Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Bilayer orthogonal ferromagnetism in CrTe$_2$-based van der Waals system

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that Cr1+δTe2 hosts an “orthogonal ferromagnet” phase — alternating out-of-plane and in-plane ferromagnetic monolayers — that resolves the disputed canted-ferromagnet picture and explains abrupt spin-flop-like transitions.

desk verdict A plausible new magnetic phase in Cr1+δTe2, but the layer-resolved orthogonal arrangement is not directly proven; the paper overstates its definitive evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09955 v1 pith:KA3HQH7U submitted 2024-12-13 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chiara Bigi , Cyriack Jego , Vincent Polewczyk , Alessandro De Vita , Thomas Jaouen , Hulerich C. Tchouekem , François Bertran , Patrick Le Fèvre
show 14 more authors
Pascal Turban Jean-François Jacquot Jill A. Miwa Oliver J. Clark Anupam Jana Sandeep Kumar Chaluvadi Pasquale Orgiani Mario Cuoco Mats Leandersson Thiagarajan Balasubramanian Thomas Olsen Younghun Hwang Matthieu Jamet Federico Mazzola
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords orthogonalferromagnetismCr1+δTe2self-intercalatedvanderWaalsmagnetspin-floptransitionnon-collinearmagnetismspin-ARPESSQUIDmagnetometrydensityfunctionaltheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Cr1+δTe2 has been studied for years, yet its magnetic ground state is disputed: some see an out-of-plane ferromagnet, others a canted ferromagnet with gradual spin reorientation. This paper argues that both descriptions miss the actual low-temperature state, which it calls orthogonal ferromagnetism: within each CrTe2 monolayer the Cr moments align ferromagnetically out of plane, while the Cr atoms intercalated in the van der Waals gap align nearly in plane, so the crystal is a natural stack of alternating in-plane and out-of-plane ferromagnetic monolayers coupled by antiferromagnetic exchange. The paper presents SQUID magnetometry, polarization-dependent ARPES, non-collinear DFT, and micro-focused spin-ARPES to argue that this single-phase alternating order explains the disputed magnetization data, including a downturn that gradual-reorientation models could not accommodate. The relevance is practical as well as fundamental: if this phase is real, Cr1+δTe2 is a bulk material that performs the orthogonal spin architecture usually achieved only by stacking different magnetic layers, with abrupt spin-flop-like switching.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a 2×2×1 supercell of CrTe2 containing one intercalated Cr atom, relaxed with non-collinear LDA including self-consistent spin-orbit coupling from a wide set of initial canting angles; all non-collinear starting points converge to the same orthogonal arrangement, while collinear ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic starting points end at energies 98 meV and 40 meV higher. The DFT energies are mapped onto a classical Heisenberg model $E = -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{ij} J_{ij}\,\mathbf{u}_i\cdot\mathbf{u}_j$, whose fitted exchanges and the 8 meV anisotropy fix the coexistence of in-plane and out-of-plane ferromagnetic blocks. Experimental confirmation relies on micro-focused spin-ARPES at the Γ point measuring all three spin components, finding both in-plane and out-of-plane polarization consistent with the calculated ground state, plus polarization-dependent ARPES that benchmarks the DFT band structure.

What would settle it

Perform bulk-sensitive magnetic diffraction (neutron or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering) on the same Bridgman-grown Cr1.25Te2 crystals below the ordering temperature and look for reflections from a unit cell in which intercalant moments are transverse to layer moments; if only a single canted moment direction is found, or the intercalant moments are disordered, the orthogonal phase is not the ground state. On the same crystals, raster the micro-focused spin-ARPES beam: spin-polarization maps that flip sign between regions would confirm domains comparable to the spot size, while a uniform polarization would favor the single-domain reading.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the magnetic ground state of Cr1+δTe2 (δ = 0.25–0.50) is a previously overlooked phase termed orthogonal ferromagnetism. In the DFT-relaxed structure, Cr moments in the CrTe2 layers are ferromagnetically aligned out of plane, while intercalated Cr moments are nearly in plane (an 83° cant relative to the c-axis), and the nearest layer Cr atoms tilt by 17°, creating local frustration. The paper reports an energy difference of 8 meV per unit cell between the out-of-plane layer spins and the in-plane intercalant spins, traced to spin-orbit coupling of Te. Exchange parameters extracted from a Heisenberg fit are J1 = −106 meV between intercalant and layer Cr, J2 = +8 meV for next-nearest neighbors, and Jint = 4 meV between neighboring intercalants, giving an effective antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling. The authors interpret the in-plane magnetization curves, which do not saturate and show a kink, as evidence of a double spin reorientation: domain alignment, then a spin-flop-like transition, then continuous rotation; they contrast this with earlier reports of a smooth reorientation. The same phenomenology is reported for Cr1.5Te2, indicating persistence up to 50% intercalation.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the orthogonal phase assumes that the ordered 2×2 supercell with one intercalated Cr per cell used in DFT matches the real excess-Cr arrangement, and that the measured spin-ARPES polarization reflects the bulk alternating state rather than a single-domain sample; the authors themselves note 'likely magnetic domains comparable to the spot size'.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The long-standing disagreement between an out-of-plane ferromagnet and a canted ferromagnet description of Cr1.25Te2 is resolved in favor of alternating orthogonal layers.
  • The magnetization downturn that gradual-reorientation models could not explain is reinterpreted as the signature of an abrupt spin-flop-like transition.
  • Orthogonal ferromagnetism is achieved in a single chemical phase, without the interfaces required by crossed-magnet heterostructures.
  • The effect extends to at least 50% excess Cr, making Cr1+δTe2 a doping-tunable platform for spin-flop generation and orbitronic devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Whether the orthogonal order survives depends on how excess Cr atoms are arranged; disordered intercalants would likely restore canted or glassy behavior, which may be why earlier samples differed — this is my inference, not the paper's claim.
  • A bulk-sensitive probe such as neutron or resonant X-ray magnetic scattering on the same crystals could directly image the alternating layer moments; the paper does not report such a measurement.
  • The three equivalent in-plane easy directions suggest a multi-level switching landscape that could be exploited for multi-state magnetic memory, a direction the paper leaves implicit.
  • Because the spin-ARPES polarization is also consistent with a single-domain sample, a rastered spatial map of the spin components would discriminate the bulk alternating phase from single-domain saturation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes that Cr1+δTe2 (δ = 0.25–0.50) hosts a previously unrecognized magnetic ground state, termed 'orthogonal ferromagnetism,' in which atomically sharp single layers of in-plane and out-of-plane ferromagnetically ordered Cr moments alternate and are coupled by antiferromagnetic exchange. The authors support this with DFT total-energy minimization over multiple initial non-collinear configurations (Supplementary Fig. S2), spin-ARPES at the Γ point showing finite Sx, Sy, and Sz (Fig. 1j), and SQUID magnetometry showing square out-of-plane loops and non-saturating in-plane M(H) with kinks interpreted as spin-flop-like transitions (Figs. 2d–e, 3a). They argue this resolves earlier discrepancies between canted-ferromagnet descriptions and magnetization downturns, and they extend the claim to Cr1.5Te2.

Significance. If correct, the discovery of an intrinsic single-phase orthogonal ferromagnet would be of considerable interest: it would constitute a new magnetic state in a quasi-2D van der Waals system, with potential implications for spintronics and for reconciling conflicting reports on Cr1+δTe2. The paper's methodology is multimodal and internally consistent: the DFT calculations are not fitted to the magnetization data, the ARPES band structure is compared to DFT, and the magnetization measurements show clear anisotropy. However, the load-bearing evidence for the layer-resolved alternating moment arrangement is indirect; the most distinctive aspect of the claim, the atomically alternating orthogonal order, rests on a DFT supercell model whose intercalant ordering is not experimentally verified, and the bulk and single-k measurements cannot exclude a uniform canted ferromagnet. The paper would be strengthened by a quantitative model of the M(H) response or a layer-resolved magnetic probe.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 2a-b and Methods (DFT calculations)] The alternating in-plane/out-of-plane moment arrangement is obtained only from LDA non-collinear DFT in a 2×2 supercell with a single intercalated Cr per cell. The assumed ordered intercalant arrangement is not verified by any experiment (e.g., electron diffraction, STEM, or XRD superstructure). Without such verification, or at least a discussion of the sensitivity of the ground state to intercalant disorder or different ordering patterns, the computed orthogonal state may not represent the actual bulk magnetic structure. The authors should either provide structural evidence for the ordered 2×2 intercalant lattice or explicitly present the orthogonal phase as a candidate ground state whose experimental confirmation requires further structural and magnetic characterization.
  2. [Fig. 1j and associated text] The spin-ARPES data at the Γ point show nonzero Sx, Sy, and Sz, which demonstrates broken time-reversal symmetry, but this is not a unique fingerprint of the alternating orthogonal state. A uniform canted ferromagnet with a single domain would also show all three spin components. The authors themselves note that the observed polarization could arise from a single magnetic domain within the 10 µm spot ('likely magnetic domains comparable to the spot size'). The claim of 'definitive evidence' in the Abstract and Conclusion is therefore too strong; at minimum, the paper should acknowledge that spin-ARPES at a single k-point is consistent with, but does not uniquely establish, the orthogonal arrangement.
  3. [Fig. 3a-b and the spin-flop interpretation] The in-plane magnetization curves show a kink and non-saturating behavior, which the authors interpret as a two-stage spin reorientation with a spin-flop-like transition. However, no quantitative model is presented to show that the proposed orthogonal state reproduces the observed M(H) curves, including the field positions of the kinks and the magnetization values. Since non-saturating M(H) and kinks are generic to systems with competing magnetic anisotropies and exchange, these data alone do not discriminate between the orthogonal state and a uniform canted ferromagnet. The authors should simulate M(H) for their spin Hamiltonian and compare the predicted kink fields and magnetization steps to experiment, also comparing to the canted-ferromagnet scenario.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Supplementary Fig. S2 and main text] The description of the DFT initial configurations is internally inconsistent: the text states that both the φi = 0 and φi = π starting configurations 'maintained ... antiferromagnetic alignment,' but then refers to '98 meV and 40 meV for the ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic alignment, respectively.' Presumably one of these is ferromagnetic; please correct this discrepancy.
  2. [Fig. 1g] The parameter V0 = 8 eV is introduced without definition; presumably it is the inner potential used for the kz mapping, but this should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Methods (Photoelectron Spectroscopy)] The word 'ploarized' appears instead of 'polarized'; please proofread the Methods section.
  4. [Supplementary Fig. S8 caption] The phrase 'single-ride magnetization curves' should be 'single-cycle' or 'single-ramp' magnetization curves.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the orthogonal ferromagnetic ground state and exchange parameters are outputs of first-principles total-energy minimization, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, the alternating in-plane/out-of-plane orthogonal ferromagnetic ground state, is determined from non-collinear DFT total-energy minimization over a wide range of initial spin configurations, with the selected state lower in energy by 98 meV and 40 meV than the tested collinear alternatives. The exchange parameters J1, J2, and Jint are outputs of mapping the DFT energies onto a Heisenberg model, not parameters fitted to reproduce the measured magnetization. The SQUID data are interpreted after the fact using the DFT ground state, and no magnetization curve or spin-ARPES polarization value is used as an input to select the magnetic configuration. The spin-ARPES measurement is presented as a consistency check in line with the theoretical prediction, not as the source of the magnetic structure. The self-citations in the paper are to code development (GPAW), to an unfolding method, and to a magnetic force theorem paper used only to suggest a more rigorous quantitative assessment beyond the present scope; none of these citations carries the load of establishing the orthogonal phase. The paper's own caveat about magnetic domains in the spin-ARPES spot size is an evidential limitation, not a circular step. Therefore, no claimed prediction reduces by construction to its inputs, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper does not tune free parameters to obtain its central result: the magnetic structure is found by energy minimization and the exchange constants are extracted from DFT, not from fitting the experimental curves. The main assumptions are domain-level: that DFT-LDA reliably orders the spin states, that the ordered 2x2 supercell represents the real intercalant distribution, and that the spin-ARPES signal reflects the bulk alternating state rather than a single-domain artifact.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The LDA exchange-correlation functional with self-consistent spin-orbit coupling correctly orders the magnetic ground states of Cr1+δTe2.
    Invoked in the Methods ('All subsequent calculations were carried out using the LDA functional and non-collinear DFT including self-consistent spin-orbit') and used to identify the most stable magnetic configuration.
  • domain assumption The ordered 2x2 supercell with a single intercalated Cr atom per cell represents the actual atomic arrangement in the synthesized Cr1.25Te2 crystals.
    Introduced in the Results text where the structural model is described: 'our structural model, constructed using a 2×2 supercell with a single intercalated Cr atom, revealed an ordered hexagonal lattice of Cr sites.'
  • domain assumption The classical Heisenberg model E = -1/2 Σ Jij ui·uj provides a valid description of the magnetic interactions for extracting exchange constants and estimating the Curie temperature.
    Used in the main text when deriving Jint, J1, and J2 and the mean-field Curie temperature estimate of approximately 90 K.
  • domain assumption The spin-ARPES measurement at the Γ point reflects the bulk alternating orthogonal state rather than a single magnetic domain artifact.
    The authors state that the measurement is compatible with 'likely magnetic domains comparable to the spot size' or 'a higher proportion of domains with a consistent orientation', which introduces ambiguity in the direct experimental verification.
invented entities (1)
  • Orthogonal ferromagnetism (magnetic phase in Cr1+δTe2) independent evidence
    purpose: Describes the proposed ground state with alternating in-plane and out-of-plane ferromagnetic layers coupled antiferromagnetically.
    The phase is the paper's central discovery. Its falsifiable predictions include specific spin orientations, exchange coupling values, and spin-flop-like magnetization transitions that are partially observed in SQUID data. It does not introduce a new force or particle, but it is a new entry in the magnetic phase diagram of this compound family.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bilayer orthogonal ferromagnetism in CrTe$_2$-based van der Waals system." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KA3HQH7U

@misc{pith2026241209955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bilayer orthogonal ferromagnetism in CrTe$_2$-based van der Waals system},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KA3HQH7U}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09955}
}
abstract

Systems with pronounced spin anisotropy play a pivotal role in advancing magnetization switching and spin-wave generation mechanisms, which are fundamental for spintronic technologies. Quasi-van der Waals ferromagnets, particularly Cr$_{1+\delta}$Te$_2$ compounds, represent seminal materials in this field, renowned for their delicate balance between frustrated layered geometries and magnetism. Despite extensive investigation, the precise nature of their magnetic ground state, typically described as a canted ferromagnet, remains contested, as does the mechanism governing spin reorientation under external magnetic fields and varying temperatures. In this work, we leverage a multimodal approach, integrating complementary techniques, to reveal that Cr$_{1+\delta}$Te$_2$ ($\delta = 0.25 - 0.50$) hosts a previously overlooked magnetic phase, which we term orthogonal-ferromagnetism. This single phase consists of alternating atomically sharp single layers of in-plane and out-of-plane ferromagnetic blocks, coupled via exchange interactions and as such, it differs significantly from crossed magnetism, which can be achieved exclusively by stacking multiple heterostructural elements together. Contrary to earlier reports suggesting a gradual spin reorientation in CrTe$_2$-based systems, we present definitive evidence of abrupt spin-flop-like transitions. This discovery, likely due to the improved crystallinity and lower defect density in our samples, repositions Cr$_{1+\delta}$Te$_2$ compounds as promising candidates for spintronic and orbitronic applications, opening new pathways for device engineering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09955 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evidence for magnetoelastic coupling and chiral magnetic ground state in quasi-van der Waals tr-Cr$_{1.22}$Te$_{2}$

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Single-crystal neutron diffraction is used to propose a canted ferromagnetic ground state for Cr1.22Te2, with a small spin-chirality component invoked to explain the topological Hall effect.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    S. K. Chaluvadi, S. P. Chalil, A. Jana, D. Dagur, G. Vinai, F. Motti, J. Fujii, M. Mezhoud, U. L ¨uders, V . Polewczyk, I. V obornik, G. Rossi, C. Bigi, Y . Hwang, T. Olsen, P. Orgiani, and F. Mazzola, Uncov- ering the lowest thickness limit for room-temperature ferromagnetism of Cr 1.6Te2, Nano Letters 24, 7601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Fujisawa, M

    Y . Fujisawa, M. Pardo-Almanza, C. Hsu, A. Mohamed, K. Yamagami, A. Krishnadas, G. Chang, F. Chuang, K. H. Khoo, J. Zang, A. Soumyanarayanan, and Y . Okada, Widely Tunable Berry Curvature in the Magnetic Semimetal Cr1+δTe2, Advanced Materials 35, 2207121 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Fujisawa, M

    Y . Fujisawa, M. Pardo-Almanza, J. Garland, K. Yamagami, X. Zhu, X. Chen, K. Araki, T. Takeda, M. Kobayashi, Y . Takeda, C. H. Hsu, F. C. Chuang, R. Laskowski, K. H. Khoo, A. Soumyanarayanan, and Y . Okada, Tailoring magnetism in self-intercalated in self-intercalated Cr1+δTe2 epitaxial films, Physical Review Materials 4, 114001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Guillet, L

    Q. Guillet, L. V oj ´aˇcek, D. Dosenovic, F. Ibrahim, H. Boukari, J. Li, F. Choueikani, P. Ohresser, A. Ouerghi, F. Mesple, V . Renard, J.-F. m. c. Jacquot, D. Jalabert, H. Okuno, M. Chshiev, C. Vergnaud, F. Bonell, A. Marty, and M. Jamet, Epitaxial van der Waals heterostructures of Cr2Te3 on two- dimensional materials, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 054005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    reveals minimal shifts in the outer hole bands located at k-points near ±0.5 ˚A−1, consistent with the system’s intrinsic two-dimensional van der Waals nature. In stark contrast, the electronic structure at the center of the Brillouin zone demonstrates a clear three-dimensional character, af- firming the system’s ”quasi”-van der Waals properties compared ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Guillet, H

    Q. Guillet, H. Boukari, F. Choueikani, P. Ohresser, A. Ouerghi, F. Mesple, V . T. Renard, J.-F. Jacquot, D. Jalabert, C. Vergnaud, F. Bonell, A. Marty, and M. Jamet, Magnetic evolution of Cr2Te3 epitaxially grown on graphene with post-growth annealing, Applied Physics Letters 124, 202402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    D. C. Freitas, R. Weht, A. Sulpice, G. Remenyi, P. Strobel, F. Gay, J. Marcus, and M. N´u˜nez-Regueiro, Ferromagnetism in layered metastable 1T-CrTe2, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 176002 (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Purbawati, J

    A. Purbawati, J. Coraux, J. V ogel, A. Hadj-Azzem, N. Wu, N. Bendiab, D. Jegouso, J. Renard, L. Marty, V . Bouchiat, A. Sulpice, L. Aballe, M. Foerster, F. Genuzio, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes ¸, Z. V . Han, X. Sun, M. N´u˜nez-Regueiro, and N. Rougemaille, In-plane magnetic domains and N ´eel- like domain walls in thin flakes of the room temperature CrTe 2...

    work page 2020

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Lu, W. Liu, W. Niu, J. Sun, J. Cook, M. Vaninger, P. F. Miceli, D. J. Singh, S. W. 13 Lian, T. R. Chang, X. He, J. Du, L. He, R. Zhang, G. Bian, and Y . Xu, Room-temperature intrinsic ferromagnetism in epitaxial CrTe2 ultrathin films, Nature Communications 12, 2492 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Dijkstra, H

    J. Dijkstra, H. H. Weitering, C. F. van Bruggen, C. Haas, and R. A. de Groot, Band-structure calcu- lations, and magnetic and transport properties of ferromagnetic chromium tellurides (CrTe, Cr 3Te4, Cr2Te3), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 1, 9141 (1989)

    1989

  3. [11]

    H. Li, L. Wang, J. Chen, T. Yu, L. Zhou, Y . Qiu, H. He, F. Ye, I. K. Sou, and G. Wang, Molecular beam epitaxy grown Cr 2Te3 thin films with tunable Curie temperatures for spintronic devices, ACS Applied Nano Materials 2, 6809 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    J. Zhou, X. Song, J. Chai, N. L. M. Wong, X. Xu, Y . Jiang, Y . P. Feng, M. Yang, and S. Wang, Structure dependent and strain tunable magnetic ordering in ultrathin chromium telluride, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 893, 162223 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Q.-Q. Li, S. Li, D. Wu, Z.-K. Ding, X.-H. Cao, L. Huang, H. Pan, B. Li, K.-Q. Chen, and X.-D. Duan, Magnetic properties manipulation of CrTe 2 bilayer through strain and self-intercalation, Ap- plied Physics Letters 119, 162402 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Lasek, P

    K. Lasek, P. M. Coelho, P. Gargiani, M. Valvidares, K. Mohseni, H. L. Meyerheim, I. Kostanovskiy, K. Zberecki, and M. Batzill, Van der Waals epitaxy growth of 2D ferromagnetic Cr(1+δ)Te2 nanolayers with concentration-tunable magnetic anisotropy, Applied Physics Reviews 9, 0114...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Pramanik, A

    T. Pramanik, A. Roy, R. Dey, A. Rai, S. Guchhait, H. C. Movva, C.-C. Hsieh, and S. K. Banerjee, Angular dependence of magnetization reversal in epitaxial chromium telluride thin films with perpen- dicular magnetic anisotropy, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 437, 72 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    A. L. Coughlin, D. Xie, X. Zhan, Y . Yao, L. Deng, H. Hewa-Walpitage, T. Bontke, C.-W. Chu, Y . Li, J. Wang, H. A. Fertig, and S. Zhang, Van der Waals superstructure and twisting in self-intercalated magnet with near room-temperature perpendicular ferromagnetism, Nano Letters ...

    2021

  9. [17]

    J. Chen, L. Wang, M. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. Zhang, L. Jin, X. Wang, H. Qin, Y . Qiu, J. Mei, F. Ye, B. Xi, H. He, B. Li, and G. Wang, Evidence for magnetic skyrmions at the interface of ferromagnet/topological-insulator heterostructures, Nano Letters 19, 6144 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    B. Tang, X. Wang, M. Han, X. Xu, Z. Zhang, C. Zhu, X. Cao, Y . Yang, Q. Fu, J. Yang, X. Li, W. Gao, J. Zhou, J. Lin, and Z. Liu, Phase engineering of cr5te8 with colossal anomalous hall effect, Nature Electronics 5, 224 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Y . Liu, M. Abeykoon, E. Stavitski, K. Attenkofer, and C. Petrovic, Magnetic anisotropy and entropy change in trigonal Cr5Te8, Phys. Rev. B 100, 245114 (2019). 14

    2019

  12. [20]

    Varvaro, F

    G. Varvaro, F. Albertini, E. Agostinelli, F. Casoli, D. Fiorani, S. Laureti, P. Lupo, P. Ranzieri, B. Astinchap, and A. M. Testa, Magnetization reversal mechanism in perpendicular exchange-coupled Fe/L10FePt bilayers, New Journal of Physics 14, 073008 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    K. A. Th ´orarinsd´ottir, T. Hase, B. Hj¨orvarsson, and F. Magnus, Amorphous exchange-spring magnets with crossed perpendicular and in-plane anisotropies, Phys. Rev. B 103, 014440 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    de Sousa, A

    N. de Sousa, A. Apolinario, F. Vernay, P. M. S. Monteiro, F. Albertini, F. Casoli, H. Kachkachi, and D. S. Schmool, Spin configurations in hard/soft coupled bilayer systems: Transitions from rigid magnet to exchange-spring, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104433 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Q. Qin, W. Song, S. He, P. Yang, and J. Chen, Magnetization reversal and magnetoresistance behavior of exchange coupled SrRuO3 bilayer, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 50, 215002 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Q. Qin, S. He, W. Lin, H. Y . Yoong, L. Liu, M. Li, S. J. Pennycook, W. Xiao, P. Yang, W. Song, and J. Chen, Interfacial antiferromagnetic coupling betweenSrRuo3 and La0.7Sr0.3Mno3 with orthogonal easy axis, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 104405 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Purbawati, S

    A. Purbawati, S. Sarkar, S. Pairis, M. Kostka, A. Hadj-Azzem, D. Dufeu, P. Singh, D. Bour- gault, M. Nu ˜nez Regueiro, J. V ogel, J. Renard, L. Marty, F. Fabre, A. Finco, V . Jacques, L. Ren, V . Tiwari, C. Robert, X. Marie, N. Bendiab, N. Rougemaille, and J. Coraux, Stability...

