pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.04209 · v2 · pith:KC4DZF6Anew · submitted 2025-10-05 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum Error Correction with Superpositions of Squeezed Fock States

Yexiong Zeng , Fernando Quijandr\'ia , Clemens Gneiting , Franco Nori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum error correctionbosonic codessqueezed Fock statescontinuous-variable qubitsphoton lossdephasingerror-transparent gates
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superpositions of squeezed Fock states form a bosonic code that corrects photon loss and dephasing with error rates falling exponentially as exp(-7r).

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors propose a bosonic quantum error correction code built from superpositions of squeezed Fock states. This encoding keeps the logical codewords exactly orthogonal at every squeezing level. Protection against single-photon loss and dephasing strengthens exponentially with squeezing strength, delivering high precision even at moderate values of r. An error-transparent logical Pauli-X gate is realized by a phase-space rotation that stops correctable errors from leaving the code space. All gates needed for the full scheme are obtained in closed form, enabling error-correction protocols that surpass the break-even threshold.

Core claim

The paper presents a bosonic code constructed from superpositions of squeezed Fock states. The codewords stay orthogonal for every value of the squeezing parameter r. Error correction performance for photon loss and dephasing scales proportionally to exp(−7r). The Pauli-X operator is implemented as a phase-space rotation that acts as an error-transparent gate, preventing correctable errors from propagating out of the code space. All quantum gates required for the scheme are derived analytically. The approach yields error-correction protocols that surpass the break-even threshold and offers a practical alternative for continuous-variable quantum computation.

What carries the argument

Superposition of squeezed Fock states as the codewords, with the squeezing level r controlling the error suppression and the phase-space rotation serving as the error-transparent Pauli-X gate.

If this is right

  • High-precision correction of both single-photon loss and dephasing is achieved even at moderate squeezing.
  • Logical operations remain protected because the Pauli-X gate prevents correctable errors from leaving the code space.
  • All required quantum gates admit analytical derivations that support experimental implementation.
  • Error-correction schemes built on this code exceed the break-even threshold.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The exponential scaling with squeezing suggests that incremental improvements in squeezing technology could produce large gains in logical fidelity.
  • The code may combine readily with existing sources of squeezed light in optical platforms.
  • Similar squeezed-Fock constructions could be tested for protection against additional bosonic noise channels.

Load-bearing premise

That a phase-space rotation implements the Pauli-X gate without allowing correctable errors to propagate outside the code space.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation showing that the post-correction logical error rate fails to decrease exponentially with increasing squeezing parameter r, or that the two codewords acquire nonzero overlap at finite r.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.04209 by Clemens Gneiting, Fernando Quijandr\'ia, Franco Nori, Yexiong Zeng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Deviation from the KL condition versus the squeezing amplitude r for different values of n. An exponential decay is observed, with n = 1 exhibiting the best performance at large r. (b) Errors from the set [I,ˆ a, ˆ n, ˆ nˆ 2 ] acting on the logical subspace define the corresponding error spaces. The code and error spaces approximately satisfy the KL condition Ker, enabling recovery via QEC. (c) Wigner … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The encoded bosonic mode resides in an infinite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Mean fidelity of the encoded state—averaged over [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Bosonic codes, leveraging infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces for redundancy, offer great potential for encoding quantum information. However, the realization of a practical continuous-variable bosonic code that can simultaneously correct both single-photon loss and dephasing errors remains elusive, primarily due to the absence of exactly orthogonal codewords and the lack of an experiment-friendly state preparation scheme. Here, we propose a code based on the superposition of squeezed Fock states with an error-correcting capability that scales as $\propto\exp(-7r)$, where $r$ is the squeezing level. The codewords remain orthogonal at all squeezing levels. The Pauli-X operator acts as a rotation in phase space is an error-transparent gate, preventing correctable errors from propagating outside the code space during logical operations. In particular, this code achieves high-precision error correction for both single-photon loss and dephasing, even at moderate squeezing levels. Building on this code, we develop quantum error correction schemes that exceed the break-even threshold, supported by analytical derivations of all necessary quantum gates. Our code offers a competitive alternative to previous encodings for quantum computation using continuous bosonic qubits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a bosonic code constructed from superpositions of squeezed Fock states. It claims that the codewords remain orthogonal for all squeezing levels r, that the error-correcting capability scales as ∝exp(-7r), and that the logical Pauli-X operator realized as a phase-space rotation is error-transparent, preventing correctable single-photon loss and dephasing errors from propagating outside the code space. The authors derive all necessary quantum gates analytically and present QEC schemes that exceed the break-even threshold.

