Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 82 references

Universal Efimov spectra and fermionic doublets in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mixtures with van der Waals and dipole interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that Efimov spectra stay universal in Er-Li and Dy-Li mixtures even when dipole forces match van der Waals forces, and that fermionic systems show a universal doublet of Efimov states with predicted loss-peak ratios.

desk verdict Solid extension of Efimov universality to dipolar Er-Li and Dy-Li, with a testable fermionic doublet prediction; abstract overstates universality for the ground state. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07721 v2 pith:K6ZUCAXD submitted 2025-06-09 cond-mat.quant-gas nucl-th

Kazuki Oi , Shimpei Endo This is my paper
classification cond-mat.quant-gasnucl-th
keywords Efimoveffectthree-bodyparametermass-imbalancedcold-atommixturesdipole-dipoleinteractionBorn-OppenheimerapproximationfermionicstatesEr-LimixtureDy-Li
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

What happens to the Efimov effect — the infinite, scale-invariant staircase of three-body bound states that forms near a large two-body scattering length — when the heavy atoms in a heavy-heavy-light system also attract each other through a strong, anisotropic dipole force? This paper studies Er-Er-Li and Dy-Dy-Li cold-atom mixtures and answers: the Efimov spectra remain universal, meaning insensitive to short-range atomic details, even when the dipole interaction is as strong as the van der Waals interaction. For bosonic heavy atoms the Efimov states live only in the $M_z=0$ channel, while for fermionic heavy atoms they appear in both $M_z=0$ and $M_z=\pm1$ channels, split by the dipole interaction into a characteristic doublet. The ratio of the three-body parameters of these two fermionic channels is universal, increasingly so as the mass imbalance grows, and the paper gives quantitative predictions for the doublet positions in specific Er-Li and Dy-Li isotopes. If the claim is right, atom-loss spectroscopy will show one loss peak per Efimov cycle for bosons and an asymmetric doublet per cycle for fermions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Born-Oppenheimer potential $V_{\rm BO}(r)$ of Eq. (2), the effective heavy-heavy interaction induced by the light atom, combined with the heavy-heavy van der Waals potential $-C_6/r^6$ and the dipole potential $C_{dd}(1-3\cos^2\theta)/r^3$ in the relative-motion Schr\"odinger equation. The dipole term mixes partial waves, so only $M_z$ remains a good quantum number; the paper solves coupled-channel equations for $L=0,2,4,\dots$ (bosons, $M_z=0$) and $L=1,3,5,\dots$ (fermions, $M_z=0,\pm1$). Short-range physics is encoded in a hard-wall radius $R_{\min}$ or equivalently a quantum defect $K_c$, and universality is tested by varying $R_{\min}$ and showing data collapse. The analytical engine is first-order perturbation theory in $a_{dd}$ built on the zero-range wavefunction, giving Eq. (6); in the limits $R_{\min}\ll r_{\rm vdw}$ and $|s_\ell|\gg 1$, the $K_c$-dependent oscillatory term vanishes, yielding Eq. (8), in which $\Delta E/|E_0|$ depends only on $a_{dd}/r_{\rm vdw}$ and the mass ratio through $|s_\ell|$. Combined with the universal product $\kappa_* a_- = \text{const}$, this fixes the doublet ratio.

What would settle it

Measure the three-body loss spectrum of a $^{167}$Er-$^6$Li mixture while sweeping the heavy-light $s$-wave scattering length to negative values near a broad Feshbach resonance; the claim predicts two loss peaks per Efimov cycle with $a_-^{(M_z=0)}/a_-^{(M_z=\pm1)}$ in $0.41$–$0.52$ (and $0.16$–$0.28$ for $^{161}$Dy-$^6$Li and $^{163}$Dy-$^6$Li). A single peak per cycle, or a ratio outside these windows across at least two consecutive cycles, would falsify the universal-doublet prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Efimov universality survives the addition of a strong, anisotropic dipole interaction between the two identical heavy atoms in a heavy-heavy-light system. Solving the Born-Oppenheimer equation for Er-Er-Li and Dy-Dy-Li with the heavy-light scattering length $a^{(HL)}$ varied across its full range, the authors find that the Efimov spectrum and the three-body parameters are insensitive to the short-range cutoff $R_{\min}$ (equivalently, to the quantum defect $K_c$) even at dipole strengths $a_{dd}/r_{\rm vdw}\sim 0.9$–$1.6$, where the dipole interaction is comparable to the van der Waals interaction. For bosonic heavy atoms, only the $M_z=0$ channel carries Efimov states; for fermionic heavy atoms, the $M_z=0$ and $M_z=\pm1$ states both exist but are split by the dipole interaction, with the $M_z=0$ state bound more tightly. First-order perturbation theory gives the splitting $\Delta E/|E_0|$ as a universal function that is independent of the Efimov-state index, and in the large-mass-imbalance limit the dependence on $K_c$ drops out entirely. From this the paper predicts $a_-^{(M_z=0)}/a_-^{(M_z=\pm1)}\simeq 0.41$–$0.52$ for $^{167}$Er-$^6$Li and $0.16$–$0.28$ for $^{161}$Dy-$^6$Li and $^{163}$Dy-$^6$Li, with the caveat that the absolute values of the fermionic three-body parameters cannot yet be predicted from scattering data alone.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the heavy-light interaction is a zero-range contact interaction fully characterized by the $s$-wave scattering length; the authors note that finite-range corrections could be non-negligible for the ground Efimov state, where $\kappa_* \gtrsim 0.5\,r_{\rm vdw}^{-1}$ and $|a_-| \lesssim 10\,r_{\rm vdw}$, which is the state experiments most easily access.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bosonic Er-Li and Dy-Li mixtures should show one three-body loss peak per Efimov cycle, at the $M_z=0$ dissociation scattering length $a_-$, with tabulated values for each isotope and state.
  • Fermionic mixtures should show two loss peaks per cycle: an $M_z=0$ peak at smaller $|a_-|$ and a two-fold-degenerate $M_z=\pm1$ peak at larger $|a_-|$, repeating with the fermionic scaling factor $e^{\pi/|s_1|}=8.262\ldots$ for Er-Li.
  • The ratio of the two fermionic peaks is predicted as $a_-^{(M_z=0)}/a_-^{(M_z=\pm1)}=0.41$–$0.52$ for $^{167}$Er-$^6$Li and $0.16$–$0.28$ for $^{161}$Dy-$^6$Li and $^{163}$Dy-$^6$Li; in the large-mass-imbalance limit the ratio becomes independent of the short-range quantum defect.
  • Extracting $a_-$ from $\kappa_*$ through the universal product $\kappa_* a_-=\text{const}$ is reliable only for highly excited states, so the ground-state values in the tables come from sweeping the full scattering length.
  • Avoided crossings with higher-partial-wave trimers exist but need fine-tuned short-range parameters and are expected to be rare in realistic cold-atom conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the large-mass-imbalance ratio is free of the quantum defect, measuring the doublet spacing at several magnetic-field points across the same Feshbach resonance would test universality without needing independent knowledge of short-range physics.
  • The same dipole-induced splitting should appear in other highly mass-imbalanced dipolar mixtures; computing the ratio from the mass ratio and $a_{dd}/r_{\rm vdw}$ would give testable predictions for species not tabulated here.
  • The authors connect this system to nuclear few-body physics with tensor forces; if the universality holds, the cold-atom mixture becomes a tunable simulator in which the dipole strength plays the role of the tensor force and scattering lengths can be swept in ways nuclei do not allow.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies three-body Efimov states in highly mass-imbalanced mixtures of two heavy dipolar atoms (Er or Dy) and one light atom (Li), using the Born-Oppenheimer approximation with a zero-range heavy-light contact interaction and a heavy-heavy potential that combines van der Waals and dipole interactions. The authors numerically diagonalize the resulting coupled-channel equation and also derive a first-order perturbative formula for the dipole-induced energy splitting between the fermionic M_z=0 and M_z=±1 channels. The central claims are that the Efimov spectra and three-body parameters in these systems are universal even when the dipole interaction is comparable in strength to the van der Waals interaction; that the fermionic spectra show a universal doublet whose ratio a_-^(M_z=0)/a_-^(M_z=±1) is universal, especially for large mass imbalance; and that quantitative predictions can be made for Er-Li and Dy-Li isotopes (Tables I and II).

