pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18200 · v1 · pith:KBQAUILVnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

First-principles investigation of small polarons in rhombohedral NaNbO₃

Mohammad Amirabbasi , Lorenzo Villa , Elaheh Ghorbani , Jochen Rohrer , Karsten Albe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 09:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords small polaronsNaNbO3hole trappingDFT+Uperovskitedefect engineeringlead-free capacitors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Small hole polarons trap stably on oxygen in rhombohedral NaNbO3 while excess electrons do not self-trap.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies density-functional theory with Hubbard U corrections to test polaron formation in rhombohedral sodium niobate, chosen as a stable model phase. Calculations show that holes localize on oxygen 2p orbitals, releasing 0.65 eV of trapping energy and facing a 0.32 eV migration barrier obtained from nudged-elastic-band paths. Electrons remain delocalized across niobium 4d states because electron-phonon coupling is weak in the conduction manifold. These findings matter for lead-free antiferroelectric capacitors, where charge trapping influences leakage currents and long-term reliability.

Core claim

Using density-functional theory corrected by a Hubbard U and the enforced-piecewise-linearity approach with finite-size scaling, the authors determine that a small hole polaron centered on an O-2p orbital possesses a trapping energy of −0.65 eV. Nudged-elastic-band calculations yield an adiabatic migration barrier of 0.32 eV for this polaron. Excess electrons do not form self-trapped states on Nb-4d orbitals, indicating weak electron-phonon coupling. The results identify oxygen as an intrinsic hole trap and show that hole polarons must be included in defect models of NaNbO3-based electroceramics.

What carries the argument

Enforced-piecewise-linearity DFT+U calculations with finite-size scaling for polaron trapping energies, paired with nudged-elastic-band paths for adiabatic migration barriers.

If this is right

  • Oxygen atoms function as intrinsic hole traps within NaNbO3.
  • Defect models for NaNbO3-based electroceramics must account for hole polarons to predict charge compensation correctly.
  • The 0.32 eV migration barrier implies a thermally activated contribution to hole conductivity at operating temperatures.
  • Weak electron-phonon coupling means excess electrons are compensated without forming small polarons on niobium sites.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These hole-trapping properties may help explain leakage currents and phase-transition behavior observed in NaNbO3 capacitors under bias.
  • The same computational protocol could be used to compare polaron stability across related perovskite niobates.
  • Targeted doping or oxygen-vacancy control might be tested to tune hole-trapping strength and raise electrical resistivity.

Load-bearing premise

The rhombohedral phase acts as a structurally stable model whose calculated polaron properties represent the intrinsic behavior relevant to capacitor performance.

What would settle it

Direct spectroscopic detection of oxygen-centered hole states or measured hole migration activation energies close to 0.32 eV in rhombohedral NaNbO3 would support the results; absence of localization or substantially different barriers would contradict them.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18200 by Elaheh Ghorbani, Jochen Rohrer, Karsten Albe, Lorenzo Villa, Mohammad Amirabbasi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of rhombohedral NaNbO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Determination of the optimal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Comparative density of states (DOS) for the (a) delocalized and (b) localized hole-polaron states. Spin-up and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Configuration-coordinate diagram illustrating the de [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The electronic DFT+ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sodium niobate (NaNbO$_{3}$) is a perovskite oxide and a key component of emerging lead-free antiferroelectric capacitors for high-energy-density applications. However, its performance can be hindered by irreversible phase transitions and leakage currents associated with low electrical resistivity. Defect and doping engineering offers a potential way to overcome these problems, but its use requires a detailed understanding of electronic, ionic, and polaron charge-compensation mechanisms, where the role of polarons remains largely unexplored. Here, we investigate the stability of small hole and electron polarons in rhombohedral NaNbO$_{3}$, which is a structurally well-defined model system that avoids lattice-dynamical instabilities. Trapping energies are calculated using density-functional theory corrected by a Hubbard $U$, using the enforced-piecewise-linearity approach including finite-size scaling. For the small hole-polaron centered on O-2$p$ orbital, we find a trapping energy of $-$0.65 (eV) and an adiabatic migration barrier of 0.32 (eV) determined by nudged-elastic-band calculations. In contrast, we show that excess electrons do not self-trap on Nb-4$d$ orbitals, reflecting weak electron-phonon coupling in the conduction band manifold. These results identify oxygen as an intrinsic hole trap in NaNbO$_{3}$ and highlight the importance of including hole polarons in defect models of NaNbO$_{3}$-based electroceramics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates small polarons in rhombohedral NaNbO3 using DFT+U with enforced piecewise linearity and finite-size scaling. It reports a hole polaron trapping energy of -0.65 eV localized on O-2p orbitals together with a 0.32 eV adiabatic migration barrier obtained from nudged-elastic-band calculations, while demonstrating that excess electrons do not self-trap on Nb-4d states owing to weak electron-phonon coupling. The rhombohedral phase is adopted as a structurally stable model system, and the results are positioned as relevant to defect engineering and leakage-current mitigation in NaNbO3-based capacitors.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies quantitative, first-principles values for hole-polaron stability and mobility that can be directly incorporated into defect models for antiferroelectric capacitors. The explicit use of enforced piecewise linearity plus finite-size scaling for trapping energies is a methodological strength that reduces self-interaction artifacts and improves transferability. The reported absence of electron self-trapping provides a clear contrast that helps rationalize observed transport asymmetries.

major comments (2)
  1. [NEB calculations (results section on hole-polaron migration)] The trapping energy of -0.65 eV is obtained with DFT+U under enforced piecewise linearity and finite-size scaling. In contrast, the 0.32 eV adiabatic barrier is reported from separate NEB calculations; the manuscript does not state whether the same linearity-enforcement correction was applied to the NEB images. If standard DFT+U was used for the barrier, the self-interaction error is treated inconsistently, directly undermining the reliability of the hole-polaron transport claim.
  2. [Electron polaron results subsection] The conclusion that electrons do not self-trap on Nb-4d orbitals is based on the absence of a negative trapping energy. The manuscript should explicitly confirm that the same supercell sizes and finite-size scaling procedure used for holes were applied to the electron case, or provide the raw total-energy differences before scaling to allow independent assessment.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The value of the Hubbard U parameter and the precise procedure for enforcing piecewise linearity (e.g., which orbitals and how the potential is adjusted) should be stated in the methods section for reproducibility.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the polaron charge-density plots should include the isosurface value and the supercell size used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and for the detailed comments that help improve the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [NEB calculations (results section on hole-polaron migration)] The trapping energy of -0.65 eV is obtained with DFT+U under enforced piecewise linearity and finite-size scaling. In contrast, the 0.32 eV adiabatic barrier is reported from separate NEB calculations; the manuscript does not state whether the same linearity-enforcement correction was applied to the NEB images. If standard DFT+U was used for the barrier, the self-interaction error is treated inconsistently, directly undermining the reliability of the hole-polaron transport claim.

    Authors: We appreciate this important observation regarding methodological consistency. The NEB calculations for the migration barrier were indeed performed using the same DFT+U approach with enforced piecewise linearity applied to each image along the path, and finite-size scaling was used for the total energies. However, we acknowledge that this was not explicitly stated in the manuscript. In the revised version, we will add a clear statement in the methods and results sections confirming that the same corrections were applied to ensure consistency in the treatment of self-interaction errors. This will strengthen the reliability of the reported 0.32 eV barrier. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Electron polaron results subsection] The conclusion that electrons do not self-trap on Nb-4d orbitals is based on the absence of a negative trapping energy. The manuscript should explicitly confirm that the same supercell sizes and finite-size scaling procedure used for holes were applied to the electron case, or provide the raw total-energy differences before scaling to allow independent assessment.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion to improve transparency. The same supercell sizes and finite-size scaling procedure were applied to the electron polaron calculations as for the holes. The trapping energy for electrons remained positive even after scaling, indicating no self-trapping. To allow for independent assessment, we will include the raw total-energy differences before and after scaling in the supplementary information of the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: trapping energies and barriers are direct computational outputs