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    B. Fu, X. Bao, H. Deng, and M. Zhang, Redetermination the basic cell trigonal Cr 5Te8 single crys- tal structure and its temperature dependence Raman spectra, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 300, 122222 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    Fabre, A

    F. Fabre, A. Finco, A. Purbawati, A. Hadj-Azzem, N. Rougemaille, J. Coraux, I. Philip, and V . Jacques, Characterization of room-temperature in-plane magnetization in thin flakes of CrTe2 with a single- spin magnetometer, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 034008 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Purbawati, J

    A. Purbawati, J. Coraux, J. V ogel, A. Hadj-Azzem, N. Wu, N. Bendiab, D. Jegouso, J. Renard, L. Marty, V . Bouchiat, A. Sulpice, L. Aballe, M. Foerster, F. Genuzio, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes ¸, Z. V . Han, X. Sun, M. N´u˜nez-Regueiro, and N. Rougemaille, In-plane magnetic dom...

    2020

  21. [29]

    F. L. Durhuus, T. Skovhus, and T. Olsen, Plane wave implementation of the magnetic force theorem 15 for magnetic exchange constants: application to bulk Fe, Co and Ni, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 35, 105802 (2023)

    2023

  22. [30]

    C. Tan, J. Lee, S.-G. Jung, T. Park, S. Albarakati, J. Partridge, M. R. Field, D. G. McCulloch, L. Wang, and C. Lee, Hard magnetic properties in nanoflake van der Waals Fe3GeTe2, Nature communications 9, 1554 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Ikeda, K

    S. Ikeda, K. Miura, H. Yamamoto, K. Mizunuma, H. Gan, M. Endo, S. Kanai, J. Hayakawa, F. Mat- sukura, and H. Ohno, A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB–MgO magnetic tunnel junction, Nature ma- terials 9, 721 (2010)

    2010

  24. [32]

    Enkovaara, C

    J. Enkovaara, C. Rostgaard, J. J. Mortensen, J. Chen, M. Dułak, L. Ferrighi, J. Gavnholt, C. Glinsvad, V . Haikola, H. A. Hansen, H. H. Kristoffersen, M. Kuisma, A. H. Larsen, L. Lehtovaara, M. Ljungberg, O. Lopez-Acevedo, P. G. Moses, J. Ojanen, T. Olsen, V . Petzold, N. A. R...

    2010

  25. [33]

    J. J. Mortensen, A. H. Larsen, M. Kuisma, A. V . Ivanov, A. Taghizadeh, A. Peterson, A. Haldar, A. O. Dohn, C. Sch ¨afer, E. ¨O. J ´onsson, E. D. Hermes, F. A. Nilsson, G. Kastlunger, G. Levi, H. J ´onsson, H. H ¨akkinen, J. Fojt, J. Kangsabanik, J. Sødequist, J. Lehtom ¨aki, ...

    2024

  26. [34]

    Popescu and A

    V . Popescu and A. Zunger, Extracting E versus K - effective band structure from supercell calculations on alloys and impurities, Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 85, 1 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Olsen, Designing in-plane heterostructures of quantum spin Hall insulators from first principles: 1T ′ − MoS2 with adsorbates, Phys

    T. Olsen, Designing in-plane heterostructures of quantum spin Hall insulators from first principles: 1T ′ − MoS2 with adsorbates, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235106 (2016). 16 Supplementary Information: Bilayer orthogonal ferromagnetism in CrTe2-based van der Waals system To underscore t...

    2016

  28. [36]

    antiferromagnetic configuration (φi = π)

    and d. antiferromagnetic configuration (φi = π). FIG. S3. Spin resolved orbital-projected partial DOS. action (J1 = −106meV), while the next nearest neighbours experienced ferromagnetic coupling (J2 = 8 meV) fig.S2.b. Only two exceptions were obtained for the φi = 0 and φi = π...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.