Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 55 references

Packet Routing for the Quantum Internet

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read IPv6 Extension Headers Can Carry Quantum Routing Instructions

desk verdict Architectural proposal for quantum-aware IPv6 Extension Headers — novel framing, but the superposition-of-processes claim is underspecified. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06075 v1 pith:JU4M55P7 submitted 2026-07-07 cs.NI quant-ph

Robert Malaney This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.NIquant-ph
keywords quantuminternetIPv6extensionheadersroutingteleportationpathsuperpositionpacketswitchingbackwardcompatibility
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes adding three new Extension Headers to the IPv6 packet standard to let routers direct quantum-mechanical processes at the network layer. The first header, the Quantum Routing Header, instructs routers on where to split a photon's path into a superposition of routes, how long to hold quantum states in memory, and whether to initiate quantum multicast. The second, the Quantum Teleportation Header, tells routers whether and where to teleport a quantum state using pre-distributed entanglement, with precedence rules governing how teleportation interacts with path superposition. The third, sketched but not fully specified, is a Quantum Superposition Header that would place different quantum processes themselves into superposition at designated routers. The key architectural choice is that all header information remains classical, traveling ahead of the quantum payload in separate light pulses. Classical routers that do not understand the new headers simply ignore them, preserving backward compatibility. The paper does not prove optimality or demonstrate an implementation; it argues that this minimal modification to IPv6 is sufficient to expose a wide range of quantum routing behaviors, including path superposition, teleportation, and superpositions of the two, at the IP layer.

What carries the argument

IPv6 Extension Headers carrying classical instruction fields (Path List, Quantum Multicast, Teleportation, Superposition) that direct quantum routers to split paths, teleport states, or superpose processes, with the quantum payload traveling as a separate light pulse stored in local quantum memory during header processing.

What would settle it

If quantum memory with sufficient coherence time and fidelity cannot be deployed at every router at IP-layer processing timescales, the entire architecture cannot function, because every header field depends on the router holding a quantum state while reading and acting on classical instructions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that three new IPv6 Extension Headers, all carrying classical data, can instruct routers to perform quantum routing (path superposition), quantum teleportation, and superpositions of these processes, while remaining invisible to classical routers that lack quantum hardware. The paper specifies the sub-fields of the Quantum Routing Header in detail, outlines the Quantum Teleportation Header with several instruction modes, and sketches a Quantum Superposition Header. The load-bearing mechanism is the separation of classical header data from quantum payload, synchronized in time so each router can store the quantum state in local memory while processing classical routing指令.

Load-bearing premise

Every router must have quantum memory capable of storing incoming quantum states while the router processes classical header data and makes routing decisions. The paper notes that fiber-loop memories with microsecond coherence times exist, but does not demonstrate that this suffices for real IP-layer processing including optical-to-electrical conversion in a live network.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If adopted and standardized, network operators could incrementally add quantum routing capabilities to existing IPv6 infrastructure by upgrading routers with quantum memory and the new header-processing logic, without replacing classical traffic handling.
  • The Quantum Routing Header's Path List and Quantum Multicast fields would enable a photon to traverse multiple network paths simultaneously, opening the door to quantum random access memory distributed across routers and to communication advantages such as error filtration and two-way communication with a single particle.
  • The Teleportation Header's precedence rules (TEL=0 through TEL=3) would let the IP layer dynamically choose between direct transmission and entanglement-based teleportation hop by hop, creating a hybrid transport mode that could route around failed quantum channels.
  • The sketched Quantum Superposition Header would provide a standardized interface for future quantum communication protocols whose advantages are not yet known, future-proofing the architecture against new discoveries in superposed quantum processes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The architecture implicitly requires a network-wide clock synchronization at picosecond precision (stated for the Time to Send field) and reliable entanglement distribution; if either is unavailable, the teleportation and path-splitting features degrade to classical single-path routing, but the paper does not analyze this degradation path.
  • The separation of classical headers from quantum payload means the headers could be spoofed or modified by a classical adversary without touching the quantum state, raising security questions about header integrity that the paper flags via reference to existing IPv6 Extension Header security concerns but does not resolve.
  • The Quantum Multicast field, which places a state into a superposition of all single-hop paths from a router, could in principle create an exponentially growing number of path branches across multiple hops, but the paper does not analyze the scaling behavior or resource cost of such branching.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper proposes three new IPv6 Extension Headers — a Quantum Routing Header, a Quantum Teleportation Header, and a sketched Quantum Superposition Header — to enable quantum teleportation, path-superposition routing, and superpositions of these processes at the IP layer. The approach is positioned as backward-compatible: classical routers ignore the new headers while quantum-capable routers act on them. The paper is an architectural design proposal; it contains no mathematical derivations, simulations, or experimental results. The quantum-mechanical processes invoked (teleportation, path superposition, superposition of processes) are established in the referenced literature, and the IPv6 Extension Header mechanism is correctly described per RFC 8200.