full rationale

The paper computes trapping energies via total-energy differences in supercell DFT+U calculations that incorporate the enforced-piecewise-linearity correction and finite-size scaling as methodological inputs. The adiabatic migration barrier is obtained separately from nudged-elastic-band calculations. Neither quantity is defined in terms of the other, nor does any reported value reduce by construction to a fitted parameter or self-citation chain. The central claims rest on explicit numerical results rather than tautological redefinitions, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained first-principles derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the DFT+U correction for describing localized polaron states and on the choice of the rhombohedral phase as a representative model; the Hubbard U parameter is an adjustable correction whose specific value is not stated in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • Hubbard U
    Correction term added to standard DFT to improve description of localized d and p states involved in polaron formation; its value is chosen or fitted for the material but not reported in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The enforced-piecewise-linearity approach combined with finite-size scaling yields accurate polaron trapping energies.
    Method invoked in the abstract to obtain the reported energies.
  • domain assumption Rhombohedral NaNbO3 avoids lattice-dynamical instabilities and serves as a well-defined model for polaron behavior.
    Stated justification for selecting this structural phase in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5812 in / 1561 out tokens · 52093 ms · 2026-05-20T09:27:54.544404+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Trapping energies are calculated using density-functional theory corrected by a Hubbard U, using the enforced-piecewise-linearity approach including finite-size scaling. For the small hole-polaron ... trapping energy of −0.65 (eV) and an adiabatic migration barrier of 0.32 (eV) determined by nudged-elastic-band calculations.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    We therefore enforceϵ p(Q) =ϵ p(0), withQ= +1 (−1) for a hole (electron) polaron as shown in Fig

    Determination of theUparameter via enforced piecewise-linearity For an exact functional, the combination of piecewise linearity and Janak’s theorem [82] implies that the energy of the localized (polaron) levelϵ p(q) is constant between integer occupations. We therefore enforceϵ p(Q) =ϵ p(0), withQ= +1 (−1) for a hole (electron) polaron as shown in Fig. 2....

    work page

  2. [2]

    3(a) and Fig

    Trapping energy and stability of small hole polaron Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 3(b) display the density of states (DOS) for the localized and delocalized configurations, respectively. The delocalized state corresponds to an ex- tra hole being uniformly distributed across all ions, re- sulting in a metallic state where the Fermi energy crosses the valence band. In...

    work page

  3. [3]

    T. R. Shrout and S. Zhang, Journal of Electroceramics 19, 185 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    R¨ odel, W

    J. R¨ odel, W. Jo, K. T. P. Seifert, E.-M. Anton, T. Granzow, and D. Damjanovic, Journal of the Amer- ican Ceramic Society92, 1153 (2009)

    work page 2009

  5. [5]

    A. J. Bell and O. Deubzer, MRS Bulletin43, 581–587 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    B. Xu, J. ´I˜ niguez, and L. Bellaiche, Nature Communi- cations8, 15682 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    L. Yang, X. Kong, F. Li, H. Hao, Z. Cheng, H. Liu, J.-F. Li, and S. Zhang, Progress in Materials Science102, 72 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    D. Yang, J. Gao, L. Shu, Y.-X. Liu, J. Yu, Y. Zhang, X. Wang, B.-P. Zhang, and J.-F. Li, Journal of Materials Chemistry A8, 23724 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Saito, H

    Y. Saito, H. Takao, T. Tani, T. Nonoyama, K. Takatori, T. Homma, T. Nagaya, and M. Nakamura, Nature432, 84 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    J. Wu, D. Xiao, and J. Zhu, Chem. Rev.115, 2559 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Shirane, R

    G. Shirane, R. Newnham, and R. Pepinsky, Phys. Rev. 96, 581 (1954)

    work page 1954

  12. [12]

