Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Agglomerative Clustering in Uniform and Proportional Feature Spaces

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.08604 v1 pith:JZPOHGYB submitted 2024-07-11 physics.soc-ph

classification physics.soc-ph
keywords similarityapproachesclusteringcomparisonhierarchicalinterestingpatternproportional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pattern comparison represents a fundamental and crucial aspect of scientific modeling, artificial intelligence, and pattern recognition. Three main approaches have typically been applied for pattern comparison: (i) distances; (ii) statistical joint variation; (iii) projections; and (iv) similarity indices, each with their specific characteristics. In addition to arguing for intrinsic interesting properties of multiset-based similarity approaches, the present work describes a respectively based hierarchical agglomerative clustering approach which inherits the several interesting characteristics of the coincidence similarity index -- including strict comparisons allowing distinguishing between closely similar patterns, inherent normalization, as well as substantial robustness to the presence of noise and outliers in datasets. Two other hierarchical clustering approaches are considered, namely a multiset-based method as well as the traditional Ward's approach. After characterizing uniform and proportional features spaces and presenting the main basic concepts and methods, a comparison of relative performance between the three considered hierarchical methods is reported and discussed, with several interesting and important results. In particular, though intrinsically suitable for implementing proportional comparisons, the coincidence similarity methodology also works effectively in several types of data in uniform feature spaces

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Systematic Approach for Studying How Topological Measurements Respond to Complex Networks Modifications

    cs.SI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using coincidence similarity networks and hierarchical clustering, the paper classifies how fourteen topological measurements of three network models respond to size changes, edge removal, and edge rewiring into three...

Pith tools