Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 125 references

Holographic fundamental matter in multilayered media

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a D3-D5-D7 brane construction describes strongly coupled layered matter, with in-plane zero sound at speed $1/\sqrt{2}$ and attenuation $\sim k^{7/3}$, while diffusion scales as $T^{-7/3}$ in-plane and $T^{-1}$…

desk verdict A careful top-down holographic model of layered matter with probe flavor; the new off-plane predictions are interesting but rest on a continuum smearing idealization the paper itself concedes. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01864 v2 pith:K36Q42IW submitted 2019-09-04 hep-th

classification hep-th MSC 81T3083E3081T40 PACS 11.25.Tq11.25.-w
keywords holographyD-braneconstructionlayeredmediaAdS/CFTcorrespondencezerosounddiffusionmodesLifshitzscalinganisotropicmatter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a top-down D-brane construction — a large stack of D3-branes carrying the gauge degrees of freedom, a large stack of D5-branes smeared into a homogeneous set of (2+1)-dimensional layers of fundamental matter, and one probe D7-brane adding valence quarks — is a workable holographic model of a strongly coupled layered medium. From the DBI action of the probe the authors derive the thermodynamics and the longitudinal collective-mode spectrum, analytically at low and high temperature and numerically in between. The central results are the anisotropic dispersion laws: an in-plane zero sound with leading speed $1/\sqrt{2}$ and attenuation growing like $k^{7/3}$, an off-plane zero sound whose dispersion carries a logarithmic factor, and diffusion constants that scale as $D_\parallel \sim T^{-7/3}$ along the layers but $D_\perp \sim T^{-1}$ across them at low temperature. If the construction holds, it separates in-plane from off-plane density-wave physics in a strongly coupled medium and gives concrete, testable scaling laws for both sectors.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the intersecting D3-D5-D7 brane system in the smearing approximation. The D3 stack supplies the adjoint sector, while a large stack of D5-branes smeared along one spatial direction and over internal directions produces the anisotropic, Lifshitz-like background of (2.3)–(2.8), with dynamical exponent $z=3$; the layers appear as a homogeneous distribution of codimension-one defects carrying fundamental matter. Into this background the authors place a single probe D7-brane whose embedding angle $\chi(r)$ and worldvolume gauge field $A_t(r)$ encode the valence-quark mass, condensate, chemical potential, and charge density, and whose DBI action supplies both the thermodynamics and the fluctuation equations. The central technical device is the gauge-invariant electric field $E=ka_t+\omega a_x$ built from the perturbed gauge potential: it reduces the fluctuation problem to one second-order ordinary differential equation per direction, (4.20) in-plane and (4.44) off-plane, which the authors solve by matching near-horizon Hankel functions to low-frequency integral expansions $I(r)$ and $J(r)$, producing the dispersion relations (4.35) and (4.57) and the diffusion constants (4.82) and (4.96).

What would settle it

Recompute the off-plane fluctuation spectrum in a geometry where the D5 defects form a periodic array with finite spacing instead of a continuous smear: if the logarithmic dispersion of the off-plane zero sound disappears, or if the low-temperature exponent departs from $D_\perp\sim T^{-1}$, the off-plane predictions are artifacts of the zero-spacing idealization. In the laboratory, measure diffusion along and across the layers of a strongly correlated layered metal at low temperature and look for the predicted asymmetry $D_\parallel\sim T^{-7/3}$ versus $D_\perp\sim T^{-1}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the D3-D5-D7 system is a valid top-down holographic description of a strongly coupled layered medium with fundamental matter, and that its longitudinal collective modes split sharply by direction. Within the layers, the density wave is a zero sound fixed by the exact dispersion relation $\frac{1}{2}k_\parallel^2-\omega^2=\frac{3}{4\gamma C}\frac{\omega^{10/3}}{\sqrt{\tilde d}}$, so the leading speed is $1/\sqrt{2}$ and the attenuation scales as $k_\parallel^{7/3}$. Across the layers, the same mode obeys $k_\perp^2=\frac{2\alpha^2}{\gamma\sqrt{\tilde d}}\left(D-\log\omega\right)\omega^2$ with a constant $D$, which at small frequency behaves as $k_\perp\sim\omega\sqrt{\log(1/\omega)}$ — a qualitatively different, logarithmically corrected dispersion. In the dissipative channel the paper derives $\omega=-iD_\parallel k_\parallel^2$ and $\omega=-iD_\perp k_\perp^2$ with closed-form diffusion constants, giving $D_\parallel\sim T^{-7/3}$ and $D_\perp\sim T^{-1}$ at low temperature and $D_\parallel\sim T^{-1}$ and $D_\perp\sim T^{1/3}$ at high temperature. The same framework yields the full thermodynamic phase structure — Minkowski (insulating) versus black hole (metallic) embeddings with a meson-melting transition at zero density and a metallic phase at finite density — and locates the hydrodynamic-to-collisionless crossover at $\omega_{\rm cr}\sim k_{\rm cr}\sim T^{7/3}/\mu$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the smearing approximation: the D5 layers are spread into a continuous, homogeneous anisotropic medium so that the interlayer separation is formally zero, a step the paper concedes is an idealization in Sections 1 and 5; if finite interlayer spacing changes the off-plane physics, the predicted off-plane zero sound and diffusion scaling would need revision.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In this class of strongly coupled layered systems, the low-temperature density response is dominated by two different collisionless modes: an in-plane zero sound with speed $1/\sqrt{2}$ and attenuation $\propto k^{7/3}$, and an off-plane zero sound whose dispersion is logarithmically corrected.
  • The dissipative sector is equally anisotropic: at low temperature the in-plane diffusion constant falls as $T^{-7/3}$ while the off-plane one falls only as $T^{-1}$, so charge and momentum spread much more slowly along the layers than across them.
  • At high temperature the behavior flips in character: the in-plane diffusion constant decreases as $T^{-1}$ while the off-plane constant grows as $T^{1/3}$.
  • For massless quarks at finite baryon chemical potential the system is always metallic, and the crossover from the hydrodynamic diffusive regime to the collisionless zero-sound regime occurs at scales $\omega_{\rm cr}\sim k_{\rm cr}\sim T^{7/3}/\mu$.
  • The same probe calculation delivers a complete equation of state — free energy, entropy, and heat capacity for both insulating and metallic embeddings, with a meson-melting transition between them — so the dynamical predictions come with thermodynamic predictions attached.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper does not pursue: because the smeared model is exactly translationally invariant, its in-plane sector may be governed by an emergent two-dimensional conformal fixed point (the speed $1/\sqrt{2}$ is the conformal value in 2+1 dimensions); computing the in-plane conductivities and checking 2d conformal relations would test this.
  • The logarithmic off-plane dispersion resembles Lifshitz hydrodynamics at dynamical exponent $z=2$, an analogy the paper cites; one could test whether an effective $z=2$ Lifshitz hydrodynamics reproduces the off-plane sound and diffusion together, giving a simple phenomenological description of layered strange metals.
  • Relaxing the smearing to finite interlayer spacing should introduce a length scale that cuts off the off-plane logarithm at layer-periodicity momenta; a periodic-array D5 computation would locate that scale and could connect the model to the surface-plasmon physics the paper leaves open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a top-down holographic model of a strongly coupled layered medium by combining a D3-D5 background, where D5 defects are smeared into a homogeneous distribution, with a probe D7-brane that adds partially quenched fundamental matter. The authors study thermodynamics at vanishing and finite density, the phase structure of Minkowski and black-hole embeddings, and the longitudinal collective modes of the probe. Their main results are the in-plane zero-sound dispersion (4.35), with leading speed 1/sqrt(2) and attenuation scaling as k^(7/3); the off-plane zero-sound dispersion (4.57), with a logarithmic correction; and the diffusion constants D_parallel ~ T^(-7/3) and D_perp ~ T^(-1) at low temperature. The analytic results are supplemented by numerics, with the diffusion constants compared in Figure 4 and the zero-sound dispersions in Figure 3.

Significance. If it holds, this is one of the few top-down holographic settings that gives an anisotropic, layered-like medium with fundamental matter and explicit analytic control over density-wave physics. The paper's strengths include a detailed and largely self-contained derivation, a kappa-symmetry check of the supersymmetric embedding in Appendix A, and a direct numerical comparison for the diffusion constants shown in Figure 4, where the analytic formulas (4.82) and (4.96) match the numerics. The model makes concrete, falsifiable scaling predictions for a homogeneous anisotropic strongly coupled medium. Its physical relevance to actual multilayered materials, however, rests on an idealization whose quantitative limitations are not controlled.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 1 and 5] The smearing approximation is load-bearing for the off-plane claims. Section 1 states that, after smearing, the interlayer separation is formally vanishing and orthogonal translations are not broken, and Section 5 concedes that real systems have finite layer separation and that finite spacing would break translations along x3. The off-plane zero sound (4.57) and the low-temperature scaling D_perp ~ T^(-1) in (4.98) are computed in the fully homogeneous, translation-invariant continuum. The manuscript provides no quantitative estimate of how a finite layer spacing, with its Brillouin zone and umklapp processes, would modify these results. I request that the authors either reframe the off-plane predictions explicitly as properties of a homogeneous anisotropic medium rather than of layered matter, or provide a controlled estimate of finite-spacing corrections. This is not a presentational issue: the physical interpretation of the central off-plane results depends on it.
  2. [Section 4.1, after Eq. (4.16)] The thermodynamic off-plane sound speed is not computed. The paragraph following (4.16) states that the dependence of the grand potential Omega on L3 is not clear because Qf is proportional to the density of D5-branes smeared along x3, so the derivative in (4.14) is not evaluated for i = 3. Consequently there is no thermodynamic speed of first sound in the orthogonal direction against which the zero-sound dispersion (4.57) could be compared. Since one of the paper's central claims is the distinct in-plane versus off-plane physics, the absence of p_perp leaves that contrast established only in the fluctuation channel. I ask the authors to compute p_perp explicitly or to state clearly why it is not well defined in the smeared construction.
  3. [Sections 4.2 and 4.3] The analytic derivations of (4.35), (4.57), (4.78), and (4.93) rely on a two-step matching of near-horizon and low-frequency expansions, but the paper does not state the precise range of validity of the leading-order results, for instance how small omega and k must be for the neglected terms in (4.20), (4.44), and (4.70) to be controlled. The transition to the hydrodynamic regime is presented only through the numerical statement (4.88). I recommend adding an explicit error estimate or a parametric statement of the regime in which the leading scaling laws are trustworthy.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says that all numerical curves asymptote to unity on the vertical axis, which correspond to diffusion poles, while the text at (4.58) states that the off-plane ratio Re k_perp / Im k_perp asymptotes to zero at high frequency. Please clarify which quantity is displayed and what the asymptotes are.
  2. [Section 4.3.2, Eq. (4.95)] The relation between the reduced and physical off-plane diffusion constants contains a temperature-dependent factor; the text explains this through the scaling symmetry, but it would help the reader if the physical dimensions of D_perp and D_parallel were stated explicitly after (4.96) and (4.97).
  3. [Section 3.2.2, Eq. (3.66)] The regulated free energy for Minkowski embeddings is written as a manifestly convergent integral, but the derivation of the subtraction term would be easier to follow if the relation of (3.65) to (3.43) were spelled out in one sentence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the predictions are derived from a fixed D3-D5 background plus a probe D7 action, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain and found no step in which an output is equivalent to an input by construction. The background geometry is taken from the earlier D3-D5 supergravity solutions [29,30]; while those works share authors with the present paper, the background is an independently derived solution of ten-dimensional supergravity with stated assumptions (smeared D5-branes) and does not assume the D7-probe results derived here. It therefore counts as real evidence, not circular self-citation. The D7 probe action (2.14) has parameters Nc, Nf, T, quark mass, and baryon chemical potential; none of these are fitted to the zero-sound or diffusion results. The in-plane first sound speed u_parallel^2 = 1/2 in (4.16) comes from the thermodynamic equation of state, while the in-plane zero sound leading speed 1/sqrt(2) in (4.37) comes from solving the fluctuation equation (4.20); their equality is a consistency check, not an imposed relation. The in-plane dispersion (4.35), the off-plane dispersion (4.57), and the diffusion constants (4.78) and (4.93) are obtained by explicit matching of near-horizon and low-frequency solutions, then checked numerically. The physical scalings D_parallel ~ T^(-7/3) and D_perp ~ T^(-1) follow from the temperature dependence of the reduced quantities, not from any input that already contains those scalings. The paper itself flags the main modeling limitation in Section 5: the D3-D5 system is an idealization with strictly vanishing layer separation, and finite spacing would break translations along x3. That is an acknowledged physical approximation affecting applicability to real multilayer materials; it is not a circular reduction of the derivation to its inputs. I therefore find no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data. The physical inputs are Nc, Nf, temperature, quark mass, and baryon chemical potential; coefficients such as m, c, and d are integration or boundary parameters mapped to mass, condensate, and density via the holographic dictionary. The assumptions are standard holographic and probe-limit approximations plus the zero-separation smearing idealization. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT or gauge/gravity duality maps the D-brane construction to a strongly coupled field theory.
    The entire interpretation of D3, D5, and D7 branes as adjoint matter, defects, and quarks relies on the holographic dictionary; invoked throughout Sections 1 and 2.
  • domain assumption The D3-D5 background of references [29] and [30] is a correct type IIB supergravity solution with smeared D5 sources.
    The paper takes the anisotropic metric, dilaton, and black hole factors from prior work without re-deriving the equations of motion; used in Section 2.
  • domain assumption The D7-brane is a probe that does not backreact on the D3-D5 background.
    The DBI action (2.14) is evaluated in the fixed background; this is the partially quenched approximation stated in Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper Continuous smearing of the D5-branes with zero interlayer separation is a valid idealization of a layered system.
    This modeling choice creates a homogeneous but anisotropic background, as stated in Section 1; real finite-spacing multilayers are outside the model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic fundamental matter in multilayered media." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K36Q42IW

@misc{pith2026190901864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic fundamental matter in multilayered media},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K36Q42IW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01864}
}
abstract

We describe a strongly coupled layered system in 3+1 dimensions by means of a top-down D-brane construction. Adjoint matter is encoded in a large-$N_c$ stack of D3-branes, while fundamental matter is confined to $(2+1)$-dimensional defects introduced by a large-$N_f$ stack of smeared D5-branes. To the anisotropic Lifshitz-like background geometry, we add a single flavor D7-brane treated in the probe limit. Such bulk setup corresponds to a partially quenched approximation for the dual field theory. The holographic model sheds light on the anisotropic physics induced by the layered structure, allowing one to disentangle flavor physics along and orthogonal to the layers as well as identifying distinct scaling laws for various dynamical quantities. We study the thermodynamics and the fluctuation spectrum with varying valence quark mass or baryon chemical potential. We also focus on the density wave propagation in both the hydrodynamic and collisionless regimes where analytic methods complement the numerics, while the latter provides the only resource to address the intermediate transition regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.01864 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. In this figure we plot the condensate parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. In these plots we represent the free energy density, internal energy density, and entropy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. We display the numerical dispersions (red curves) and the approximated dispersions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: On the left panel we compare the numerical results for the reduced in-plane and off [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: We display the typical dispersion relations for the in-plane case (off-plane is qualitatively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Three-dimensional collective charge excitations in electron-doped copper oxide superconductors,

    M. Hepting et al , “Three-dimensional collective charge excitations in electron-doped copper oxide superconductors,” Nature 563 (2018) 374-378 54

  2. [2]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200]

  3. [3]

    Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence,

    A. V. Ramallo, “Introduction to the AdS/CFT correspondence,” Springer Proc. Phys. 161 (2015) 411 [arXiv:1310.4319 [hep-th]]

  4. [4]

    Holographic Zero Sound from Spacetime- Filling Branes,

    N. I. Gushterov, A. O’Bannon and R. Rodgers, “Holographic Zero Sound from Spacetime- Filling Branes,” JHEP 1810 (2018) 076 [arXiv:1807.11327 [hep-th]]

  5. [5]

    Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal,

    M. Mitrano et al, “Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal,” National Academy of Sciences 115 (2018) 21, 5392–5396 [arXiv:1708.01929 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  6. [6]

    On String Theory Duals of Lifshitz-like Fixed Points,

    T. Azeyanagi, W. Li and T. Takayanagi, “On String Theory Duals of Lifshitz-like Fixed Points,” JHEP 0906 (2009) 084 [arXiv:0905.0688 [hep-th]]

  7. [7]

    Josephson Junctions and AdS/CFT Networks,

    E. Kiritsis and V. Niarchos, “Josephson Junctions and AdS/CFT Networks,” JHEP 1107 (2011) 112 Erratum: [JHEP 1110 (2011) 095] [arXiv:1105.6100 [hep-th]]

  8. [8]

    Thermodynamics and Instabilities of a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,

    D. Mateos and D. Trancanelli, “Thermodynamics and Instabilities of a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,” JHEP 1107 (2011) 054 [arXiv:1106.1637 [hep-th]]

Show all 125 references
  1. [9]

    D3/D7 Quark-Gluon Plasma with Mag- netically Induced Anisotropy,

    M. Ammon, V. G. Filev, J. Tarrio and D. Zoakos, “D3/D7 Quark-Gluon Plasma with Mag- netically Induced Anisotropy,” JHEP 1209 (2012) 039 [arXiv:1207.1047 [hep-th]]

