) and unitary su (4) groups in terms of dirac matrices, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 4, 021 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    Denk,Covariant Hamiltonian Formulation of the Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions, Bachelor’s thesis, Faculty of Physics, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (2019)

    V. Denk,Covariant Hamiltonian Formulation of the Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions, Bachelor’s thesis, Faculty of Physics, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (2019)

    2019

  48. [48]

    V. Denk, D. Vasak, and J. Kirsch, Torsion waves in co- variant canonical gauge theory of gravity, arXiv e-prints , arXiv (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    Krupkov´ a and D

    O. Krupkov´ a and D. Smetanov´ a, Lepage equivalents of second-order euler—lagrange forms and the inverse prob- lem of the calculus of variations, Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics16, 235 (2009)

    2009

  50. [50]

    Chen, An explicit formula of hessian determinants of composite functions and its applications, Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics36, 27 (2012)

    B.-Y. Chen, An explicit formula of hessian determinants of composite functions and its applications, Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics36, 27 (2012)

    2012

  51. [51]

    M. P. do Carmo,Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces(Prentice-Hall, 1976)

    1976

  52. [52]

    Spivak,A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, Vol

    M. Spivak,A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, Vol. 3 (Publish or Perish, 1979)

    1979