Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A direct measurement of galaxy major and minor merger rates and stellar mass accretion histories at z < 3 using galaxy pairs in the REFINE survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.03984 v1 pith:K3BD37E7 submitted 2022-07-08 astro-ph.GA

A direct measurement of galaxy major and minor merger rates and stellar mass accretion histories at z < 3 using galaxy pairs in the REFINE survey

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords mergersmassminorgalaxymajormergergalaxiesratios
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We measure the role of major and minor mergers in forming the stellar masses of galaxies over $0<z<3$ using a combination of $\sim 3.25$ deg$^{2}$ of the deepest ground based near-infrared imaging taken to date as part of the REFINE survey. We measure the pair fraction and merger fractions for galaxy mergers of different mass ratios, and quantify the merger rate with newly measured time-scales derived from the Illustris simulation as a function of redshift and merger mass ratio. We find that over $0 < z < 3$ major mergers with mass ratios greater than 1:4 occur $0.85^{+0.19}_{-0.20}$ times on average, while minor mergers down to ratios of 1:10 occur on average $1.43^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$ times per galaxy. We also quantify the role of major and minor mergers in galaxy formation, whereby the increase in mass due to major mergers is $93^{+49}_{-31}$% while minor mergers account for an increase of $29^{+17}_{-12}$%; thus major mergers add more stellar mass to galaxies than minor mergers over this epoch. Overall, mergers will more than double the mass of massive galaxies over this epoch. Finally, we compare our results to simulations, finding that minor mergers are over predicted in Illustris and in semi-analytical models, suggesting a mismatch between observations and theory in this fundamental aspect of galaxy assembly.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mass--size evolution and the emerging passive--density relation revealed by JWST/NIRCam in the Spiderweb protocluster

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In the Spiderweb protocluster, passive fraction rises with local density to ~60% while passive mass–size intercepts sit between field and cluster values, indicating advanced quenching but ongoing size growth.

  2. Performance of morphological classifiers for galaxy mergers compared to current machine learning methods

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Updated G-M20 and G-C morphological cuts achieve ~70% merger precision comparable to ML, with better high-z robustness, but only select pre-mergers.