Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Analyzing Utility of Visual Context in Multimodal Speech Recognition Under Noisy Conditions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.00477 v2 pith:K7PZNDXV submitted 2019-06-30 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS
keywords visualauxiliarymodelsmultimodalaudiocontextimproveinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal learning allows us to leverage information from multiple sources (visual, acoustic and text), similar to our experience of the real world. However, it is currently unclear to what extent auxiliary modalities improve performance over unimodal models, and under what circumstances the auxiliary modalities are useful. We examine the utility of the auxiliary visual context in Multimodal Automatic Speech Recognition in adversarial settings, where we deprive the models from partial audio signal during inference time. Our experiments show that while MMASR models show significant gains over traditional speech-to-text architectures (upto 4.2% WER improvements), they do not incorporate visual information when the audio signal has been corrupted. This shows that current methods of integrating the visual modality do not improve model robustness to noise, and we need better visually grounded adaptation techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools