pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.16946 · v1 · pith:K2IN7TONnew · submitted 2025-12-16 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · physics.ed-ph· quant-ph

Women in Theoretical Quantum Physics in Brazil:demographics, career profiles, recognition, and leadership

Tatiana Pauletti , Paula Homem de Mello , Thereza Paiva , Vivian V.Fran\c{c}a This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph physics.ed-phquant-ph
keywords women in physicstheoretical quantum physicsBrazilgender equityscientific productivityLattes platformcareer profilesSheQ
0
0 comments X

The pith

Women in Brazilian theoretical quantum physics produce at high levels but gain limited fellowship recognition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper provides the first comprehensive profile of the 93 women researchers in theoretical quantum physics in Brazil, referred to as the SheQ community. Drawing from CNPq Lattes data, it documents their geographic spread, academic paths, output, international training, and leadership positions. The analysis shows strong scientific productivity and international experience alongside modest recognition through productivity fellowships. Engagement with gender equity initiatives is present but limited overall, though rising among younger researchers. These findings point to both progress in women's participation and ongoing structural challenges in achieving full recognition and inclusion.

Core claim

Using data from the CNPq Lattes platform, the study identifies 93 women working in theoretical quantum physics in Brazil and shows they have strong scientific productivity, leadership roles, and international training, yet modest recognition through productivity fellowships and limited involvement in gender-related initiatives, which is increasing among younger generations.

What carries the argument

The CNPq Lattes platform dataset covering 93 SheQ researchers, used to quantify demographics, productivity, recognition, and initiative engagement.

If this is right

  • SheQ researchers maintain high levels of scientific productivity and leadership.
  • International training is common among these researchers.
  • Recognition via productivity fellowships lags behind their output.
  • Participation in gender equity initiatives increases with younger cohorts.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar demographic and recognition patterns may appear in other specialized physics subfields in Brazil.
  • Targeted policies to boost fellowship awards could accelerate inclusion of women in theoretical quantum physics.
  • Expanding this type of data analysis to include comparisons with male researchers would clarify gender-specific barriers.

Load-bearing premise

The CNPq Lattes platform data accurately and completely captures the full population of women in theoretical quantum physics in Brazil without significant omissions, misclassifications, or biases in self-reported achievements.

What would settle it

Finding a substantially different total number of women researchers or markedly different fellowship rates through an independent national census of Brazilian theoretical quantum physicists would falsify the reported demographics and recognition levels.

read the original abstract

Gender imbalance in Physics remains a persistent global challenge, and Brazil is no exception. While women account for only 24% of Physics faculty in the country, their representation in Quantum Physics is even smaller. In this work, we provide the first comprehensive overview of women working in Theoretical Quantum Physics in Brazil, here referred to as the SheQ (She + Quantum) community. Using data from the CNPq Lattes platform, we identify 93 researchers and analyze their geographic distribution, academic trajectories, scientific productivity, international experience, recognition through awards and fellowships, and engagement with initiatives promoting gender equity. Our results reveal both progress and persistent disparities: SheQ researchers have a strong scientific output, leadership roles, and international training; yet, their recognition through productivity fellowships remains modest, and their involvement in gender-related initiatives, although increasing among younger generations, remains limited. By combining quantitative indicators with institutional perspectives, we highlight structural barriers as well as opportunities for fostering a more inclusive environment in Quantum Physics. his study thus contributes to a broader reflection on how diversity not only promotes fairness but also strengthens creativity, innovation, and scientific progress.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to provide the first comprehensive overview of the SheQ community—93 women researchers in theoretical quantum physics in Brazil—identified from the CNPq Lattes platform. It analyzes geographic distribution, academic trajectories, scientific productivity, international training, leadership roles, recognition via awards and productivity fellowships, and engagement with gender-equity initiatives. The central findings are that SheQ researchers exhibit strong output, leadership, and international experience, yet receive modest fellowship recognition, while involvement in gender-related initiatives remains limited (though increasing among younger cohorts).

Significance. If the 93-researcher sample is representative and accurately classified, the study supplies rare empirical data on gender dynamics within a narrow physics subfield in Brazil. It documents a clear productivity-recognition gap and generational shifts in equity engagement, which could inform targeted policies. The combination of quantitative indicators with institutional context adds value for discussions on diversity and scientific progress.

major comments (2)
  1. [Data and Methods] Data and Methods (sample identification): The manuscript states that 93 SheQ researchers were identified from the CNPq Lattes platform but supplies no explicit search protocol, keyword list, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or validation steps (e.g., manual review, cross-check against arXiv author lists, department rosters, or other Brazilian physics directories). Because every quantitative claim about output, leadership, fellowships, and initiative involvement rests on the completeness and correctness of this sample, the absence of methodological transparency is load-bearing and prevents independent verification or assessment of selection bias.
  2. [Results] Results on recognition and fellowships: The assertion that recognition through productivity fellowships 'remains modest' is presented without a quantitative benchmark, comparison to male peers in the same subfield, or overall CNPq fellowship rates for theoretical physics. This makes it impossible to evaluate the magnitude of the reported disparity or to distinguish it from field-wide patterns.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The sentence 'his study thus contributes' contains a typographical error and should read 'This study thus contributes'.
  2. [Figures/Tables] Figures and tables: Sample sizes (N=93) and any statistical tests or confidence intervals should be explicitly stated in every figure caption and table to improve clarity and reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed feedback, which identifies key areas for improving methodological transparency and contextualizing our findings. We address each major comment below and describe the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Data and Methods] Data and Methods (sample identification): The manuscript states that 93 SheQ researchers were identified from the CNPq Lattes platform but supplies no explicit search protocol, keyword list, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or validation steps (e.g., manual review, cross-check against arXiv author lists, department rosters, or other Brazilian physics directories). Because every quantitative claim about output, leadership, fellowships, and initiative involvement rests on the completeness and correctness of this sample, the absence of methodological transparency is load-bearing and prevents independent verification or assessment of selection bias.

    Authors: We agree that explicit details on sample identification are necessary for transparency and to allow assessment of potential biases. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the Data and Methods section to provide a complete description of the protocol used on the CNPq Lattes platform. This will include the exact search terms and keywords employed, the inclusion criteria (researchers holding a doctorate, affiliated with Brazilian institutions, and whose primary research area is theoretical quantum physics as indicated by publications, research interests, and Lattes keywords), exclusion criteria (e.g., experimentalists or those outside the subfield), and validation procedures such as independent manual review of all profiles by the author team plus cross-checks against arXiv author lists and institutional physics department directories where publicly available. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results on recognition and fellowships: The assertion that recognition through productivity fellowships 'remains modest' is presented without a quantitative benchmark, comparison to male peers in the same subfield, or overall CNPq fellowship rates for theoretical physics. This makes it impossible to evaluate the magnitude of the reported disparity or to distinguish it from field-wide patterns.

    Authors: We accept that the characterization of fellowship recognition as 'modest' requires quantitative context to be fully interpretable. In the revision, we will add a benchmark by incorporating publicly available CNPq statistics on productivity fellowship award rates across physics subfields, allowing direct comparison of the SheQ rates to national averages for physicists. A side-by-side comparison specifically with male researchers in theoretical quantum physics is not possible within the present study, which was designed as a focused survey of the women in this community; we will explicitly note this scope limitation while providing the broader CNPq context to help readers gauge the observed rates. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct comparison to male peers in the same subfield

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical survey of Lattes data with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a descriptive demographic study that extracts a population of 93 researchers from the CNPq Lattes platform and tabulates their career metrics, productivity, fellowships, and initiative involvement. No equations, models, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the abstract or described methodology. The central claims are direct counts and comparisons from the collected data rather than any derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for any uniqueness theorem or ansatz. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits none of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical demographic study relying on an external public database; no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or new physical entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The CNPq Lattes platform contains complete and accurate records of researchers' careers, publications, awards, and affiliations.
    All quantitative findings depend on the reliability and coverage of this single data source.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5519 in / 1159 out tokens · 46175 ms · 2026-05-16T21:17:50.642117+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beige, A., Predojevi´ c, A., Metelmann, A., Sanpera, A., Macchiavello, C., Koch, C.P., Silberhorn, C., Toninelli, C., Bruß, D., Ercolessi, E., Paladino, E., Fer- laino, F., Ferrini, G., Platero, G., Fuentes, I., Nemoto, K., Tarruell, L., Bondani, M., Chiofalo, M., Pons, M., D’Angelo, M., Murao, M., Fabbri, N., Verrucchi, P., Senellart-Mardon, P., Citro, R...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.02612 2024

