Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Multi-phonon interactions between nitrogen-vacancy centers and nanomechanical resonators

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A strongly driven nitrogen-vacancy center and a nanomechanical resonator can exchange phonons in bundles, with analytic n-phonon coupling rates reaching $2\pi \times 10$ kHz.

desk verdict Good idea, broken derivation: Eq. (14) does not follow from the paper's own perturbative calculation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03727 v1 pith:K5HP4HYA submitted 2019-08-10 quant-ph

Xing-Liang Dong , Peng-Bo Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords multi-phononinteractionsnitrogen-vacancycentersnanomechanicalresonatorssidebandengineeringJaynes-CummingsmodelFockstatepreparationSchrodingercatstatesphononcorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that a single nitrogen-vacancy (NV) center in diamond, strongly driven by microwave fields and coupled to the bending mode of a nanomechanical cantilever, can interact with that mode through n-phonon processes at once rather than only through single-phonon exchange. Through sideband engineering analogous to Mollow and Lamb-Dicke dynamics, the system reduces to an effective n-phonon Jaynes-Cummings-type Hamiltonian whose coupling rate has a closed analytical form. The authors claim the second sideband reaches $2\pi\times 10$ kHz and the third $2\pi\times 1$ kHz, orders of magnitude larger than direct high-order spin-mechanical coupling, which would let a single swap operation prepare multi-phonon Fock states and drive the motion into Schr\"odinger cat states. They also show that engineered dissipation can turn the same nonlinear interaction into n-phonon bunching or antibunching depending on the effective spin lifetime. A sympathetic reader would care because this offers a concrete path from a solid-state spin to nonclassical mechanical states without repeated swap operations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the effective n-phonon Jaynes-Cummings-type Hamiltonian together with its closed-form coupling rate. The derivation starts from the strongly driven Jaynes-Cummings model, dresses the spin with the pump, and uses leading-order perturbation theory restricted to the near-degenerate manifold $\{|+,0\rangle, |-,n\rangle, |+,m\rangle, |-,m\rangle\}$ with $m=1,\dots,n-1$. Each intermediate state contributes an energy denominator of the form $n/(2m\Omega)$ or $n/(2(n-m)\Omega)$, and the product gives the analytic rate $\lambda^{(n)}$. This effective coupling is the object that converts ordinary single-phonon exchange into an n-phonon transition that can dominate the dynamics, and it is also the basis for the numerical simulations of Fock-state, cat-state, and correlation dynamics.

What would settle it

Take the full driven Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian with the parameters used for the two-, three-, and four-phonon resonances, simulate the populations without any perturbation truncation, and compare them with the effective-model predictions: a visible discrepancy in the n-phonon Rabi frequency or population, or an avoided-crossing gap that disagrees with the analytic rate, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central logical move is to show that a linear spin-mechanical coupling, once the spin is strongly driven, behaves as an n-phonon nonlinearity. In the Mollow scheme, the driven Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian is transformed to the dressed basis of the strong pump; when the pump is tuned so that $2\Omega=n\Delta_a$, the effective Hamiltonian becomes $H_{\mathrm{eff}}^{M}=\Delta_a \hat a^\dagger \hat a+\Omega \tilde\sigma_z+\lambda^{(n)}(\hat a^n\tilde\sigma^\dagger+\hat a^{\dagger n}\tilde\sigma)$, with $\lambda^{(n)}\approx(-1)^{n-1}\lambda^n/[2((n-1)!)^2](n^2/(4\Omega))^{n-1}$. The same structure appears in the Lamb-Dicke scheme with coupling $\Omega/n!(2\lambda/\omega_r)^n$, derived both by perturbation theory and by an equivalent unitary transformation. The authors then use this effective model to predict a one-swap route to n-phonon Fock states (three-phonon probability up to 0.7, four-phonon above 0.5), a dissipative jump between two Schr\"odinger cat states, and n-phonon correlation functions that show either bunched super-Poisson or antibunched sub-Poisson statistics depending on the engineered spin decay rate.