  2. [10]

    Anisotropic plasma at finite U(1) chemical potential,

    L. Cheng, X. H. Ge and S. J. Sin, “Anisotropic plasma at finite U(1) chemical potential,” JHEP 1407 (2014) 083 [arXiv:1404.5027 [hep-th]]

  3. [11]

    A Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Fluid From Dilaton Driven Holography,

    S. Jain, N. Kundu, K. Sen, A. Sinha and S. P. Trivedi, “A Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Fluid From Dilaton Driven Holography,” JHEP 1501 (2015) 005 [arXiv:1406.4874 [hep-th]]

  4. [12]

    A new phase for the anisotropic N=4 super Yang-Mills plasma,

    E. Banks and J. P. Gauntlett, “A new phase for the anisotropic N=4 super Yang-Mills plasma,” JHEP 1509 (2015) 126 [arXiv:1506.07176 [hep-th]]

  5. [13]

    On anisotropic black branes with Lifshitz scaling,

    D. Roychowdhury, “On anisotropic black branes with Lifshitz scaling,” Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 410 [arXiv:1509.05229 [hep-th]]

  6. [14]

    Strongly-coupled anisotropic gauge theories and holography,

    D. Giataganas, U. G¨ ursoy and J. F. Pedraza, “Strongly-coupled anisotropic gauge theories and holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) no.12, 121601 [arXiv:1708.05691 [hep-th]]

  7. [15]

    Holographic Entanglement Entropy Decomposition in an Anisotropic Gauge Theory,

    M. Rahimi and M. Ali-Akbari, “Holographic Entanglement Entropy Decomposition in an Anisotropic Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) no.2, 026004 [arXiv:1803.01754 [hep- th]]

  8. [16]

    Low-energy modes in anisotropic holo- graphic fluids,

    G. Itsios, N. Jokela, J. J¨ arvel¨ a and A. V. Ramallo, “Low-energy modes in anisotropic holo- graphic fluids,” Nucl. Phys. B 940 (2019) 264 [arXiv:1808.07035 [hep-th]]

  9. [17]

    Inverse Anisotropic Catalysis in Holo- graphic QCD,

    U. G¨ ursoy, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and J. F. Pedraza, “Inverse Anisotropic Catalysis in Holo- graphic QCD,” JHEP 1904 (2019) 071 [arXiv:1811.11724 [hep-th]]. 55

  10. [18]

    Holography and defect conformal field theories,

    O. DeWolfe, D. Z. Freedman and H. Ooguri, “Holography and defect conformal field theories,” Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025009 [hep-th/0111135]

  11. [19]

    Four-dimensional superconformal theories with interacting boundaries or defects,

    J. Erdmenger, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch, “Four-dimensional superconformal theories with interacting boundaries or defects,” Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025020 [hep-th/0203020]

  12. [20]

    Open string modes at brane intersections,

    D. Arean and A. V. Ramallo, “Open string modes at brane intersections,” JHEP 0604 (2006) 037 [hep-th/0602174]

  13. [21]

    Universal Holographic Chiral Dynamics in an External Magnetic Field,

    V. G. Filev, C. V. Johnson and J. P. Shock, “Universal Holographic Chiral Dynamics in an External Magnetic Field,” JHEP 0908 (2009) 013 [arXiv:0903.5345 [hep-th]]

  14. [22]

    Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz- Thouless Transitions,

    K. Jensen, A. Karch, D. T. Son and E. G. Thompson, “Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz- Thouless Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 041601 [arXiv:1002.3159 [hep-th]]

  15. [23]

    Phase diagram of the D3/D5 system in a magnetic field and a BKT transition,

    N. Evans, A. Gebauer, K. Y. Kim and M. Magou, “Phase diagram of the D3/D5 system in a magnetic field and a BKT transition,” Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 91 [arXiv:1003.2694 [hep-th]]

  16. [24]

    Giant D5 Brane Holographic Hall State,

    C. Kristjansen and G. W. Semenoff, “Giant D5 Brane Holographic Hall State,” JHEP 1306 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1212.5609 [hep-th]]

  17. [25]

    A Holographic Quantum Hall Ferromag- net,

    C. Kristjansen, R. Pourhasan and G. W. Semenoff, “A Holographic Quantum Hall Ferromag- net,” JHEP 1402 (2014) 097 [arXiv:1311.6999 [hep-th]]

  18. [26]

    Holographic Graphene in a Cavity,

    N. Evans and P. Jones, “Holographic Graphene in a Cavity,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.8, 086008 [arXiv:1407.3097 [hep-th]]

  19. [27]

    Bubbling Defect CFT’s,

    J. Gomis and C. Romelsberger, “Bubbling Defect CFT’s,” JHEP 0608 (2006) 050 [hep- th/0604155]

  20. [28]

    Unquenched Flavor in the Gauge/Gravity Corre- spondence,

    C. Nunez, A. Paredes and A. V. Ramallo, “Unquenched Flavor in the Gauge/Gravity Corre- spondence,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2010 (2010) 196714 [arXiv:1002.1088 [hep-th]]

  21. [29]

    D3-D5 theories with un- quenched flavors,

    E. Conde, H. Lin, J. M. Penin, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, “D3-D5 theories with un- quenched flavors,” arXiv:1607.04998 [hep-th]

  22. [30]

    Anisotropic D3-D5 black holes with unquenched flavors,

    J. M. Penin, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, “Anisotropic D3-D5 black holes with unquenched flavors,” JHEP 1802 (2018) 139 [arXiv:1710.00548 [hep-th]]

  23. [31]

    Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,

    A. Karch and E. Katz, “Adding flavor to AdS / CFT,” JHEP 0206 (2002) 043 [hep- th/0205236]

  24. [32]

    Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries,

    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas and N. Poovuttikul, “Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries,” arXiv:1810.10016 [hep-th]

  25. [33]