Significance. The paper addresses a legitimate gap: prior quantum network architecture work has not deeply explored how path-superposition routing and superpositions of quantum processes could be surfaced at the IP layer via IPv6 Extension Headers. The backward-compatibility argument is a practical strength, and the header field designs (Figs. 3–5) are concrete enough to seed future standardization discussions. The paper is honest about its limitations — it explicitly states it claims no optimality and that detailed standardization is left to the community. However, the central novelty claim — that the architecture 'enables a wider range of outcomes allowed by quantum mechanics' — is not substantiated by any analysis showing that the proposed header processing preserves quantum coherence for specific operational scenarios.

major comments (2)
  1. §IV.A, footnote 10: The paper's central novelty is enabling superposition of quantum processes at the IP layer (§IV.C, Fig. 6). Footnote 10 acknowledges that 'the designs outlined do not automatically guarantee maintenance of superposition for all setting combinations,' and footnote 17 notes that measurements of control qubits can collapse superpositions unless classical information is stored unread in an ancilla. However, no analysis — analytical, simulational, or formal — is provided for which specific header-setting combinations preserve coherence and which do not. Consider the basic path-splitting scenario (§IV.A): the classical header is copied into all paths, and each router reads the Path List field and makes routing decisions. Whether this classical processing constitutes extractable which-path information that decoheres the quantum superposition depends on implementation details
  2. §IV.C: The Quantum Superposition Header is the least developed of the three proposed headers. The SUP field and its Sub Data Field are described in only two paragraphs, with no figure showing the header layout (unlike Figs. 3 and 5 for the other two headers). Given that superposition of quantum processes is the paper's primary novelty claim relative to prior work, the absence of even a suggestive field-level diagram makes it difficult to assess whether the proposal is sufficiently specified to be actionable. A figure comparable to Figs. 3–5, even labeled as suggestive, would substantially strengthen the contribution.
minor comments (7)
  1. Abstract: 'optimally' should be 'optimality' (the same error appears in the Introduction: 'We do not claim any optimally in our design').
  2. §III.A, Assumption 1: The requirement for quantum memory on all routers is acknowledged as potentially droppable but not pursued. Footnote 3 cites fiber-loop circulation [32] as evidence that required memory timescales are available, but no quantitative argument is given for whether microsecond-scale coherence suffices for IP-layer processing including optical-to-electrical conversion. A brief quantitative estimate would strengthen this assumption.
  3. §IV.A, Path List field: The description states that after path splitting, 'all paths must be routed to the original destination IPv6 address.' It is unclear how this is enforced if intermediate routers pick next-hop addresses autonomously (as described for the case where the next hop is not in the local routing table). Clarifying the enforcement mechanism would help.
  4. Fig. 4: The sub-figures (a)–(d) are referenced in the text but the figure caption does not describe what each sub-figure represents. Adding brief labels or a more descriptive caption for each example would help readers.
  5. §IV.B: The statement 'the link layer can intelligently adopt to information in this new header and override previous settings' uses 'adopt' where 'adapt' is likely intended.
  6. §V: The paper delegates entanglement distribution to 'a presumed operational entanglement distribution process' but does not discuss how entanglement fidelity requirements or decoherence during entanglement swapping interact with the header-level decisions. Even a brief discussion of whether the IP-layer teleportation requests can be satisfied given realistic entanglement distribution rates would make the architecture more assessable.
  7. References [7], [9], [10], [20], [49] are dated 2026. Please verify these are not preprints mislabeled with future dates and confirm citation details for accuracy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive reading of the manuscript. The referee correctly identifies the paper as an architectural design proposal and acknowledges the backward-compatibility argument and the concreteness of the header field designs. The two major comments both concern the superposition-of-processes aspects of the paper: (1) the absence of any analysis of which header-setting combinations preserve quantum coherence, and (2) the under-specification of the Quantum Superposition Header, including the lack of a field-level diagram. We agree with both points and will revise the manuscript accordingly. Specifically, we will add a new subsection presenting a concrete coherence-preservation analysis for the basic path-splitting scenario and at least one teleportation-superposition scenario, and we will add a field-level diagram for the Quantum Superposition Header comparable to Figs. 3 and 5. We also clarify below why a complete enumeration of all setting combinations is beyond the scope of an architectural proposal but why the referee's request for specific worked examples is well-founded and will be addressed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §IV.A, footnote 10: The paper's central novelty is enabling superposition of quantum processes at the IP layer (§IV.C, Fig. 6). Footnote 10 acknowledges that 'the designs outlined do not automatically guarantee maintenance of superposition for all setting combinations,' and footnote 17 notes that measurements of control qubits can collapse superpositions unless classical information is stored unread in an ancilla. However, no analysis — analytical, simulational, or formal — is provided for which specific header-setting combinations preserve coherence and which do not. Consider the basic path-splitting scenario (§IV.A): the classical header is copied into all paths, and each router reads the Path List field and makes routing decisions. Whether this classical processing constitutes extractable which-path information that decoheres the quantum superposition depends on implementation details

    Authors: The referee is correct that the manuscript provides no analysis of coherence preservation for specific header-setting combinations, and we agree this is a genuine gap that should be addressed. We will revise the manuscript to include a new subsection (to be placed in §IV.A or as a new §IV.D) that works through concrete scenarios in detail. For the basic path-splitting scenario the referee highlights, the analysis proceeds as follows. The classical header is copied into all paths, but only the quantum payload is placed in superposition. The key question is whether the classical processing at each router — reading the Path List field, updating the Time to Send field, and making routing decisions — constitutes extractable which-path information. We will argue that it does not, provided the classical header information is identical on all paths (which the architecture mandates: the header is copied, not modified differently on different branches). The which-path information would only become extractable if a router's classical processing left a record that is correlated with a specific path — for example, if the Time to Send field were updated to different values on different branches. The default settings (TS field set to -1,-1,-1, meaning no action) avoid this. When the TS field is active, coherence is preserved only if the same values are written on all paths, which the router can ensure because it processes the header classically before the quantum payload arrives. We will also analyze the teleportation-superposition scenario from §IV.C (Fig. 6), where the referee's concern about control-qubit measurement is directly relevant. Here, footnote 17 already identifies the key condition: classical measurement outcomes must be stored unread in an ancilla rather than read by a revision: no

  2. Referee: §IV.C: The Quantum Superposition Header is the least developed of the three proposed headers. The SUP field and its Sub Data Field are described in only two paragraphs, with no figure showing the header layout (unlike Figs. 3 and 5 for the other two headers). Given that superposition of quantum processes is the paper's primary novelty claim relative to prior work, the absence of even a suggestive field-level diagram makes it difficult to assess whether the proposal is sufficiently specified to be actionable. A figure comparable to Figs. 3–5, even labeled as suggestive, would substantially strengthen the contribution.

