pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11655 · v1 · pith:KBKC4RT5new · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🪐 quant-ph

Fast Adiabatic Quantum Gates via Hyperfine Intermediate States

Jiayin Fan , Xingdong Zhao , Manqi Zhang , Fangfang Xie , Jing Qian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords adiabatic quantum gateshyperfine intermediate statesCNOT gateelectromagnetically induced transparencyRydberg atomspulse optimizationquantum information
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hyperfine intermediate states accelerate adiabatic CNOT gates to 0.39 microseconds while maintaining fidelity above 0.9991 in cesium atoms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that hyperfine intermediate states, normally avoided in two-photon transitions because of decay, can instead be chosen to strengthen adiabaticity along the STAY pathway and quicken population transfer along the TRANSFER pathway. This EIT-based protocol for an adiabatic CNOT gate therefore shortens operation time without sacrificing the robustness that makes adiabatic methods attractive. In realistic Cs setups, pulse optimization produces fidelities above 0.9991 in 0.3903 microseconds. The same construction is shown to generalize when multiple hyperfine states and their decays are included. A reader would care because adiabatic gates are intrinsically tolerant of imperfections yet have been limited by slow evolution that exceeds coherence times.

Core claim

The central claim is that an electromagnetically induced transparency-based adiabatic CNOT gate can harness appropriately chosen atomic hyperfine intermediate states to enhance adiabaticity in the STAY pathway and accelerate population transfer in the TRANSFER pathway, yielding gate fidelities exceeding 0.9991 within 0.3903 microseconds in realistic Cs atomic setups; the protocol remains effective when extended to multiple hyperfine states and their decays.

What carries the argument

Hyperfine intermediate states (HISs) in the two-photon EIT transitions, employed to modify the STAY and TRANSFER pathways of the adiabatic protocol.

If this is right

  • Adiabatic quantum operations become short enough to fit inside typical qubit coherence times.
  • The protocol supplies a concrete route to fast, robust gates in Rydberg-atom platforms.
  • The same HIS-assisted construction applies when the model is enlarged to an arbitrary number of intermediate states.
  • Pulse-optimized adiabatic CNOT gates retain their tolerance to technical imperfections while running faster.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pathway modification might be tested on other atomic species that possess analogous hyperfine structure.
  • Integration with existing Rydberg blockade techniques could produce faster multi-qubit adiabatic circuits.
  • The optimization method may suggest pulse shapes for other adiabatic quantum-control tasks that currently face speed limits.
  • If the fidelity holds under additional noise sources, the approach could reduce the overhead required for error-corrected adiabatic algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

Selected hyperfine intermediate states can improve adiabaticity and speed transfer without producing decay errors large enough to destroy the gate performance under realistic laboratory conditions.

What would settle it

An experiment that implements the optimized pulses on Cs atoms, includes the chosen hyperfine states, and measures whether the resulting CNOT fidelity stays above 0.999 while total operation time remains near 0.39 microseconds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11655 by Fangfang Xie, Jiayin Fan, Jing Qian, Manqi Zhang, Xingdong Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Illustration of EIT-based fast adiabatic CNOT gates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the target-atom population dynamics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Average gate fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Gate performance for the adiabaticity-enhanced case [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The appeal of adiabatic quantum computing lies in its intrinsic robustness against various technical imperfections, making it attractive for many quantum information applications. However, it faces a fundamental challenge: accelerating the adiabatic operations while preserving adiabaticity within the qubit coherence time. In this article, we propose an electromagnetically induced transparency-based adiabatic CNOT gate protocol which harnesses atomic hyperfine intermediate states (HISs) to speed up the adiabatic evolution. The HISs, naturally-existed in two-photon transitions, often need to be suppressed due to their significant decay errors. In contrast, this paper introduces a novel method that utilizes appropriately chosen HISs not only to enhance the adiabaticity in STAY pathway but also to accelerate the population transfer in TRANSFER pathway. Through pulse optimization, we achieve adiabatic gate fidelities exceeding 0.9991 within 0.3903 {\mu}s in realistic Cs atomic setups. To demonstrate the generality of protocol we further assess the impact of decays from multiple HIS and extend our model to arbitrary number of states, providing a practical route toward fast and robust adiabatic quantum gates in Rydberg-atom platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT)-based adiabatic CNOT gate protocol for Rydberg-atom platforms that deliberately incorporates hyperfine intermediate states (HISs) in two-photon transitions. The central claim is that suitably chosen HISs can simultaneously enhance adiabaticity along the STAY pathway and accelerate population transfer along the TRANSFER pathway; pulse optimization then yields gate fidelities exceeding 0.9991 in 0.3903 μs under realistic cesium conditions. The work further examines decay contributions from multiple HISs and generalizes the model to an arbitrary number of states.

