REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 44 references
Non-Centrosymmetric $\gamma$-Phase GaS Nanobelts for On-Chip Nonlinear Photonic Applications
T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-31 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read GaS nanobelts can be grown in a non-centrosymmetric phase that emits strong second harmonics, comparable to GaSe, and can be integrated onto silicon-nitride waveguides for on-chip wavelength conversion.
desk verdict Credible on-chip CW SHG/SFG in GaS nanobelts, but the γ-phase population claim rests on a single TEM cross-section and SHG that cannot identify the polytype. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The key mechanism is edge-selective growth kinetics at the self-catalyzed gallium catalyst interface: during VLS growth, the Ga particle suppresses armchair edges and favors zigzag-type interfaces, and among these the 2-bond zigzag edge has the highest dangling-bond density and strongest affinity for incoming sulfur. Maintaining this edge at the growth front across successive unit layers stabilizes the non-centrosymmetric γ-phase stacking while keeping all layers in a single in-plane orientation, producing a macroscopic, uniformly aligned dipole moment. This structural control is what converts optically silent centrosymmetric GaS into an active second-order nonlinear material.
What would settle it
A decisive test would be to collect cross-sectional HAADF-STEM images from a statistically meaningful number of separately grown nanobelts and show that γ-phase is dominant and in-plane orientation is uniform in every one; conversely, finding even one SHG-emitting nanobelt with predominantly β-phase stacking or with randomly oriented domains would undermine the central claim. A complementary measurement would be to verify that SHG intensity scales with nanobelt volume or thickness, ruling out surface-only nonlinearity.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that GaS nanobelts synthesized via self-catalyzed vapor–liquid–solid growth crystallize predominantly in the non-centrosymmetric γ-phase, overcoming the centrosymmetry of bulk GaS. Atomic-resolution imaging of a representative nanobelt shows γ-phase stacking with a small fraction of β-phase stacking faults near the substrate, yet the in-plane orientation of the layers remains uniform; the authors attribute this to growth-front favorability of the 2-bond zigzag edge at the Ga catalyst interface. As a result, the nanobelts show deterministic in-plane dipole alignment and robust second-harmonic generation, observed in 28 of 28 randomly selected nanobelts, with intensity com
Load-bearing premise
The load-bearing premise is that the γ-phase stacking with uniform in-plane orientation, seen in detail in one nanobelt cross-section, is representative of all nanobelts and that the observed SHG comes from this bulk non-centrosymmetric structure rather than from surfaces, interfaces, or minority domains.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- GaS nanobelts become a viable nonlinear material for integrated photonics, providing frequency conversion in the visible–near-infrared without the two-photon absorption that limits GaSe and GaSSe alloys under telecom pumping.
- Because all measured nanobelts show SHG, the growth process offers reproducible nonlinear response across many samples, unlike exfoliated GaS where only a small fraction of flakes are non-centrosymmetric.
- The demonstration of CW-pumped SHG and SFG on a SiN waveguide indicates that low-power, continuous-wave operation is feasible for on-chip wavelength conversion.
- The nanobelts are transferable and positionable onto prefabricated waveguides, and simulations show the guided mode follows the nanobelt regardless of placement, simplifying integration tolerance.
- The wide bandgap of GaS extends the transparency range for nonlinear processes, potentially enabling frequency conversion at shorter pump wavelengths than GaSe-based devices.
Reading between the lines
- If the γ-phase stabilization is truly kinetic and edge-driven, similar self-catalyzed VLS growth may be extendable to other III–VI compounds or alloys to lock in non-centrosymmetric polytypes that are otherwise unstable in bulk form.
- The claim that SHG arises from the bulk γ-phase rather than surface or interface effects could be tested directly by measuring SHG intensity versus nanobelt thickness; bulk-dominated SHG should scale with thickness while surface contributions would not.
- A statistical electron-microscopy survey across many nanobelts, rather than a single representative cross-section, would strengthen the inference that γ-phase uniformity is universal; SHG from 28 nanobelts is suggestive but not a direct structural census.