    Authors: We agree entirely. The Quantum Superposition Header is the least developed of the three headers, and given that superposition of quantum processes is the paper's central novelty claim, the absence of a field-level diagram is a legitimate weakness. We will add a new figure (to be labeled Fig. 7 in the revised manuscript) showing the header layout for the Quantum Superposition Header, comparable in structure to Figs. 3 and 5. The figure will depict the Next Header field, the Header Extension Length field, and the Data field broken down into sub-fields including the SUP field (indicating which processes are to be placed in superposition), the Sub Data Field (for additional instructions and clarifications on how the superposition is to proceed, including where and when superpositions are to occur and which control qubits trigger them), and a Control Qubit Identifier field (specifying which control qubit governs the superposition, consistent with the schematic in Fig. 6). We will also expand the text in §IV.C from two paragraphs to a fuller description that parallels the level of detail provided for the Quantum Routing Header (§IV.A) and the Quantum Teleportation Header (§IV.B), including a discussion of default values, precedence rules, and the relationship between the SUP field and the TEL=3 setting in the Teleportation Header. As with the other headers, the figure and field descriptions will be explicitly labeled as suggestive rather than definitive, pending community standardization. (yes) revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; architectural proposal with non-load-bearing self-citations

full rationale

This paper is an architectural specification proposing new IPv6 Extension Header formats for quantum routing, teleportation, and superposition of processes. It does not perform quantitative derivations, fit parameters to data, or make numerical predictions that could reduce to inputs by construction. The central claims rest on externally established quantum mechanical results (teleportation [22,23], quantum routing [24-27], superposition of quantum processes [28]) and the IPv6 standard (RFC 8200 [4]). Self-citations by the author ([27], [39], [41], [44]) are used for contextual examples — e.g., [41] is cited for a routing-table update process analogy, [44] for a satellite-based entanglement architecture example, [27] as one of several references for quantum routing, and [39] for a QRAM implementation attempt. None of these self-citations are load-bearing for the paper's central architectural claims: removing them would not invalidate the header designs or the feasibility arguments. No uniqueness theorem, no fitted-parameter-as-prediction, and no self-definitional reduction is present. The paper's limitations (e.g., coherence preservation across header settings, quantum memory assumptions) are correctness/completeness concerns, not circularity. Score 1 reflects the presence of minor self-citations that are non-load-bearing and do not form a circular logic chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The axiom ledger reveals that the paper's architecture rests on six domain assumptions (several of which are strong idealizations: flawless classical communication, perfect synchronization, reliable entanglement distribution) and one ad-hoc design constraint (superposition preservation) that the paper itself acknowledges is not guaranteed by the proposed designs. The three invented entities are new protocol header types with no independent implementation or testing. No free parameters are fitted to data — the paper is a design specification, not an empirical or theoretical derivation — but multiple design choices (field sizes, TLV coding, synchronization precision) are left unspecified.

free parameters (3)
  • Field bit sizes (TY, TS, PL, QM, QMS, CDA, TEL, SD, SUP) = unspecified
    The paper explicitly declines to specify field sizes (§IV): 'we do not categorically state the size of any fixed length field.' These are design choices left to standardization.
  • TLV coding for quantum Option bits = unspecified
    The mapping of Option bits to specific quantum instructions is stated to require definition but is not provided.
  • Time synchronization precision (picoseconds) = picoseconds
    The TS field uses picosecond time units (§IV.A), but the required synchronization precision for maintaining path superpositions is not derived or justified.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Quantum memory is available on all routers with sufficient coherence time for IP-layer processing.
    Assumption 1, §III.A. The paper notes fiber-loop memory (footnote 3, citing [32]) but does not verify the timescale is sufficient.
  • domain assumption All classical communication is flawless.
    Assumption 4, §III.A. Stated without qualification; classical packet loss is a real network phenomenon.
  • domain assumption A reliable entanglement distribution protocol is in place.
    Assumption 6, §III.A. The paper defers all entanglement distribution details to 'other layers' (§V) without specifying the protocol.
  • domain assumption The network is perfectly synchronized.
    Fig. 1 caption: 'The network is assumed perfectly synchronized.' Required for the TS field and for coordinating classical header arrival ahead of quantum payload.
  • domain assumption Quantum information can be encoded in a single pulse of light (DV or CV).
    Assumption 2, §III.A. Supported by experimental progress cited in [21] but stated as an assumption for the architecture.
  • domain assumption The link layer transfers quantum information via direct transmissions.
    Assumption 5, §III.A. The paper notes teleportation at the link layer is possible but requires care (footnote 8).
  • ad hoc to paper No action by any router on any path destroys any requested superposition of paths.
    §IV.A, stated as the most important base rule. Footnote 10 acknowledges the designs 'do not automatically guarantee maintenance of superposition for all setting combinations,' making this an unverified design constraint.
invented entities (3)
  • Quantum Routing Header (new IPv6 Extension Header type)
    purpose: Carries classical instructions for path superposition, quantum multicast, and destination changes.
    A new protocol entity proposed by the paper. No implementation, simulation, or IETF registration is provided. Evidence is limited to the design specification itself.
  • Quantum Teleportation Header (new IPv6 Extension Header type)
    purpose: Carries classical instructions for teleportation-based routing at the IP layer.
    Same as above; a new protocol entity without independent validation.
  • Quantum Superposition Header (new IPv6 Extension Header type)
    purpose: Carries the SUP field and instructions for superposing different quantum processes (e.g., routing + teleportation).
    Only sketched in one paragraph (§IV.C); no figure or field specification provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Packet Routing for the Quantum Internet." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JU4M55P7

