Long-wavelength density response and momentum resolution in strange-metal charge spectroscopy

Ilmo Sung

Long-wavelength density response and momentum resolution in strange-metal charge spectroscopy

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Charge conservation forces a metal's long-wavelength density response to vanish as q², and self-similar momentum-resolution averaging cannot change that.

desk verdict A correctly proved but narrowly scoped theorem: q-scaled momentum averaging preserves the q^2 Ward asymptotics, but the Bi-2212 conclusion depends on whether real EELS resolution is actually q-scaled. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21206 v1 pith:K7JBQLKY submitted 2026-07-23 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

Ilmo Sung This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con

keywords Wardidentitychargeconservationdensityresponseopticalconductivitymomentum-resolvedEELSstrangemetalBi-2212crossoverscale

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves a general constraint on the charge-density response of metals. As long as a homogeneous metal conserves charge and has a finite long-wavelength optical conductivity, its proper bulk density spectral weight must vanish as q² at fixed nonzero frequency. The new result is that this q² law survives a broad class of momentum-resolution averaging: any nonnegative, self-similar kernel whose width shrinks with the nominal momentum only rescales the prefactor. Consequently, the nearly momentum-independent charge continuum seen in momentum-resolved EELS on the strange metal Bi-2212 cannot be an asymptotic long-wavelength property of the bulk response. It must be a finite-momentum preasymptotic regime connected to the conserved optical regime by a crossover surface q*(ω,T), which is the experimentally useful prediction.

What carries the argument

The central objects are (1) the proper homogeneous bulk charge-density polarization χ''_bulk, the irreducible density response entering the longitudinal dielectric function before Coulomb self-consistency, and (2) the Ward identity χ''_bulk(q,ω)=q² Reσ_L(q,ω)/ω, which links the dissipative density spectrum to the longitudinal matter conductivity. The paper's new mechanism is the momentum-resolution theorem: for any nonnegative, normalized, self-similar q-scaled kernel with bounded second moment and tight tails, convolution with χ''_bulk preserves the leading q² power, changing only the angular prefactor C(q̂). This is what rules out resolution-based explanations of a q⁰ continuum.

What would settle it

Measure the proper bulk charge-density spectral weight directly (e.g., via transmission EELS with careful electrodynamic inversion) in a homogeneous metal with finite optical conductivity, and look at fixed nonzero frequency: if χ''(q,ω) tends to a nonzero constant as q→0 while Reσ_L remains finite, the Ward identity is violated. Conversely, a demonstration of a q-scaled resolution kernel satisfying the theorem's hypotheses that nonetheless produces a q⁰ measured spectrum would disprove the proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For any homogeneous U(1)-conserving metal whose longitudinal matter conductivity remains finite as q→0 at fixed nonzero frequency, the Ward identity in combination with the continuity equation gives χ''(q,ω)=q² Reσ_L(q,ω)/ω. The paper then proves a momentum-resolution theorem: if the measured signal is a positive convolution of this proper bulk response with a normalized kernel of the form K_{q,q̂}(Q)=q^{-2} k_{q̂}((Q−q q̂)/q) — i.e., a self-similar momentum-resolution profile whose width scales with q — satisfying a uniform second-moment bound and tight tails, then the measured spectral weight still obeys χ''_meas(q q̂,ω)=q² C(q̂) S(ω)+o(q²), with C(q̂)=∫d²x |q̂+x|² k_{q̂}(x). Fixed absolut

Load-bearing premise

The theorem applies only if the measured finite-q EELS signal, after electrodynamic conversion, is a positive convolution of the proper homogeneous bulk density response — not a surface loss, a fixed out-of-plane momentum component, or a screened Coulomb effect — and if the q→0 longitudinal conductivity equals the in-plane optical conductivity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The apparent contradiction between metallic optical conductivity and the nearly q-independent EELS continuum in Bi-2212 is resolved by a crossover, not by a local (q⁰) bulk density response.
Any claim of a q⁰ proper density continuum in a homogeneous conserved metal with finite optical conductivity requires the longitudinal conductivity to diverge as q^{-2}, which is testable.
Momentum-resolution corrections with q-scaled width cannot rescue a q⁰ interpretation; instead, resolution effects must be fixed-width to explain flattening, which predicts a crossover tied to an absolute momentum scale.
The crossover surface q*(ω,T) can be measured and compared with Eq. (33), providing a quantitative test of whether the finite-q continuum is the preasymptotic regime of the optical metal.
The theorem applies only to proper bulk density response (or positive q-scaled convolutions), so surface-loss or screened-loss interpretations must first be converted before the q² constraint is imposed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the observed continuum in Bi-2212 is a genuine finite-momentum property, the crossover scale q*(ω,T) may track the same energy-temperature scaling seen in optical conductivity, allowing a direct check of strange-metal scaling hypotheses.
The theorem suggests a sharp experimental protocol: acquire EELS spectra while deliberately varying the momentum resolution width; if the low-q spectrum stays flat even when the resolution is scaled down with q, that would point to an intrinsic preasymptotic regime rather than resolution.
The same Ward constraint may apply to other layered bad metals where overdamped versus propagating plasmons are debated, provided the bulk longitudinal conductivity is regular in the q→0 limit.
The mathematical structure — q² suppression invariant under self-similar smearing — may connect to scaling arguments in quantum-critical theories, though the paper itself does not draw that link.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

This is a clean, honest theory paper, and the central lemma is real: for any nonnegative momentum-resolution kernel whose width scales with nominal q, with bounded second moment and tight tails, the q^2 Ward-identity asymptotics of the proper bulk density response survive up to a prefactor. The proof in Appendix C is complete, and the paper is unusually careful about the difference between the proper bulk response, screened loss functions, and surface EELS observables. It also flags in Sec. 5 that a fixed absolute Delta-q kernel is a different animal and can produce a flat continuum from a q^2 bulk response. That is not buried; it is right there.

The genuinely new piece is the momentum-resolution invariance theorem and the crossover-surface framing q*(omega,T). The Ward identity itself is textbook, and the paper says so. The crossover formula is a matching definition, not a predictive derivation, and it is presented as such. No data are fit, no self-citations prop up the claim. Credit where it is due.

The soft spot, as you might guess, is the transfer to Bi-2212. The theorem applies to the proper bulk response convolved with a q-scaled kernel. Real EELS momentum resolution is set by detector aperture and beam geometry, essentially a fixed absolute Delta-q, not a width proportional to q. The paper acknowledges this and explicitly excludes fixed-width kernels from the theorem, but the consequence is that the "nearly local continuum in Bi-2212 must be a finite-q preasymptotic regime" holds only if the experimental resolution is actually q-scaled, or if the electrodynamic conversion yields a q-scaled positive convolution of the proper bulk response. The paper does not establish either condition for the M-EELS setups it cites. The fixed-width toy model in Eq. (30) shows how a flat continuum can arise trivially, without any intrinsic crossover q*(omega,T). So the experimental punchline is more conditional than the abstract suggests.

That does not sink the paper. The theorem is what it says it is, and the paper is honest about the limits. The fixed-width case is not a counterexample; it is outside the theorem's scope. The remaining question is how much of the experimentally observed continuum in real measurements is captured by the q-scaled model. That is an empirical matter, and the paper does not resolve it.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee and is publishable after the authors make the scope limitations more prominent, perhaps in the abstract, and either find evidence that the relevant EELS resolution is q-scaled or soften the Bi-2212 conclusion to "if the resolution is q-scaled." I would cite it for the lemma, not for the cuprate conclusion.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives the Ward-identity constraint for a homogeneous, U(1)-conserving metal: at fixed nonzero frequency, the proper bulk charge-density spectral function satisfies χ''_bulk(q,ω) = q² Reσ_L(q,ω)/ω, hence χ''_bulk = q² S(ω) + o(q²) when the longitudinal conductivity has a regular optical limit. The central new result is a momentum-resolution theorem (Sec. 4, Appendix C): any nonnegative, normalized convolution kernel of the self-similar q-scaled form K_{q,q̂}(Q) = q^{-2} k_{q̂}((Q−q q̂)/q), with uniformly bounded second moment and tight tails, preserves the q² leading power law and only renormalizes the angular prefactor. The paper contrasts this with fixed absolute momentum broadening, which can produce a flat plateau (Eq. (30) and Fig. 1, right panel). It then applies the constraint to Bi-2212, arguing that a nearly local finite-q continuum, if connected to a regular metallic optical limit of the same proper bulk response, must be described by a crossover surface q*(ω,T), with a phenomenological matching formula (Eq. (33)) and illustrative scaling estimates.