- The deterministic in-plane orientation suggests arrays of aligned nanobelts could act as engineered nonlinear metasurfaces or quasi-phase-matched stacks, extending the work toward phase-matched frequency conversion on a chip.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports the MOCVD self-catalyzed VLS growth of GaS nanobelts, with structural evidence (HAADF-STEM and electron diffraction) interpreted as a dominant non-centrosymmetric γ-phase stacking. The authors propose an edge-selective growth mechanism at the Ga catalyst interface to explain both the γ-phase stabilization and a deterministic in-plane dipole-moment orientation. SHG measurements on 28 nanobelts show emission from all of them, with one nanobelt giving a sixfold polarization pattern and a power exponent near 2. The nanobelts are then transferred onto SiN waveguides, where CW-pumped SHG and SFG are observed with the expected wavelength and power-scaling behavior. The paper concludes that γ-GaS nanobelts are a transferable, wide-bandgap nonlinear material for integrated photonics.
Significance. If the central claims are fully supported, this is a valuable contribution: it would provide a wide-bandgap vdW nonlinear material whose centrosymmetric β-phase problem is overcome by growth-phase control, enabling telecom-pumped frequency conversion without two-photon absorption. The use of an exfoliated β-GaS flake as a negative SHG control is a strong experimental benchmark, and the 28/28 SHG success rate, the clean power-scaling exponents, and the demonstration of on-chip CW SHG/SFG with correct spectral shifts are notable strengths. The independent structural and optical measurements reduce the risk of circular reasoning. However, the load-bearing generalization from one TEM specimen to the full growth series, the absence of per-nanobelt orientation data, and the lack of quantitative conversion efficiency leave the strongest claims under-supported as they stand.
major comments (5)
- [§2.2, Figs. 2–3] The claim that GaS nanobelts 'predominantly crystallize' in the γ phase is based on HAADF-STEM and diffraction from a single representative nanobelt. The 28-nanobelt SHG survey (Fig. S1) shows non-centrosymmetric response but cannot distinguish bulk γ-phase from minority γ-domains in a β matrix, faulted stacking, or surface/interface contributions. A statistical TEM survey across multiple nanobelts, or thickness-dependent SHG and full polarization-tensor analysis, is needed to support the phase-purity generalization that underpins the abstract.
- [§2.3, Fig. 4(c) and Fig. S1] The 'deterministic in-plane dipole moment alignment' is a central utility claim, yet the sixfold polarization pattern is shown for only one nanobelt. No polarization-resolved SHG data are provided for the other 27 nanobelts or for the integrated waveguide device. Without showing that the crystal-orientation angle is consistent across nanobelts, the claim of deterministic alignment is not established; SHG presence alone is insufficient.
- [§2.4, Fig. 5] The abstract and conclusion describe 'efficient on-chip SHG and SFG', but no conversion efficiency, coupled pump power, or on-chip power estimate is reported. The power exponents (α = 1.17 ± 0.01 and 2.46 ± 0.06) confirm the processes but not their efficiency. A quantitative conversion efficiency, normalized to coupled pump power and interaction length, is necessary to support the efficiency claim.
- [§2.2, Fig. 3(i,j)] The proposed edge-selective growth mechanism is presented as the origin of γ-phase stabilization and deterministic alignment, but it is a qualitative post-hoc hypothesis. No DFT calculations, growth-front imaging, or controlled growth experiments varying precursor ratio/temperature are provided to test the '2-bond zigzag edge has stronger affinity for S' assumption. The manuscript should either present supporting evidence or explicitly frame this as a hypothesis that remains to be tested.
- [§2.3, Fig. 4(a)] The statement that SHG intensity is 'comparable to those of GaSe' rests on one nanobelt and one GaSe flake, with no sample-to-sample statistics and no explicit thickness normalization. The thickness of the SHG nanobelt is not stated in this section, while the morphology nanobelt in Fig. 1 is 230 nm and the comparison flakes are ~140 nm. Additional samples and a thickness-normalized comparison are needed to support this comparative claim.
minor comments (5)
- [Abstract] Grammar: 'one-dimensional nonlinear materials' should be singular 'material' or rephrased.
- [§2.3] The SHG setup reference says 'Figure S2' but the measurement setup is SI Figure S3; similarly, §2.4 references 'Figure S3' for the CW setup, which is SI Figure S4. Please correct cross-references.
- [§2.4 vs. SI §2] Refractive-index values for GaS are inconsistent: main text gives no = 2.6, ne = 2.4 at 1550 nm, while the SI gives no ≈ 2.64, ne ≈ 2.35 at 1550 nm. Unify.