@misc{pith2026260706075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Packet Routing for the Quantum Internet},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JU4M55P7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06075}
}
read the original abstract

We present a new design for quantum packet routing within the emerging Quantum Internet, highlighting how a little-used feature of Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6), namely Extension Headers, can lead to a significant amount of quantumness within the IP layer. Taking a minimalist approach to alterations of established standards, we outline the changes required in order for quantum teleportation, quantum routing, and superpositions of these processes to be enabled. Relative to other proposals for routing within the Quantum Internet, the architecture we propose enables a wider range of outcomes allowed by quantum mechanics. We do not claim any optimally in our design, but rather a pathway to invoke new quantum routing outcomes via small additions to the current IPv6.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.06075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. System Model. A typical system set up where IP routing will be required. Satellite S1 wishes to transmit quantum information to node C via nodes A and B. Here a second satellite S2 sends classical data (header information) synchronized to reach node A just ahead of the quantum information from S1 (systems where S1 also sends the classical information are also possible). Node D may be used, as quantum mechanics allow… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The Quantum IP Stack. For direct transmission, classical data from the Base IPv6 Header and the Extension Headers are synchronized so that classical data arrives at the next router’s physical layer just prior to the quantum data. The quantum data is then stored in memory whilst the classical data is propagated up through the stack to the IP layer (teleportation involves a different transmission strategy). If the des… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Quantum Routing Header. A proposed new IPv6 Extension Header that allows for various path superposition outcomes. Quantum Internet, and any specific formatting we provide is to be taken as suggestive rather than definitive. In this vein, we do not categorically state the size of any fixed length field, or the structure and form of the padding and coding used to specify instruction sets or Options. This level of deta… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quantum Teleportation Header. A proposed new IPv6 Extension Header that allows for various teleportation outcomes. This paradigm offers another quantum-only aspect of the network, teleportation. We delegate to the IP layer (or higher layers) decisions whether to telepo…
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quantum Routing Format. The IPv6 Quantum Routing format for various scenarios. IPv6 Header. This allows for the different paths to now have different destinations (i.e., have different header information). The above fields accommodate most scenarios that could be envis…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Quantum Superposition of Quantum Processes. One superposition of Quantum Routing and Quantum Teleportation where the hardware at a router located at Addr 1 invokes a superposition of the processes, triggered by Control Qubit 1. Here, the path su￾perposition is triggere…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    OSI reference model - the ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection,

    H. Zimmermann, “OSI reference model - the ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 425–432,

    work page

  2. [2]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1980

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1980. 1094702

    work page doi:10.1109/tcom.1980 1980

  3. [3]

    A protocol for packet network intercommunication,

    V . Cerf and R. Kahn, “A protocol for packet network intercommunication,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 637–648, 1974. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1974.1092259

    work page doi:10.1109/tcom.1974.1092259 1974

  4. [4]

    Improved routing strategies for internet traffic delivery,

    P. Echenique, J. G ´omez-Garde˜nes, and Y . Moreno, “Improved routing strategies for internet traffic delivery,”Phys. Rev. E, vol. 70, p. 056105, Nov 2004. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056105

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.70.056105 2004

  5. [5]

    Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification,

    S. Deering and R. Hinden, “Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification,” Internet Requests for Comments, RFC Editor, RFC 8200, 2017. [Online]. Available: https: //www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8200

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Quantum internet protocol stack: A comprehensive survey,

    J. Illiano, M. Caleffi, A. Manzalini, and A. S. Cacciapuoti, “Quantum internet protocol stack: A comprehensive survey,” Computer Networks, vol. 213, p. 109092, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109092

    work page doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109092 2022

  7. [7]

    Quantum internet addressing,

    A. S. Cacciapuoti, J. Illiano, and M. Caleffi, “Quantum internet addressing,”IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 104–111,

    work page

  8. [8]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2023

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2023. 3328393

    work page doi:10.1109/mnet.2023 2023

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum internet architecture: Unlocking quantum-native routing via quantum addressing,

    M. Caleffi and A. S. Cacciapuoti, “Quantum internet architecture: Unlocking quantum-native routing via quantum addressing,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 74, pp. 3577–3599, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1109/TCOMM.2025.3650397

    2026

  2. [10]

    A resource-centric, task-based approach to quantum network control,

    A. Pirker, B. Munoz, and W. D ¨ur, “A resource-centric, task-based approach to quantum network control,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12030, 2025. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/2507.12030

    2025

  3. [11]

    A quantum internet protocol suite beyond layering,

    A. S. Cacciapuoti and M. Caleffi, “A quantum internet protocol suite beyond layering,”IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSE.2026.3679795

    2026 doi

  4. [12]

    Quantum routers: A switching-fabric framework for quantum- native forwarding,

    J. Illiano, C. D. Risi, A. S. Cacciapuoti, and M. Caleffi, “Quantum routers: A switching-fabric framework for quantum- native forwarding,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/ abs/2606.17773

    2026 arXiv

  5. [13]

    A quantum network stack and protocols for reliable entanglement-based networks,

    A. Pirker and W. D ¨ur, “A quantum network stack and protocols for reliable entanglement-based networks,”New Journal of Physics, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 033003, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab05f7

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    System design for a long-line quantum repeater,

    R. V . Meter, T. D. Ladd, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, “System design for a long-line quantum repeater,”IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1002–1013,

  7. [15]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2008

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2008. 927260

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    A link layer protocol for quantum networks,

    A. Dahlberg, M. Skrzypczyk, D. Cavalcanti, and S. Wehner, “A link layer protocol for quantum networks,” inProceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (SIGCOMM), 2019, pp. 159–173. [Online]. Available: https: //dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3341302.3342070

    2019 doi

  9. [17]

    Designing a quantum network protocol,

    W. Kozlowski, A. Dahlberg, and S. Wehner, “Designing a quantum network protocol,” inProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies. NY , USA: ACM, 2020, p. 1–16. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3386367.3431293

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Packet switching in quantum networks: A path to the quantum internet,

    S. DiAdamo, A. Dahlberg, M. Skrzypczyk, and S. Wehner, “Packet switching in quantum networks: A path to the quantum internet,”Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 4, p. 043064, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4. 043064

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    Quantum key distribution in a packet-switched network,

    R. Mandil, S. DiAdamo, B. Qi, and A. Shabani, “Quantum key distribution in a packet-switched network,”npj Quantum Information, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 85, Sep 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-023-00757-x

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Quantum wrapper networking,

    S. J. B. Yoo, M. B. On, G. Gul, R. Proietti, G. S. Kanter, and P. Kumar, “Quantum wrapper networking,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 148–155,

  13. [21]

    Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 9593032/

    [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 9593032/

  14. [22]

    Experimental demonstration of datagram switching with monitoring in quantum wrapper networks,

    M. B. On, R. Proietti, G. G ¨ul, G. S. Kanter, S. K. Singh, P. Kumar, and S. J. B. Yoo, “Experimental demonstration of datagram switching with monitoring in quantum wrapper networks,”Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 3504–3517, 2024. [Online]. Available: ht...