Significance. If the reported fidelities are supported by the underlying numerics, the protocol would address a long-standing tension in adiabatic quantum computing by shortening gate times while preserving robustness, thereby offering a concrete route toward practical high-fidelity adiabatic operations in existing Rydberg hardware. The explicit use of decay-prone HISs as a resource rather than a liability is a distinctive conceptual contribution.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the numerical values 0.9991 and 0.3903 μs are stated with four significant figures; the main text should explicitly link these figures to the optimization procedure (e.g., the cost function, convergence criteria, and ensemble of initial conditions) so that readers can assess reproducibility.
  2. The generalization to an arbitrary number of states is mentioned; a compact statement of the scaling of the effective Hamiltonian or the computational cost of the optimization with state number would strengthen the claim of generality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work on the EIT-based adiabatic CNOT protocol using hyperfine intermediate states and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on numerical pulse optimization results for an EIT-based adiabatic CNOT protocol in Cs atoms, with reported fidelities >0.9991 in 0.3903 μs obtained by simulating the dynamics under realistic conditions while incorporating decay from chosen hyperfine intermediate states. No derivation step reduces by construction to its own inputs: the protocol is defined via the Hamiltonian and optimization objective, the fidelities are computed outputs rather than fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The extension to multiple HIS and arbitrary state numbers is presented as a direct numerical assessment, keeping the result self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based solely on abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Hyperfine intermediate states can be chosen to simultaneously enhance adiabaticity and accelerate transfer without prohibitive decay.
    Central premise of the protocol stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5727 in / 1101 out tokens · 15439 ms · 2026-06-27T09:41:09.756333+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This enhancement leads to a substantial reduction in the pulse durationτ, as theπ-pulse area conditionR τ 0 dtΩeff =πmust be satisfied. A direct comparison between Fig.2(b1) and (b2) explicitly demonstrates the advantage of our scheme which achieves a much shorter pulse durationτ≈0.3282µs compared to the original duration (τ≈0.5102µs) while preserving a h...

  2. [2]

    the STAY-pathway fidelity reaches as high as 0.99997 mainly due to the increased adiabaticity (∝µ) for the dark state evolution. Meanwhile, the optimized gate du- ration becomes even shorter asNincreases, consistent with the effective two-photon Rabi frequency analysis for TRANSFER pathway that is alsok-dependent. This fact indicates that our protocol eff...

  3. [3]

    Bacon and S

    D. Bacon and S. T. Flammia, Adiabatic gate teleporta- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 120504 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    I. I. Beterov, M. Saffman, E. A. Yakshina, D. B. Tretyakov, V. M. Entin, S. Bergamini, E. A. Kuznetsova, and I. I. Ryabtsev, Two-qubit gates using adiabatic pas- sage of the stark-tuned f¨ orster resonances in rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A94, 062307 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    Frees, S

    A. Frees, S. Mehl, J. K. Gamble, M. Friesen, and S. N. Coppersmith, Adiabatic two-qubit gates in capacitively coupled quantum dot hybrid qubits, npj Quantum Infor- mation5, 73 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Setiawan, P

