pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.05896 · v3 · pith:KAOVVACEnew · submitted 2025-11-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Effects of crystal field and momentum-based frustrated exchange interactions on multiorbital square skyrmion lattice

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 19:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords square skyrmion latticemultiorbital Hubbard modelfrustrated exchange interactionscrystal field anisotropyCe-based magnetsmulti-Q magnetic statestopological spin texturesmean-field theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

The cooperative interplay of interorbital coupling, frustrated exchanges at higher harmonics, and crystal-field anisotropy stabilizes square skyrmion lattices in multiorbital Ce-based magnets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper explores the stabilization of square-shaped skyrmion lattices in centrosymmetric tetragonal Ce-based magnets by examining multiorbital effects and momentum-dependent frustrated exchange interactions. Using self-consistent mean-field calculations on a multiorbital Hubbard-like model, it finds that interorbital coupling, frustrated exchanges at higher-harmonic wave vectors, and crystal-field-induced anisotropy must work together to form these topologically nontrivial structures. Competition between easy-plane intraorbital and easy-axis interorbital anisotropies significantly widens the stability region for the skyrmion lattice. The study also uncovers a range of other multi-Q magnetic states, such as slightly distorted skyrmion lattices, magnetic bubble lattices, and double-Q phases exhibiting local or net scalar chirality. These insights offer a microscopic understanding for realizing skyrmion lattices in f-electron materials with orbital degrees of freedom, extending beyond systems without them.

Core claim

By performing self-consistent mean-field calculations over a broad range of model parameters, we demonstrate that the cooperative interplay among interorbital coupling, frustrated exchange interactions at higher-harmonic wave vectors, and crystal-field-induced anisotropy is crucial for the stabilization of the S-SkL. The competition between the easy-plane intraorbital anisotropy and the easy-axis interorbital anisotropy leads to a significant enhancement of the S-SkL stability region. We also identify a rich variety of multi-Q states, including a topologically nontrivial S-SkL state with a slight breaking of fourfold rotational symmetry, magnetic bubble lattices, and double-Q phases with a 1

What carries the argument

Self-consistent mean-field approximation applied to a multiorbital Hubbard-like model with momentum-dependent frustrated exchange interactions and crystal-field anisotropy terms.

If this is right

  • The S-SkL stability region is enhanced by the anisotropy competition.
  • Multiple multi-Q states including S-SkL', MBLs, and chiral double-Q phases appear in the phase diagram.
  • This mechanism applies to a broader class of f-electron materials with orbital angular momentum.
  • The findings elucidate the microscopic origin of S-SkLs in Ce-based magnets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Material synthesis targeting specific crystal fields in Ce compounds could realize these skyrmion lattices experimentally.
  • Incorporating Kondo screening effects might narrow or shift the stability windows for these phases.
  • Neutron scattering experiments could probe the higher-harmonic wave vectors predicted to be important.
  • Similar multiorbital mechanisms might apply to other topological spin textures in heavy-fermion systems.

Load-bearing premise

The self-consistent mean-field approximation faithfully captures the ground-state energetics of the multiorbital model without needing corrections from quantum fluctuations or explicit Kondo screening.

What would settle it

Experimental confirmation or refutation of the square skyrmion lattice phase in a Ce-based tetragonal magnet, with the predicted dependence on crystal-field parameters and exchange frustration strengths.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.05896 by Satoru Hayami, Yan S. Zha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Dependence on the superposition coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a)–(e) ∆– [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Real-space and momentum-space characteristics of the magnetic phases stabilized in the positive-∆ region, or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real-space and momentum-space characteristics of the magnetic phases stabilized only in the negative-∆ region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Magnitude of the summed structure factor compo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dependence of the absolute skyrmion number [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Decomposed and total internal energies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Phase diagram at low temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Real-space and momentum-space characteristics of magnetic-moment configurations obtained from various values of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Phase diagram at low temperature ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Real-space and momentum-space characteristics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent theoretical predictions of a square-shaped skyrmion lattice (S-SkL) in centrosymmetric tetragonal Ce-based magnets [Yan Zha and Satoru Hayami, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165155 (2025)], we perform a comprehensive theoretical investigation into the role of multiorbital effects and momentum-based frustrated exchange interactions in stabilizing such topologically nontrivial magnetic textures. By employing self-consistent mean-field calculations over a broad range of model parameters, we demonstrate that the cooperative interplay among interorbital coupling, frustrated exchange interactions at higher-harmonic wave vectors, and crystal-field-induced anisotropy is crucial for the stabilization of the S-SkL. Furthermore, the competition between the easy-plane intraorbital anisotropy and the easy-axis interorbital anisotropy leads to a significant enhancement of the S-SkL stability region. We also identify a rich variety of multi-$Q$ states, including a topologically nontrivial S-SkL state with a slight breaking of fourfold rotational symmetry (S-SkL$'$), magnetic bubble lattices (MBLs), and double-$Q$ phases with a local/net scalar chirality. Our findings elucidate the microscopic mechanism responsible for the emergence of S-SkLs in prototypical Ce-based magnets and provide a route toward realizing skyrmion lattices in a broader class of $f$-electron materials beyond conventional Gd- and Eu-based systems lacking orbital angular momentum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses self-consistent mean-field calculations on a multiorbital Hubbard-like model with momentum-dependent frustrated exchanges and crystal-field terms to investigate the stabilization of square skyrmion lattices (S-SkL) in centrosymmetric tetragonal Ce-based magnets. It claims that the cooperative interplay among interorbital coupling, higher-harmonic frustrated exchanges, and crystal-field anisotropy is crucial for S-SkL formation, that competition between easy-plane intraorbital and easy-axis interorbital anisotropy enlarges the stability region, and that a variety of multi-Q states (including symmetry-broken S-SkL', magnetic bubble lattices, and double-Q phases with scalar chirality) appear over broad parameter ranges.

Significance. If the mean-field energetics are reliable, the work supplies a concrete microscopic route to S-SkL phases in f-electron systems that possess orbital angular momentum, thereby extending earlier single-orbital results and suggesting design principles for topological magnetism beyond Gd- and Eu-based compounds.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods and §4 (results on stability regions)] The central claim that the cooperative interplay stabilizes the S-SkL rests entirely on self-consistent mean-field energetics. No section compares these results to Monte Carlo, exact diagonalization, or a Kondo-lattice reformulation that would incorporate hybridization and screening effects known to be important in Ce f-electron systems; without such benchmarks the ranking of S-SkL versus competing multi-Q states remains unverified.
  2. [§5 (parameter dependence and phase diagrams)] The reported stability regions are obtained by scanning interorbital coupling, higher-harmonic exchange amplitudes, and crystal-field anisotropy parameters. The manuscript does not state whether these values were chosen a priori from microscopic estimates or adjusted post hoc to enlarge the S-SkL window; this choice directly affects the claim that the interplay is 'crucial'.
minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract would be clearer if it briefly indicated the form of the multiorbital Hamiltonian or the mean-field decoupling scheme employed.
  2. Figure captions for the multi-Q phase diagrams should explicitly label the S-SkL' state and the regions of local versus net scalar chirality.
  3. [Introduction] The introduction cites the authors' prior PRB 111, 165155 (2025) work; a short paragraph contrasting the new multiorbital and higher-harmonic ingredients with that earlier study would help readers assess incremental novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in turn below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods and §4 (results on stability regions)] The central claim that the cooperative interplay stabilizes the S-SkL rests entirely on self-consistent mean-field energetics. No section compares these results to Monte Carlo, exact diagonalization, or a Kondo-lattice reformulation that would incorporate hybridization and screening effects known to be important in Ce f-electron systems; without such benchmarks the ranking of S-SkL versus competing multi-Q states remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that mean-field theory is an approximation and that comparisons to Monte Carlo or a Kondo-lattice treatment incorporating hybridization would provide valuable cross-checks. Our study is based on an effective multiorbital model with momentum-dependent exchanges, for which self-consistent mean-field is the standard method used in the literature to determine relative phase stabilities in frustrated magnets. Within this controlled framework the cooperative effects are shown to enlarge the S-SkL region. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing the limitations of the mean-field approach and outlining possible future extensions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§5 (parameter dependence and phase diagrams)] The reported stability regions are obtained by scanning interorbital coupling, higher-harmonic exchange amplitudes, and crystal-field anisotropy parameters. The manuscript does not state whether these values were chosen a priori from microscopic estimates or adjusted post hoc to enlarge the S-SkL window; this choice directly affects the claim that the interplay is 'crucial'.

