Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CRUDE: Calibrating Regression Uncertainty Distributions Empirically

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.12496 v6 pith:JW25GOSK submitted 2020-05-26 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords uncertaintyregressioncrudedistributionsestimatesacrosscalibratedcalibrating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Calibrated uncertainty estimates in machine learning are crucial to many fields such as autonomous vehicles, medicine, and weather and climate forecasting. While there is extensive literature on uncertainty calibration for classification, the classification findings do not always translate to regression. As a result, modern models for predicting uncertainty in regression settings typically produce uncalibrated and overconfident estimates. To address these gaps, we present a calibration method for regression settings that does not assume a particular uncertainty distribution over the error: Calibrating Regression Uncertainty Distributions Empirically (CRUDE). CRUDE makes the weaker assumption that error distributions have a constant arbitrary shape across the output space, shifted by predicted mean and scaled by predicted standard deviation. We detail a theoretical connection between CRUDE and conformal inference. Across an extensive set of regression tasks, CRUDE demonstrates consistently sharper, better calibrated, and more accurate uncertainty estimates than state-of-the-art techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sustainability or Survivability? Eliminating the Need to Choose in LEO Satellite Constellations

    cs.NI 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The abstract claims a sun-synchronous LEO constellation design cuts required satellite count by up to 10x and radiation by ~23%, but the manuscript text contains a different paper entirely, leaving the claim without a...

Pith tools