    F. Setiawan, P. Groszkowski, and A. A. Clerk, Fast and robust geometric two-qubit gates for superconduct- ing qubits and beyond, Phys. Rev. Applied19, 034071 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    M. Xue, S. Xu, X. Li, and X. Li, High-fidelity and ro- bust controlled-z gates implemented with rydberg atoms via echoing rapid adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A110, 032619 (2024)

    2024

  8. [8]

    L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Geometric manipu- lation of trapped ions for quantum computation, Science 292, 1695 (2001)

    2001

  9. [9]

    Barends, A

    R. Barends, A. Shabani, L. Lamata, and et al., Digitized adiabatic quantum computing with a superconducting circuit, Nature534, 222 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Liang, X

    Z.-T. Liang, X. Yue, Q. Lv, Y.-X. Du, W. Huang, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Proposal for implementing univer- sal superadiabatic geometric quantum gates in nitrogen- vacancy centers, Phys. Rev. A93, 040305(R) (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    X.-F. Liu, Y. Matsumoto, T. Fujita, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, and A. Oiwa, Accelerated adiabatic passage of a single electron spin qubit in quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 027002 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Bergmann, H

    K. Bergmann, H. Theuer, and B. W. Shore, Coherent population transfer among quantum states of atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.70, 1003 (1998)

    1998

  13. [13]

    M. H. Goerz, E. J. Halperin, J. M. Aytac, C. P. Koch, and K. B. Whaley, Robustness of high-fidelity rydberg gates with single-site addressability, Phys. Rev. A90, 032329 (2014)

    2014

  14. [14]

    Saffman, I

    M. Saffman, I. I. Beterov, A. Dalal, E. J. P´ aez, and B. C. Sanders, Symmetric rydberg controlled-Z gates with adi- abatic pulses, Phys. Rev. A101, 062309 (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    Mitra, M

    A. Mitra, M. J. Martin, G. W. Biedermann, A. M. Marino, P. M. Poggi, and I. H. Deutsch, Robust molmer- sorensen gate for neutral atoms using rapid adiabatic ry- dberg dressing, Phys. Rev. A101, 030301 (2020)

    2020

  16. [16]

    Zheng, Y

    W. Zheng, Y. Zhang, Y. Dong, J. Xu, Z. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Li, D. Lan, J. Zhao, S. Li, X. Tan, and Y. Yu, Op- timal control of stimulated raman adiabatic passage in a superconducting qudit, npj Quantum Information8, 9 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Turyansky, O

    D. Turyansky, O. Ovdat, R. Dann, Z. Aqua, R. Kosloff, B. Dayan, and A. Pick, Inertial geometric quantum logic gates, Phys. Rev. Applied21, 054033 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Møller, L

    D. Møller, L. B. Madsen, and K. Mølmer, Quantum gates and multi-particle entanglement by rydberg excitation blockade and adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 170504 (2008)

    2008

  19. [19]

    Mitra, S

    A. Mitra, S. Omanakuttan, M. J. Martin, G. W. Bieder- mann, and I. H. Deutsch, Neutral-atom entanglement us- ing adiabatic rydberg dressing, Phys. Rev. A107, 062609 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    W. F. Yuan, B. B. Liu, N. Li, G. Y. Ding, W. Q. Ding, H. J. Du, J. C. Li, G. Chen, H. Jing,et al., Beating hermitian speed limits for entanglement generation via exceptional points in a trapped-ion system, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 210201 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    D. D. Bhaktavatsala Rao and K. Mølmer, Robust rydberg-interaction gates with adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A89, 030301 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    Keating, R

    T. Keating, R. L. Cook, A. M. Hankin, Y.-Y. Jau, G. W. Biedermann, and I. H. Deutsch, Robust quantum logic in neutral atoms via adiabatic rydberg dressing, Phys. Rev. A91, 012337 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Petrosyan, F

    D. Petrosyan, F. Motzoi, M. Saffman, and K. Mølmer, High-fidelity rydberg quantum gate via a two-atom dark state, Phys. Rev. A96, 042306 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Wu, X.-R