    Authors: The scanned parameter ranges were chosen as representative values drawn from typical crystal-field splittings and exchange strengths reported for Ce-based tetragonal compounds in the literature. The scan was performed systematically to map the conditions under which the interplay stabilizes the S-SkL, rather than being tuned post hoc to maximize its window. We will revise the text in §5 (and the methods section) to state this motivation explicitly and to reference the microscopic estimates that guided the choice of ranges. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Self-citation for motivation only; new multiorbital and crystal-field terms are independent model inputs

full rationale

The paper cites its own prior work [Yan Zha and Satoru Hayami, Phys. Rev. B 111, 165155 (2025)] solely to motivate the existence of S-SkL in the single-orbital limit. The present analysis introduces multiorbital coupling, explicit crystal-field anisotropy, and higher-harmonic frustrated exchanges as new, independently chosen model ingredients that are then scanned via self-consistent mean-field calculations. No equation or result is obtained by fitting to the prior paper's outputs and then relabeling the fit as a prediction; the central claim that their cooperative interplay stabilizes S-SkL follows directly from the numerical exploration of the extended parameter space. The derivation therefore remains self-contained and does not reduce to the self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a multiorbital Hubbard-like model whose exchange terms at higher harmonics and crystal-field splittings are introduced as inputs; no independent microscopic derivation of these parameters from first principles is provided.

free parameters (3)
  • interorbital coupling strength
    Tuned across a range to demonstrate cooperative stabilization of S-SkL
  • higher-harmonic exchange amplitudes
    Introduced to capture momentum-based frustration
  • crystal-field anisotropy parameters
    Chosen to produce competing easy-plane and easy-axis effects
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Mean-field decoupling is sufficient to determine the relative stability of multi-Q magnetic states
    Invoked when performing self-consistent calculations over parameter space

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1446 out tokens · 34605 ms · 2026-05-21T19:11:29.535657+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 118 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    =0 can be realized. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that most known S- SkL materials involve 4flanthanoid elements with a quenched orbital angular momentum, such as Gd and Eu ions [59, 72–75], while Ce-based compounds with finite orbital angular momentum have not been extensively ex- plored. Moreover, most theoretical studies have focused only on spin degre...

  2. [2]

    represent one rank-2 electric quadrupole and two rank-4 electric hexadecapoles, re- spectively. These multipolesO q k are expressed as polyno- mials of the total angular-momentum operators, known as Stevens operators [80, 81], defined by O0 2 = 3J 2 z −J 2, O0 4 = 35J 4 z −30J 2J2 z + 25J2 z −6J 2 + 3J4,(5) O4 4 = 1 2 (J+)4 + (J−)4 . TheD 4h symmetry of t...

  3. [3]

    Easy-axis

    To quantify their contribution, we define [63] ξ= JQ1±Q2 JQ1 .(19) Here, we adoptξ= 0.875 (J 2 =−0.5, J 3 =−0.25) and 0.268 (J 2 =−0.1, J 3 =−0.45) corresponding to strong and weak higher-harmonic contributions, respectively. III. METHOD In this section, we present the computational method- ology in Sec. III A. Then, we outline several physi- cal quantiti...

  4. [4]

    Square skyrmion lattice The most remarkable observation in this study is the emergence of the S-SkL state in the intermediate-field region in Fig. 2. Forα= 0.3, the S-SkL state extends 8 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) FIG. 2. (a)–(e) ∆–hphase diagrams forα= 0.3, 0.38,0.408,0.6124, and 0.65 at low temperature (T= 0.05) in the square- lattice system with the relativel...

  5. [5]

    3(a)– 3(c)

    2QII state The 2QII state is another double-Qphase character- ized by a finite net scalar chirality, as shown in Figs. 3(a)– 3(c). In the present study, the 2QII state appears within a narrow range of ∆≃0.5 forα= 0.3, 0.38, and 0.408 in the low-field region, and its stability range further shrinks with increasingα. Our previous work [64] re- ported in det...

  6. [6]

    2QIV state The 2QIV state is characterized by comparable but different intensities ofJ xy Q1 andJ xy Q2, together with small but finite components at the higher-harmonic wave vec- torsQ ′ 1 andQ ′

  7. [7]

    The out-of-plane components also ap- pear with nearly the same intensities at the dominant or- dering wave vectors, indicating a noncoplanar magnetic- moment configuration with broken fourfold rotational symmetry as shown in Fig. 3(b). The net scalar chirality ⟨χ⟩vanishes, confirming its topologically trivial nature. This phase predominantly appears in th...

  8. [8]

    2QV and 2QIX states The 2QV state is stabilized in the low- and intermediate-field regions for both positive and negative ∆ values as shown in Fig. 2. It typically appears near the boundary between the 2QIX state in the negative-∆ region and the 2QIV state in the positive-∆ region, as well as near the S-SkL state on both sides of ∆ for allα in the interme...

  9. [9]

    Square and rectangular magnetic bubble lattice I states A MBL is a two-dimensional soliton lattice com- posed of multi-Qordering waves similar to those in the SkL state, but with a zero topological skyrmion num- ber [40, 98]. The checkerboard-type S-MBL I phase cor- responds to a two-dimensional soliton lattice consisting of periodically aligned magnetic-...

  10. [10]

    2QXII state The 2QXII state emerges between the S-SkL ′ and S- MBL I states atα= 0.6124, as shown in Fig. 2(d). Its structure factors contain finite but small and equal com- ponents ofJ xy Q1 andJ xy Q2, together withJ z Q1 =J z Q2 and the higher-harmonic termsJ z Q′ 1 =J z Q′ 2 . These features imply a partial deformation of the S-SkL ′ state without com...

  11. [11]

    Other states The remaining magnetic phases are not discussed in detail here; however, their characteristics are summarized in Table II and illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4. B. Effects of interorbital coupling In this subsection, to examine the role of the interor- bital coupling on the stability of the S-SkL, we introduce a weighting coefficientγthat multipli...

  12. [12]

    We decompose the original total angular-momentum operatorJ i into a linear combination ofJ diag i , which con- tains only the diagonal block, andJ off-diag i , which con- tains only the off-diagonal block inH ex: Ji =J diag i +γJ off-diag i , γ∈[0,1].(33) In the limit ofγ= 0, the crystal-field ground-state or- bitals at each site are completely decoupled,...

  13. [13]

    Their magnitude is evaluated by the Fourier components of the real-space interaction, whereξ= 0.875 is used in previous results

    Thus, the interactions atQ ′ 1 andQ ′ 2 affect the type of the double-Qsuperpositon. Their magnitude is evaluated by the Fourier components of the real-space interaction, whereξ= 0.875 is used in previous results. Here, we consider a regime with weak higher-harmonic contributions by settingξ= 0.268 (corresponding to J2 =−0.1 andJ 3 =−0.45) while keeping t...

  14. [14]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature nanotechnol- ogy8, 899 (2013)

  15. [15]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, K. M. Song, T.-E. Park, J. Xia, 19 M. Ezawa, X. Liu, W. Zhao, G. Zhao, and S. Woo, Skyrmion-electronics: writing, deleting, reading and processing magnetic skyrmions toward spintronic ap- plications, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 143001 (2020)

  16. [16]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Kanazawa, Magnetic skyrmion mate- rials, Chemical Reviews121, 2857 (2020)

  17. [17]

    G¨ obel, I

    B. G¨ obel, I. Mertig, and O. A. Tretiakov, Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative mag- netic quasiparticles, Physics Reports895, 1 (2021)

  18. [18]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Topological spin crystals by itinerant frustration, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter33, 443001 (2021)

  19. [19]

    Hayami and R

    S. Hayami and R. Yambe, Stabilization mechanisms of magnetic skyrmion crystal and multiple-qstates based on momentum-resolved spin interactions, Mater. Today Quantum3, 100010 (2024)

  20. [20]

    Kawamura, Frustration-induced skyrmion crystals in centrosymmetric magnets, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter37, 183004 (2025)

    H. Kawamura, Frustration-induced skyrmion crystals in centrosymmetric magnets, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter37, 183004 (2025)

  21. [21]

    A. P. Petrovi´ c, C. Psaroudaki, P. Fischer, M. Garst, and C. Panagopoulos, Colloquium: Quantum properties and functionalities of magnetic skyrmions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 031001 (2025)

  22. [22]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Antiferromagnetic skyrmion: stability, creation and manipulation, Scien- tific reports6, 24795 (2016)

  23. [23]