Significance. If the error-transparency property of the phase-space rotation and the claimed scaling are rigorously established, the code would provide a competitive bosonic encoding that simultaneously handles loss and dephasing with high precision at moderate squeezing, supported by analytical gate constructions. This could be a useful addition to the set of continuous-variable codes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections describing the logical gates and error transparency] The assertion that the Pauli-X operator, acting as a phase-space rotation, is error-transparent (preventing correctable errors from leaving the code space) is load-bearing for both the orthogonality claim and the exp(-7r) scaling. The manuscript should supply explicit commutation relations or the action of the rotation on the error operators (e.g., a†a and the loss operator) to confirm that no uncorrectable components are generated.
  2. [Sections on error-correction performance and scaling analysis] The derivation of the ∝exp(-7r) error-correcting capability and the break-even exceedance must be shown explicitly, including how the superposition structure produces this factor and any supporting calculations or bounds for moderate r.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the code achieves 'high-precision error correction' but does not quantify the improvement (e.g., logical error rate versus physical error rate at specific r).
  2. [Code construction section] Clarify the precise definition of the superposition coefficients and the range of r considered for orthogonality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to include the requested explicit derivations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sections describing the logical gates and error transparency] The assertion that the Pauli-X operator, acting as a phase-space rotation, is error-transparent (preventing correctable errors from leaving the code space) is load-bearing for both the orthogonality claim and the exp(-7r) scaling. The manuscript should supply explicit commutation relations or the action of the rotation on the error operators (e.g., a†a and the loss operator) to confirm that no uncorrectable components are generated.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of the error-transparency property is crucial. In the revised manuscript, we have added detailed calculations of the commutation relations. We explicitly compute the action of the phase-space rotation on the error operators a†a and the photon loss operator a. These relations show that the rotation preserves the code space for correctable errors, with no leakage to uncorrectable subspaces. This is derived using the displacement and squeezing operators inherent to the code construction, confirming the orthogonality for all r and underpinning the scaling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Sections on error-correction performance and scaling analysis] The derivation of the ∝exp(-7r) error-correcting capability and the break-even exceedance must be shown explicitly, including how the superposition structure produces this factor and any supporting calculations or bounds for moderate r.

    Authors: We have now included an explicit derivation of the exp(-7r) scaling in the updated manuscript. The factor arises from the specific superposition coefficients and the Gaussian nature of the squeezed states, leading to higher-order suppression in the error matrix elements for both loss and dephasing. We provide the full calculation involving the integrals over the wavefunctions in the squeezed Fock basis, along with bounds and numerical results for moderate r that demonstrate break-even exceedance. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from state definition

full rationale

The paper defines the code via superpositions of squeezed Fock states and derives orthogonality for all r, the exp(-7r) error suppression, and error transparency of the phase-space rotation Pauli-X directly from the explicit form of the codewords and their action under loss/dephasing operators. All gates are stated to admit analytical derivations without reduction to fitted parameters, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations whose content is itself unverified. No step equates a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to its own input by construction; the central claims remain independent structural consequences of the proposed encoding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on the tunable squeezing parameter r and domain assumptions about orthogonality and gate transparency; no new physical entities are postulated beyond the encoding itself.

free parameters (1)
  • squeezing level r
    Tunable parameter that sets the exponential error-correction strength; not fitted to external data in the abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The codewords remain orthogonal at all squeezing levels.
    Fundamental structural property stated for the proposed code.
  • domain assumption The Pauli-X operator acts as a rotation in phase space serving as an error-transparent gate.
    Required to keep errors correctable during logical operations.
invented entities (1)
  • Superposition of squeezed Fock states code no independent evidence
    purpose: Bosonic encoding for simultaneous correction of photon loss and dephasing
    Newly introduced encoding scheme whose properties are derived in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1514 out tokens · 52953 ms · 2026-05-21T21:51:26.246458+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Essentially singular limits of Jacobi operators and applications to higher-order squeezing

    math-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Jacobi operators with λ-scaled diagonals exhibit essentially singular limits as λ→0, with subsequential strong resolvent convergence to any self-adjoint extension of the limit, applied to show non-unique selection in ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    For the error set E, this corresponds to a reduction in deviation by more than six and four orders of magnitude compared to the squeezed cat and squeezed Fock codes, respectively

    921 (approximately 8 dB), a squeezing level readily achievable in current experiments [ 36]. For the error set E, this corresponds to a reduction in deviation by more than six and four orders of magnitude compared to the squeezed cat and squeezed Fock codes, respectively. This performance gap stems from the substantial overlap of squeezed cat codewords un...