    H. Wu, X.-R. Huang, C.-S. Hu, Z.-B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Rydberg-interaction gates via adiabatic passage and phase control of driving fields, Phys. Rev. A96, 022321 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Khazali and K

    M. Khazali and K. Mølmer, Fast multiqubit gates by adi- abatic evolution in interacting excited-state manifolds of rydberg atoms and superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. X10, 021054 (2020). 11

    2020

  26. [26]

    D. Yu, H. Wang, D. Ma, X. Zhao, and J. Qian, Adiabatic and high-fidelity quantum gates with hybrid rydberg- rydberg interactions, Opt. Express27, 23080 (2019)

    2019

  27. [27]

    Li, F.-Q

    M. Li, F.-Q. Guo, Z. Jin, L.-L. Yan, E.-J. Liang, and S.-L. Su, Multiple-qubit controlled unitary quantum gate for rydberg atoms using shortcut to adiabaticity and opti- mized geometric quantum operations, Phys. Rev. A103, 062607 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    M. E. Rus, A. Ferr´ on, O. Osenda, and S. S. Gomez, A uni- versal set of geometric quantum gates through dressed- states assisted shortcuts to adiabaticity, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.59, 035503 (2026)

    2026

  29. [29]

    Turyansky, Y

    D. Turyansky, Y. Zolti, Y. Cohen, and A. Pick, Pulse op- timization in adiabatic quantum computation and con- trol, Phys. Rev. Research8, 013206 (2026)

    2026

  30. [30]

    X. Chen, I. Lizuain, A. Ruschhaupt, D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Shortcut to adiabatic passage in two- and three-level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 123003 (2010)

    2010

  31. [31]

    Gu´ ery-Odelin, A

    D. Gu´ ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S. Martinez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Short- cuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applica- tions, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 045001 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 365303 (2009)

    2009

  33. [33]

    Ib´ a˜ nez, X

    S. Ib´ a˜ nez, X. Chen, E. Torrontegui, J. G. Muga, and A. Ruschhaupt, Multiple schr¨ odinger pictures and dy- namics in shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 100403 (2012)

    2012

  34. [34]

    del Campo, Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdia- batic driving, Phys

    A. del Campo, Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdia- batic driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 100502 (2013)

    2013

  35. [35]

    P. W. Claeys, M. Pandey, D. Sels, and A. Polkovnikov, Floquet-engineering counterdiabatic protocols in quan- tum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 090602 (2019)

    2019

  36. [36]

    Campbell, G

    S. Campbell, G. D. Chiara, M. Paternostro, G. M. Palma, and R. Fazio, Shortcut to adiabaticity in the lipkin- meshkov-glick model, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 177206 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Sels and A

    D. Sels and A. Polkovnikov, Minimizing irreversible losses in quantum systems by local counterdiabatic driving, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, E3909 (2017)

    2017

  38. [38]

    Hartmann, V

    A. Hartmann, V. Mukherjee, W. Niedenzu, and W. Lech- ner, Many-body quantum heat engines with shortcuts to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023145 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    F. P. Barone, O. Kiss, M. Grossi, S. Vallecorsa, and A. Mandarino, Counterdiabatic optimized driving in quantum phase sensitive models, New Journal of Physics 26, 033031 (2024)

    2024

  40. [40]

    I. Cong, H. Levine, A. Keesling, D. Bluvstein, S.- T. Wang, and M. D. Lukin, Hardware-efficient, fault- tolerant quantum computation with rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X12, 021049 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    L. V. Gerasimov, R. R. Yusupov, A. D. Moiseevsky, I. Vybornyi, K. S. Tikhonov, S. P. Kulik, S. S. Straupe, C. I. Sukenik, and D. V. Kupriyanov, Coupled dynamics of spin qubits in optical dipole microtraps: Application to the error analysis of a rydberg-blockade gate, Phys. Rev. A106, 042410 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara, H. Levine, G. Semeghini, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity parallel entan- gling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature 622, 268 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    Z. Fu, P. Xu, Y. Sun, Y.-Y. Liu, X.-D. He, X. Li, M. Liu, R.-B. Li, J. Wang, and et al., High-fidelity entanglement of neutral atoms via a rydberg-mediated single-modulated-pulse controlled-phase gate, Phys. Rev. A105, 042430 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    Ozeri, W