    Lifshitz Field Theories at Non-Zero Temperature, Hydro- dynamics and Gravity,

    C. Hoyos, B. S. Kim and Y. Oz, “Lifshitz Field Theories at Non-Zero Temperature, Hydro- dynamics and Gravity,” JHEP 1403 (2014) 029 [arXiv:1309.6794 [hep-th]]. 56

  26. [34]

    Lifshitz Hydrodynamics,

    C. Hoyos, B. S. Kim and Y. Oz, “Lifshitz Hydrodynamics,” JHEP 1311 (2013) 145 [arXiv:1304.7481 [hep-th]]

  27. [35]

    Semi-Holographic Fermi Liquids,

    T. Faulkner and J. Polchinski, “Semi-Holographic Fermi Liquids,” JHEP 1106 (2011) 012 [arXiv:1001.5049 [hep-th]]

  28. [36]

    SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symme- try,

    E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symme- try,” In *Shifman, M. (ed.) et al.: From fields to strings, vol. 2* 1173-1200 [hep-th/0307041]

  29. [37]

    Particle vortex duality and the modular group: Applications to the quantum Hall effect and other 2-D systems,

    C. P. Burgess and B. P. Dolan, “Particle vortex duality and the modular group: Applications to the quantum Hall effect and other 2-D systems,” Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 155309 [hep- th/0010246]

  30. [38]

    The Quantum Hall effect in graphene: Emergent modular symmetry and the semi-circle law,

    C. P. Burgess and B. P. Dolan, “The Quantum Hall effect in graphene: Emergent modular symmetry and the semi-circle law,” Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 113406 [cond-mat/0612269 [cond- mat.mes-hall]]

  31. [39]

    Holographic anyonic superfluidity,

    N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert, “Holographic anyonic superfluidity,” JHEP 1310 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1307.6336 [hep-th]]

  32. [40]

    Flowing holographic anyonic superfluid,

    N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert, “Flowing holographic anyonic superfluid,” JHEP 1410 (2014) 21 [arXiv:1407.3794 [hep-th]]

  33. [41]

    Holographic anyonization: A systematic approach,

    M. Ihl, N. Jokela and T. Zingg, “Holographic anyonization: A systematic approach,” JHEP 1606 (2016) 076 [arXiv:1603.09317 [hep-th]]

  34. [42]

    Striped anyonic fluids,

    N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert, “Striped anyonic fluids,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.4, 046016 [arXiv:1706.05006 [hep-th]]

  35. [43]

    Holographic Optics and Negative Refractive Index,

    A. Amariti, D. Forcella, A. Mariotti and G. Policastro, “Holographic Optics and Negative Refractive Index,” JHEP 1104 (2011) 036 [arXiv:1006.5714 [hep-th]]

  36. [44]

    Additional Light Waves in Hydrodynamics and Holography,

    A. Amariti, D. Forcella and A. Mariotti, “Additional Light Waves in Hydrodynamics and Holography,” arXiv:1010.1297 [hep-th]

  37. [45]

    Electromagnetic response of strongly coupled plas- mas,

    D. Forcella, A. Mezzalira and D. Musso, “Electromagnetic response of strongly coupled plas- mas,” JHEP 1411, 153 (2014) [arXiv:1404.4048 [hep-th]]

  38. [46]

    Holographic Plasmons,

    U. Gran, M. Torns¨ o and T. Zingg, “Holographic Plasmons,” JHEP 1811 (2018) 176 [arXiv:1712.05672 [hep-th]]

  39. [47]

    Plasmons in Holographic Graphene,

    U. Gran, M. Torns¨ o and T. Zingg, “Plasmons in Holographic Graphene,” arXiv:1804.02284 [hep-th]

  40. [48]

    Exotic Holographic Dispersion,

    U. Gran, M. Torns¨ o and T. Zingg, “Exotic Holographic Dispersion,” JHEP 1902 (2019) 032 [arXiv:1808.05867 [hep-th]]. 57

  41. [49]

    Holographic Response of Electron Clouds,

    U. Gran, M. Torns¨ o and T. Zingg, “Holographic Response of Electron Clouds,” JHEP 1903 (2019) 019 [arXiv:1810.11416 [hep-th]]

  42. [50]

    Screening of Coulomb interactions in Holography,

    E. Mauri and H. T. C. Stoof, “Screening of Coulomb interactions in Holography,” JHEP 1904 (2019) 035 [arXiv:1811.11795 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  43. [51]

    Anomalous attenuation of plasmons in strange metals and holography,

    A. Romero-Berm´ udez, A. Krikun, K. Schalm and J. Zaanen, “Anomalous attenuation of plasmons in strange metals and holography,” Phys. Rev. B 99 (2019) no.23, 235149 [arXiv:1812.03968 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  44. [52]

    Density response of holographic metallic IR fixed points with translational pseudo-spontaneous symmetry breaking,

    A. Romero-Berm´ udez, “Density response of holographic metallic IR fixed points with translational pseudo-spontaneous symmetry breaking,” JHEP 1907 (2019) 153 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)153 [arXiv:1904.06237 [hep-th]]

  45. [53]

    Holographic Plasmon Relaxation with and without Broken Translations,

    M. Baggioli, U. Gran, A. J. Alba, M. Torns¨ o and T. Zingg, “Holographic Plasmon Relaxation with and without Broken Translations,” arXiv:1905.00804 [hep-th]

  46. [54]

    Gravity dual of a multilayer system,

    N. Jokela, J. M. Pen´ ın, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, “Gravity dual of a multilayer system,” JHEP 1903 (2019) 064 [arXiv:1901.02020 [hep-th]]

  47. [55]

    On the gravity dual of Chern-Simons-matter theories with unquenched flavor,

    E. Conde and A. V. Ramallo, “On the gravity dual of Chern-Simons-matter theories with unquenched flavor,” JHEP 1107 (2011) 099 [arXiv:1105.6045 [hep-th]]

  48. [56]

    Thermodynamics of the brane in Chern- Simons matter theories with flavor,

    N. Jokela, J. Mas, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, “Thermodynamics of the brane in Chern- Simons matter theories with flavor,” JHEP 1302 (2013) 144 [arXiv:1211.0630 [hep-th]]

  49. [57]

    Unquenched massive flavors and flows in Chern-Simons matter theories,

    Y. Bea, E. Conde, N. Jokela and A. V. Ramallo, “Unquenched massive flavors and flows in Chern-Simons matter theories,” JHEP 1312 (2013) 033 [arXiv:1309.4453 [hep-th]]

  50. [58]

    Magnetic catalysis in flavored ABJM,

    N. Jokela, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, “Magnetic catalysis in flavored ABJM,” JHEP 1402 (2014) 021 [arXiv:1311.6265 [hep-th]]

  51. [59]

    Flux and Hall states in ABJM with dynamical flavors,

    Y. Bea, N. Jokela, M. Lippert, A. V. Ramallo and D. Zoakos, “Flux and Hall states in ABJM with dynamical flavors,” JHEP 1503 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1411.3335 [hep-th]]

  52. [60]

    Noncommutative massive unquenched ABJM,

    Y. Bea, N. Jokela, A. P¨ onni and A. V. Ramallo, “Noncommutative massive unquenched ABJM,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) no.14n15, 1850078 [arXiv:1712.03285 [hep-th]]

  53. [61]

    N=6 superconformal Chern- Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern- Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,” JHEP 0810 (2008) 091 [arXiv:0806.1218 [hep-th]]

  54. [62]

    Fractional M2-branes,

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2-branes,” JHEP 0811 (2008) 043 [arXiv:0807.4924 [hep-th]]

  55. [63]

    A Note on the holography of Chern-Simons matter theories with flavor,

    S. Hohenegger and I. Kirsch, “A Note on the holography of Chern-Simons matter theories with flavor,” JHEP 0904 (2009) 129 [arXiv:0903.1730 [hep-th]]. 58

  56. [64]

    Notes on adding D6 branes wrapping RP**3 in AdS(4) x CP**3,

    D. Gaiotto and D. L. Jafferis, “Notes on adding D6 branes wrapping RP**3 in AdS(4) x CP**3,” JHEP 1211 (2012) 015 [arXiv:0903.2175 [hep-th]]

  57. [65]

    Thermodynamics of the brane,

    D. Mateos, R. C. Myers and R. M. Thomson, “Thermodynamics of the brane,” JHEP 0705 (2007) 067 [hep-th/0701132]

  58. [66]

    Quantum Hall Effect in a Holographic Model,

    O. Bergman, N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert, “Quantum Hall Effect in a Holographic Model,” JHEP 1010 (2010) 063 [arXiv:1003.4965 [hep-th]]

  59. [67]

    A holographic quantum Hall model at integer filling,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and M. Lippert, “A holographic quantum Hall model at integer filling,” JHEP 1105 (2011) 101 [arXiv:1101.3329 [hep-th]]

  60. [68]

    Stiff phases in strongly coupled gauge theories with holographic duals,

    C. Ecker, C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, D. Rodr´ ıguez Fern´ andez and A. Vuorinen, “Stiff phases in strongly coupled gauge theories with holographic duals,” JHEP 1711 (2017) 031 [arXiv:1707.00521 [hep-th]]

  61. [69]

    Breaking the sound barrier in AdS/CFT,

    C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, D. Rodr´ ıguez Fern´ andez and A. Vuorinen, “Breaking the sound barrier in AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.10, 106008 [arXiv:1609.03480 [hep-th]]

  62. [70]

    Cool baryon and quark matter in holographic QCD,

    T. Ishii, M. J¨ arvinen and G. Nijs, “Cool baryon and quark matter in holographic QCD,” arXiv:1903.06169 [hep-ph]

  63. [71]

    Collective excitations of massive flavor branes,

    G. Itsios, N. Jokela and A. V. Ramallo, “Collective excitations of massive flavor branes,” Nucl. Phys. B 909 (2016) 677 [arXiv:1602.06106 [hep-th]]

  64. [72]

    Universal properties of cold holographic matter,

    N. Jokela and A. V. Ramallo, “Universal properties of cold holographic matter,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) no.2, 026004 [arXiv:1503.04327 [hep-th]]

  65. [73]

    Holographic Responses of Fermion Matter,

    M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, “Holographic Responses of Fermion Matter,” Nucl. Phys. B 815, 125 (2009) [arXiv:0811.2262 [hep-th]]

  66. [74]

    Shear viscosity in holography and effective theory of transport without translational symmetry,

    P. Burikham and N. Poovuttikul, “Shear viscosity in holography and effective theory of transport without translational symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.10, 106001 [arXiv:1601.04624 [hep-th]]

  67. [75]

    Non-relativistic anyons from holography,

    N. Jokela, J. J¨ arvel¨ a and A. V. Ramallo, “Non-relativistic anyons from holography,” Nucl. Phys. B 916 (2017) 727 [arXiv:1605.09156 [hep-th]]

  68. [76]

    Zero Sound in Strange Metallic Hologra- phy,

    C. Hoyos-Badajoz, A. O’Bannon and J. M. S. Wu, “Zero Sound in Strange Metallic Hologra- phy,” JHEP 1009 (2010) 086 [arXiv:1007.0590 [hep-th]]

  69. [77]

    Generalised global symmetries in holography: magnetohy- drodynamic waves in a strongly interacting plasma,

    S. Grozdanov and N. Poovuttikul, “Generalised global symmetries in holography: magnetohy- drodynamic waves in a strongly interacting plasma,” JHEP1904 (2019) 141 [arXiv:1707.04182 [hep-th]]

  70. [78]

    Universal Formula for the Holo- graphic Speed of Sound,

    A. Anabalon, T. Andrade, D. Astefanesei and R. Mann, “Universal Formula for the Holo- graphic Speed of Sound,” Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 547 [arXiv:1702.00017 [hep-th]]. 59