Significance. The theorem is a clean and useful clarification: it shows that positive, q-scaled momentum averaging cannot convert the conserved q² suppression into a q⁰ local continuum, and it explicitly separates this statement from fixed-width resolution effects, screened loss functions, and surface electrodynamics. The proof in Appendix C is complete and self-contained, and the paper carefully maintains the distinction between the proper bulk density response and measured EELS observables. The crossover formula is honestly presented as a matching definition rather than a derived prediction, and no overclaim is made. The main limitation is that the experimental relevance to Bi-2212 is conditional on the momentum-resolution kernel being q-scaled and on a successful electrodynamic conversion to the proper bulk response; these conditions are clearly stated but not established for the cited experiments. This limits the strength of the experimental conclusion but does not affect the theorem.

minor comments (3)

[Sec. 8] The Bi-2212 discussion lists reported momentum scales as 'empirical candidates' for q*. It would help to state explicitly in this section that the M-EELS setups of Refs. [9,10,21] have not been shown to satisfy the q-scaled kernel assumption, and that a fixed absolute momentum resolution (Eq. (30)) provides an alternative way to produce a flat continuum outside the theorem. The paper does make this point in Secs. 5 and 9, but a one-sentence reminder at the point of application would prevent misreading.
[Sec. 4 / Eq. (19)] The ultraviolet domination condition (19) is stated for all Q in R². For a lattice system the physical response is Brillouin-zone periodic, as the text notes. It would be cleaner to state the theorem directly on the periodic domain or to define the replacements for the compact-domain case, since the current wording requires the reader to interpolate between the continuum statement and the lattice application.
[Sec. 5 / Fig. 1] The fixed-Δq benchmark in the right panel is labeled 'heuristic', which is appropriate. Consider adding a sentence in the caption clarifying that this benchmark is not a counterexample to the theorem but an illustration of a different physical limit, so that the two panels are not read as competing predictions for the same experimental setup.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Ward-identity theorem and momentum-resolution proof are self-contained; the crossover scale is explicitly a matching definition, not a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a self-contained mathematical argument. Equation (8) is derived exactly from the continuity equation and longitudinal Ohm law (Eqs. 1–6) and depends only on the stated regularity of Re σ_L. The momentum-resolution Proposition (Eqs. 13–20) is proved in Appendix C from the kernel hypotheses; the conclusion does not appear among the assumptions. The Gaussian corollary and fixed-width benchmark are computed explicitly. The crossover formula Eq. (33) is explicitly called a 'phenomenological matching estimate' and is a definition of q* once the asymptotic and finite-q regimes are identified, not a prediction extracted from the theorem. No parameters are fitted and no self-citations are load-bearing. The experimental conclusions are explicitly conditional: raw loss functions and surface EELS require electrodynamic conversion, and fixed absolute Δq kernels are excluded from the theorem ('The theorem applies to the left-hand class of models; the fixed-Δq comparison is heuristic'). Such caveats are applicability limitations, not circularity. No circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core theorem carries no free parameters; its inputs are the standard conservation/linear-response hypotheses plus explicit technical kernel conditions. The only hand-chosen quantities are phenomenological exponents in the illustrative q*(ω) scaling (Sec. 7) and the arbitrary Gaussian width ratio in the corollary. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)

α (finite-q continuum frequency exponent) = 0 (illustrative)
Appears in Eq. (34)-(37); assumed frequency-flat continuum in the example q* ∝ ω^{5/6}. Not measured in this paper.
β (optical conductivity frequency exponent) = 2/3 (representative, from Refs. [19,20])
Used in Eq. (36) to obtain q* ∝ ω^{5/6}; illustrative input, not fitted.
ν and β_σ (finite-temperature scaling exponents) = unspecified
Appear in Eqs. (38)-(40) for the T-dependent crossover; purely formal scaling assumptions.
σ (q-scaled Gaussian resolution width ratio) = 0.8 in Fig. 1; arbitrary
In corollary Eq. (27)-(29), σ sets the prefactor C=1+2σ² but does not affect the q² law. It is a model parameter, not fitted.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Continuity equation ∂_t ρ + ∇·J = 0 for matter charge and current.
Used in Eq. (2)/(41) to derive Ward identity; standard conservation law.
domain assumption The proper bulk charge polarization χ^R_ρρ is the response to the total scalar potential and is related to the longitudinal matter conductivity by Kubo linear-response conventions.
Defines the constrained object in Sec. 2 and Appendix A; standard but convention-dependent.
domain assumption Local-electrodynamic identification: regular q→0 longitudinal conductivity equals the in-plane optical conductivity.
Stated in Sec. 1: 'This identification assumes the standard local-electrodynamic limit in which the regular longitudinal and transverse conductivities coincide as q→0 at fixed nonzero frequency.' This connects the theorem to optics but can fail in principle.
domain assumption Fixed-frequency order of limits: ω>0 fixed, then q→0; excludes static/Drude/superfluid and diffusive scaling paths.
Sec. 2 and Sec. 3.1; the theorem is not a statement about hydrodynamic or static response.
ad hoc to paper Momentum-resolution kernel is nonnegative, normalized, q-scaled, with bounded second moment and tight tails; and χ''_bulk satisfies the UV domination bound Eq. (19).
These are the explicit technical hypotheses of the Proposition in Sec. 4; not proved for any specific experimental setup.
domain assumption Measured EELS intensities can be converted to the proper bulk χ'' (or a positive q-scaled convolution of it) by an electrodynamic model.
Sec. 6 and Table 1: raw loss functions and surface/reflection EELS require an electrodynamic conversion before the theorem applies. The Bi-2212 conclusion depends on this premise.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Long-wavelength density response and momentum resolution in strange-metal charge spectroscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7JBQLKY

@misc{pith2026260721206,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Long-wavelength density response and momentum resolution in strange-metal charge spectroscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7JBQLKY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21206}
}

abstract

Momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) on strange-metal Bi$_2$Sr$_2$CaCu$_2$O$_{8+x}$ (Bi-2212) observes a broad charge continuum that is nearly momentum independent over an extended finite-momentum regime, whereas optical spectroscopy determines a metallic local conductivity. We analyze the long-wavelength response function that connects these regimes: the proper homogeneous bulk charge-density polarization. For any homogeneous $U(1)$-conserving metal whose longitudinal matter conductivity remains finite in the $q\to0$ limit at fixed nonzero frequency, the Ward identity gives $\chi''_{\rho\rho}({\bf q},\omega)=q^2\operatorname{Re}\sigma_L({\bf q},\omega)/\omega$. We then prove that any nonnegative normalized momentum-resolution kernel with a self-similar $q$-scaled profile, uniformly bounded second moment, and tight second-moment tails preserves this $q^2$ asymptotic behavior, changing only the prefactor. Consequently, a nearly local finite-$q$ continuum in Bi-2212, if continuously connected to a regular metallic optical limit of the same proper bulk response, is naturally described by a crossover surface $q_\ast(\omega,T)$. The theorem is a constraint on the proper bulk density response, or on a positive $q$-scaled convolution of it; screened loss functions and surface EELS observables require the corresponding electrodynamic conversion before the constraint is applied.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21206 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Schematic crossover implied by charge conservation. At fixed nonzero frequency and temperature, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

[1]

Long-wavelengthcollectiveexcitationsofchargecarriers in high-𝑇𝑐 superconductors,

N.Nücker,U.Eckern,J.Fink,andP.Müller,“Long-wavelengthcollectiveexcitationsofchargecarriers in high-𝑇𝑐 superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B44, 7155(R) (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7155

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.7155 1991
[2]

Determinationofaneffectiveone-electronspectrum from the plasmon dispersion of nearly optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8,

V.G.Grigoryan,G.Paasch,andS.-L.Drechsler,“Determinationofaneffectiveone-electronspectrum from the plasmon dispersion of nearly optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8,” Phys. Rev. B60, 1340–1348 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1340

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.1340 1999
[3]

Measurement of the dynamic charge response of materials using low-energy, momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (M- EELS),

S. Vig, A. Kogar, M. Mitrano, A. A. Husain, V. Mishra, M. S. Rak, L. Venema, P. D. Johnson, G. D. Gu, E. Fradkin, M. R. Norman, and P. Abbamonte, “Measurement of the dynamic charge response of materials using low-energy, momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (M- EELS),” SciPost Phys.3, 026 (2017), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.026

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.3.4.026 2017
[4]

Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal,

M. Mitrano, A. A. Husain, S. Vig, A. Kogar, M. S. Rak, S. I. Rubeck, J. Schmalian, B. Uchoa, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, “Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 5392–5396 (2018), doi:10.1073/pnas.1721495115

doi:10.1073/pnas.1721495115 2018
[5]

Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,

A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. S. Rak, S. I. Rubeck, B. Uchoa, K. March, C. Dwyer, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, “Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,” Phys. Rev. X9, 041062 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041062

doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041062 2019
[6]

Comment on: Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,

J. Fink, “Comment on: Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,” arXiv:2103.10268 (2021), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.10268

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10268 2021
[7]

Reply to arXiv:2103.10268: comment on Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,

A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. S. Rak, S. Rubeck, B. Uchoa, K. March, C. Dwyer, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, “Reply to arXiv:2103.10268: comment on Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,” arXiv:2106.03301 (2021), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2106.03301

arXiv 2021
[8]

Collectivechargeexcitationsstudiedbyelectronenergy-lossspectroscopy,

P.AbbamonteandJ.Fink,“Collectivechargeexcitationsstudiedbyelectronenergy-lossspectroscopy,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.16, 465–480 (2025), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822- 044125

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822- 2025

Show all 21 references

[9]

J. Chen, X. Guo, C. Boyd, S. Bettler, C. Kengle, D. Chaudhuri, F. Hoveyda, A. Husain, J. Schnee- loch, G. Gu, P. Phillips, B. Uchoa, T.-C. Chiang, and P. Abbamonte, “Consistency between reflec- tion momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy and optical spectroscopy m...

2024 doi
[10]

Reexamining the strange metal charge response with transmission inelastic electron scattering,

N. de Vries, E. Hoglund, D. Chaudhuri, S. H. Bae, J. Chen, X. Guo, D. Bałut, G. Gu, P. Huang, J. Hachtel, and P. Abbamonte, “Reexamining the strange metal charge response with transmission inelastic electron scattering,” Phys. Rev. B113, 235158 (2026), doi:10.1103/zp4x-r2jk

2026 doi
[11]

Optical and acoustic plasmons in the layered material Sr2RuO4,

J. Schultz, A. Lubk, F. Jerzembeck, N. Kikugawa, M. Knupfer, D. Wolf, B. Büchner, and J. Fink, “Optical and acoustic plasmons in the layered material Sr2RuO4,” Nat. Commun.16, 4287 (2025), doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58978-x

2025 doi
[12]

Comparative analysis of plasmon modes in layered Lindhard metals and strange metals,

N. de Vries, J. Chen, E. Hoglund, X. Guo, D. Chaudhuri, J. Hachtel, and P. Abbamonte, “Comparative analysis of plasmon modes in layered Lindhard metals and strange metals,” Phys. Rev. B112, 165145 (2025), doi:10.1103/39wl-mzly; see also arXiv:2507.17840. 16

2025 arXiv
[13]

Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and sim- ple applications to magnetic and conduction problems,

R. Kubo, “Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and sim- ple applications to magnetic and conduction problems,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.12, 570–586 (1957), doi:10.1143/JPSJ.12.570

1957 doi
[14]

A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971)

1971
[15]

G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physics, 3rd ed. (Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 2000)

2000
[16]

G. F. Giuliani and G. Vignale,Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005)

2005
[17]

R. F. Egerton,Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 2011), doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9583-4

2011 doi
[18]