    Koruza, H

    J. Koruza, H. Liu, M. H¨ ofling, M.-H. Zhang, and P. Ve- ber, Journal of Materials Research35, 990 (2020)

    work page 2020

  13. [14]

    Z. Liu, T. Lu, J. Ye, G. Wang, X. Dong, R. Withers, and Y. Liu, Advanced Materials Technologies3, 1800111 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [15]

    J.-F. Li, K. Wang, F.-Y. Zhu, L.-Q. Cheng, and F.-Z. Yao, Journal of the American Ceramic Society96, 3677 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [16]

    Valdez, C

    E. Valdez, C. B. de Ara´ ujo, and A. A. Lipovskii, Applied Physics Letters89, 031901 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [17]

    H. D. Megaw, Ferroelectrics7, 87 (1974)

    work page 1974

  17. [18]

    Lanfredi, M

    S. Lanfredi, M. H. Lente, and J. A. Eiras, Applied Physics Letters80, 2731 (2002)

    work page 2002

  18. [19]

    L. A. Reznitchenko, A. V. Turik, E. M. Kuznetsova, and V. P. Sakhnenko, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, 3875 (2001)

    work page 2001

  19. [20]

    Darlington and H

    C. Darlington and H. D. Megaw, Structural Science29, 2171 (1973)

    work page 1973

  20. [21]

    Glazer and H

    A. Glazer and H. Megaw, Foundations of Crystallography 29, 489 (1973)

    work page 1973

  21. [22]

    Glazer and H

    A. Glazer and H. D. Megaw, Philosophical Magazine25, 1119 (1972)

    work page 1972

  22. [23]

    Koruza, J

    J. Koruza, J. Tellier, B. Maliˇ c, V. Bobnar, and M. Kosec, Journal of Applied Physics108(2010), 10.1063/1.3512980

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3512980 2010

  23. [24]

    N. Luo, L. Ma, G. Luo, C. Xu, L. Rao, Z. Chen, Z. Cen, Q. Feng, X. Chen, F. Toyohisa, Y. Zhu, J. Hong, J.-F. Li, and S. Zhang, Nature Communications14, 1776 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [25]

    K. E. Johnston, C. C. Tang, J. E. Parker, K. S. Knight, P. Lightfoot, and S. E. Ashbrook, Journal of the Amer- ican Chemical Society132, 8732 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [26]

    C. S. Htet, S. Nayak, A. Manj´ on-Sanz, J. Liu, J. Kong, D. R. Sørensen, F. Marlton, M. R. V. Jørgensen, and A. Pramanick, Phys. Rev. B105, 174113 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [27]

    H. Guo, H. Shimizu, Y. Mizuno, and C. A. Randall, Journal of Applied Physics118, 054102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [28]

    Egert, M.-H

    S. Egert, M.-H. Zhang, J. Koruza, P. B. Groszewicz, and G. Buntkowsky, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124, 23852 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [29]

    Zhang, N

    M.-H. Zhang, N. Hadaeghi, S. Egert, H. Ding, H. Zhang, P. B. Groszewicz, G. Buntkowsky, A. Klein, and J. Ko- ruza, Chemistry of Materials33, 266 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [30]

    Shimizu, H

    H. Shimizu, H. Guo, S. E. Reyes-Lillo, Y. Mizuno, K. M. Rabe, and C. A. Randall, Dalton Transactions44, 10763 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [31]

    Z. Wang, D. Li, W. Liu, L. He, D. Xu, J. Liu, J. Ren, X. Wang, Y. Liu, G. He, J. Bao, Z. Fang, G. Yan, X. Liang, T. Zhou, W. Zhao, W. Liu, D. Wang, and D. Zhou, Nature Communications16, 2892 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [32]

    Koruza, P

    J. Koruza, P. Groszewicz, H. Breitzke, G. Buntkowsky, T. Rojac, and B. Maliˇ c, Acta Materialia126, 77 (2017)

    work page 2017

  32. [33]