Load-bearing premise

The whole scheme rests on the assumption that the small off-resonant spin-mechanical coupling can be treated as a weak perturbation and all effects beyond the leading n-phonon term ignored; if higher-order corrections or leaks into other mechanical levels are not negligible, the resonance condition and coupling rates will shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single coherent swap on the n-phonon sideband can populate the mechanical Fock state $|n\rangle$ with high probability, unlike methods that must repeat the swap n times.
  • The second-sideband coupling of roughly $2\pi\times 10$ kHz exceeds typical NV dephasing rates in the dressed-state picture, so coherent multi-phonon oscillations should be observable under the stated parameters.
  • At the resonance condition $2\Omega=n\Delta_a$, an avoided crossing appears between the ground state and the n-phonon state, and its size is set by the analytic rate $\lambda^{(n)}$.
  • With a two-phonon interaction plus a resonant pump, dissipation drives the mechanical mode into a bimodal steady state whose individual quantum trajectories jump between two Schr\"odinger cat states of opposite parity.
  • The generalized correlation function $g_n^{(2)}(\tau)$ shows super-Poisson bunching for a short-lived spin and sub-Poisson antibunching for a long-lived spin, indicating that phonons are released in correlated bundles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the analytic rate survives full benchmarking against the untruncated driven Jaynes-Cummings model, the same dressed-state sideband engineering should transfer to other spin-mechanical platforms with a similar SU(2) spin structure, including other color centers in diamond.
  • The paper's noise analysis treats static magnetic-field drift only; a natural testable extension is to examine time-dependent magnetic noise and whether dynamical-decoupling sequences can preserve the n-phonon resonance.
  • Because the effective coupling scales as $\lambda(\lambda^2/\Omega)^{n-1}$, the hierarchy between sidebands can be tuned in situ, which suggests the possibility of engineering effective phonon-phonon nonlinearities or a tunable Fock-state blockade beyond what the paper explicitly discusses.
  • The predicted dissipative cat state could be distinguished from a classical mixture by measuring the Wigner function's central interference fringes, providing a concrete experimental signature of the claimed multi-phonon coherence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid system in which a single nitrogen-vacancy center coupled to a nanomechanical resonator is driven by microwave fields to engineer multi-phonon interactions. In the Mollow regime the authors derive an effective n-phonon Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian, Eq. (11), with the analytic coupling rate Eq. (14), and claim that the second sideband can reach 2π×10 kHz and the third 2π×1 kHz. In the Lamb-Dicke regime they recover the standard sideband coupling Ω/n!(2λ/ω_r)^n, Eq. (20). Based on these effective Hamiltonians, the paper studies dissipative preparation of Schrödinger-cat-like states, one-swap preparation of multi-phonon Fock states, and n-phonon correlation functions. Feasibility is discussed using realistic NV-mechanical parameters, and one noise-sensitivity simulation of the full driven Jaynes-Cummings model is presented in Fig. 7.

Significance. The proposal is well motivated and the parameter estimates are grounded in existing NV-mechanical experiments. If the effective coupling formula survives a corrected derivation, the applications would be useful: direct n-phonon Fock-state swap operations and dissipative cat-state preparation are both appealing, and the claimed enhancement over direct high-order spin-mechanical couplings is significant. The Lamb-Dicke part appears standard. However, the central Mollow-sideband result is not established by the derivation as written: the stated perturbation theory leads to an exact cancellation at n=2 and to sign-opposite energy denominators for general n. Because Eq. (14) sets the coupling rates used in Figs. 4-6 and in the quoted kHz numbers, the quantitative claims are conditional on a substantially revised derivation and on benchmark simulations against the full Hamiltonian.