- [References] Ref. 33 has a typo in the author list: 'Y, Li' should be 'Y. Li'.
- [SI §1] The SHG survey uses a 1530 nm pump while the main-text pulsed SHG uses 1500 nm; the potential effect of this wavelength difference on comparative intensity statements should be noted or the conditions should be aligned.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity: the γ-phase and SHG claims rest on direct structural and optical measurements, and the growth mechanism is a post-hoc explanation rather than a fitted prediction.
full rationale
The paper's central claims are supported by independent external measurements rather than by definitional or fitted inputs. The claim that GaS nanobelts chiefly crystallize in the non-centrosymmetric γ phase is based on cross-sectional HAADF-STEM images and electron diffraction (Figs. 2b,d and 3b–g), which are direct structural observations, not quantities derived from the SHG measurement. The SHG survey of 28 nanobelts (Fig. S1) independently confirms non-centrosymmetric response, and the power/polarization dependence (Figs. 4b,c) is a separate optical probe. The only self-citations are to Ref. 32 for the growth method and for the generic statement that a Ga catalyst favors zigzag-type interfaces; the present work independently verifies the stacking and orientation, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The edge-selective growth mechanism is presented as a qualitative interpretation consistent with the observed γ-phase fraction increasing from 88% near the substrate to 100% near the surface; it is not produced by fitting the data to the conclusion. No quantity called a 'prediction' is constructed from fitted parameters, and no uniqueness theorem or imported ansatz is used to force the result. The known evidentiary gap—statistical TEM generalization from a single nanobelt—is a limitation of sampling, not circularity. Thus the derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks, and the minor self-citation does not raise the score materially.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (5)
- standard math γ-phase GaS has point group C3v and is non-centrosymmetric; β-phase GaS has D6h and is centrosymmetric.
- domain assumption Electric-dipole SHG is forbidden in centrosymmetric media; the sixfold SHG rotation pattern reflects the threefold crystal symmetry.
- ad hoc to paper The 2-bond zigzag Ga-terminated edge has higher dangling-bond density and thus stronger affinity for S, and since S supply limits growth, this edge defines the growth direction and stabilizes γ-phase stacking.
- domain assumption Theoretical χ2 values of GaS (62.4 pm/V) and GaSe (64.6 pm/V) from Ref. 19.
- domain assumption Refractive indices of GaS (no=2.6, ne=2.4 at 1550 nm) and SiN (n=2.0) used in COMSOL simulations.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Non-Centrosymmetric $\gamma$-Phase GaS Nanobelts for On-Chip Nonlinear Photonic Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K2L5G5BX
@misc{pith2026260723939,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Non-Centrosymmetric $\gamma$-Phase GaS Nanobelts for On-Chip Nonlinear Photonic Applications},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K2L5G5BX}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23939}
}
abstract
Second-order nonlinear optical processes in van der Waals (vdW) semiconductors offer a compelling route toward compact, integrable photon-conversion platforms. Among III-VI vdW semiconductors, GaS is particularly attractive owing to its wide bandgap suppressing two-photon absorption under near-infrared laser excitation. However, bulk GaS typically crystallizes in the centrosymmetric $\beta$ phase, which eliminates second-order nonlinearity and severely limits its application in nonlinear photonics. Here, we demonstrate that GaS nanobelts synthesized via self-catalyzed vapor-liquid-solid growth predominantly crystallize in non-centrosymmetric $\gamma$-phase stacking. This behavior originates from edge-selective growth kinetics at the Ga catalyst interface, which stabilizes the $\gamma$ phase and enables deterministic in-plane dipole moment alignment. The GaS nanobelts exhibit strong second-harmonic generation (SHG) with intensities comparable to those of GaSe, a widely used nonlinear optical material. Furthermore, we integrate the nanobelts onto SiN waveguides and demonstrate efficient on-chip SHG and sum-frequency generation. These results establish $\gamma$-GaS nanobelts as a transferable one-dimensional nonlinear materials well suited for on-chip photonic integration and indicate their strong potential for nonlinear optical applications.