    Shiratori, A

    Y. Shiratori, A. Magrez, J. Dornseiffer, F.-H. Haegel, C. Pithan, and R. Waser, The Journal of Physical Chem- istry B109, 20122 (2005)

    work page 2005

  33. [34]

    X. Tan, Z. Xu, X. Liu, and Z. Fan, Materials Research Letters6, 159 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [35]

    S. Aso, H. Matsuo, and Y. Noguchi, Scientific Reports 13, 6771 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [36]

    J. Ye, G. Wang, X. Chen, F. Cao, and X. Dong, Applied Physics Letters114, 122901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [37]

    F. Ye, H. Cheng, X. Jiang, L. Zhu, W. Shi, and J. Xue, Journal of Advanced Ceramics (2025), 10.26599/JAC.2025.9221119

    work page doi:10.26599/jac.2025.9221119 2025

  37. [38]

    H. Qi, A. Xie, J. Fu, and R. Zuo, Acta Materialia208, 116710 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [39]

    B. Luo, H. Dong, D. Wang, and K. Jin, Journal of the American Ceramic Society101, 3460 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [40]

    Villa and K

    L. Villa and K. Albe, Phys. Rev. B106, 134101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [41]

    Sakamoto, Y

    W. Sakamoto, Y. ichi Hamazaki, H. Maiwa, M. Moriya, and T. Yogo, Thin Solid Films518, 4256 (2010)

    work page 2010

  41. [42]

    Zhang, H

    M.-H. Zhang, H. Ding, S. Egert, C. Zhao, L. Villa, L. Fu- lanovi´ c, P. B. Groszewicz, G. Buntkowsky, H.-J. Kleebe, K. Albe,et al., Nature communications14, 1525 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    J. T. Devreese, Physics Today68, 11 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [44]

    Franchini, M

    C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Nature Reviews Materials6, 560 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [45]

    M. I. Dykman and E. I. Rashba, Physics Today68, 10 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [46]

    A. S. Alexandrov and J. T. Devreese,Advances in polaron physics, Vol. 159 (Springer, 2010)

    work page 2010

  46. [47]

    Emin,Polarons(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    D. Emin,Polarons(Cambridge University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [48]

    Holstein, Annals of Physics8, 343 (1959)

    T. Holstein, Annals of Physics8, 343 (1959)

    work page 1959

  48. [49]

    Fr¨ ohlich, H

    H. Fr¨ ohlich, H. Pelzer, and S. Z. and, The London, Edin- burgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science41, 221 (1950)

    work page 1950

  49. [50]

    Zhang, L

    M.-H. Zhang, L. Fulanovi´ c, S. Egert, H. Ding, P. B. Groszewicz, H.-J. Kleebe, L. Molina-Luna, and J. Ko- ruza, Acta Materialia200, 127 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [51]

    Gouget, M

    G. Gouget, M. Duttine, E. Durand, A. Villesuzanne, V. Rodriguez, F. Adamietz, T. Le Mercier, M.-D. Braida, and A. Demourgues, ACS Applied Electronic Materials 1, 513 (2019). 9

    work page 2019

  51. [52]

    Shi and Z

    H. Shi and Z. Zou, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids73, 788 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [53]

    G.-Z. Wang, H. Chen, G. Wu, A.-L. Kuang, and H.-K. Yuan, ChemPhysChem17, 489 (2016)

    work page 2016

  53. [54]

    N. Bein, B. Kmet, T. Rojac, A. B. c. v. Golob, B. Maliˇ c, J. Moxter, T. Schneider, L. Fulanovic, M. Azadeh, T. Fr¨ omling, S. Egert, H. Wang, P. van Aken, J. Schwarzkopf, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 084404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [55]

    Klein, K

    A. Klein, K. Albe, N. Bein, O. Clemens, K. A. Creutz, P. Erhart, M. Frericks, E. Ghorbani, J. P. Hofmann, B. Huang, B. Kaiser, U. Kolb, J. Koruza, C. K¨ ubel, K. N. S. Lohaus, J. R¨ odel, J. Rohrer, W. Rheinheimer, R. A. D. Souza, V. Streibel, A. Weidenkaff, M. Widen- meyer, B.-X. Xu, and H. Zhang, Journal of Electroce- ramics51, 147 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [56]

    Hermans, A

    Y. Hermans, A. Klein, H. P. Sarker, M. N. Huda, H. Junge, T. Toupance, and W. Jaegermann, Advanced Functional Materials30, 1910432 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [57]

    Lohaus, A

    C. Lohaus, A. Klein, and W. Jaegermann, Nature Com- munications9, 4309 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [58]

    Tadano and S

    T. Tadano and S. Tsuneyuki, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan127, 404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  58. [59]

    Pallikara, P

    I. Pallikara, P. Kayastha, J. M. Skelton, and L. D. Whal- ley, Electronic Structure4, 033002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [60]

    Kotiuga, S

    M. Kotiuga, S. Halilov, B. Kozinsky, M. Fornari, N. Marzari, and G. Pizzi, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [61]

    O. F. Schirmer, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 21, 123201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  61. [62]

    Schmidt, A

    F. Schmidt, A. L. Kozub, T. Biktagirov, C. Eigner, C. Sil- berhorn, and U. Gerstmann, Physical Review Research 2, 043002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [63]

    Sanna, in2015 Symposium on Piezoelectricity, Acous- tic Waves, and Device Applications (SPAWDA)(2015) pp

    S. Sanna, in2015 Symposium on Piezoelectricity, Acous- tic Waves, and Device Applications (SPAWDA)(2015) pp. 523–527

    work page 2015

  63. [64]

    Sanson, A

    A. Sanson, A. Zaltron, N. Argiolas, C. Sada, M. Bazzan, W. G. Schmidt, and S. Sanna, Phys. Rev. B91, 094109 (2015)

    work page 2015

  64. [65]

    Krampf, M

    A. Krampf, M. Imlau, Y. Suhak, H. Fritze, and S. Sanna, New Journal of Physics23, 033016 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [66]

    Friedrich, W

    M. Friedrich, W. G. Schmidt, A. Schindlmayr, and S. Sanna, Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 054406 (2017)

    work page 2017

  66. [67]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Computational Materials Science6, 15 (1996)

    work page 1996

  67. [68]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    work page 1994

  68. [69]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    work page 1999

  69. [70]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  70. [71]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 136406 (2008)

    work page 2008

  71. [72]

    T. D. Pham and N. A. Deskins, Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation16, 5264 (2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [73]

    V. I. Anisimov, J. Zaanen, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B44, 943 (1991)

    work page 1991

  73. [74]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    work page 1998

  74. [75]

    J. P. Allen and G. W. Watson, Physical Chemistry Chem- ical Physics16, 21016 (2014)

    work page 2014

  75. [76]

    Falletta, J

    S. Falletta, J. Wiktor, and A. Pasquarello, Phys. Rev. B 102, 041115 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [77]

    Falletta and A

    S. Falletta and A. Pasquarello, npj Computational Ma- terials8, 263 (2022)

    work page 2022

  77. [78]

    Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions,

    H. J´ onsson, G. Mills, and K. W. Jacobsen, “Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions,” inClassical and Quantum Dynamics in Condensed Phase Simulations, pp. 385–404

    work page

  78. [79]

    Mills, H

    G. Mills, H. J´ onsson, and G. K. Schenter, Surface Science 324, 305 (1995)

    work page 1995

  79. [80]

    S. K. Mishra, N. Choudhury, S. L. Chaplot, P. S. R. Krishna, and R. Mittal, Phys. Rev. B76, 024110 (2007)

    work page 2007

  80. [81]

    H. H. Nahm and C. H. Park, Phys. Rev. B78, 184108 (2008)

    work page 2008

Showing first 80 references.