    work page 2074

  2. [2]

    Chiaverini, D

    J. Chiaverini, D. Leibfried, T. Schaetz, M. D. Barrett, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, and D. J. Wineland, Re- alization of quantum error correction, Nature 432, 602 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Schindler, J

    P. Schindler, J. T. Barreiro, T. Monz, V. Nebendahl, D. Nigg, M. Chwalla, M. Hennrich, and R. Blatt, Exper- imental Repetitive Quantum Error Correction, Science 332, 1059 (2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    Mabuchi and P

    H. Mabuchi and P. Zoller, Inversion of Quantum Jumps in Quantum Optical Systems under Continuous Observation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3108 (1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    G. Q. AI, Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit, Nature 614, 676 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    G. Q. AI and Collaborators, Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Nature , 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    D. A. Lidar and T. A. Brun, Quantum Error Correction (Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Gaitan, Quantum Error Correction and Fault Tolerant Quantum Computing (Taylor & Francis, Andover, Eng- land, UK, 2018)

    F. Gaitan, Quantum Error Correction and Fault Tolerant Quantum Computing (Taylor & Francis, Andover, Eng- land, UK, 2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Kerckhoff, H

    J. Kerckhoff, H. I. Nurdin, D. S. Pavlichin, and H. Mabuchi, Designing Quantum Memories with Embed- ded Control: Photonic Circuits for Autonomous Quantum Error Correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 040502 (2010)

    work page 2010

  10. [10]

    B. M. Terhal, Quantum error correction for quantum memories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    R. L. Kosut, A. Shabani, and D. A. Lidar, Robust Quan- tum Error Correction via Convex Optimization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 020502 (2008)

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    J. P. Barnes and W. S. Warren, Automatic Quantum Error Correction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 856 (2000)

    work page 2000

  13. [13]

    Sarovar and G

    M. Sarovar and G. J. Milburn, Continuous quantum error correction by cooling, Phys. Rev. A 72, 012306 (2005)

    work page 2005

  14. [14]

    Cohen and M

    J. Cohen and M. Mirrahimi, Dissipation-induced continu- ous quantum error correction for superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A 90, 062344 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Sarma and H

    G. Sarma and H. Mabuchi, Gauge subsystems, separa- bility and robustness in autonomous quantum memories, New J. Phys. 15, 035014 (2013)

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Dahan, G

    R. Dahan, G. Baranes, A. Gorlach, R. Ruimy, N. Rivera, and I. Kaminer, Creation of optical cat and GKP states using shaped free electrons, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Ryan-Anderson, J

    C. Ryan-Anderson, J. G. Bohnet, K. Lee, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, et al. , Realization of Real-Time Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041058 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Hillmann, F

    T. Hillmann, F. Quijandría, A. L. Grimsmo, and G. Fer- rini, Performance of Teleportation-Based Error-Correction Circuits for Bosonic Codes with Noisy Measurements, PRX Quantum 3, 020334 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Fukui, A

    K. Fukui, A. Tomita, and A. Okamoto, Analog Quantum Error Correction with Encoding a Qubit into an Oscillator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180507 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Zheng, A

    Y. Zheng, A. Ferraro, A. F. Kockum, and G. Ferrini, Gaussian conversion protocol for heralded generation of generalized Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill states, Phys. Rev. A 108, 012603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Lami and M

    L. Lami and M. M. Wilde, Exact solution for the quantum and private capacities of bosonic dephasing channels, Nat. Photonics 17, 525 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Zeng, Z.-Y

    Y. Zeng, Z.-Y. Zhou, E. Rinaldi, C. Gneiting, and F. Nori, Approximate autonomous quantum error correction with reinforcement learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 050601 6 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Y.-H. Chen, R. Stassi, W. Qin, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Fault-Tolerant Multiqubit Geometric Entangling Gates Using Photonic Cat-State Qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024076 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    A. L. Grimsmo and S. Puri, Quantum Error Correction with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill Code, PRX Quantum 2, 020101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    D. S. Schlegel, F. Minganti, and V. Savona, Quantum error correction using squeezed Schrödinger cat states, Phys. Rev. A 106, 022431 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Y. Zeng, W. Qin, Y.-H. Chen, C. Gneiting, and F. Nori, Neural-network-based design of approximate gottesman- kitaev-preskill code, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 060601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Gottesman, A