    H. Oike, A. Kikkawa, N. Kanazawa, Y. Taguchi, M. Kawasaki, Y. Tokura, and F. Kagawa, Interplay between topological and thermodynamic stability in a metastable magnetic skyrmion lattice, Nature Physics 12, 62 (2016)

  24. [24]

    Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, W

    D. Cort´ es-Ortu˜ no, W. Wang, M. Beg, R. A. Pepper, M.- A. Bisotti, R. Carey, M. Vousden, T. Kluyver, O. Hov- orka, and H. Fangohr, Thermal stability and topological protection of skyrmions in nanotracks, Scientific reports 7, 4060 (2017)

  25. [25]

    Je, H.-S

    S.-G. Je, H.-S. Han, S. K. Kim, S. A. Montoya, W. Chao, I.-S. Hong, E. E. Fullerton, K.-S. Lee, K.-J. Lee, M.-Y. Im,et al., Direct demonstration of topologi- cal stability of magnetic skyrmions via topology manip- ulation, ACS nano14, 3251 (2020)

  26. [26]

    Jonietz, S

    F. Jonietz, S. M¨ uhlbauer, C. Pfleiderer, A. Neubauer, W. M¨ unzer, A. Bauer, T. Adams, R. Georgii, P. B¨ oni, R. A. Duine, K. Everschor, M. Garst, and A. Rosch, Spin transfer torques in mnsi at ul- tralow current densities, Science330, 1648 (2010), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1195709

  27. [27]

    X. Yu, N. Kanazawa, W. Zhang, T. Nagai, T. Hara, K. Kimoto, Y. Matsui, Y. Onose, and Y. Tokura, Skyrmion flow near room temperature in an ultralow current density, Nature communications3, 988 (2012)

  28. [28]

    Schulz, R

    T. Schulz, R. Ritz, A. Bauer, M. Halder, M. Wagner, C. Franz, C. Pfleiderer, K. Everschor, M. Garst, and A. Rosch, Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet, Nature Physics8, 301 (2012)

  29. [29]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45 (1984)

  30. [30]

    Ohgushi, S

    K. Ohgushi, S. Murakami, and N. Nagaosa, Spin anisotropy and quantum Hall effect in thekagom´ elat- tice: Chiral spin state based on a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B62, R6065 (2000)

  31. [31]

    Bruno, V

    P. Bruno, V. K. Dugaev, and M. Taillefumier, Topolog- ical hall effect and berry phase in magnetic nanostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 096806 (2004)

  32. [32]

    Neubauer, C

    A. Neubauer, C. Pfleiderer, B. Binz, A. Rosch, R. Ritz, P. G. Niklowitz, and P. B¨ oni, Topological hall effect in theaphase of mnsi, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 186602 (2009)

  33. [33]

    Kanazawa, Y

    N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, T. Arima, D. Okuyama, K. Ohoyama, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Large topological hall effect in a short- period helimagnet mnge, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 156603 (2011)

  34. [34]

    Y. Li, N. Kanazawa, X. Z. Yu, A. Tsukazaki, M. Kawasaki, M. Ichikawa, X. F. Jin, F. Kagawa, and Y. Tokura, Robust formation of skyrmions and topolog- ical hall effect anomaly in epitaxial thin films of mnsi, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 117202 (2013)

  35. [35]

    Romming, C

    N. Romming, C. Hanneken, M. Menzel, J. E. Bickel, B. Wolter, K. von Bergmann, A. Kubetzka, and R. Wiesendanger, Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions, Science341, 636 (2013)

  36. [36]

    A. Fert, V. Cros, and J. Sampaio, Skyrmions on the track, Nature nanotechnology8, 152 (2013)

  37. [37]

    A. Fert, N. Reyren, and V. Cros, Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications, Nature Reviews Materials2, 1 (2017)

  38. [38]

    In this study, we adopt the former term, SkLs

  39. [39]

    Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids4, 241 (1958)

    I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids4, 241 (1958)

  40. [40]

    Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

    T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev.120, 91 (1960)

  41. [41]

    Bogdanov and D

    A. Bogdanov and D. Yablonskiui, Thermodynamically stable ”vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. the mixed state of magnets, Sov. Phys. JETP68, 101 (1989)

  42. [42]

    Bogdanov and A

    A. Bogdanov and A. Hubert, Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials138, 255 (1994)

  43. [43]

    B. Binz, A. Vishwanath, and V. Aji, Theory of the he- lical spin crystal: A candidate for the partially ordered state of mnsi, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 207202 (2006)

  44. [44]

    U. K. Roessler, A. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Sponta- neous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals, Na- ture442, 797 (2006)

  45. [45]

    Binz and A

    B. Binz and A. Vishwanath, Theory of helical spin crys- tals: Phases, textures, and properties, Phys. Rev. B74, 214408 (2006)

  46. [46]

    M¨ uhlbauer, B

    S. M¨ uhlbauer, B. Binz, F. Jonietz, C. Pflei- derer, A. Rosch, A. Neubauer, R. Georgii, and P. B¨ oni, Skyrmion lattice in a chi- ral magnet, Science323, 915 (2009), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1166767

  47. [47]

    S. D. Yi, S. Onoda, N. Nagaosa, and J. H. Han, Skyrmions and anomalous hall effect in a dzyaloshinskii- moriya spiral magnet, Phys. Rev. B80, 054416 (2009)

  48. [48]

    Okubo, S

    T. Okubo, S. Chung, and H. Kawamura, Multiple-q states and the skyrmion lattice of the triangular-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet under magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 017206 (2012)

  49. [49]

    In this study, we do not explicitly distinguish between skyrmions and antiskyrmions [64, 96]

  50. [50]

    M. A. Ruderman and C. Kittel, Indirect exchange cou- pling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction elec- 20 trons, Phys. Rev.96, 99 (1954)

  51. [51]

    T. Kasuya, A theory of metallic ferro- and antiferromag- netism on zener’s model, Progress of Theoretical Physics 16, 45 (1956), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/16/1/45/5266722/16-1-45.pdf

  52. [52]

    Yosida, Magnetic properties of cu-mn alloys, Phys

    K. Yosida, Magnetic properties of cu-mn alloys, Phys. Rev.106, 893 (1957)

  53. [53]

    Hayami, S.-Z

    S. Hayami, S.-Z. Lin, and C. D. Batista, Bubble and skyrmion crystals in frustrated magnets with easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B93, 184413 (2016)

  54. [54]

    Martin and C

    I. Martin and C. D. Batista, Itinerant electron-driven chiral magnetic ordering and spontaneous quantum hall effect in triangular lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 156402 (2008)

  55. [55]

    Akagi and Y

    Y. Akagi and Y. Motome, Spin chirality order- ing and anomalous hall effect in the ferromagnetic kondo lattice model on a triangular lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan79, 083711 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.79.083711

  56. [56]

    Y. Kato, I. Martin, and C. D. Batista, Stability of the spontaneous quantum hall state in the triangular kondo- lattice model, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 266405 (2010)

  57. [57]

    Akagi, M

    Y. Akagi, M. Udagawa, and Y. Motome, Hidden multiple-spin interactions as an origin of spin scalar chi- ral order in frustrated kondo lattice models, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 096401 (2012)

  58. [58]

    Barros and Y

    K. Barros and Y. Kato, Efficient langevin simulation of coupled classical fields and fermions, Phys. Rev. B88, 235101 (2013)

  59. [59]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Multiple-qinstability by (d−2)-dimensional connections of fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. B90, 060402 (2014)

  60. [60]

    Ozawa, S

    R. Ozawa, S. Hayami, and Y. Motome, Zero-field skyrmions with a high topological number in itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 147205 (2017)

  61. [61]

    Y. Dong, Y. Arai, K. Kuroda, M. Ochi, N. Tanaka, Y. Wan, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Y. Aoki, T. D. Matsuda, and T. Kondo, Fermi surface nesting driving the rkky interaction in the centrosymmetric skyrmion magnet gd2pdsi3, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 016401 (2024)

  62. [62]

    Y. Dong, Y. Kinoshita, M. Ochi, R. Nakachi, R. Hi- gashinaka, S. Hayami, Y. Wan, Y. Arai, S. Huh, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, M. Tokunaga, Y. Aoki, T. D. Matsuda, and T. Kondo, Pseudogap and fermi arc induced by fermi surface nesting in a centrosym- metric skyrmion magnet, Science388, 624 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adj7710

  63. [63]

    O. I. Utesov, Thermodynamically stable skyrmion lat- tice in a tetragonal frustrated antiferromagnet with dipolar interaction, Phys. Rev. B103, 064414 (2021)