  2. [2]

    https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/ knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/interactive-reports/she-figures-2021 Accessed 17 Aug

    Commission, E.: She figures 2021: gender in research and innova- tion (2021). https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/ knowledge-publications-tools-and-data/interactive-reports/she-figures-2021 Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    https://www.dpg-physik.de/ vereinigungen/fachuebergreifend/ak/akc/publikationen/statistiken Accessed 17 Aug

    Gesellschaft, D.P.: Working group on equal opportunities (AKC),statistics on the situation of women physicists in Germany (2024). https://www.dpg-physik.de/ vereinigungen/fachuebergreifend/ak/akc/publikationen/statistiken Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    https://www.iop.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/ Physics-Staff-in-UK-Universities-HESA-Data-Brief.pdf Accessed 17 Aug

    Physics, I.: Physics staff in UK universities: HESA data brief (2023). https://www.iop.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/ Physics-Staff-in-UK-Universities-HESA-Data-Brief.pdf Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    https://www

    F´ ısica GEMF, R.S.E.: Los datos hablan (The data speak) (2024). https://www. gemf-rsef.es/informacion/ Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    https://www.atominnen.ac Accessed 17 Aug

    Atominnen: Statistics on the situation of women physicists in Germany (2024). https://www.atominnen.ac Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    https://www.janu

    National Universities, J.A.: The 20th follow-up survey report for implementation of gender equality promotion in national universities (2024). https://www.janu. jp/janu/gender/ Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    https://www.ipsos.com/en/ one-two-women-scientists-say-they-have-experienced-sexual-harassment-work Accessed 17 Aug

    Ipsos,on behalf of the L’Or´ eal Foundation: International study on gender equality in science involving 5,200 sci- entists in 117 countries (2024). https://www.ipsos.com/en/ one-two-women-scientists-say-they-have-experienced-sexual-harassment-work Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    https://revistacontemporaneos.com.br/publicacoes/ edicao-26/dossie-mulheres-na-ciencia-women-in-cience/ Accessed 17 Jul

    Humanidades, E..: Dossiˆ e – Mulheres na ciˆ encia / Women in Science, Santo Andr´ e, SP (2025). https://revistacontemporaneos.com.br/publicacoes/ edicao-26/dossie-mulheres-na-ciencia-women-in-cience/ Accessed 17 Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Educational Psychology Review29(1), 119–140 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

    Wang, M.-T., Degol, J.L.: Gender gap in science,technology,engineering,and 13 mathematics (stem): current knowledge,implications for practice,policy,and future directions. Educational Psychology Review29(1), 119–140 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x 2016

  11. [11]

    OECD Publishing, Paris (2015)

    OECD: The ABC of gender equality in education: aptitude,behaviour,confidence. OECD Publishing, Paris (2015). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/ en/publications/reports/2015/03/the-abc-of-gender-equality-in-education g1g51025/9789264229945-en.pdf

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    by cordelia fine

    Meynell, L.: Delusions of gender: how our minds,society,and neurosexism create difference. by cordelia fine. new york: W. w. norton & company,2010. - brain storm: the flaws in the science of sex differences. by rebecca m. jordan-young. cambridge,mass.: Harvard university press,2010. Hypatia28(3), 684–689 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12036

    work page doi:10.1111/hypa.12036 2010

  13. [13]

    The Biochemist43(3), 63–63 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1042/bio 2021 122

    Borthwick, B.: The gendered brain by gina rippon. The Biochemist43(3), 63–63 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1042/bio 2021 122

    work page doi:10.1042/bio 2021

  14. [14]

    American Psychologist60(9), 950–958 (2005) https://doi.org/10

    Spelke, E.S.: Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? a critical review. American Psychologist60(9), 950–958 (2005) https://doi.org/10. 1037/0003-066X.60.9.950

    work page 2005

  15. [15]

    Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks

    Nosek, B.A., Smyth, F.L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N.M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar- Anan, Y., Bergh, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkorale, K., Kesebir, S., Maliszewski, N., Neto, F., Olli, E., Park, J., Schnabel, K., Shiomura, K., Tulbure, B.T., Wiers, R.W., Somogyi, M., Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Vianello, M., Banaji, M.R., Green- wald, A.G.: National differences in ge...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas 2009

  16. [16]

    Annual Review of Psychology 65(1), 373–398 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057

    Hyde, J.S.: Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology 65(1), 373–398 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 2014

  17. [17]

    A., Hekker, S., Stello, D., Guti ´errez-Soto, J., Handberg, R., Huber, D., et al

    Lindgren, C.: Pink brain blue brain: how small differences grow into trouble- some gaps. Acta Paediatrica99(7), 1108–1108 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1651-2227.2010.01845.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j 2010

  18. [18]

    International Journal of STEM Education9(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0

    Chan, R.C.H.: A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self- efficacy,interest,and aspirations in science,technology,engineering,and mathemat- ics (stem): the influence of cultural and gender norms. International Journal of STEM Education9(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0

    work page doi:10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0 2022

  19. [19]

    European Jour- nal of Internal Medicine134, 9–16 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2025

    Gualtierotti, R.: Bridging the gap: time to integrate sex and gender differences into research and clinical practice for improved health outcomes. European Jour- nal of Internal Medicine134, 9–16 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2025. 01.030 14

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2025 2025

  20. [20]

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience17(2023) https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1094830

    Rippon, G.: Mind the gender gap: the social neuroscience of belonging. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience17(2023) https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1094830

    work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1094830 2023

  21. [21]

    Revista Ciˆ encia em Extens˜ ao14(2), 188–194 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.23901/1679-4605.2018v14n2p188-194

    Lazzarini, A.B., Sampaio, C.P., Gon¸ calves, V.S.P., Nascimento, ´ e.R.F., Pereira, F.M.V., Fran¸ ca, V.V.: Women in science: the role of education without gender inequality. Revista Ciˆ encia em Extens˜ ao14(2), 188–194 (2018) https://doi.org/ 10.23901/1679-4605.2018v14n2p188-194

    work page doi:10.23901/1679-4605.2018v14n2p188-194 2018

  22. [22]

    UNESCO / CILAC

    Bello, A., Est´ ebanez, M.E.: An unbalanced equation: increasing par- ticipation of women in STEM in LAC. UNESCO / CILAC. Open Access – Policy Brief (2022). https://forocilac.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/ PolicyPapers-CILAC-Gender-ENG-VFEB22.pdf

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    IEEE Access12, 112576–112593 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3442879

    Costa, L.F.C., Nascimento, L.M.A., Lima, Y.O.d., Santos, A.M., Barbosa, C.E., Xex´ eo, G., Souza, J.M.: Women’s journey in stem education in brazil: a rapid review on engineering and computer science. IEEE Access12, 112576–112593 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3442879

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3442879 2024

  24. [24]

    Editora da UNICAMP, Campinas (1998)

    Velho, L., Le´ on, E.: The social construction of science: gender and science in Brazil. Editora da UNICAMP, Campinas (1998). https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp. br/ojs/index.php/cadpagu/article/view/4631474

    work page arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Estudos Avan¸ cados17(49), 271–284 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0103-40142003000300016

    Leta, J.: Women in brazilian science: growth,contrasts,and a profile of suc- cess. Estudos Avan¸ cados17(49), 271–284 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0103-40142003000300016

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/ensinoemperspectivas/article/ view/8532

    Gomes, G.C.A., Silva, C.L.T.d.: Women and science: notes on old and new chal- lenges (2022). https://revistas.uece.br/index.php/ensinoemperspectivas/article/ view/8532

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    International Journal of Science and Research Archive14(1), 202–217 (2025) https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.1.0026

    Nweje, U., Amaka, N.S., Makai, C.C.: Women in stem: breaking barriers and building the future. International Journal of Science and Research Archive14(1), 202–217 (2025) https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.1.0026

    work page doi:10.30574/ijsra.2025.14.1.0026 2025

  28. [28]

    https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working Group on Women in Physics Accessed 17 Aug

    Pure, I.U., (IUPAC), A.C.: Working group on women in physics (2022). https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working Group on Women in Physics Accessed 17 Aug. 2025