    D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 64, 012310 (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    M. H. Michael, M. Silveri, R. T. Brierley, V. V. Albert, J. Salmilehto, L. Jiang, and S. M. Girvin, New Class of Quantum Error-Correcting Codes for a Bosonic Mode, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    A. L. Grimsmo, J. Combes, and B. Q. Baragiola, Quan- tum Computing with Rotation-Symmetric Bosonic Codes, Phys. Rev. X 10, 011058 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Del- becq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an oscillator, Nat. Phys. 16, 509 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Putterman, K

    H. Putterman, K. Noh, C. T. Hann, G. S. MacCabe, S. Aghaeimeibodi, et al., Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits, Nature 638, 927 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    V. V. Sivak, A. Eickbusch, B. Royer, et al. , Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even, Nature 616, 50 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Matsuura, H

    T. Matsuura, H. Yamasaki, and M. Koashi, Equivalence of approximate Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill codes, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    V. V. Albert, K. Noh, K. Duivenvoorden, et al. , Perfor- mance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032346 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Fukui, T

    K. Fukui, T. Matsuura, and N. C. Menicucci, Efficient Concatenated Bosonic Code for Additive Gaussian Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 170603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    For additional details, please refer to the Supplementary Material

    work page

  37. [37]

    X. Pan, J. Schwinger, N.-N. Huang, P. Song, W. Chua, F. Hanamura, A. Joshi, F. Valadares, R. Filip, and Y. Y. Gao, Protecting the quantum interference of cat states by phase-space compression, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021004 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Hillmann and F

    T. Hillmann and F. Quijandría, Quantum error correction with dissipatively stabilized squeezed-cat qubits, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032423 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    S. B. Korolev, E. N. Bashmakova, and T. Yu. Golubeva, Error correction using squeezed Fock states, Quantum Inf. Process. 23, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Albano, D

    L. Albano, D. F. Mundarain, and J. Stephany, On the squeezed number states and their phase space represen- tations, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclassical Opt. 4, 352 (2002)

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and L. Viola, Theory of quantum error correction for general noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2525 (2000)

    work page 2000

  42. [42]

    S. M. Girvin, Introduction to quantum error correction and fault tolerance, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 070 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    D. W. Leung, M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Approximate quantum error correction can lead to better codes, Phys. Rev. A 56, 2567 (1997)

    work page 1997

  44. [44]

    Knill and R

    E. Knill and R. Laflamme, Theory of quantum error- correcting codes, Phys. Rev. A 55, 900 (1997)

    work page 1997

  45. [45]

    Faist, S

    P. Faist, S. Nezami, V. V. Albert, G. Salton, F. Pastawski, P. Hayden, and J. Preskill, Continuous Symmetries and Approximate Quantum Error Correction, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041018 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Khaneja, T

    N. Khaneja, T. Reiss, C. Kehlet, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, and S. J. Glaser, Optimal control of coupled spin dynam- ics: design of NMR pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms, J. Magn. Reson. 172, 296 (2005)

    work page 2005

  47. [47]

    de Fouquieres, S

    P. de Fouquieres, S. G. Schirmer, S. J. Glaser, and I. Kuprov, Second order gradient ascent pulse engineering, J. Magn. Reson. 212, 412 (2011)

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [51]

    Eickbusch, V

    A. Eickbusch, V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, et al. , Fast universal control of an oscillator with weak dispersive coupling to a qubit, Nat. Phys. 18, 1464 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [52]

    Z. Ni, S. Li, X. Deng, Y. Cai, L. Zhang, et al. , Beating the break-even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit, Nature 616, 56 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [53]

    Xiang, S

    Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: Superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [54]

    J. Q. You and F. Nori, Quantum information processing with superconducting qubits in a microwave field, Phys. Rev. B 68, 064509 (2003)

    work page 2003

  54. [55]

    C. Wang, Y. Y. Gao, P. Reinhold, et al. , A Schrödinger cat living in two boxes, Science 352, 1087 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [56]

    B. L. Brock, S. Singh, A. Eickbusch, V. V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, et al. , Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even, Nature 641, 612 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [57]

    Campagne-Ibarcq, A

    P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, S. Touzard, E. Zalys- Geller, N. E. Frattini, et al. , Quantum error correction of a qubit encoded in grid states of an oscillator, Nature 584, 368 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [58]

    Hillmann, F

    T. Hillmann, F. Quijandría, G. Johansson, A. Ferraro, S. Gasparinetti, and G. Ferrini, Universal Gate Set for Continuous-Variable Quantum Computation with Mi- crowave Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 160501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [59]

