REVIEW 2 cited by
Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Does the effectiveness of neural language models derive entirely from accurate modeling of surface word co-occurrence statistics, or do these models represent and reason about the world they describe? In BART and T5 transformer language models, we identify contextual word representations that function as models of entities and situations as they evolve throughout a discourse. These neural representations have functional similarities to linguistic models of dynamic semantics: they support a linear readout of each entity's current properties and relations, and can be manipulated with predictable effects on language generation. Our results indicate that prediction in pretrained neural language models is supported, at least in part, by dynamic representations of meaning and implicit simulation of entity state, and that this behavior can be learned with only text as training data. Code and data are available at https://github.com/belindal/state-probes .
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
When Do Neural Networks Learn World Models?
With Boolean variables, a low-degree bias, and a task distribution weighted toward simple functions of the latents, multi-task training provably recovers the latent world model up to permutations and negations.
-
Tracking World States with Language Models: State-Based Evaluation Using Chess
A model-agnostic chess evaluation metric measures state-tracking fidelity by comparing legal-move sets of predicted and true positions, showing GPT-4o's reconstruction quality degrades over longer games.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.