Significance. If the universality claims hold, this would constitute a substantial extension of Efimov universality to dipolar systems with strong anisotropic interactions, and the predicted doublet loss structure would be a clear, falsifiable experimental signature. The paper's strengths include a well-documented numerical method with stated convergence errors (<0.5% for most quantities, up to 4% near avoided crossings), a derivable analytical first-order formula (Eq. (7)) that is free of fitted parameters, systematic tests of universality by varying R_min and reexpressing it in terms of the quantum defect K_c, and the availability of the code on Zenodo (Ref. [81]). The quantitative predictions for excited Efimov states are valuable because they are tied to concrete isotope parameters. However, the significance is moderated by the paper's own demonstration that the ground Efimov state deviates substantially from the zero-range universal relations, and by the zero-range assumption for the heavy-light interaction being least secure in precisely the regime that experiments access.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. IV (Conclusion)] The unqualified claim that "the Efimov spectra and hence the three-body parameters are universal" is too strong in light of the paper's own results. Section III B (Fig. 2) shows that the ground Efimov state deviates from the zero-range universal value κ*a_− by up to ~15% (and more for 168Er-6Li in Table I, where κ*a_− ≈ -5.0 to -5.3 instead of -4.3), and Sec. III C (Fig. 4(i)(j)) shows that the fermionic ratio a_-^(0)/a_-^(±1) drops sharply with K_c for the ground state, so that only an upper bound can be given. Since cold-atom experiments most easily observe the ground or first excited state, the abstract should explicitly state that the claimed universality is established for the highly excited states and holds only to a limited degree for the ground Efimov state.
  2. [Sec. III D, Tables I and II] The quantitative predictions for the ground Efimov state rest on the zero-range heavy-light contact interaction of Eq. (2) and are internally flagged by the authors themselves as uncertain when κ* ≳ 0.5 r_vdw^-1 and |a_-| ≲ 10 r_vdw. Table I shows that the bosonic ground states in Er-Li and Dy-Li satisfy these inequalities (κ*r_vdw ≈ 0.3–0.6 and |a_-|/r_vdw ≈ 5–13), so the most experimentally relevant states lie in the regime where finite-range heavy-light corrections are non-negligible. The paper should either provide an estimate of the finite-range correction (e.g., through an effective-range model or a two-channel calculation) or explicitly mark the ground-state rows of Tables I and II as provisional and outside the strictly universal regime.
  3. [Sec. III C, Eq. (7) and Sec. III D] The universal formula in Eq. (7) is derived assuming R_min ≪ r_vdw and first-order perturbation theory, and the paper concedes that this formula breaks down for Dy-Li (where the M_z=±1 energy becomes positive) and for the ground state of Er-Li. Nevertheless, Eq. (7) is used in Table II to quote central values for the Er-Li ratio with a claimed 10–15% accuracy. This accuracy estimate is based on agreement for the first and second excited states; it does not cover the ground state, for which only an upper bound is given. The presentation would be more accurate if the table clearly separated the ground-state upper bound from the excited-state universal ranges, since the current wording in Sec. III D conflates them.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III A, Fig. 1 caption] The caption lists R_min values as "(a) 0.272 rvdw, (b) 0.2641, (b) 0.27, (d) 0.2597"; the third entry should likely read "(c)".
  2. [Sec. III A] The word "regarderd" is a typo; it should be "regarded".
  3. [Sec. III D] The phrase "theoriacl model" is a typo; it should be "theoretical model".
  4. [Sec. III B and Fig. 2] The text refers to the universal zero-range values as "black-dotted lines" while the Fig. 2 caption calls them "black dashed lines"; please unify the notation.
  5. [Eq. (5)] The formula after the "≃" symbol contains stray characters and is presented as "− 1/ tan h 2r2 vdw R2 min − π 4 i"; this should be the standard expression for the tangent, e.g., −1/\tan(2 r_vdw^2/R_min^2 - π/4).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the universality claims are supported by independent numerical solution of the Born-Oppenheimer model, not by fitting or self-referential definition.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain from Eqs. (1)-(2) through the universality tests and the perturbative splitting formula. The model is the standard Born-Oppenheimer potential with zero-range heavy-light interaction, taken from Ref. [47] and earlier work; adopting it is a modeling choice, not a circular step. Universality is tested by varying R_min and reexpressing the short-range condition through the quantum-defect parameter K_c via Eq. (5); the collapse of the numerical spectra onto K_c-dependent curves (Figs. 2-4) is a genuine numerical check rather than an assumed result. The perturbative energy splitting, Eq. (6), and its R_min-independent large-mass-imbalance limit, Eqs. (7)-(8), are derived in Appendix A from the unperturbed wavefunction, not fitted to the dipole-split energies. The ratio a_-^{Mz=0}/a_-^{Mz=±1} is then obtained either directly from the numerical solution or from the derived formula supplemented by the standard zero-range universal value kappa*a_- = -7.81; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citation of Ref. [47] is used as a foundation for the wavefunction and the R_min-K_c relation, but the paper's central numerical results do not reduce to that citation: the universality claim stands on the new variable-a^(HL) calculations. The finite-range caveat in Sec. III D is an acknowledged limitation and a correctness risk, not a circularity. None of the seven circularity patterns is exhibited with a quotable specific reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central physical content is carried by the model and the quantum-defect parameterization, not by invented entities. The only fitted parameter is R_min (or K_c), which is used both to test universality and to set the scale for isotope-specific predictions.

free parameters (1)
  • R_min (hard-wall cutoff / quantum defect K_c) = 0.25-0.40 r_vdw; specific values per isotope to reproduce a_HH
    The short-range cutoff is chosen to reproduce the background heavy-heavy scattering length a_HH for bosonic predictions (Sec. III D). In the universality scans, R_min is varied over 0.25-0.40 r_vdw and results are expressed in terms of K_c.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer approximation is quantitatively accurate for mass ratios M/m ~ 27.6 (Er-Li, Dy-Li)
    The Schrödinger equation for heavy-heavy relative motion uses V_BO induced by the light particle (Eq. (1)-(2)); non-adiabatic corrections are neglected.
  • domain assumption Heavy-heavy interaction is the sum of van der Waals -C6/r^6 and dipole C_dd(1-3cos^2θ)/r^3; heavy-light is zero-range with s-wave scattering length
    Model defined in Eq. (1)-(2); the zero-range approximation for the heavy-light interaction is a key assumption flagged in the paper's limitations.
  • domain assumption Short-range physics is described by a single hard-wall boundary condition at R_min, equivalent to a quantum defect K_c, and dipole interaction is negligible in determining K_c
    Sec. II and III C; used to parameterize universality. The paper justifies dipole neglect at r~R_min because dipole is at least 50 times weaker than vdW there.
  • domain assumption First-order perturbation theory for the dipole-induced energy splitting is valid
    Appendix A; used to derive Eq. (7)-(8). The paper shows it breaks down for Dy-Li (a_dd/r_vdw ~ 1.6).
  • domain assumption Zero-range universal relation κ*a_- = const holds for highly excited Efimov states
    Sec. III B; established zero-range Efimov theory, but the paper shows it fails for the ground state; used to convert κ* ratios to a_- ratios in Sec. III C/D.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Efimov spectra and fermionic doublets in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mixtures with van der Waals and dipole interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K6ZUCAXD

@misc{pith2026250607721,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Efimov spectra and fermionic doublets in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mixtures with van der Waals and dipole interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K6ZUCAXD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07721}
}
abstract

We study the Efimov states in highly mass-imbalanced three-body systems composed of two identical heavy atoms and one light atom, focusing on the Er-Er-Li and Dy-Dy-Li cold-atom mixtures with strong dipole-dipole interactions between the heavy atoms. By solving the Born-Oppenheimer equation for varying $s$-wave scattering lengths between the heavy and light atoms, we demonstrate for both bosonic and fermionic systems that the Efimov spectra and hence the three-body parameters are universal even with the dipole interaction comparable in strength to the van der Waals interaction. While the bosonic systems exhibit Efimov states only in the $M_z=0$ channel, the fermionic systems show a characteristic doublet of the Efimov states in the $M_z=0$ and $M_z = \pm 1$ channels due to the interplay of finite angular momentum and the anisotropy of the dipole interaction. Both numerical results and analytical formula obtained with the first-order perturbation show that the ratio of the three-body parameters between these two fermionic channels exhibits universality, particularly well in the limit of large mass imbalance. Leveraging this universality, we provide quantitative predictions for the values and ratios of the three-body parameters for experimentally relevant Er-Li and Dy-Li isotopes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07721 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Binding energy of the Efimov trimer as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy difference between the fermionic Efimov states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ratio of the three-body parameters as a function of the quantum defect parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Y. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Universal three-body physics for fermionic dipoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 233201 (2011)

    2011

  2. [81]

    Sch¨ afer, T

    F. Sch¨ afer, T. Fukuhara, S. Sugawa, Y. Takasu, and Y. Takahashi, Tools for quantum simulation with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Nature Reviews Physics2, 411 (2020)

    2020

  3. [1]

    rotating

    (a)(b)a dd = 0.86755... rvdw. (c)(d)a dd = 0.87054...rvdw. The left (right) panels are for negative (positive)K c, which should smoothly connect with each other atK c = 0. Blue cir- cles, green triangles, and open red rectangles are the numer- ical results for the ground, first excited, and second excited Efimov states (see Fig. 1(a)(c)), respectively. Bl...

  4. [2]

    Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys

    V. Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys. Lett. B33, 563 (1970)

    1970

  5. [3]

    Efimov, Energy levels of three resonantly interacting 12 particles, Nucl

    V. Efimov, Energy levels of three resonantly interacting 12 particles, Nucl. Phys. A210, 157 (1973)

    work page 1973

  6. [4]

    Naidon and S

    P. Naidon and S. Endo, Efimov physics: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 056001 (2017)

    2017

  7. [5]

    C. H. Greene, P. Giannakeas, and J. P´ erez-R ´ ıos, Univer- sal few-body physics and cluster formation, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [6]

    J. P. D’Incao, Few-body physics in resonantly interacting ultracold quantum gases, J. Phys. B51, 043001 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 82 references
  1. [7]

    Braaten and H.-W

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Universality in few-body systems with large scattering length, Phys. Rep.428, 259 (2006)

    2006

  2. [8]

    Kunitski, S

    M. Kunitski, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, A. Kalinin, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Sch¨ offler, A. Czasch, W. Sch¨ ollkopf, R. E. Grisenti, T. Jahnke, et al., Observation of the Efi- mov state of the helium trimer, Science348, 551 (2015)

    2015

  3. [9]

    T. K. Lim, S. K. Duffy, and W. C. Damer, Efimov state in the 4He trimer, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 341 (1977)

    1977

  4. [10]

    H. W. Hammer and L. Platter, Efimov states in nuclear and particle physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 207 (2010)

    2010

  5. [11]

    D. Hove, E. Garrido, P. Sarriguren, D. V. Fedorov, H. O. U. Fynbo, A. S. Jensen, and N. T. Zinner, Emer- gence of clusters: Halos, Efimov states, and experimental signals, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 052502 (2018)

    2018

  6. [12]

    Hammer, C

    H. Hammer, C. Ji, and D. Phillips, Effective field theory description of halo nuclei, J. Phys. G44, 103002 (2017)

    2017

  7. [13]

    Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars

    F. Hoyle, On nuclear reactions occuring in very hot stars. I. the synthesis of elements from carbon to nickel., As- trophys. J. Suppl. Ser.1, 121 (1954)

    1954

  8. [14]

    Kraemer, M

    T. Kraemer, M. Mark, P. Waldburger, J. G. Danzl, C. Chin, B. Engeser, A. D. Lange, K. Pilch, A. Jaakkola, H. C. N¨ agerl, and R. Grimm, Evidence for Efimov quan- tum states in an ultracold gas of Cesium atoms, Nature 440, 315 (2006)

    2006

  9. [15]

    Inouye, M

    S. Inouye, M. R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H. J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Observation of Feshbach resonances in a Bose–Einstein condensate, Na- ture392, 151 (1998)

    1998

  10. [16]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Fesh- bach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  11. [17]

    Berninger, A

    M. Berninger, A. Zenesini, B. Huang, W. Harm, H. C. N¨ agerl, F. Ferlaino, R. Grimm, P. S. Julienne, and J. M. Hutson, Universality of the three-body parameter for Efi- mov states in ultracold Cesium, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 120401 (2011)

    2011

  12. [18]

    Gross, Z

    N. Gross, Z. Shotan, O. Machtey, S. Kokkelmans, and L. Khaykovich, Study of Efimov physics in two nuclear- spin sublevels of 7Li, Compt. Rend. Phys.12, 4 (2011)

    2011

  13. [19]

    Naidon, S

    P. Naidon, S. Endo, and M. Ueda, Physical origin of the universal three-body parameter in atomic Efimov physics, Phys. Rev. A90, 022106 (2014)

    2014

  14. [20]

    Naidon, S

    P. Naidon, S. Endo, and M. Ueda, Microscopic origin and universality classes of the Efimov three-body parameter, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 105301 (2014)

    2014

  15. [21]

    J. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, B. D. Esry, and C. H. Greene, Origin of the three-body parameter universality in Efi- mov physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 263001 (2012)

    2012

  16. [22]

    Y. Wang, J. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Universal three-body parameter in heteronuclear atomic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 243201 (2012)

    2012

  17. [23]

    H¨ afner, J

    S. H¨ afner, J. Ulmanis, E. D. Kuhnle, Y. Wang, C. H. Greene, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Role of the intraspecies scattering length in the Efimov scenario with large mass difference, Phys. Rev. A95, 062708 (2017)

    2017

  18. [24]

    S. Roy, M. Landini, A. Trenkwalder, G. Semeghini, G. Spagnolli, A. Simoni, M. Fattori, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Test of the universality of the three-body Efimov parameter at narrow Feshbach resonances, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 053202 (2013)

    2013

  19. [25]

    Chapurin, X

    R. Chapurin, X. Xie, M. J. Van de Graaff, J. S. Popowski, J. P. D’Incao, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Precision test of the limits to universality in few-body physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 233402 (2019)

    2019

  20. [26]

    X. Xie, M. J. Van de Graaff, R. Chapurin, M. D. Frye, J. M. Hutson, J. P. D’Incao, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, and E. A. Cornell, Observation of Efimov universality across a non-universal Feshbach resonance in 39K, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 243401 (2020)

    2020

  21. [27]

    Johansen, B

    J. Johansen, B. DeSalvo, K. Patel, and C. Chin, Testing universality of Efimov physics across broad and narrow Feshbach resonances, Nature Physics13, 731 (2017)

    2017

  22. [28]

    Schmidt, S

    R. Schmidt, S. P. Rath, and W. Zwerger, Efimov physics beyond universality, Eur. Phys. J. B85, 1 (2012)

    2012

  23. [29]

    Secker, D

    T. Secker, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, P. M. A. Mestrom, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Multichannel effects in the Efimov regime from broad to narrow Feshbach reso- nances, Phys. Rev. A103, 052805 (2021)

    2021

  24. [30]

    D. S. Petrov, Three-boson problem near a narrow Fesh- bach resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 143201 (2004)

    2004

  25. [31]

    A. O. Gogolin, C. Mora, and R. Egger, Analytical solu- tion of the bosonic three-body problem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 140404 (2008)

    2008

  26. [32]

    P. K. Sørensen, D. V. Fedorov, A. S. Jensen, and N. T. Zinner, Efimov physics and the three-body param- eter within a two-channel framework, Phys. Rev. A86, 052516 (2012)

    2012

  27. [33]

    van de Kraats, D

    J. van de Kraats, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, J.-L. Li, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Efimovian three-body po- tential from broad to narrow Feshbach resonances, Phys. Rev. A107, 023301 (2023)

    2023

  28. [34]

    van de Kraats, D

    J. van de Kraats, D. J. M. Ahmed-Braun, J.-L. Li, and S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, Emergent inflation of the Efimov spectrum under three-body spin-exchange inter- actions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 133402 (2024)

    2024

  29. [35]

    D. S. Petrov, Three-body problem in Fermi gases with short-range interparticle interaction, Phys. Rev. A67, 010703 (2003)

    2003

  30. [36]

    D. S. Petrov, C. Salomon, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Weakly bound dimers of fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 090404 (2004)

    2004

  31. [37]

    H. Hara, Y. Takasu, Y. Yamaoka, J. M. Doyle, and Y. Takahashi, Quantum degenerate mixtures of alkali and alkaline-earth-like atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 205304 (2011)

    2011

  32. [38]

    Sch¨ afer, H

    F. Sch¨ afer, H. Konishi, A. Bouscal, T. Yagami, and Y. Takahashi, Spectroscopic determination of magnetic- field-dependent interactions in an ultracold Yb( 3p2)-Li mixture, Phys. Rev. A96, 032711 (2017)

    2017

  33. [39]

    W. Dowd, R. J. Roy, R. K. Shrestha, A. Petrov, C. Makrides, S. Kotochigova, and S. Gupta, Magnetic field dependent interactions in an ultracold Li–Yb( 3p2) mixture, New J. Phys.17, 055007 (2015)

    2015

  34. [40]

    Green, H

    A. Green, H. Li, J. H. See Toh, X. Tang, K. C. McCormick, M. Li, E. Tiesinga, S. Kotochigova, and S. Gupta, Feshbach resonances inp-wave three-body re- combination within Fermi-Fermi mixtures of open-shell 6Li and closed-shell 173Yb atoms, Phys. Rev. X10, 13 031037 (2020)

    2020

  35. [41]

    Sch¨ afer, N

    F. Sch¨ afer, N. Mizukami, and Y. Takahashi, Feshbach res- onances of large-mass-imbalance Er-Li mixtures, Phys. Rev. A105, 012816 (2022)

    2022

  36. [42]

    Sch¨ afer, Y

    F. Sch¨ afer, Y. Haruna, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of Feshbach resonances in an 167Er-6Li Fermi-Fermi mix- ture, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.92, 054301 (2023)

    2023

  37. [43]

    Kalia, J

    J. Kalia, J. Rivera, R. R. Emran, W. J. S. Hernandez, K. Kwon, and R. J. Fletcher, Creation of a degenerate Bose-Bose mixture of erbium and lithium atoms (2025), arXiv:2506.00177