    Rosenblum, Y

    S. Rosenblum, Y. Y. Gao, P. Reinhold, et al. , A CNOT gate between multiphoton qubits encoded in two cavities, Nat. Commun. 9, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [60]

    Rosenblum, P

    S. Rosenblum, P. Reinhold, M. Mirrahimi, L. Jiang, L. Frunzio, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Fault-tolerant detection of a quantum error, Science 361, 266 (2018)

    work page 2018

  60. [61]

    Reinhold, S

    P. Reinhold, S. Rosenblum, W.-L. Ma, et al. , Error- corrected gates on an encoded qubit, Nat. Phys. 16, 822 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [62]

    J. Q. You and F. Nori, Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits, Nature 474, 589 7 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [63]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-X. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rep. 718-719, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [64]

    de Neeve, T.-L

    B. de Neeve, T.-L. Nguyen, T. Behrle, and J. P. Home, Error correction of a logical grid state qubit by dissipative pumping, Nat. Phys. 18, 296 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [65]

    Cai, Y.-K

    M.-L. Cai, Y.-K. Wu, Q.-X. Mei, W.-D. Zhao, Y. Jiang, et al. , Observation of supersymmetry and its spontaneous breaking in a trapped ion quantum simulator, Nat. Com- mun. 13, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [66]

    L. Hu, Y. Ma, W. Cai, X. Mu, Y. Xu, et al. , Quantum error correction and universal gate set operation on a binomial bosonic logical qubit, Nat. Phys. 15, 503 (2019)

    work page 2019

  66. [67]

    Wang, Z.-J

    W. Wang, Z.-J. Chen, X. Liu, et al. , Quantum-enhanced radiometry via approximate quantum error correction, Nat. Commun. 13, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  67. [68]

    Sayrin, I

    C. Sayrin, I. Dotsenko, X. Zhou, B. Peaudecerf, T. Ry- barczyk, et al. , Real-time quantum feedback prepares and stabilizes photon number states, Nature 477, 73 (2011)

    work page 2011

  68. [69]

    Krastanov, M

    S. Krastanov, M. Heuck, J. H. Shapiro, P. Narang, D. R. Englund, and K. Jacobs, Room-temperature photonic log- ical qubits via second-order nonlinearities, Nat. Commun. 12, 1 (2021) . Supplemental Information for ”Quantum Error Correction with Superposi tions of Squeezed Fock States” Yexiong Zeng ,1 Fernando Quijandr ´ ıa ,1 Clemens Gneiting ,1, ∗ and Fra...

    work page 2021

  69. [70]

    0 6 . 7115 0 . 29561 240 . 13 0 . 09506 9956 . 3

    work page

  70. [71]

    0414 − 360

    6332 0 . 0414 − 360. 64 0 . 02024 868 . 27 0 . 20038 − 0. 2944 − 360. 69 − 0. 77259 − 11082 − 0. 9056 118890

    work page

  71. [72]

    02024 − 11082 0

    35 0 . 02024 − 11082 0 . 19964 − 12945 0 . 0 − 0. 01497 868 . 11 − 0. 9056 − 12944 0 . 0 0 . 0

    work page

  72. [73]

    20038 11889 0

    9 0 . 20038 11889 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0               , (S16) Im(α ) =               0 0 . 22634 0 . 0 0 . 77684 0 0 . 43069

    work page

  73. [74]

    22633 0 . 0 0 . 30752 0 . 0 − 0. 00143 0 . 0 0 0 . 31577 0 0 . 03513 0 − 0. 78899

    work page

  74. [75]

    78078 0 0 . 03969 0 . 0 − 1. 4467 0 . 0

    work page

  75. [76]

    0 0 . 0 0 . 0 2 . 3474 0 . 0 0 . 0

    work page

  76. [77]

    26227 0 . 0 0 . 69542 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0               . (S17) III QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION APPROACHES We develop error-correction schemes based on the codewords Eq. ( S1). These schemes encompass measurement- based error correction, and autonomous error correction techniques. To f acilitate the design of recovery unitary operators, we reform...

    work page

  77. [78]

    M. M. Nieto, Displaced and squeezed number states, Phys. Lett. A 229, 135 (1997)

    work page 1997

  78. [79]

    S. B. Korolev, E. N. Bashmakova, and T. Yu. Golubeva, Error co rrection using squeezed Fock states, Quantum Inf. Process. 23, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [80]

    S. M. Girvin, Introduction to quantum error correction and fault tolerance, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 70 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [81]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbec q, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Exponential suppression of bit-flips in a qubit encoded in an o scillator, Nat. Phys. 16, 509 (2020) . S9

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.