    R. Ozeri, W. M. Itano, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, J. Chiaverini, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, D. Leibfried, R. Re- ichle, S. Seidelin, J. H. Wesenberg, and D. J. Wineland, Errors in trapped-ion quantum gates due to spontaneous photon scattering, Phys. Rev. A75, 042329 (2007)

    2007

  45. [45]

    X. L. Zhang, A. T. Gill, L. Isenhower, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman, Fidelity of a rydberg-blockade quantum gate from simulated quantum process tomography, Phys. Rev. A85, 042310 (2012)

    2012

  46. [46]

    S. J. Evered, M. Xu, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, J. P. B. Ataides, M. Kalinowski, D. Bluvstein, N. Maskara, C. Kokail, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, High-fidelity entangling gates and nonlocal circuits with neutral atoms (2026), arXiv:2604.25987 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    McDonnell, L

    K. McDonnell, L. F. Keary, and J. D. Pritchard, Demon- stration of a quantum gate using electromagnetically in- duced transparency, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 200501 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    A. M. Farouk, I. I. Beterov, P. Xu, S. Bergamini, and I. I. Ryabtsev, Parallel implementation of cnot n and c 2not2 gates via homonuclear and heteronuclear f¨ orster interac- tions of rydberg atoms, Photonics10, 1280 (2023)

    2023

  49. [49]

    D. A. Tate and T. F. Gallagher, Microwave-optical two- photon excitation of rydberg states, Phys. Rev. A97, 033410 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    Pelegr´ ı, A

    G. Pelegr´ ı, A. J. Daley, and J. D. Pritchard, High-fidelity multiqubit Rydberg gates via two-photon adiabatic rapid passage, Quantum Science and Technology7, 045020 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    Duspayev and G

    A. Duspayev and G. Raithel, Hyperfine structure and collisions in three-photon rydberg electromagnetically induced transparency, Physical Review A111, 032821 (2025)

    2025

  52. [52]

    M¨ uller, I

    M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, H. Weimer, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Mesoscopic rydberg gate based on elec- tromagnetically induced transparency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 170502 (2009)

    2009

  53. [53]

    L. S. Theis, F. Motzoi, F. K. Wilhelm, and M. Saffman, High-fidelity rydberg-blockade entangling gate using shaped, analytic pulses, Phys. Rev. A94, 032306 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    Pagano, S

    A. Pagano, S. Weber, D. Jaschke, T. Pfau, F. Meinert, S. Montangero, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Error budgeting for a controlled-phase gate with strontium-88 rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Research4, 033019 (2022)

    2022

  55. [55]

    Polat, R

    I. Polat, R. W. J. Overwater, M. Rimbach-Russ, and F. Sebastiano, Pulse shaping for ultra-fast adi- abatic quantum gates, npj Quantum Information 10.1038/s41534-026-01245-8 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01245-8 2026

  56. [56]

    X. X. Li, X. Q. Shao, and W. Li, Single temporal-pulse- modulated parameterized controlled-phase gate for ryd- berg atoms, Phys. Rev. Applied18, 044042 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    I. I. Beterov, K. V. Kozenko, I. I. Ryabtsev, and P. Xu, Symmetric controlled-z gate for ultracold neutral atoms based on counterdiabatic driving at rydberg excitation, Physical Review A113, 042614 (2026)

    2026

  58. [58]

    S. S. Rej and B. Deb, Neutral-atom quantum computa- tion using multi-qubit geometric gates via adiabatic pas- 12 sage, New Journal of Physics28, 014513 (2026)

    2026

  59. [59]

    J. B. Naber, L. Torralbo-Campo, T. Hubert, and R. J. C. Spreeuw, Raman transitions between hyperfine clock states in a magnetic trap, Phys. Rev. A94, 013427 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    T. G. Walker and M. Saffman, Consequences of zeeman degeneracy for the van der waals blockade between ryd- berg atoms, Phys. Rev. A77, 032723 (2008)

    2008

  61. [61]

    N. V. Vitanov, A. A. Rangelov, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Stimulated raman adiabatic passage in physics, chemistry, and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015006 (2017)

    2017

  62. [62]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 037901 (2001)

    2001

  63. [63]

    ˇSibali´ c, J

    N. ˇSibali´ c, J. D. Pritchard, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms, Computer Physics Communications220, 319 (2017)

    2017

  64. [64]

    T. Xing, J. Zhang, and G. Long, Accelerating quantum adiabatic evolution withπpulse sequences, Sci. China- Phys. Mech. Astron.69, 230311 (2026)

    2026

  65. [65]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and et al., Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 170503 (2019)

    2019

  66. [66]

    I. I. Sobelman,Atomic Spectra and Radiative Transitions (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  67. [67]

    S. S. Rej, S. Ray, and B. Deb, Rydberg atom parity gate based on dark state resonances (2026), arXiv:2601.06665 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    K. S. Rajasree, R. K. Gupta, V. Gokhroo, F. Le Kien, T. Nieddu, T. Ray, S. Nic Chormaic, and G. Tkachenko, Spin selection in single-frequency two-photon excitation of alkali-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033341 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    R. Li, J. Qian, and W. Zhang, Proposal for practical Ryd- berg quantum gates using a native two-photon excitation, Quantum Science and Technology8, 035032 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Y. Sun, P. Xu, P. Chen, and L. Liu, Controlled phase gate protocol for neutral atoms via off-resonant modu- lated driving, Phys. Rev. Applied13, 024059 (2020)

    2020

  71. [71]

    Katoch, S

    S. Katoch, S. S. Chauhan, and V. Kumar, A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future, Multimedia Tools and Applications80, 8091 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    R. Li, S. Li, D. Yu, J. Qian, and W. Zhang, Optimal model for fewer-qubit cnot gates with rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. Applied17, 024014 (2022)

    2022

  73. [73]

    Mitchell,An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (MIT Press, 1998)

    M. Mitchell,An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (MIT Press, 1998)

    1998

  74. [74]

    Shi, Quantum logic and entanglement by neutral rydberg atoms: methods and fidelity, Quantum Sci

    X.-F. Shi, Quantum logic and entanglement by neutral rydberg atoms: methods and fidelity, Quantum Sci. Tech- nol.7, 023002 (2022)

    2022

  75. [75]

    M. H. Goerz, T. Calarco, and C. P. Koch, The quan- tum speed limit of optimal controlled phasegates for trapped neutral atoms, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 154011 (2011)

    2011

  76. [76]

    Sun and H

    Y. Sun and H. Metcalf, Nonadiabaticity in stimulated ra- man adiabatic passage, Phys. Rev. A90, 033408 (2014)

    2014

  77. [77]

    Jandura and G

    S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two- and three- qubit gates for rydberg atoms, Quantum6, 712 (2022)

    2022

  78. [78]

    P. Song, J. Wei, P. Xu, L. Yan, M. Feng, S. Su, and G. Chen, Fast realization of high-fidelity nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates with a time-optimal-control technique in rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A109, 022613 (2024)

    2024

  79. [79]

    Basilewitsch, C

    D. Basilewitsch, C. Dlaska, and W. Lechner, Compar- ing planar quantum computing platforms at the quantum speed limit, Phys. Rev. Research6, 023026 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Doultsinos and D

    G. Doultsinos and D. Petrosyan, Quantum gates between distant atoms mediated by a rydberg excitation antifer- romagnet, Phys. Rev. Research7, 023246 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.