  71. [79]

    Zero Sound from Holography,

    A. Karch, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Zero Sound from Holography,” arXiv:0806.3796 [hep-th]

  72. [80]

    Striped instability of a holographic Fermi-like liquid,

    O. Bergman, N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert, “Striped instability of a holographic Fermi-like liquid,” JHEP 1110 (2011) 034 [arXiv:1106.3883 [hep-th]]

  73. [81]

    Comments on Fermi Liquid from Holography,

    M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, “Comments on Fermi Liquid from Holography,” Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 086004 [arXiv:0808.3953 [hep-th]]

  74. [82]

    Baryonic Response of Dense Holographic QCD,

    K. Y. Kim and I. Zahed, “Baryonic Response of Dense Holographic QCD,” JHEP 0812 (2008) 075 [arXiv:0811.0184 [hep-th]]

  75. [83]

    Holographic quantum liquids in 1+1 dimensions,

    L. Y. Hung and A. Sinha, “Holographic quantum liquids in 1+1 dimensions,” JHEP 1001 (2010) 114 [arXiv:0909.3526 [hep-th]]

  76. [84]

    Holography and the sound of criticality,

    M. Edalati, J. I. Jottar and R. G. Leigh, “Holography and the sound of criticality,” JHEP 1010 (2010) 058 [arXiv:1005.4075 [hep-th]]

  77. [85]

    Notes on Properties of Holographic Strange Metals,

    B. H. Lee and D. W. Pang, “Notes on Properties of Holographic Strange Metals,” Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 104011 [arXiv:1006.4915 [hep-th]]

  78. [86]

    Zero Sound in Effective Holographic Theories,

    B. H. Lee, D. W. Pang and C. Park, “Zero Sound in Effective Holographic Theories,” JHEP 1011 (2010) 120 [arXiv:1009.3966 [hep-th]]

  79. [87]

    On Stability and Transport of Cold Holographic Matter,

    M. Ammon, J. Erdmenger, S. Lin, S. Muller, A. O’Bannon, J. P. Shock, J. Erdmenger and S. Lin et al. , “On Stability and Transport of Cold Holographic Matter,” JHEP 1109 (2011) 030 [arXiv:1108.1798 [hep-th]]

  80. [88]

    Holographic zero sound at finite temperature,

    R. A. Davison and A. O. Starinets, “Holographic zero sound at finite temperature,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 026004 [arXiv:1109.6343 [hep-th]]

  81. [89]

    Magnetic effects in a holographic Fermi-like liquid,

    N. Jokela, G. Lifschytz and M. Lippert, “Magnetic effects in a holographic Fermi-like liquid,” JHEP 1205 (2012) 105 [arXiv:1204.3914 [hep-th]]

  82. [90]

    Fluctuations in finite density holographic quan- tum liquids,

    M. Goykhman, A. Parnachev and J. Zaanen, “Fluctuations in finite density holographic quan- tum liquids,” JHEP 1210 (2012) 045 [arXiv:1204.6232 [hep-th]]

  83. [91]

    Anomalous Zero Sound,

    A. Gorsky and A. V. Zayakin, “Anomalous Zero Sound,” JHEP 1302 (2013) 124 [arXiv:1206.4725 [hep-th]]

  84. [92]

    Collective Excitations of Holographic Quantum Liquids in a Magnetic Field,

    D. K. Brattan, R. A. Davison, S. A. Gentle and A. O’Bannon, “Collective Excitations of Holographic Quantum Liquids in a Magnetic Field,” JHEP 1211 (2012) 084 [arXiv:1209.0009 [hep-th]]

  85. [93]

    Fluctuations and instabilities of a holographic metal,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and M. Lippert, “Fluctuations and instabilities of a holographic metal,” JHEP 1302 (2013) 007 [arXiv:1211.1381 [hep-th]]. 60

  86. [94]

    Hydrodynamics of cold holographic matter,

    R. A. Davison and A. Parnachev, “Hydrodynamics of cold holographic matter,” JHEP 1306 (2013) 100 [arXiv:1303.6334 [hep-th]]

  87. [95]

    Probing holographic semilocal quantum liquids with D-branes,

    D. W. Pang, “Probing holographic semilocal quantum liquids with D-branes,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 4, 046002 [arXiv:1306.3816 [hep-th]]

  88. [96]

    Zero sound in strange metals with hyperscaling violation from hologra- phy,

    P. Dey and S. Roy, “Zero sound in strange metals with hyperscaling violation from hologra- phy,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 046010 [arXiv:1307.0195 [hep-th]]

  89. [97]

    Aspects of Current Correlators in Holographic Theories with Hyperscaling Violation,

    M. Edalati and J. F. Pedraza, “Aspects of Current Correlators in Holographic Theories with Hyperscaling Violation,” Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 086004 [arXiv:1307.0808 [hep-th]]

  90. [98]

    AdS/CFT and Landau Fermi liquids,

    R. A. Davison, M. Goykhman and A. Parnachev, “AdS/CFT and Landau Fermi liquids,” JHEP 1407 (2014) 109 [arXiv:1312.0463 [hep-th]]

  91. [99]

    Holographic zero sound at finite tem- perature in the Sakai-Sugimoto model,

    B. S. DiNunno, M. Ihl, N. Jokela and J. F. Pedraza, “Holographic zero sound at finite tem- perature in the Sakai-Sugimoto model,” JHEP 1404 (2014) 149 [arXiv:1403.1827 [hep-th]]

  92. [100]

    Cold holographic matter in the Higgs branch,

    G. Itsios, N. Jokela and A. V. Ramallo, “Cold holographic matter in the Higgs branch,” Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 229 [arXiv:1505.02629 [hep-th]]

  93. [101]

    Phonon and Shifton from a Real Modulated Scalar,

    D. Musso and D. Naegels, “Phonon and Shifton from a Real Modulated Scalar,” arXiv:1907.04069 [hep-th]

  94. [102]

    Baryon number-induced Chern-Simons couplings of vector and axial-vector mesons in holographic QCD,

    S. K. Domokos and J. A. Harvey, “Baryon number-induced Chern-Simons couplings of vector and axial-vector mesons in holographic QCD,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 141602 [arXiv:0704.1604 [hep-ph]]

  95. [103]

    Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,

    S. Nakamura, H. Ooguri and C. S. Park, “Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,” Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 044018 [arXiv:0911.0679 [hep-th]]

  96. [104]

    Gravity dual of spin and charge density waves,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and M. Lippert, “Gravity dual of spin and charge density waves,” JHEP 1412 (2014) 083 [arXiv:1408.1397 [hep-th]]

  97. [105]

    Holographic sliding stripes,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and M. Lippert, “Holographic sliding stripes,” Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.8, 086006 [arXiv:1612.07323 [hep-th]]

  98. [106]

    Pinning of holographic sliding stripes,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and M. Lippert, “Pinning of holographic sliding stripes,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.10, 106017 [arXiv:1708.07837 [hep-th]]

  99. [107]

    Holographic Q-lattices,

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Holographic Q-lattices,” JHEP 1404 (2014) 040 [arXiv:1311.3292 [hep-th]]

  100. [108]

    Holographic helical superconductors,

    A. Donos and J. P. Gauntlett, “Holographic helical superconductors,” JHEP 1112 (2011) 091 [arXiv:1109.3866 [hep-th]]. 61

  101. [109]

    A holographic perspective on phonons and pseudo-phonons,

    A. Amoretti, D. Are´ an, R. Argurio, D. Musso and L. A. Pando Zayas, “A holographic perspective on phonons and pseudo-phonons,” JHEP1705 (2017) 051 [arXiv:1611.09344 [hep- th]]

  102. [110]

    Simplest phonons and pseudo-phonons in field theory,

    D. Musso, “Simplest phonons and pseudo-phonons in field theory,” arXiv:1810.01799 [hep- th]

  103. [111]

    An Entropy-Area Law for Neutron Stars Near the Black Hole Threshold,

    S. H. Alexander, K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “An Entropy-Area Law for Neutron Stars Near the Black Hole Threshold,” Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) no.1, 015010 [arXiv:1810.01313 [gr-qc]]

  104. [112]

    Holographic quark matter and neutron stars,

    C. Hoyos, D. Rodr´ ıguez Fern´ andez, N. Jokela and A. Vuorinen, “Holographic quark matter and neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) no.3, 032501 [arXiv:1603.02943 [hep-ph]]

  105. [113]

    Holographic compact stars meet gravitational wave constraints,

    E. Annala, C. Ecker, C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, D. Rodr´ ıguez Fern´ andez and A. Vuorinen, “Holographic compact stars meet gravitational wave constraints,” JHEP 1812 (2018) 078 [arXiv:1711.06244 [astro-ph.HE]]

  106. [114]

    Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit and neutron stars,

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and J. Remes, “Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit and neutron stars,” JHEP 1903 (2019) 041 [arXiv:1809.07770 [hep-ph]]

  107. [115]

    Compact Star of Holographic Nuclear Matter and GW170817,

    T. Hirayama, F. L. Lin, L. W. Luo and K. Zhang, “Compact Star of Holographic Nuclear Matter and GW170817,” arXiv:1902.08477 [hep-ph]

  108. [116]

    Finite-temperature Equations of State for Neutron Star Mergers,

    P. M. Chesler, N. Jokela, A. Loeb and A. Vuorinen, “Finite-temperature Equations of State for Neutron Star Mergers,” arXiv:1906.08440 [astro-ph.HE]

  109. [117]

    Gravitational Waves from Holographic Neutron Star Mergers,

    C. Ecker, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and W. van der Schee, “Gravitational Waves from Holographic Neutron Star Mergers,” arXiv:1908.03213 [astro-ph.HE]

  110. [118]

    The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,

    G. Policastro, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

  111. [119]

    Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,

    P. Kovtun, D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

  112. [120]

    Non-universal shear viscosity from Einstein gravity,

    J. Erdmenger, P. Kerner and H. Zeller, “Non-universal shear viscosity from Einstein gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 699 (2011) 301 [arXiv:1011.5912 [hep-th]]

  113. [121]

    Out-of-bounds hydrodynamics in anisotropic Dirac fluids,

    J. M. Link, B. N. Narozhny, E. I. Kiselev and J. Schmalian, “Out-of-bounds hydrodynamics in anisotropic Dirac fluids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.19, 196801 [arXiv:1708.02759 [cond-mat.str-el]]

  114. [122]

    Violation of the Holographic Viscosity Bound in a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,

    A. Rebhan and D. Steineder, “Violation of the Holographic Viscosity Bound in a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 021601 [arXiv:1110.6825 [hep-th]]

  115. [123]

    The Shear Viscosity in Anisotropic Phases,

    S. Jain, R. Samanta and S. P. Trivedi, “The Shear Viscosity in Anisotropic Phases,” JHEP 1510 (2015) 028 [arXiv:1506.01899 [hep-th]]. 62

  116. [124]

    Thermoelectric conductivities, shear viscosity, and stability in an anisotropic linear axion model,

    X. H. Ge, Y. Ling, C. Niu and S. J. Sin, “Thermoelectric conductivities, shear viscosity, and stability in an anisotropic linear axion model,” Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) no.10, 106005 [arXiv:1412.8346 [hep-th]]

  117. [125]

    Quan- tum critical scaling and holographic bound for transport coefficients near Lifshitz points,

    G. A. Inkof, J. M. C. Kuppers, J. M. Link, B. Gout´ eraux and J. Schmalian, “Quan- tum critical scaling and holographic bound for transport coefficients near Lifshitz points,” arXiv:1907.05744 [cond-mat.str-el]. 63

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.