Figures
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Nonlinear Optics with 2D Layered Materials,
A. Autere, H. Jussila, Y. Dai, Y. Wang, H. Lipsanen, Z. Sun, “Nonlinear Optics with 2D Layered Materials,” Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705963. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705963
-
[2]
Quasi-Phase-Matching Enabled by van der Waals Stacking,
Y. Tang, K. Sripathy, H. Qin, Z. Lu, G. Guccione, J. Janousek, Y. Zhu, M. M. Hasan, Y. Iwasa, P. K. Lam, and Y. Lu, “Quasi-Phase-Matching Enabled by van der Waals Stacking,” Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 9979. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53472-2
-
[3]
Quasi-Phase-Matched Up- and Down- 16 Conversion in Periodically Poled Layered Semiconductors,
C. Trovatello, C. Ferrante, B. Yang, J. Bajo, B. Braun, Z. H. Peng, X. Xu, P. K. Jenke, A. Ye, M. Delor, D. N. Basov, J. Park, P. Walther, C. R. Dean, L. A. Rozema, A. Marini, G. Cerullo, and P. J. Schuck, “Quasi-Phase-Matched Up- and Down- 16 Conversion in Periodically Poled Layered Semiconductors,” Nat. Photonics 2025, 19,
2025
-
[4]
Photonic van der Waals Integration from 2D Materials to 3D Nanomembranes,
Y. Meng, J. Feng, S. Han, Z. Xu, W. Mao, T. Zhang, J. S. Kim, I. Roh, Y. Zhao, D.-H. Kim, Y. Yang, J.-W. Lee, L. Yang, C.-W. Qiu, and S.-H. Bae, “Photonic van der Waals Integration from 2D Materials to 3D Nanomembranes,” Nat. Rev. Mater. 2023, 8, 498–517. DOI: 10.1038/s41578-023-00558-w
-
[5]
Z. Liu, B. Chen, X. Wang, G. Qiu, Q. Cao, D. Wei, and J. Liu, “Enhanced Vertical Second Harmonic Generation from Layered GaSe Coupled to Photonic Crystal Circular Bragg Resonators,” Nanophotonics 2024, 13, 4029–4035. DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0282
-
[6]
Hybrid Integration of 2D Materials for On-Chip Nonlinear Photonics,
V. Pelgrin, H. H. Yoon, E. Cassan, and Z. Sun, “Hybrid Integration of 2D Materials for On-Chip Nonlinear Photonics,” Light: Adv. Manuf. 2023, 4, 14. DOI: 10.37188/lam.2023.014
-
[7]
B. Wang, Y. Ji, L. Gu, L. Fang, X. Gan, and J. Zhao, “High-Efficiency Second- Harmonic and Sum-Frequency Generation in a Silicon Nitride Microring Integrated with Few-Layer GaSe,” ACS Photonics 2022, 9, 1671–1678. DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00038
-
[8]
Microwatts Continuous-Wave Pumped Second Harmonic Generation in Few- and Mono-Layer GaSe,
X.-T. Gan, C.-Y. Zhao, S.-Q. Hu, T. Wang, Y. Song, J. Li, Q.-H. Zhao, W.-Q. Jie, and J.-L. Zhao, “Microwatts Continuous-Wave Pumped Second Harmonic Generation in Few- and Mono-Layer GaSe,” Light: Sci. Appl. 2018, 7, 17126. DOI: 10.1038/lsa.2017.126
Show all 44 references
-
[9]
High-Efficiency Second-Order Nonlinear Processes in an Optical Microfibre Assisted by Few-Layer GaSe,
B. Jiang, Z. Hao, Y. Ji, Y. Hou, R. Yi, D. Mao, X. Gan, and J. Zhao, “High-Efficiency Second-Order Nonlinear Processes in an Optical Microfibre Assisted by Few-Layer GaSe,” Light: Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 63. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-020-0304-1
2020 doi
-
[10]
Effective Nonlinear GaSe Crystal. Optical Properties and Applications,
K. R. Allakhverdiev, M. Ö. Yetis, S. Özbek, T. K. Baykara, and E. Yu. Salaev, “Effective Nonlinear GaSe Crystal. Optical Properties and Applications,” Laser Phys. 2009, 19, 1092–1104. DOI: 10.1134/S1054660X09050375
2009 doi
-
[11]
Strong Second-Harmonic Generation in Atomic Layered GaSe,
X. Zhou, J. Cheng, Y. Zhou, T. Cao, H. Hong, Z. Liao, S. Wu, H. Peng, K. Liu, and D. Yu, “Strong Second-Harmonic Generation in Atomic Layered GaSe,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7994–7997. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5b04305
2015 doi
-
[12]
Highly Efficient Nonlinear Optical Conversion in Waveguiding GaSe Nanoribbons with Pump Pulses Down to a Femto-Joule Level,
F. Liao, Y. Wang, T. Peng, J. Peng, Z. Gu, H. Yu, T. Chen, J. Yu, and F. Gu, “Highly Efficient Nonlinear Optical Conversion in Waveguiding GaSe Nanoribbons with Pump Pulses Down to a Femto-Joule Level,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1701012. DOI: 10.1002/adom.201701012 17
2018 doi
-
[13]
Nonlinear Optical Activities in Two-Dimensional Gallium Sulfide: a Comprehensive Study,
S. Ahmed, P. K. Cheng, J. Qiao, W. Gao, A. M. Saleque, M. N. A. Subri Ivan, T. Wang, T. I. Alam, S. U. Hani, Z. L. Guo, S. F. Yu, and Y. H. Tsang, “Nonlinear Optical Activities in Two-Dimensional Gallium Sulfide: a Comprehensive Study,” ACS Nano 2022, 16, 12390–12402. DOI: 10....
2022 doi
-
[14]
Power Scalability and Frequency Agility of Compact Terahertz Source Based on Frequency Mixing from Solid-State Lasers,
P. Zhao, S. Ragam, Y. J. Ding, and I. B. Zotova, “Power Scalability and Frequency Agility of Compact Terahertz Source Based on Frequency Mixing from Solid-State Lasers,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 131106. DOI: 10.1063/1.3572337
2011 doi
-
[15]
Efficient, Tunable, and Coherent 0.18–5.27-THz Source Based on GaSe Crystal,
W. Shi, Y. J. Ding, N. Fernelius, and K. Vodopyanov, “Efficient, Tunable, and Coherent 0.18–5.27-THz Source Based on GaSe Crystal,” Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 1454–
2002
-
[16]
A Monochromatic and High-Power Terahertz Source Tunable in the Ranges of 2.7–38.4 and 58.2–3540 mm for a Variety of Potential Applications,
W. Shi and Y. J. Ding, “A Monochromatic and High-Power Terahertz Source Tunable in the Ranges of 2.7–38.4 and 58.2–3540 mm for a Variety of Potential Applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84, 1635–1637. DOI: 10.1063/1.1649802
2004 doi
-
[17]
Picosecond Mid- Infrared Optical Parametric Amplifier Based on the Wide-Bandgap GaS0.4Se0.6 Pumped by a Nd:YAG Laser System at 1064 nm,
K. Miyata, G. Marchev, A. Tyazhev, V. Panyutin, and V. Petrov, “Picosecond Mid- Infrared Optical Parametric Amplifier Based on the Wide-Bandgap GaS0.4Se0.6 Pumped by a Nd:YAG Laser System at 1064 nm,” Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1785–1787. DOI: 10.1364/OL.36.001785
2011 doi
-
[18]
Counter-Propagating Entangled Photon Pairs from Monolayer GaSe,
Z. Lu, J. Janousek, S. M. Assad, S. Qiu, M. Joshi, Y. Hu, A. Y. Song, C. Wang, M. Suriyage, J. Zhao, P. K. Lam, and Y. Lu, “Counter-Propagating Entangled Photon Pairs from Monolayer GaSe,” Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9616. DOI: 10.1038/s41467- 025-64620-7
2025 doi
-
[19]
Layer-Independent and Layer-Dependent Nonlinear Optical Properties of Two-Dimensional GaX (X = S, Se, Te) Nanosheets,
L. Hu, X. Huang, and D. Wei, “Layer-Independent and Layer-Dependent Nonlinear Optical Properties of Two-Dimensional GaX (X = S, Se, Te) Nanosheets,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 11131–11138. DOI: 10.1039/C7CP00578D
2017 doi
-
[20]
Polytypes and Excitons in GaSe1-xSx Mixed Crystals,
H. Serizawa, Y. Sasaki, and Y. Nishina, “Polytypes and Excitons in GaSe1-xSx Mixed Crystals,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1980, 48, 490–495. DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.48.490
1980 doi
-
[21]
GaS0.4Se0.6: Relevant Properties and Potential for 1064 nm Pumped Mid-IR OPOs and OPGs Operating Above 5 μm,
V. Petrov, V. L. Panyutin, A. Tyazhev, G. Marchev, A. I. Zagumennyi, F. Rotermund, F. Noack, K. Miyata, L. D. Iskhakova, and A. F. Zerrouk, “GaS0.4Se0.6: Relevant Properties and Potential for 1064 nm Pumped Mid-IR OPOs and OPGs Operating Above 5 μm,” Laser Phys. 2011, 21, 774–...
2011 doi
-
[22]
80-MHz Difference- Frequency Generation of Femtosecond Pulses in the Mid-Infrared Using GaS0.4Se0.6,
M. Beutler, I. Rimke, E. Büttner, V. Panyutin, and V. Petrov, “80-MHz Difference- Frequency Generation of Femtosecond Pulses in the Mid-Infrared Using GaS0.4Se0.6,” Laser Phys. Lett. 2013, 10, 075406. DOI: 10.1088/1612-2011/10/7/075406 18
2013 doi
-
[23]
Some Properties of the Mixed GaS0.4Se0.6 Nonlinear Crystal in Comparison to GaSe,
G. Marchev, A. Tyazhev, V. Panyutin, V. Petrov, F. Noack, K. Miyata, and M. Griepentrog, “Some Properties of the Mixed GaS0.4Se0.6 Nonlinear Crystal in Comparison to GaSe,” Proc. SPIE 2011, 7917, 79171G. DOI: 10.1117/12.874452
2011 doi
-
[24]
Phase-Matching Properties of GaS0.4Se0.6 for Difference-Frequency Generation in the 100.4–1030.6 μm Range,
K. Kato, V. Petrov, and N. Umemura, “Phase-Matching Properties of GaS0.4Se0.6 for Difference-Frequency Generation in the 100.4–1030.6 μm Range,” CLEO: Science and Innovations 2015, JTu5A.34. DOI: 10.1364/CLEO_AT.2015.JTu5A.34
2015 doi
-
[25]
Red-to-Ultraviolet Emission Tuning of Two-Dimensional Gallium Sulfide/Selenide,
C. S. Jung, F. Shojaei, K. Park, J. Y. Oh, H. S. Im, D. M. Jang, J. Park, and H. S. Kang, “Red-to-Ultraviolet Emission Tuning of Two-Dimensional Gallium Sulfide/Selenide,” ACS Nano 2015, 9, 9585–9593. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b04876
2015 doi
-
[26]
Controlling Two-Photon Absorption Properties by Altering the Composition Ratio of GaSxSe1–x Crystals,
A. Karatay, “Controlling Two-Photon Absorption Properties by Altering the Composition Ratio of GaSxSe1–x Crystals,” Opt. Laser Technol. 2019, 111, 6–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.09.024
2019 doi
-
[27]
Structural and Optical Characterization of GaS1-xSex Layered Mixed Crystals Grown by Chemical Vapor Transport,
Y.-T. Shih, D.-Y. Lin, B.-C. Tseng, Y.-M. Kao, S.-B. Hwang, and C.-F. Lin, “Structural and Optical Characterization of GaS1-xSex Layered Mixed Crystals Grown by Chemical Vapor Transport,” Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 37, 107047. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107047
2023
-
[28]
Phase Identification of Layered GaS by Polarization-Dependent Angle-Resolved Oblique Incident Second Harmonic Generation,
Y. Song et al., “Phase Identification of Layered GaS by Polarization-Dependent Angle-Resolved Oblique Incident Second Harmonic Generation,” Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 5770–5777. DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c00345
2025 doi
-
[29]
Nanoribbon Waveguides for Subwavelength Photonics Integration,
M. Law, D. J. Sirbuly, J. C. Johnson, J. Goldberger, R. J. Saykally, and P. Yang, “Nanoribbon Waveguides for Subwavelength Photonics Integration,” Science 2004, 305, 1269–1273. DOI: 10.1126/science.1100999
2004 doi
-
[30]
Self-Aligned On-Chip Coupled Photonic Devices Using Individual Cadmium Sulfide Nanobelts,
J. S. Berger, H.-S. Ee, M. Ren, D. Agarwal, W. Liu, and R. Agarwal, “Self-Aligned On-Chip Coupled Photonic Devices Using Individual Cadmium Sulfide Nanobelts,” Nano Res. 2020, 13, 1413–1418. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-020-2663-6
2020 doi
-
[31]
Waveguide-Integrated Spatial Mode Filters with PtSe2 Nanoribbons,
T. Xu, Z. Xing, S. Xiao, R. Niu, Q. Yuan, L. Xu, Z. Zhang, T. Liu, H. K. Tsang, J. Wang, and Z. Cheng, “Waveguide-Integrated Spatial Mode Filters with PtSe2 Nanoribbons,” Nanophotonics 2025, 14, 327–333. DOI: 10.1515/nanoph-2024-0552
2025 doi
-
[32]
Self-Catalyzed Vapor–Liquid–Solid Growth of GaS Nanobelt for Nano-Optoelectronic Applications,
Y. Endo, Y. Sekine, and Y. Taniyasu, “Self-Catalyzed Vapor–Liquid–Solid Growth of GaS Nanobelt for Nano-Optoelectronic Applications,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025, 126, 043105. DOI: 10.1063/5.0246212
2025 doi
-
[33]
Dielectric- 19 Confinement-Induced in-Plane Photoelectric Anisotropy in Isotropic Quasi-1D γ-GaS Nanoribbon,
J. Jing, J. Chen, X. Xin, P. Peng, Z. Wu, W. Zhong, H. Zhang, W. Shen, J. Zhang, Y. Shan, Y, Li, X. Zhao, W. Xin, F. Wang, W. Hu, H. Xu, and Y. Liu, “Dielectric- 19 Confinement-Induced in-Plane Photoelectric Anisotropy in Isotropic Quasi-1D γ-GaS Nanoribbon,” Advanced Science ...
2026 doi
-
[34]
Synthesis and Transfer of Large-Area Monolayer WS2 Crystals: Moving Toward the Recyclable Use of Sapphire Substrates,
Z.-Q. Xu, Y. Zhang, S. Lin, C. Zheng, Y. L. Zhong, X. Xia, Z. Li, P. J. Sophia, M. S. Fuhrer, Y.-B. Cheng, and Q. Bao, “Synthesis and Transfer of Large-Area Monolayer WS2 Crystals: Moving Toward the Recyclable Use of Sapphire Substrates,” ACS Nano 2015, 9, 6178–6187. DOI: 10.1...
2015 doi
-
[37]
Second-Harmonic Generation (SHG) Spectra Measured from Large Number of GaS Nanobelts
-
[38]
Optical Simulations for GaS Nanobelt-Integrated SiN Waveguide
-
[39]
SHG Experiment Setup Using Pulsed Laser for Excitation
-
[40]
SHG and Sum-Frequency Generation (SFG) Experiment Setup Using Continuous- Wave Laser for Excitation 21
-
[41]
As shown in Figure S1(a– c), 28 GaS nanobelts were randomly selected, as indicated by the yellow arrows
SHG Spectra Measured from Large Number of GaS Nanobelts The second-harmonic generation (SHG) responses of a sufficiently large number of GaS nanobelts were measured to evaluate sample-to-sample variations. As shown in Figure S1(a– c), 28 GaS nanobelts were randomly selected, a...
-
[42]
The thicknesses of the GaS nanobelt and the SiN waveguide were set to 100 nm and 350 nm, respectively, while their widths were 2 μm and 3 μm
Optical Simulations for GaS Nanobelt-Integrated SiN Waveguide Numerical simulations were performed using COMSOL to evaluate the optical confinement in a GaS nanobelt-integrated SiN waveguide. The thicknesses of the GaS nanobelt and the SiN waveguide were set to 100 nm and 350 ...
-
[43]
Schematic illustration of optical setup used for SHG measurements under normal- reflection geometry
SHG Experiment Setup Using Pulsed Laser for Excitation Figure S3. Schematic illustration of optical setup used for SHG measurements under normal- reflection geometry. Light paths for 810 nm, 1500 nm, and SHG signals are indicated by blue, red, and green lines, respectively. 24
-
[44]
Schematic illustration of optical setup used for SHG and SFG measurements of GaS NB-WG
SHG and SFG Experiment Setup Using Continuous-Wave Laser for Excitation Figure S4. Schematic illustration of optical setup used for SHG and SFG measurements of GaS NB-WG. Light paths for 1550 nm, 1560–1615 nm, and SHG and SFG signals are indicated by red, blue, and green lines...
-
[291]
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-024-01602-z
-
[1456]
DOI: 10.1364/OL.27.001454
Reviewed July 31, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.