  64. [64]

    O. I. Utesov, Mean-field description of skyrmion lattice in hexagonal frustrated antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 105, 054435 (2022)

  65. [65]

    Hayami, S.-Z

    S. Hayami, S.-Z. Lin, Y. Kamiya, and C. D. Batista, Vortices, skyrmions, and chirality waves in frustrated Mott insulators with a quenched periodic array of im- purities, Phys. Rev. B94, 174420 (2016)

  66. [66]

    Amoroso, P

    D. Amoroso, P. Barone, and S. Picozzi, Spontaneous skyrmionic lattice from anisotropic symmetric exchange in a Ni-halide monolayer, Nat. Commun.11, 5784 (2020)

  67. [67]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Noncoplanar multiple-Q spin textures by itinerant frustration: Effects of single- ion anisotropy and bond-dependent anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B103, 054422 (2021)

  68. [68]

    Yambe and S

    R. Yambe and S. Hayami, Effective spin model in momentum space: Toward a systematic understand- ing of multiple-Qinstability by momentum-resolved anisotropic exchange interactions, Phys. Rev. B106, 174437 (2022)

  69. [69]

    Zhang and S.-Z

    H. Zhang and S.-Z. Lin, Multipolar Skyrmion Crystals in Non-Kramers Doublet Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 196702 (2024)

  70. [70]

    Yambe and S

    R. Yambe and S. Hayami, Dynamical generation of skyrmion and bimeron crystals by a circularly polar- ized electric field in frustrated magnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 014428 (2024)

  71. [71]

    Shirato, R

    T. Shirato, R. Yambe, and S. Hayami, Bimeron crystals by a linearly polarized ac electric field in frustrated magnets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 063601 (2025), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.94.063601

  72. [72]

    N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, X. Yu, S. Gao, K. Shibata, M. Hirschberger, Y. Yamasaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, L. Peng,et al., Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet, Nature Nanotech- nology15, 444 (2020)

  73. [73]

    Yasui, C

    Y. Yasui, C. J. Butler, N. D. Khanh, S. Hayami, T. Nomoto, T. Hanaguri, Y. Motome, R. Arita, T.-h. Arima, Y. Tokura,et al., Imaging the coupling between itinerant electrons and localised moments in the cen- trosymmetric skyrmion magnet gdru2si2, Nature com- munications11, 5925 (2020)

  74. [74]

    N. D. Khanh, T. Nakajima, S. Hayami, S. Gao, Y. Ya- masaki, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, R. Takagi, Y. Motome, Y. Tokura,et al., Zoology of multiple-q spin textures in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet with itinerant electrons, Advanced Science9, 2105452 (2022)

  75. [75]

    G. D. A. Wood, D. D. Khalyavin, D. A. Mayoh, J. Bouaziz, A. E. Hall, S. J. R. Holt, F. Orlandi, P. Manuel, S. Bl¨ ugel, J. B. Staunton, O. A. Petrenko, M. R. Lees, and G. Balakrishnan, Double-qground state with topological charge stripes in the centrosymmet- ric skyrmion candidate GdRu 2Si2, Phys. Rev. B107, L180402 (2023)

  76. [76]

    Hayami, Rectangular and square skyrmion crys- tals on a centrosymmetric square lattice with easy-axis anisotropy, Phys

    S. Hayami, Rectangular and square skyrmion crys- tals on a centrosymmetric square lattice with easy-axis anisotropy, Phys. Rev. B105, 174437 (2022)

  77. [77]

    Zha and S

    Y. Zha and S. Hayami, Square skyrmion lattice in mul- tiorbitalf-electron systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 165155 (2025)

  78. [78]

    Lin and S

    S.-Z. Lin and S. Hayami, Ginzburg-landau theory for skyrmions in inversion-symmetric magnets with com- peting interactions, Phys. Rev. B93, 064430 (2016)

  79. [79]

    S. Hayami, Multiple skyrmion crystal phases by itiner- ant frustration in centrosymmetric tetragonal magnets, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan91, 023705 (2022), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.91.023705

  80. [80]

    Hayami and Y

    S. Hayami and Y. Motome, Square skyrmion crystal in centrosymmetric itinerant magnets, Phys. Rev. B103, 024439 (2021)

Showing first 80 references.