major comments (3)
  1. [III.A, Eqs. (10)-(14)] Equation (14) does not follow from the Rayleigh-Schrödinger calculation described in the text. For n=2 at the resonance 2Ω=2Δ_a, the two second-order paths |+,0>→|-,1>→|-,2> and |+,0>→|+,1>→|-,2> have intermediate energy denominators +1/Ω and −1/Ω, respectively; their amplitudes cancel exactly, so the leading matrix element in the stated subspace {|+,0>,|-,2>,|+,1>,|-,1>} is zero, not −λ²/(2Ω). More generally, 1/(E_i−E_{+,m}) is negative while 1/(E_i−E_{-,m}) is positive, so writing both as n/(2mΩ) and n/(2(n−m)Ω) in Eq. (14) is inconsistent with the perturbation expansion; the statement that "each intermediate state provides a negative sign" does not repair this. Even if Eq. (13) is corrected to read λ(n)=⟨+,0|V_corr|−,n⟩/√n! so that the phonon matrix elements are cancelled, the sign problem remains. Consequently the rates 2π×10 kHz and 2π×1 kHz and the effective-model simulations in Figs. 4-6 rest on an unverified formula. The authors should provide a correct derivation, for instance by a polaron or Schrieffer-Wolff transformation that first eliminates the σ̃_z(a+a†) term, or they should extract λ^(n) numerically from the full Hamiltonian (8).
  2. [V, Fig. 7] The only full-model check, Fig. 7, does not validate the central effective coupling. It simulates Eq. (8) with an added static-noise term and plots the two-phonon population, but it does not compare the oscillation period or amplitude with the prediction of Eq. (14), nor does it overlay the dynamics of the effective model (11) for the same parameters. Given the truncation of the perturbative subspace and the sign issue in Eq. (14), a direct benchmark of P_2(t) from Eq. (8) against Eq. (11) at the parameters of Fig. 5(b) is needed, and a similar check should be provided for n=3 or n=4 before the predicted Fock-state and cat-state dynamics can be accepted.
  3. [III.A after Eq. (12)] The assertion that the leading energy shift is only λ²/4Ω and that the resonance condition is therefore approximately satisfied is insufficient for the long integration times used in Figs. 4-6. Off-resonant transitions out of the subspace {|+,m>,|-,m>: m=0..n} can act as an effective decay or a frequency shift on timescales of several Rabi periods of λ^(n); this should be quantified, for example by comparing the population dynamics of the full model (8) with the effective model (11) over the same time window.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (13)] The typesetting of Eq. (13) is confusing: "λ(n)=⟨+,0|Vcorr|−,n⟩ (√n)!" appears to be missing a division sign, and the intended normalization should be stated explicitly, presumably division by √n! to cancel the phonon matrix elements.
  2. [III.A, Eq. (14)] The text says "each intermediate state provides a negative sign" but Eq. (14) uses positive energy denominators; if a phase convention or an absolute-value convention is intended, it should be defined and justified.
  3. [IV.A, Eq. (24)] The dark-state condition is written as H_I|ψ_d⟩=0, but the mechanical state is then denoted |ψ_a⟩ and the spin component is not specified; the full spin-mechanical dark state and the mechanical state should be distinguished clearly.
  4. [IV.A, Eqs. (25)-(26)] The normalization factors are miswritten: N_e^{-1/2}=2[1+exp(-2|β|²)] is not the inverse square root of the normalization constant; the intended expressions should be 1/√(2(1±exp(-2|β|²))).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective n-phonon coupling is derived by perturbation theory from a microscopic Hamiltonian, with no fitted-input predictions or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The Mollow-regime effective coupling is computed by Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory from the microscopically motivated driven-JC Hamiltonian, Eq. (10): 'the n-phonon coupling rate is given by λ(n) = ⟨+, 0| V̂corr |− , n⟩/(√n)!' (Eq. 13), and Eq. (14) is the resulting analytical expression, not a fit to any simulation or experimental datum. The resonance condition 2Ω = nΔa is a design choice, and the numerical figures solve the effective master equations using this analytically obtained rate rather than extracting it from data. Parameter values (λ ∼ 2π×150 kHz, nth ∼ 40, γs, γm) are external experimental inputs, not fitted outputs. The Lamb-Dicke formula Ω/n! (2λ/ωr)^n follows from the same perturbation treatment and a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of Eq. (17), again without fitting. The paper's self-citations appear in background and feasibility contexts, not as the load-bearing justification for the effective Hamiltonian. Whether the RS calculation in Sec. III.A is correct at n=2 (the cancellation issue) is a derivation-validity question, not a circularity: the claimed λ(n) is not defined in terms of the Fock-state or cat-state predictions, nor is any predicted quantity used as an input to obtain Eq. (14). Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard spin-mechanical Hamiltonians, first-order magnetic gradient coupling, and a sequence of rotating-wave and perturbation-theory approximations. The free parameters are experimental control inputs (drive amplitudes, detunings, coupling strength, dissipation rates) chosen to satisfy resonance and feasibility conditions; they are not fitted to a target result.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda (spin-mechanical coupling) = 2π × 150 kHz (small cantilever); kHz scale for diamond resonator
    Input from prior experimental work (Refs. 24, 38, 41); the n-phonon rates in Eq. (14) scale as λ^n, so the entire large-coupling claim depends on this value.
  • Omega_x (dressing Rabi frequency) = 2π × 25 MHz (Fig. 7)
    Chosen so Ω_x ≫ λ and, together with Δ, sets the effective TLS splitting ω_bd ≈ 2Ω_x^2/Δ.
  • Delta (dressing detuning) = 2π × 250 MHz (Fig. 7)
    Chosen so Δ ≫ Ω_x, making the dressed-state approximation in Eqs. (5)-(7) valid.
  • Omega/Delta_a operating ratios = 5λ/10λ, 5λ/5λ, 7.5λ/5λ, 6λ/3λ for n=1,2,3,4
    Hand-picked to satisfy the n-phonon resonance condition 2Ω = nΔ_a; the dominance of each transition is demonstrated only at these ratios.
  • Dissipation rates (γs, γm, nth) = γs=10^-3λ, γm=5×10^-5λ, nth=40 (Fig. 5); γs=10^2λ^(2), (nth+1)γm=10λ^(2) (Fig. 6)
    Chosen from experimental ranges; they determine whether the state-preparation and correlation signals survive decoherence.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The NV center is modeled as a S=1 triplet ground state with Hamiltonian D S_z^2 plus Zeeman coupling, ignoring higher electronic levels and other mechanical modes.
    Eq. (1) and whole paper; standard for low-temperature ground-state spin physics.
  • domain assumption The magnetic tip field is expanded to first order in displacement, yielding Hint = λ(a+a†)S_z.
    Sec. II after Eq. (1); higher-order gradient terms are neglected, which is standard at small zero-point amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Rotating-wave, large-detuning (Δ≫Ω_x), strong-driving (Ω≫λ), and off-resonant-sideband approximations reduce the full Hamiltonian to the driven Jaynes-Cummings or Lamb-Dicke models.
    Sec. III, Eqs. (3)-(10) and (16)-(19); the effective n-phonon Hamiltonian inherits all these limits.
  • domain assumption Leading-order Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory in the n-phonon subspace is sufficient; higher-order corrections and level shifts are negligible.
    Sec. III.A, Eqs. (12)-(14); this is the load-bearing assumption for the analytic coupling rates.
  • domain assumption The mechanical mode can be actively cooled close to its ground state, so the D[a†] heating term can be dropped in the cat-state and correlation calculations.
    Sec. IV.A after Eq. (22) and Sec. IV.C after Eq. (28); note Fig. 5 still uses nth=40 when the heating term is retained.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-phonon interactions between nitrogen-vacancy centers and nanomechanical resonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K5HP4HYA

@misc{pith2026190803727,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-phonon interactions between nitrogen-vacancy centers and nanomechanical resonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K5HP4HYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03727}
}
abstract

We investigate the multi-phonon interactions in a hybrid system composed of a nitrogen-vacancy center and a mechanical resonator.We show that, through appropriate sideband engineering analogy to the Mollow or Lamb-Dicke dynamics, the enhanced nonlinear interactions can dominate the coupled system. As an example, we show the preparation of nonclassical states of the mechanical motion and explore the quantum correlation of $n$-phonon with the engineered dissipation,based on the large multi-phonon coupling strength attainable in this sideband structure. This work takes full advantage of the structure and coherence features of defect centers in diamond, and may be useful for quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03727 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) Schematic of the setup. A sharp mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) (a) The curve of the energy eigenvalue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (Color online) (a) Time evolution of the phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) Time evolution of the probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) Second-order phonon correlations at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (Color online) The population of the two-phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Poot and H

    M. Poot and H. S. van der Zant, Mechanical systems in the quantum regime, Phys. Rep. 511, 273 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    ≅_ ! _ ! ≅_ ! _ ! (a) (b) FIG

    reads ˆH M tot = ∆ aˆa†ˆa +λ(ˆaˆσ† + ˆa† ˆσ) + Ω(ˆσ + ˆσ†), (9) with ∆ a =ωr −ωL. ≅_ ! _ ! ≅_ ! _ ! (a) (b) FIG. 3. (Color online) (a) The curve of the energy eigenvalue s with the pumping Ω increasing from 0 to 20 λ . The result is calculated from Eq. ( 9) at ∆ a = 5λ . This plot only contains the second to the ninth energy eigenvalues. (b) Enlarged vie ...

  3. [3]

    The dark state condition is ˆHI |ψd⟩ = 0, (23) where the mechanical dark state |ψa⟩ satisfies the equa- tion ˆa2|ψa⟩ = −Ω 0/λ(2)|ψa⟩. (24) 6 It’s proved that the solutions are two states with opposite parity known as Schrodinger cat states |ψa⟩0 =N −1/ 2 e (|β⟩ + | −β⟩) (25) |ψa⟩1 =N −1/ 2 o (|β⟩ − | −β⟩), (26) with β = √ −Ω 0/λ(2), N −1/ 2 e = 2[1 + exp( ...

  4. [4]

    R. G. Knobel and A. N. Cleland, Nanometre-scale dis- placement sensing using a single electron transistor, Nature 424, 291 (2003)

    work page 2003

  5. [5]

    Manenti, A

    R. Manenti, A. F. Kockum, A. Patterson, T. Behrle, J. Rahamim, G. Tancredi, F. Nori, and P. J. Leek, Circuit quantum acoustodynamics with surface acoustic waves, Nat. Commun. 8, 975 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    ( 27), with a free energy term ( δωbd/2)ˆσz added to the Hamiltonian ( 8)

    and Eq. ( 27), with a free energy term ( δωbd/2)ˆσz added to the Hamiltonian ( 8). We find that the perturba- tions induced by the static drift in the magnetic field are negligible forδn ≤ 5λ, but the result significantly changes with respect to noise strength δn = 8λ. Moreover, the perturbations can be further suppressed by increasing the detuning ∆. So the...

    work page

  7. [7]

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekstr¨ om, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Prop- agating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Science 346, 207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    In the rotating frame with respect to the driv- ing frequency ωL, the Hamiltonian Eq

    can be further simplified. In the rotating frame with respect to the driv- ing frequency ωL, the Hamiltonian Eq. (

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    A. N. Cleland and R. M. L., Fabrication of high frequency nanometer scale mechanical resonators from bulk si crys- tals, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 2653 (1996)

    1996

  3. [11]

    and Eq. (27). Here the system is initialized in the state |0, +⟩. The coupling strength is given by Eq. ( 14). Fig. 5(a) plots the probability of the resonator being in the states |0⟩ and |1⟩ on one-phonon resonance, with the coupling rate λ(1) = 0.5λ. We find that the probabil...

  4. [12]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y. P. Zhong, H.-S. Chang, G. A. Peairs, A. Bienfait, M.-H. Chou, A. Y. Cleland, C. r. Conner, ´E. Dumur, J. Grebel, I. Gutierrez, B. H. November, R. G. Povey, S. J. Whiteley, D. D. Awschalom, D. I. Schuster, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum control of surface acoust...

    2018

  5. [13]

    Metcalfe, S

    M. Metcalfe, S. M. Carr, A. Muller, G. S. Solomon, and J. Lawall, Resolved sideband emission of InAs / GaAs quantum dots strained by surface acoustic waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 037401 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Lemonde, S

    M.-A. Lemonde, S. Meesala, A. Sipahigil, M. J. A. Schuetz, M. D. Lukin, M. Loncar, and P. Rabl, Phonon networks with silicon-vacancy centers in diamond waveg- uides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 213603 (2018)

    2018

  7. [15]

    Li, X.-X

    P.-B. Li, X.-X. Li, and F. Nori, Band-gap-engineered spin-phonon, and spin-spin interactions with defect centers in diamond coupled to phononic crystals, arXiv:1901.04650 [quant-ph]. 9

    1901 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Jiang, S

    Y. Jiang, S. Maayani, T. Carmon, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 064037 (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    M. D. LaHaye, J. Suh, P. M. Echternach, K. C. Schwab, and M. L. Roukes, Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit, Nature 459, 960 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    and Eq. ( 28). For short lifetime, the phonon field is bunched and has a super- Poisson distribution of single phonons and phonon pairs. This limit may allow the creation of phonon laser with n-phonon released. On the other hand, in the long life- time limit, we observe the phe...

  11. [19]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, W. H. Renninger, L. D. Burkhart, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Quantum acoustics with superconducting qubits, Science 358, 199 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Yeo, P.-L

    I. Yeo, P.-L. de Assis, A. Gloppe, E. Dupont-Ferrier, P. Verlot, N. S. Malik, E. Dupuy, J. Claudon, J.-M. G´ erard, A. Auff ˙ aves, G. Nogues, S. Seidelin, J.-P. Poizat, O. Arcizet, and M. Richard, Strain-mediated coupling in a quantum dotmechanical oscillator hybrid system, Na...

    2013

  13. [21]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. L. Hollenberg, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond, Phys. Rep. 528, 1 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    D. Lee, K. W. Lee, J. V. Cady, P. Ovartchaiyapong, and A. C. B. Jayich, Topical review: Spins and mechanics in diamond, J. Opt. 19, 033001 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Treutlein, C

    P. Treutlein, C. Genes, K. Hammerer, M. Poggio, and P. Rabl, Hybrid Mechanical Systems (Springer, 2014) pp. 327–351

    2014

  16. [24]

    C. Hepp, T. M¨ uller, V. Waselowski, J. N. Becker, B. Pin- gault, H. Sternschulte, D. Steinm¨ uller-Nethl, A. Gali, J. R. Maze, M. Atat¨ ure, and C. Becher, Electronic struc- ture of the silicon vacancy color center in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 036405 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    M. K. Bhaskar, D. D. Sukachev, A. Sipahigil, R. E. Evans, M. J. Burek, C. T. Nguyen, L. J. Rogers, P. Siyu- shev, M. H. Metsch, H. Park, F. Jelezko, M. Lonˇ car, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics with a germanium-vacancy color center in a nanoscale diamond waveguide, P...

    2017

  18. [26]

    Wilson-Rae, P

    I. Wilson-Rae, P. Zoller, and A. Imamo¯ glu, Laser cool- ing of a nanomechanical resonator mode to its quantum ground state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 075507 (2004)

    2004

  19. [27]

    A. D. O’Connell, M. Hofheinz, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bial- czak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, D. Sank, H. Wang, M. Weides, J. Wenner, J. M. Mar- tinis, and A. N. Cleland, Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator, Nature 464, 697 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    J. D. Teufel, T. Donner, D. Li, J. W. Harlow, M. S. Allman, K. Cicak, A. J. Sirois, J. D. Whittaker, K. W. Lehnert, and R. W. Simmonds, Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state, Nature 475, 359 (2011)

    2011

  21. [29]

    J. Chan, T. P. M. Alegre, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, J. T. Hill, A. Krause, S. Grblacher, M. Aspelmeyer, and O. Painter, Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state, Nature 478, 89 (2011)

    2011

  22. [30]

    P. Rabl, P. Cappellaro, M. G. Dutt, L. Jiang, J. Maze, and M. D. Lukin, Strong magnetic coupling between an electronic spin qubit and a mechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. B 79, 041302 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    Rabl, Cooling of mechanical motion with a two-level system: The high-temperature regime, Phys

    P. Rabl, Cooling of mechanical motion with a two-level system: The high-temperature regime, Phys. Rev. B 82, 165320 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    K. V. Kepesidis, S. D. Bennett, S. Portolan, M. D. Lukin, and P. Rabl, Phonon cooling and lasing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 88, 064105 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Liao, Q.-Q

    J.-Q. Liao, Q.-Q. Wu, and F. Nori, Entangling two macroscopic mechanical mirrors in a two-cavity optome- chanical system, Phys. Rev. A 89, 014302 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Wang, X.-Y

    M. Wang, X.-Y. L¨ u, Y.-D. Wang, J. Q. You, and Y. Wu, Macroscopic quantum entanglement in modulated op- tomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 94, 053807 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    C. F. Ockeloen-Korppi, E. Damsk¨ agg, J.-M. Pirkkalainen, M. Asjad, A. A. Clerk, F. Massel, M. J. Woolley, and M. A. Sillanp¨ a¨ a, Stabilized entanglement of massive mechanical oscillators, Nature 556, 478482 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    J¨ ahne, C

    K. J¨ ahne, C. Genes, K. Hammerer, M. Wallquist, E. S. Polzik, and P. Zoller, Cavity-assisted squeezing of a me- chanical oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 79, 063819 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    L¨ u, J.-Q

    X.-Y. L¨ u, J.-Q. Liao, L. Tian, and F. Nori, Steady-stat e mechanical squeezing in an optomechanical system via duffing nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. A 91, 013834 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Monroe, D

    C. Monroe, D. Meekhof, B. King, and D. J. Wineland, A schr¨ odinger cat superposition state of an atom, Science 272, 1131 (1996)

    1996

  31. [39]

    Y. Chu, P. Kharel, T. Yoon, L. Frunzio, P. T. Rakich, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Creation and control of multi- phonon fock states in a bulk acoustic-wave resonator, Nature 563, 666670 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Childress, M

    L. Childress, M. V. Gurudev Dutt, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Zibrov, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, Coherent dynamics of coupled electron and nuclear spin qubits in diamond, Science 314, 281 (2006)

    2006

  33. [41]

    Hanson and D

    R. Hanson and D. D. Awschalom, Coherent ma- nipulation of single spins in semiconductors, Nature 453, 10431049 (2008)

    2008

  34. [42]

    Balasubramanian, P

    G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V. Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond, Nat. Mater. 8, 383 (2009)

    2009

  35. [43]

    Bar-Gill, L

    N. Bar-Gill, L. Pham, A. Jarmola, D. Budker, and R. Walsworth, Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second, Nat. Commun. 4, 1743 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    P. Rabl, S. J. Kolkowitz, F. H. L. Koppens, J. G. E. Har- ris, P. Zoller, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum spin trans- ducer based on nanoelectromechanical resonator arrays, Nat. Phys. 6, 602608 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Li, Z.-L

    P.-B. Li, Z.-L. Xiang, P. Rabl, and F. Nori, Hy- brid quantum device with nitrogen-vacancy cen- ters in diamond coupled to carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 015502 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    Z.-q. Yin, T. Li, X. Zhang, and L. M. Duan, Large quantum superpositions of a levitated nan- odiamond through spin-optomechanical coupling, Phys. Rev. A 88, 033614 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Arcizet, V

    O. Arcizet, V. Jacques, A. Siria, P. Poncharal, P. Vincent, and S. Seidelin, A single nitrogen- vacancy defect coupled to a nanomechanical oscillator, Nat. Phys. 7, 879883 (2011) . 10

    2011

  40. [48]

    Kolkowitz, A

    S. Kolkowitz, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, Q. P. Unterreith - meier, S. D. Bennett, P. Rabl, J. G. E. Harris, and M. D. Lukin, Coherent sensing of a mechanical resonator with a single-spin qubit, Science 335, 1603 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    D. A. Golter, T. Oo, M. Amezcua, I. Lekavicius, K. A. Stewart, and H. Wang, Coupling a surface acoustic wave to an electron spin in diamond via a dark state, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041060 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    D. A. Golter, T. Oo, M. Amezcua, K. A. Stew- art, and H. Wang, Optomechanical quantum con- trol of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 143602 (2016)

    2016

  43. [51]

    M. C. Kuzyk and H. Wang, Scaling phononic quantum networks of solid-state spins with closed mechanical sub- systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041027 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, A

    C. S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, A. Lara, J. Puebla, and F. Nori, Hybrid systems for the generation of nonclassi- cal mechanical states via quadratic interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123604 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Li, Y.-C

    P.-B. Li, Y.-C. Liu, S.-Y. Gao, Z.-L. Xiang, P. Rabl, Y.-F. Xiao, and F.-L. Li, Hybrid quantum device based on nv centers in diamond nanomechanical resonators plus superconducting waveguide cavities, Phys. Rev. Applied 4, 044003 (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    Li and F

    P.-B. Li and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum system with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond coupled to surface-phonon polaritons in piezomagnetic superlat- tices, Phys. Rev. Applied 10, 024011 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Y. Zhou, B. Li, X.-X. Li, F.-L. Li, and P.-B. Li, Preparing multiparticle entangled states of nitrogen- vacancy centers via adiabatic ground-state transitions, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052346 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Zhou, S.-L

    Y. Zhou, S.-L. Ma, B. Li, X.-X. Li, F.-L. Li, and P.-B. Li, Simulating the lipkin-meshkov-glick model in a hybrid quantum system, Phys. Rev. A 96, 062333 (2017)

    2017

  49. [57]

    P. Cao, R. Betzholz, S. Zhang, and J. Cai, Entan- gling distant solid-state spins via thermal phonons, Phys. Rev. B 96, 245418 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    T. Li, A. Miranowicz, X. Hu, K. Xia, and F. Nori, Quantum memory and gates using a Λ-type quantum emitter coupled to a chiral waveguide, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062318 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Zheng, T.-S

    L.-L. Zheng, T.-S. Yin, Q. Bin, X.-Y. L¨ u, and Y. Wu, Single-photon-induced phonon block- ade in a hybrid spin-optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. A 99, 013804 (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Cai, Z.-W

    K. Cai, Z.-W. Pan, R.-X. Wang, D. Ruan, Z.-Q. Yin, and G.-L. Long, Single phonon source based on a giant polariton nonlinear effect, Opt. Lett. 43, 1163 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two-lev el systems, Phys

    B. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two-lev el systems, Phys. Rev. 188, 1969 (1969)

    1969

  54. [62]

