Pith. sign in

REVIEW

How to perform modeling with independent and preferential data jointly?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07094 v1 pith:KCSHODVI submitted 2023-07-13 stat.AP

How to perform modeling with independent and preferential data jointly?

classification stat.AP
keywords modelspreferentialgeostatisticalprocesssamplingcombinedataemployed
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Continuous space species distribution models (SDMs) have a long-standing history as a valuable tool in ecological statistical analysis. Geostatistical and preferential models are both common models in ecology. Geostatistical models are employed when the process under study is independent of the sampling locations, while preferential models are employed when sampling locations are dependent on the process under study. But, what if we have both types of data collectd over the same process? Can we combine them? If so, how should we combine them? This study investigated the suitability of both geostatistical and preferential models, as well as a mixture model that accounts for the different sampling schemes. Results suggest that in general the preferential and mixture models have satisfactory and close results in most cases, while the geostatistical models presents systematically worse estimates at higher spatial complexity, smaller number of samples and lower proportion of completely random samples.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.