    2025

  38. [44]

    K. Xie, X. Li, Y.-Y. Zhou, J.-H. Luo, S. Wang, Y.-Z. Nie, H.-C. Shen, Y.-A. Chen, X.-C. Yao, and J.-W. Pan, Feshbach spectroscopy of ultracold mixtures of 6Li and 164Dy atoms, Phys. Rev. A111, 023327 (2025)

    2025

  39. [45]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a review of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys.86, 026401 (2022)

    2022

  40. [46]

    Y. Wang, J. P. D’Incao, and C. H. Greene, Efimov effect for three interacting bosonic dipoles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 233201 (2011)

    2011

  41. [48]

    K. Oi, P. Naidon, and S. Endo, Universality of Efi- mov states in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mix- tures with van der Waals and dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. A110, 033305 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    Ticknor, C

    C. Ticknor, C. A. Regal, D. S. Jin, and J. L. Bohn, Mul- tiplet structure of Feshbach resonances in nonzero partial waves, Phys. Rev. A69, 042712 (2004)

    2004

  43. [50]

    Zhang, E

    J. Zhang, E. G. M. van Kempen, T. Bourdel, L. Khaykovich, J. Cubizolles, F. Chevy, M. Teichmann, L. Tarruell, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, and C. Salomon, p-wave Feshbach resonances of ultracold 6Li, Phys. Rev. A70, 030702 (2004)

    2004

  44. [51]

    C. H. Schunck, M. W. Zwierlein, C. A. Stan, S. M. F. Raupach, W. Ketterle, A. Simoni, E. Tiesinga, C. J. Williams, and P. S. Julienne, Feshbach resonances in fermionic 6Li, Phys. Rev. A71, 045601 (2005)

    2005

  45. [52]

    Nakasuji, J

    T. Nakasuji, J. Yoshida, and T. Mukaiyama, Experimen- tal determination ofp-wave scattering parameters in ul- tracold 6Li atoms, Phys. Rev. A88, 012710 (2013)

    2013

  46. [53]

    J. W. Park, C.-H. Wu, I. Santiago, T. G. Tiecke, S. Will, P. Ahmadi, and M. W. Zwierlein, Quantum degener- ate Bose-Fermi mixture of chemically different atomic species with widely tunable interactions, Phys. Rev. A 85, 051602 (2012)

    2012

  47. [54]

    Gerken, B

    M. Gerken, B. Tran, S. H¨ afner, E. Tiemann, B. Zhu, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Observation of dipolar splittings in high-resolution atom-loss spectroscopy of 6Lip-wave Feshbach resonances, Phys. Rev. A100, 050701 (2019)

    2019

  48. [55]

    Luciuk, S

    C. Luciuk, S. Trotzky, S. Smale, Z. Yu, S. Zhang, and J. H. Thywissen, Evidence for universal relations describ- ing a gas withp-wave interactions, Nature Physics12, 599 (2016)

    2016

  49. [56]

    S. Peng, S. Peng, L. Ren, S. Liu, B. Liu, J. Li, and L. Luo, Precision measurement of spin-dependent dipolar split- ting in 6Lip-wave feshbach resonances, arXiv:2505.22409 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Soave, V

    E. Soave, V. Corre, C. Ravensbergen, J. Han, M. Kreyer, E. Kirilov, and R. Grimm, Low-field Feshbach resonances and three-body losses in a fermionic quantum gas of 161Dy, Ukrainian Journal of Physics67, 334 (2022)

    2022

  51. [58]

    A. C. Fonseca, E. F. Redish, and P. Shanley, Efimov effect in an analytically solvable model, Nucl. Phys. A320, 273 (1979)

    1979

  52. [59]

    Gao, Solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation for an at- tractive 1/r6 potential, Phys

    B. Gao, Solutions of the Schr¨ odinger equation for an at- tractive 1/r6 potential, Phys. Rev. A58, 1728 (1998)

    1998

  53. [60]

    Gao, Angular-momentum-insensitive quantum-defect theory for diatomic systems, Phys

    B. Gao, Angular-momentum-insensitive quantum-defect theory for diatomic systems, Phys. Rev. A64, 010701 (2001)

    2001

  54. [61]

    Gao, General form of the quantum-defect theory for −1/rα type of potentials withα >2, Phys

    B. Gao, General form of the quantum-defect theory for −1/rα type of potentials withα >2, Phys. Rev. A78, 012702 (2008)

    2008

  55. [62]

    O. I. Kartavtsev and A. V. Malykh, Low-energy three- body dynamics in binary quantum gases, J. Phys. B40, 1429 (2007)

    2007

  56. [63]

    S. Endo, P. Naidon, and M. Ueda, Universal physics of 2+1 particles with non-zero angular momentum, Few- Body Systems51, 207 (2011)

    2011

  57. [64]

    J. Bohn, M. Cavagnero, and C. Ticknor, Quasi-universal dipolar scattering in cold and ultracold gases, New J. Phys.11, 055039 (2009)

    2009

  58. [65]

    Pires, J

    R. Pires, J. Ulmanis, S. H¨ afner, M. Repp, A. Arias, E. D. Kuhnle, and M. Weidem¨ uller, Observation of Efimov res- onances in a mixture with extreme mass imbalance, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 250404 (2014)

    2014

  59. [66]

    S.-K. Tung, K. Jim´ enez-Garc ´ ıa, J. Johansen, C. V. Parker, and C. Chin, Geometric scaling of Efimov states in a 6Li−133Cs mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 240402 (2014)

    2014

  60. [67]

    R. A. W. Maier, M. Eisele, E. Tiemann, and C. Zim- mermann, Efimov resonance and three-body parameter in a Lithium-Rubidium mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 043201 (2015)

    2015

  61. [68]

    T. B. Ottenstein, T. Lompe, M. Kohnen, A. N. Wenz, and S. Jochim, Collisional stability of a three-component degenerate Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 203202 (2008)

    2008

  62. [69]

    J. R. Williams, E. L. Hazlett, J. H. Huckans, R. W. Stites, Y. Zhang, and K. M. O’Hara, Evidence for an excited-state Efimov trimer in a three-component Fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 130404 (2009)

    2009

  63. [70]

    Nakajima, M

    S. Nakajima, M. Horikoshi, T. Mukaiyama, P. Naidon, and M. Ueda, Nonuniversal Efimov atom-dimer reso- nances in a three-component mixture of 6Li, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 023201 (2010)

    2010

  64. [71]

    Huang, L

    B. Huang, L. A. Sidorenkov, R. Grimm, and J. M. Hut- son, Observation of the second triatomic resonance in Efimov’s scenario, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 190401 (2014)

    2014

  65. [72]

    Maier, H

    T. Maier, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, I. Ferrier- Barbut, T. Pfau, A. Frisch, S. Baier, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark, F. Ferlaino, C. Makrides, E. Tiesinga, A. Petrov, and S. Kotochigova, Emergence of chaotic scattering in ultracold Er and Dy, Phys. Rev. X5, 041029 (2015)

    2015

  66. [73]

    Patscheider, L

    A. Patscheider, L. Chomaz, G. Natale, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, S. Baier, B. Yang, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, and F. Ferlaino, Determination of the scattering length of erbium atoms, Phys. Rev. A105, 063307 (2022)

    2022

  67. [74]

    A. N. Zulli, B. C. Mulkerin, M. M. Parish, and J. Levin- sen, Universal Efimov scaling in the Rabi-coupled few- body spectrum, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 053401 (2025)

    2025

  68. [75]

    Deb and L

    B. Deb and L. You, Low-energy atomic collision with dipole interactions, Phys. Rev. A64, 022717 (2001)

    2001

  69. [76]

    Kanjilal and D

    K. Kanjilal and D. Blume, Low-energy resonances and 14 bound states of aligned bosonic and fermionic dipoles, Phys. Rev. A78, 040703 (2008)

    2008

  70. [77]

    Wang and C

    Y. Wang and C. H. Greene, Universal bound and scatter- ing properties for two dipoles, Phys. Rev. A85, 022704 (2012)

    2012

  71. [78]

    Otsuka, T

    T. Otsuka, T. Suzuki, R. Fujimoto, H. Grawe, and Y. Akaishi, Evolution of nuclear shells due to the ten- sor force, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 232502 (2005)

    2005

  72. [79]

    Tanihata, H

    I. Tanihata, H. Savajols, and R. Kanungo, Recent exper- imental progress in nuclear halo structure studies, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.68, 215 (2013)

    2013

  73. [80]

    S. Endo, E. Epelbaum, P. Naidon, Y. Nishida, K. Sekiguchi, and Y. Takahashi, Three-body forces and Efimov physics in nuclei and atoms, Eur. Phys. J. A (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    Oi and S

    K. Oi and S. Endo, Universal Efimov spectra and fermionic doublets in highly mass-imbalanced cold-atom mixtures with van der Waals and dipole interactions, 10.5281/zenodo.16757623 (2025)

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.