REVIEW 1 cited by
Weak Gravitational Lensing in Ricci-Coupled Kalb-Ramond Bumblebee Gravity: Global Monopole and Axion-Plasmon Medium Effects
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we study the influence of the axion-plasmon medium, as proposed in [10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.181803]\cite{Tercas:2018gxv}, on the optical properties of black holes in a Lorentz-violating spacetime containing a global monopole. Our primary aim is to provide a test for detecting the effects of a fixed axion-plasmon background within the framework of Ricci-coupled Kalb-Ramond bumblebee gravity. By extending the conventional Einstein-bumblebee model through a nonminimal coupling between the Kalb-Ramond field and the Ricci tensor, we demonstrate that the combined presence of a global monopole and Lorentz-violating effects induces significant modifications to the classical Schwarzschild lensing signature. Employing the Gauss-Bonnet theorem within an optical geometry approach, we derive an analytical expression for the deflection angle that incorporates both linear and quadratic contributions from the Lorentz-violating parameter and the monopole charge. Furthermore, we investigate how the axion-plasmon coupling alters light propagation, affecting key observable gravitational deflection angle. Our results indicate that these optical characteristics are notably sensitive to the axion-plasmon parameters, thereby offering promising observational signatures for probing new physics beyond standard general relativity.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Charged black holes in Kalb-Ramond gravity: Weak Deflection Angle, Shadow cast, Quasinormal Modes and Neutrino annihilation
The Kalb-Ramond black hole phenomenology is mostly an extension of known results, and its shadow formula is internally inconsistent, invalidating the EHT-based constraints.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.