    2024

  15. [23]

    Experimental demonstration of entanglement delivery using a quantum network stack,

    M. Pompili, C. Delle Donne, I. te Raa, B. van der Vecht, M. Skrzypczyk, G. Ferreira, L. de Kluijver, A. J. Stolk, S. L. N. Hermans, P. Pawełczak, W. Kozlowski, R. Hanson, and S. Wehner, “Experimental demonstration of entanglement delivery using a quantum network stack,”npj Qua...

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Combined physical- and link-layer protocols for quantum networks,

    B. Baier, R. Rosenauer, V . Li, C. Deppe, and W. Kellerer, “Combined physical- and link-layer protocols for quantum networks,”IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 7, pp. 1–15, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ TQE.2025.3630201

    2026

  17. [25]

    Classical-decisive quantum internet by integrated photonics,

    Y . Zhang, R. Broberg, A. Zhu, G. Li, L. Ge, J. M. Smith, and L. Feng, “Classical-decisive quantum internet by integrated photonics,”Science, vol. 389, no. 6763, pp. 940–944, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.adx6176

    2025

  18. [26]

    Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels,

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, “Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 70, pp. 1895–1899, Mar 1993. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1...

    1993 doi

  19. [27]

    Progress in quantum teleportation,

    X.-M. Hu, Y . Guo, B.-H. Liu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, “Progress in quantum teleportation,”Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 339–353, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00588-x

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    Interference of quantum channels,

    D. K. L. Oi, “Interference of quantum channels,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 91, p. 067902, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.067902

    2003 doi

  21. [29]

    Error filtration and entanglement purification for quantum communication,

    N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, and S. Popescu, “Error filtration and entanglement purification for quantum communication,” Physical Review A, vol. 72, p. 012338, 2005. [Online]. Avail- able: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.012338

    2005 doi

  22. [30]

    Resource-efficient linear-optical quantum router,

    K. Lemr, K. Bartkiewicz, A. ˇCernoch, and J. Soubusta, “Resource-efficient linear-optical quantum router,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 87, p. 062333, 2013. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.062333

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    Quantum routing for emerging quantum networks,

    W. Shi and R. Malaney, “Quantum routing for emerging quantum networks,”IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/ MNET.2023.3317821

    2024

  24. [32]

    Path superposition as resource for perfect quantum teleportation with separable states,

    S. Mondal, P. Ghosh, and U. Sen, “Path superposition as resource for perfect quantum teleportation with separable states,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505. 11398

    2025

  25. [33]

    Facilitating data usage control through IPv6 extension headers,

    H. Qarawlus, M. Hellmeier, and F. Howar, “Facilitating data usage control through IPv6 extension headers,” inProceedings of the 14th International Conference on Data Management 12 Technologies and Applications (DATA). SciTePress, 2025, pp. 526–535. [Online]. Available: https:/...

    2025

  26. [34]

    Threats and surprises behind ipv6 extension headers,

    L. Hendriks, P. Velan, R. d. O. Schmidt, P.-T. de Boer, and A. Pras, “Threats and surprises behind ipv6 extension headers,” in2017 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), 2017, pp. 1–9. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.23919/TMA.2017.8002912

    2017 doi

  27. [35]

    Micius quantum experiments in space,

    C.-Y . Lu, Y . Cao, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, “Micius quantum experiments in space,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 94, p. 035001, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.94.035001

    2022

  28. [36]

    Fiber-integrated quantum memory for telecom light,

    K. A. G. Bonsma-Fisher, C. Hnatovsky, D. Grobnic, S. J. Mihailov, P. J. Bustard, D. G. England, and B. J. Sussman, “Fiber-integrated quantum memory for telecom light,”Phys. Rev. A, vol. 108, p. 012606, Jul 2023. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.012606

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    Asymptotic teleportation scheme as a universal programmable quantum processor,

    S. Ishizaka and T. Hiroshima, “Asymptotic teleportation scheme as a universal programmable quantum processor,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, p. 240501, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.240501

    2008 doi

  30. [38]

    Quantum Shannon theory with superpositions of trajectories,

    G. Chiribella and H. Kristj ´ansson, “Quantum Shannon theory with superpositions of trajectories,”Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 475, no. 2225, p. 20180903, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0903