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    http://bi.cnpq.br/painel/formacao-atuacao-lattes/ #/pages/sexo Accessed 8 Jul

    Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), C.N.: Database and statistics of the Lattes Platform – edu- cation and activity by gender. http://bi.cnpq.br/painel/formacao-atuacao-lattes/ #/pages/sexo Accessed 8 Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    https://buscatextual.cnpq.br/ buscatextual/busca.do?metodo=apresentar Accessed 8 Jul

    Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), C.N.: Lattes Platform. https://buscatextual.cnpq.br/ buscatextual/busca.do?metodo=apresentar Accessed 8 Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    18/2024 – Productivity scholarships: final results

    Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), C.N.: Call CNPq no. 18/2024 – Productivity scholarships: final results. http://memoria2.cnpq.br/web/guest/chamadas-publicas Accessed 2 15 Aug. 2025

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    https://www.todamateria.com.br/ mapa-do-brasil/ Accessed 2025-02-20

    Marques, V.T.M.: Mapa do Brasil. https://www.todamateria.com.br/ mapa-do-brasil/ Accessed 2025-02-20

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Relat´ orio (PDF) disponibilizado no site do IBGE

    IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat´ ıstica: Estimativas da pop- ula¸ c˜ ao residente no Brasil e unidades da federa¸ c˜ ao: data de referˆ encia em 1º de julho de 2025. Relat´ orio (PDF) disponibilizado no site do IBGE. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2025 (2025). https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Estimativas de Populacao/ Estimativas 2025/estimativa dou 2025.pdf

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Agˆ encia de Not´ ıcias

    IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estat´ ıstica: PIB cresce em todos os 27 estados do pa´ ıs em 2023. Agˆ encia de Not´ ıcias. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2025 (2025). https://agenciadenoticias. ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/ 45142-pib-cresce-em-todos-os-27-estados-do-pais-em-2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Not´ ıcia no site ANDIFES

    ANDIFES – Associa¸ c˜ ao Nacional dos Dirigentes das Institui¸ c˜ oes Federais de Ensino Superior: Brasil tem 69 universidades federais; conhe¸ ca cada uma. Not´ ıcia no site ANDIFES. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2025 (2025). https://www.andifes.org.br/ 2025/01/16/brasil-tem-69-universidades-federais-conheca-cada-uma/

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    https://www2.icb.ufmg.br/ projetosol/?page id=1621&utm source

    Universidades Estaduais do Brasil, Projeto SOL – ICB: Instituto de Ciˆ encias Biol´ ogicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. https://www2.icb.ufmg.br/ projetosol/?page id=1621&utm source. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2025 (s.d.)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    https://www.gov.br/mcti (2025)

    Ciˆ encia, T.e.I.a.: 2.3.4 Brasil: Expenditures of state governments in sci- ence and technology (S&T), by region, federation unit and activity. https://www.gov.br/mcti (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2007)

    National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine: Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Aca- demic Science and Engineering. National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    http://plsql1.cnpq.br/divulg/RESULTADO PQ 102003.curso Accessed 20 Jul

    Tecnol´ ogico (CNPq), C.N.: Search by field of knowledge of ongoing scholar- ships. http://plsql1.cnpq.br/divulg/RESULTADO PQ 102003.curso Accessed 20 Jul. 2025

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Nature645(8081), 561–561 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02916-w

    Armenteras, D.: Equity in science is a beautiful lie — and i’m done pretending. Nature645(8081), 561–561 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02916-w

    work page doi:10.1038/d41586-025-02916-w 2025

  41. [41]

    Acesso em: 22 set

    Qu´ ımica, U.I.: SheQ Members — Mulheres na Ciˆ encia, Araraquara, S˜ ao Paulo. Acesso em: 22 set. 2025 (2025). https://www.iq.unesp.br/#! /mulheres-na-ciencia/sheq-members/

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Acesso em: 22 set

    Qu´ ımica, U.I.: Iniciativas no Brasil — Mulheres na Ciˆ encia, Araraquara, 16 S˜ ao Paulo. Acesso em: 22 set. 2025 (2025). https://www.iq.unesp.br/#! /mulheres-na-ciencia/iniciativas-no-brasil/ 17

    work page 2025