D.Forster,HydrodynamicFluctuations,BrokenSymmetry,andCorrelationFunctions(W.A.Benjamin, Reading, MA, 1975)

1975
[19]

Quantum critical behaviour in a high-𝑇𝑐 superconductor,

D. van der Marel, H. J. A. Molegraaf, J. Zaanen, Z. Nussinov, F. Carbone, A. Damascelli, H. Eisaki, M. Greven, P. H. Kes, and M. Li, “Quantum critical behaviour in a high-𝑇𝑐 superconductor,” Nature 425, 271–274 (2003), doi:10.1038/nature01978

2003 doi
[20]

Scaling properties of the optical conductivityofBi-basedcuprates,

D. van der Marel, F. Carbone, A. B. Kuzmenko, and E. Giannini, “Scaling properties of the optical conductivityofBi-basedcuprates,”Ann.Phys.321,1716–1729(2006),doi:10.1016/j.aop.2006.04.012

2006 doi
[21]

Conformally invariant charge fluctuations in a strange metal,

X. Guo, J. Chen, F. Hoveyda-Marashi, S. L. Bettler, D. Chaudhuri, C. S. Kengle, J. A. Schnee- loch, R. Zhang, G. Gu, T.-C. Chiang, A. M. Tsvelik, T. Faulkner, P. W. Phillips, and P. Abba- monte, “Conformally invariant charge fluctuations in a strange metal,” arXiv:2411.11164 (...

2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Long-wavelengthcollectiveexcitationsofchargecarriers in high-𝑇𝑐 superconductors,

N.Nücker,U.Eckern,J.Fink,andP.Müller,“Long-wavelengthcollectiveexcitationsofchargecarriers in high-𝑇𝑐 superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B44, 7155(R) (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7155

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.44.7155 1991

[2] [2]

Determinationofaneffectiveone-electronspectrum from the plasmon dispersion of nearly optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8,

V.G.Grigoryan,G.Paasch,andS.-L.Drechsler,“Determinationofaneffectiveone-electronspectrum from the plasmon dispersion of nearly optimally doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8,” Phys. Rev. B60, 1340–1348 (1999), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1340

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.60.1340 1999

[3] [3]

Measurement of the dynamic charge response of materials using low-energy, momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (M- EELS),

S. Vig, A. Kogar, M. Mitrano, A. A. Husain, V. Mishra, M. S. Rak, L. Venema, P. D. Johnson, G. D. Gu, E. Fradkin, M. R. Norman, and P. Abbamonte, “Measurement of the dynamic charge response of materials using low-energy, momentum-resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy (M- EELS),” SciPost Phys.3, 026 (2017), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.3.4.026

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.3.4.026 2017

[4] [4]

Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal,

M. Mitrano, A. A. Husain, S. Vig, A. Kogar, M. S. Rak, S. I. Rubeck, J. Schmalian, B. Uchoa, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, “Anomalous density fluctuations in a strange metal,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115, 5392–5396 (2018), doi:10.1073/pnas.1721495115

doi:10.1073/pnas.1721495115 2018

[5] [5]

Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,

A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. S. Rak, S. I. Rubeck, B. Uchoa, K. March, C. Dwyer, J. Schneeloch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, “Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,” Phys. Rev. X9, 041062 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041062

doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041062 2019

[6] [6]

Comment on: Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,

J. Fink, “Comment on: Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,” arXiv:2103.10268 (2021), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.10268

arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10268 2021

[7] [7]

Reply to arXiv:2103.10268: comment on Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,

A. A. Husain, M. Mitrano, M. S. Rak, S. Rubeck, B. Uchoa, K. March, C. Dwyer, J. Schnee- loch, R. Zhong, G. D. Gu, and P. Abbamonte, “Reply to arXiv:2103.10268: comment on Crossover of charge fluctuations across the strange metal phase diagram,” arXiv:2106.03301 (2021), doi:10.48550/arXiv.2106.03301

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

Collectivechargeexcitationsstudiedbyelectronenergy-lossspectroscopy,

P.AbbamonteandJ.Fink,“Collectivechargeexcitationsstudiedbyelectronenergy-lossspectroscopy,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.16, 465–480 (2025), doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822- 044125

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032822- 2025