Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mapping Magnetic Field Lines for an Accelerating Solar Wind

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1907.08683 v1 pith:KAAQY6HB submitted 2019-07-19 physics.space-ph

classification physics.space-ph
keywords solarfieldwindlinesmagneticmapsmodelmapping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Mapping of magnetic field lines is important for studies of the solar wind and the sources and propagation of energetic particles between the Sun and observers. A recently developed mapping approach is generalised to use a more advanced solar wind model that includes the effects of solar wind acceleration, non-radial intrinsic magnetic fields and flows at the source surface/inner boundary, and conservation of angular momentum. The field lines are mapped by stepping along local magnetic field $\bm{B}$ and via a Runge-Kutta algorithm, leading to essentially identical maps. The new model's maps for Carrington rotation CR 1895 near solar minimum (19 April to 15 May 1995) and a solar rotation between CR 2145 and CR 2146 near solar maximum (14 January to 9 February 2014) are compared with the published maps for a constant solar wind model. The two maps are very similar on a large scale near both solar minimum and solar maximum, meaning that the field line orientations, winding angles, and connectivity generally agree very well. However, close inspection shows that the field lines have notable small-scale structural differences. An interpretation is that inclusion of the acceleration and intrinsic azimuthal velocity has significant effects on the local structure of the magnetic field lines. Interestingly, the field lines are more azimuthal for the accelerating solar wind model for both intervals. In addition, predictions for the pitch angle distributions (PADs) for suprathermal electrons agree at the $90$ -- $95\%$ level with observations for both solar wind models for both intervals.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools