REVIEW 1 cited by
Asymptotically Optimal Bounds for (t,2) Broadcast Domination on Finite Grids
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph and $t,r$ be positive integers. The \emph{signal} that a tower vertex $T$ of signal strength $t$ supplies to a vertex $v$ is defined as $sig(T,v)=max(t-dist(T,v),0),$ where $dist(T,v)$ denotes the distance between the vertices $v$ and $T$. In 2015 Blessing, Insko, Johnson, and Mauretour defined a \emph{$(t,r)$ broadcast dominating set}, or simply a \emph{$(t,r)$ broadcast}, on $G$ as a set $\mathbb{T}\subseteq V$ such that the sum of all signals received at each vertex $v \in V$ from the set of towers $\mathbb{T}$ is at least $r$. The $(t,r)$ broadcast domination number of a finite graph $G$, denoted $\gamma_{t,r}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality over all $(t,r)$ broadcasts for $G$. Recent research has focused on bounding the $(t,r)$ broadcast domination number for the $m \times n$ grid graph $G_{m,n}$. In 2014, Grez and Farina bounded the $k$-distance domination number for grid graphs, equivalent to bounding $\gamma_{t,1}(G_{m,n})$. In 2015, Blessing et al. established bounds on $\gamma_{2,2}(G_{m,n})$, $\gamma_{3,2}(G_{m,n})$, and $\gamma_{3,3}(G_{m,n})$. In this paper, we take the next step and provide a tight upper bound on $\gamma_{t,2}(G_{m,n})$ for all $t>2$. We also prove the conjecture of Blessing et al. that their bound on $\gamma_{3,2}(G_{m,n})$ is tight for large values of $m$ and $n$.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On $(t,r)$ broadcast domination of certain grid graphs
Exact (t,r) broadcast domination numbers are claimed for paths, wide rectangular grids, and narrow king's grids, with upper bounds for slant and 3D grids.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.