    Zakrzewski, M

    J. Zakrzewski, M. Lewenstein, and T. W. Mossberg, The- ory of dressed-state lasers. i. effective hamiltonians and stability properties, Phys. Rev. A 44, 7717 (1991)

    1991

  55. [63]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  56. [64]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, E. del Valle, A. G. Tudela, K. Mller, S. Lichtmannecker, M. Kaniber, C. Tejedor, J. J. Fin- ley, and F. P. Laussy, Emitters of n-photon bundles, Nat. Photonic. 8, 550555 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, F. P. Laussy, E. del Valle, C. Tejedor, and A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, Filtering multiphoton emission from state-of-the-art cavity quantum electrodynamics, Optica 5, 14 (2018)

    2018

  58. [66]

    Bin, X.-Y

    Q. Bin, X.-Y. L, F. P. Laussy, F. Nori, and Y. Wu, N-phonon bundle emission via the anti-stokes process, arXiv:1907.12714 [quant-ph]

    1907 arXiv

  59. [67]

    B. R. Mollow, Stimulated emission and ab- sorption near resonance for driven systems, Phys. Rev. A 5, 2217 (1972)

    1972

  60. [68]

    Hubaˇ c and S

    I. Hubaˇ c and S. Wilson, Brillouin-Wigner Methods for Many-Body Systems (Springer, 2010) pp. 133–189

    2010

  61. [69]

    H. Tan, F. Bariani, G. Li, and P. Meystre, Generation of macroscopic quantum superposi- tions of optomechanical oscillators by dissipation, Phys. Rev. A 88, 023817 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced measurements: Beating the standard quantum limit, Science 306, 1330 (2004)

    2004

  63. [71]

    Gilles, B

    L. Gilles, B. M. Garraway, and P. L. Knight, Generation of nonclassical light by dissipative two-photon processes , Phys. Rev. A 49, 2785 (1994)

    1994

  64. [72]

    H. J. Carmichael, Statistical Methods in Quantum Optics 1 (Springer, 1999)

    1999

  65. [73]

    M. B. Plenio and P. L. Knight, The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 101 (1998)

    1998

  66. [74]

    Tamarat, N

    P. Tamarat, N. B. Manson, J. P. Harrison, R. L. McMurtrie, A. Nizovtsev, C. Santori, R. G. Beau- soleil, P. Neumann, T. Gaebel, F. Jelezko, P. Hemmer, and J. Wrachtrup, Spin-flip and spin-conserving optical transitions of the nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond, New. J. Phys 10,...

    2008

  67. [75]

    R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963)

    1963

  68. [76]

    J. A. Sidles, J. L. Garbini, K. J. Bruland, D. Rugar, O. Z¨ uger, S. Hoen, and C. S. Yan- noni, Magnetic resonance force microscopy, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 249 (1995)

    1995

  69. [77]

    H. J. Mamin, M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, and D. Rugar, Nu- clear magnetic resonance imaging with 90-nm resolution, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 301 (2007)

    2007

  70. [78]

    Y. Tao, J. M. Boss, B. A. Moores, and C. L. Degen, Single-crystal diamond nanomechanical res- onators with quality factors exceeding one million, Nat. Commun. 5, 3638 (2014)

    2014

  71. [79]

    Ovartchaiyapong, L

    P. Ovartchaiyapong, L. M. A. Pascal, B. A. My- ers, P. Lauria, and A. C. B. Jayich, High qual- ity factor single-crystal diamond mechanical resonators, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 163505 (2012)

    2012

  72. [80]

    Takahashi, R

    S. Takahashi, R. Hanson, J. van Tol, M. S. Sher- win, and D. D. Awschalom, Quenching spin deco- herence in diamond through spin bath polarization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 047601 (2008)

    2008

  73. [81]

    E. R. MacQuarrie, T. A. Gosavi, S. A. Bhave, and G. D. Fuchs, Continuous dynamical decoupling of a single di- amond nitrogen-vacancy center spin with a mechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224419 (2015)

    2015

  74. [82]

    Hason, V

    R. Hason, V. V. Dobrovitski, A. E. Feiguin, O. Gy- wat, and D. D. Awschalom, Coherent dynamics of a single spin interacting with an adjustable spin bath, Science 320, 352 (2008)

    2008

  75. [83]

    J. Du, X. Rong, N. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and R. B. Liu, Preserving electron spin coherence in solids by opti- mal dynamical decoupling, Nature 461, 1265 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.