REVIEW 3 cited by
Training Data Extraction From Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
As the deployment of pre-trained language models (PLMs) expands, pressing security concerns have arisen regarding the potential for malicious extraction of training data, posing a threat to data privacy. This study is the first to provide a comprehensive survey of training data extraction from PLMs. Our review covers more than 100 key papers in fields such as natural language processing and security. First, preliminary knowledge is recapped and a taxonomy of various definitions of memorization is presented. The approaches for attack and defense are then systemized. Furthermore, the empirical findings of several quantitative studies are highlighted. Finally, future research directions based on this review are suggested.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Automated Privacy Information Annotation in Large Language Model Interactions
A 249K-query English/Chinese dataset with 154K privacy phrases and a benchmark showing fine-tuned 1B-7B local models can detect privacy leaks, with 87.6% leakage accuracy but only 44.7% information-level F1.
-
Towards Harnessing the Collaborative Power of Large and Small Models for Domain Tasks
The paper organizes large-small model collaboration into downward, upward, and inference-time transfer, and advocates multi-objective benchmarks for private-domain tasks.
-
Integrating LLMs with ITS: Recent Advances, Potentials, Challenges, and Future Directions
The paper surveys recent work, models, applications, and challenges of using LLMs in intelligent transportation systems, without presenting new experimental results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.