pith. sign in

arxiv: 2307.04552 · v1 · pith:JV4XQSVUnew · submitted 2023-07-10 · 💻 cs.CV

SparseVSR: Lightweight and Noise Robust Visual Speech Recognition

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords densenoisevisualequivalentmodelnetworkssparseachieve
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent advances in deep neural networks have achieved unprecedented success in visual speech recognition. However, there remains substantial disparity between current methods and their deployment in resource-constrained devices. In this work, we explore different magnitude-based pruning techniques to generate a lightweight model that achieves higher performance than its dense model equivalent, especially under the presence of visual noise. Our sparse models achieve state-of-the-art results at 10% sparsity on the LRS3 dataset and outperform the dense equivalent up to 70% sparsity. We evaluate our 50% sparse model on 7 different visual noise types and achieve an overall absolute improvement of more than 2% WER compared to the dense equivalent. Our results confirm that sparse networks are more resistant to noise than dense networks.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Head-Pose-Aware Visual Speech Recognition with FiLM Modulation

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    HP-VSR-ResFiLM adds a single residual FiLM modulation block conditioned on head pose to a CNN visual encoder, yielding WER of 25.0% on LRS2 and 33.2% on LRS3 under standard training conditions.

  2. Junk DNA Hypothesis: Pruning Small Pre-Trained Weights Irreversibly and Monotonically Impairs "Difficult" Downstream Tasks in LLMs

    cs.LG 2023-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Pruning small-magnitude weights from pre-trained LLMs causes monotonic irreversible performance degradation on difficult downstream tasks, supporting the Junk DNA Hypothesis that these weights hold essential knowledge.