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    Two-way communication with a single quantum particle,

    F. Del Santo and B. Daki ´c, “Two-way communication with a single quantum particle,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, p. 060503, 2018. [Online]. Available: https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.060503

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    Quantum random access memory,

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, “Quantum random access memory,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 100, p. 160501, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.100.160501

    2008

  33. [41]

    Quantum networks with coherent routing of information through multiple nodes,

    H. Kristj ´ansson, Y . Zhong, A. Munson, and G. Chiribella, “Quantum networks with coherent routing of information through multiple nodes,”npj Quantum Information, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 131, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41534-024-00919-5

    2024

  34. [42]

    QRAM: A Survey and Critique,

    S. Jaques and A. G. Rattew, “QRAM: A Survey and Critique,”Quantum, vol. 9, p. 1922, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-12-02-1922

    1922 doi

  35. [43]

    Error-mitigated quantum random access memory,

    W. Shi, N. K. Kundu, M. R. McKay, and R. Malaney, “Error-mitigated quantum random access memory,” in2025 International Conference on Quantum Communications, Net- working, and Computing (QCNC), 2025, pp. 32–39. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/QCNC64685.2025.00015

    2025 doi

  36. [44]

    Internet Pro- tocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters,

    Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), “Internet Pro- tocol Version 6 (IPv6) Parameters,” https://www.iana.org/ assignments/ipv6-parameters/ipv6-parameters.xhtml, 2025, last updated: 2025-12-24

    2025

  37. [45]

    A new scalable hybrid routing protocol for V ANETs,

    M. Al-Rabayah and R. Malaney, “A new scalable hybrid routing protocol for V ANETs,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2625–2635, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2012.2198837

    2012 doi

  38. [46]

    Enhanced communi- cation with the assistance of indefinite causal order,

    D. Ebler, S. Salek, and G. Chiribella, “Enhanced communi- cation with the assistance of indefinite causal order,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, p. 120502, Mar 2018. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.120502

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    To share and not share a singlet: control qubit and nonclassicality in teleportation,

    K. Sen, A. Ajith, S. Halder, and U. Sen, “To share and not share a singlet: control qubit and nonclassicality in teleportation,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 58, no. 5, p. 055302, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ada64a

    2025 doi

  40. [48]

    Satellite-terrestrial quantum networks and the global quantum internet,

    A. Conti, R. Malaney, and M. Z. Win, “Satellite-terrestrial quantum networks and the global quantum internet,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 34–39,

  41. [49]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.007

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.007. 2300854

    doi

  42. [50]

    The engineering of software-defined quantum key distribution networks,

    A. Aguado, V . Lopez, D. Lopez, M. Peev, A. Poppe, A. Pastor, J. Folgueira, and V . Martin, “The engineering of software-defined quantum key distribution networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 20– 26, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCO...

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    Advances in quantum cryptography,

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, J. L. Pereira, M. Razavi, J. S. Shaari, M. Tomamichel, V . C. Usenko, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and P. Wallden, “Advances in quantum cryptography,”Advance...

  44. [52]

    Available: https://opg.optica.org/aop/abstract

    [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/aop/abstract. cfm?uri=aop-12-4-1012

  45. [53]

    Quantum internet—applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, challenges, and research directions,

    A. Singh, K. Dev, H. Siljak, H. D. Joshi, and M. Magarini, “Quantum internet—applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, challenges, and research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2218–2247, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:/...

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    The quantum internet: A synergy of quantum information technologies and 6g networks,

    G. G. Rozenman, N. K. Kundu, R. Liu, L. Zhang, A. Maslennikov, Y . Reches, and H. Y . Youm, “The quantum internet: A synergy of quantum information technologies and 6g networks,”IET Quantum Communication, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 147–166, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ietresear...

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Continuous-variable quantum communication,

    V . C. Usenko, A. Ac ´ın, R. All ´eaume, U. L. Andersen, E. Diamanti, T. Gehring, A. A. E. Hajomer, F. Kanitschar, C. Pacher, S. Pirandola, and V . Pruneri, “Continuous-variable quantum communication,”Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 98, p. 015003, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://link...

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.